They will share the information if requested by Government. Now I don't know where you are from but in Countries like the US, it's already happening.
I have quickly read through their terms and privacy policy, and they talk about how customers need to be responsible about their taxes. They also state how they are obliged to collect user data and hand it over to Government in order to comply with laws and regulations.
Please take your time to read through
1.
https://bitvavo.com/en/terms2.
https://bitvavo.com/en/privacyIf your Country has strict tax laws. You don't want to mess with them.
I'm from Belgium. I've recently opened a topic about our regulations.
Basically the IRS (our equivalent of it) makes 3 categories. Amateurs, part time traders and professional traders.
Amateurs don't pay any taxes. However, it is very vague how they categorize people. Hodlers are considered amateurs. And "people who don't take risks". Which makes no sense because everybody does. Also the portion of ones total net worth is a criterium. Some articles mention 2%. Others 25%. In reality it just shows that they don't know and they will tax the fuck out of everyone as soon as they can.
For now it says that they will tax on realized profits. I assume that these have to be withdrawn to bank accounts before there can be any tax.
However the article also says that the tax agent "is looking at our crypto wallet in 2023 and later". I read an article that said someone had to pay taxes on owning a 47000 euro asset, while the current value was 3x less. This implies that they tax the shit out of us regardless of withdrawals.
It mentions that we have to prove that we are amateurs based on inactive transaction history. But this would require direct access of the tax agent to our crypto wallet, which goes against everything BTC stands for. I assume the article means that exchanges have to comply with tax regulations. But of course I will get my money off of the exchange and I wonder how they can know my portfolio then
Is bitvavo popular there in your country? Honestly, I have never heard anything from that exchange but if you're fine using them and you have proved them to be legit, all on you.
And about such amounts, I think you should be patient and don't do the 2 times 10k deposit because even if they say so that it's fine. That amount is likely a lot for a transaction.
I've read before that what if you do like $1k or $2k per transaction as that won't trigger them from asking why is that amount being made and transferred by you.
Quite a few people use it but none of them have been visited by a tax agent. I expect this to happen soon, as part of the fight from the government. These people have a false sense of security and banks are getting nervous about losing liquidity.
I see a plan to avoid these hawks ripping me to pieces:
I spread my initial 15k investment amongst 3 people:
- Me
- My wife (I transfer 5k to her now. Banks will see this, but she is the real owner)
- My father (I give him 5k later)
When the money is paid, I make my mother in law (who lives outside of the EU and is almost 80 years old) go through KYC.
We manage her account though. There was never a bank transfer (fiat to BTC) in her name, so banks in Brazil will not expect anything. There will only be a crypto transaction of our 3 accounts here, to hers. She doesn't live here so our government can not tax her.
When the tax hawks come for me, I say that all BTC has been transfered to my non EU family member as a donation. Because BTC taxes in her country (Brazil) are much friendlier. I can also prove this with my transaction history. This is like someone trying to take my money at gunpoint, and then realizing that there is nothing to steal. I don't think they will contact the authorities in Brazil because there's nothing in it for themselves.
However with my mother in law at 78 years old.. What happens if she passes away with 500k euros worth of BTC on her name?
I wonder if it ever gets to a point where we actively need her fingerprint or live camera footage to transfer her BTC holdings in 2035, for example
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]