BREAKING: Musk “Will Consider” Bringing Alex Jones Back on X...

[BADecker]

Here is a Tucker Talk that should be applied to most of the Jan. 6 people sent to prison.

View on X.


BREAKING: Musk “Will Consider” Bringing Alex Jones Back on X, Announces Imminent Poll, Plans to Watch Carlson Interview!


https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-musk-will-consider-bringing-alex-jones-back-on-x/
UPDATE: Elon Musk said he will watch Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones to “hear him out” regarding his case to return to X:
...

[Hispo]

Quite ironic keeping in mind Elon himself said that he would not allow Jones to come back to Twitter because the way he denied the death of little children as a government false flag. I wonder what made him change of heart, assuming he is actually considering to let him come back.
I don't understand why Musk would allow Jones to come back in Twitter, by the way, he knows he will face massive backlash if he does and Jones has already been found guilty of defamation, because of the way he made the life of those unfortunate parents a living hell, even after losing their children to a psychopath with a rifle.
Whatever, let us see what he is up to and what he plans.

[BADecker]

Musk is practical. If he makes a mistake, he changes it. Alex Jones, though he makes a mistake or two now and again, is practical. Even if his style is a bit radical, he is in favor of non-censorship, as is Musk. The two of them would make a good team, applying their love of freedom in different ways that match their individual personalities.

The massive backlash that you talk about - that Musk would receive if he allowed Jones back on X - is only backlash from the media, the Elite, corrupt government leaders, and those they have brainwashed. Average people love Jones's info even if some of them don't like his style. You can see this in his following that he had before he was censored off the major media platforms.

Getting Jones back on would show the Trump story correctly... how Trump is being persecuted rather than prosecuted. Jones would show it. Musk is practical.


Disney's 'Democratic Political Operative' Bob Iger Fully Exposed After Musk Spat: Thacke


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/disneys-democratic-political-operative-paul-iger-fully-exposed-after-musk-spat-thacker
The issue came to a head after Musk vented during an interview when asked about Disney and other companies pulling advertising over alleged antisemitism on his platform.

"If someone is going to try and blackmail me with advertising? Blackmail me with money? Go fuck yourself," Elon Musk said. Musk repeated the advice with a wave of his hand toward Disney's Bob Iger, a Musk critic and Biden administration donor and functionary.

"Go. Fuck. Yourself. Is that clear? Hey, Bob, if you're in the audience."

Within hours of the interview, dozens of parodies began appearing on X, including this one. But if you read about the exchange in any media outlet, you would think Musk was coming unhinged, attacking advertisers who support his own company.

This is far from reality. Democratic operatives including Disney's Bob Iger have been harassing Musk since he took over Twitter and released company documents showing the government and Democratic Party aligned organizations were censoring Americans. You can read some of my reporting on these Twitter Files here, here, here, here, and here.
...

[BADecker]

Now that Jones is back, take a look at his interview on his return.

Alex Jones Interviews Elon Musk For 2+ Hours Live -- Learn What Comes Next! -- FULL SHOW 12/10/23 - https://banned.video/watch?id=65765aa31b7347401e21bab7


Tune In! Alex Jones Returns to X for His First Interview After Reinstatement


https://www.infowars.com/posts/live-alex-jones-returns-to-x-for-his-first-interview-after-reinstatement/
Alex Jones will be interviewed on X for the first time since his reinstatement early Sunday at 12:00 PM CST, which is sure to be an epic event!

Jones will join Mario Nawfal to discuss his return to X and what it means for the future of free speech in America, especially as the 2024 presidential election approaches.
...

[BADecker]

The depths of understanding of practical freedom begins here.


Elon Musk, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate in HEATED Debate!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEW2aYQlXo4
In the video:

00:00 Alex Jones

12:00 Vivek Ramaswamy Joins Conversation

20:00 Andrew Tate Joins Conversation

40:20 Vivek Peeing

1:17:00 Jason Calacanis Joins Conversation

1:21:00 Patrick Bet-David Joins Conversation

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

SEE ALSO:

"Libertarians" and those who are "anti-system"

The latest from Klaus Anal Schwab (37 seconds) Somewhere in the recesses of his decrepit brain he realizes that "Libertarians" and those who are "anti-system" are turning again his Beast System...
...

[DeathAngel]

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

[Hispo]

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

[BADecker]

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

[Hispo]

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference?
Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him?

You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on.

[BADecker]

~

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference?
Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him?

You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on.

The trouble with your line of thought regarding Jones is, it was not Jones that damaged the parents. It was they, themselves. After all, they were the ones that induced their own feelings of pain by placing any stock in Jones's words. Since they DID place stock in his words, maybe Jones was right after all. They really need to go back to the psychiatrist for more self-control training.

Your whole line of thought should be applied to most Covid government officials and doctors, rather than Jones, who is helping to show the truth about the evil in the medical and government... even if he made a mistake about the school shootings.

[covfefe_]

Like him or loathe him, Jones sparks debate. He gets people talking about him & no publicity is bad publicity for Elon. He pushed for free speech & no censorship with his revamp of X so Elon is just doing what he said he’d do. Alex Jones will bring attention & interest to Twitter & ultimately that’s what Elon desires.

In the short term, sure. Alex will bring some stuff to talk about Twitter and the fact Elon left him back in. However, in the long term people will not longer focus on the fact he is back and will only talk about the disgusting and completely fabricated stuff Jones will start to push all around Twitter. The worst part is that it will be matter of time before he start to do so, si ce we are entering an electoral year in the United States and Jones won't be able to resist to spread falsehoods to Trump supporters, for the sake of money. Even if he is trying to avoid to pay what he owes to the Sandy Hook families, he won't be able to resist the temptation.

Once it starts, mainstream media will continue to trash Twitter as a platform which one serves to spread misinformation, antisemitism, election denial, etc. To me, it will take other platform to actually start to steal percentage of the market from Elon to realize free speech is not the same as leaving a legally convicted person who committed defamation against families of massacred children back in.

This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time?

The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want.

It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners.

The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored.

The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference?
Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him?

You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on.

The thing you raised is discussed in the debate. Stupid people do say stupid things sometimes but it's upto the individuals to decide what is truth and what are lies.
When all of the government are feeding propaganda and the media are corrupted, they are causing much larger damage to the society which is incomparable to what a quack doctor may do to a gullible patient.

[BADecker]

The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents.

Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean?

It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for.

Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on.

Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits:

1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know;

2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill.

Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents.

[Hispo]

The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents.

Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean?

It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for.

Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on.

Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits:

1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know;

2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill.

Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents.

You must be joking. Most the things Jones and professional conspiracy theorists like him spread are completely fabricated "information" which they do not have any evidence of. It is not a matter of him being careful about saying thing he cannot provez otherwise he would not be able to say anything at all which appealed to his overage subscriber/viewer, it is about him continue to spread lies and devious conspiracy theories but ones which are not directly targeted against inviduals or organizations which could sue him again for defamation.

It is different to say parents are part of a cover up for a false massacre in a school, from saying the earth is flat or the government is spraying the sky with chemicals. Nobody will be able to sue Jones for saying Earth is flat (a planet cannot sue for defamation) and the government won't sue Jones because it would be ridiculous for them to do so for those allegations of them having aliens or whatever.

Also, Alex is not even willing to start paying to those families, hence he declared bankrupcy after years of accumulating millions of dollars from selling silver water to his followers.

[BADecker]

The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents.

Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean?

It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for.

Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on.

Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits:

1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know;

2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill.

Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents.

You must be joking. Most the things Jones and professional conspiracy theorists like him spread are completely fabricated "information" which they do not have any evidence of. It is not a matter of him being careful about saying thing he cannot provez otherwise he would not be able to say anything at all which appealed to his overage subscriber/viewer, it is about him continue to spread lies and devious conspiracy theories but ones which are not directly targeted against inviduals or organizations which could sue him again for defamation.

It is different to say parents are part of a cover up for a false massacre in a school, from saying the earth is flat or the government is spraying the sky with chemicals. Nobody will be able to sue Jones for saying Earth is flat (a planet cannot sue for defamation) and the government won't sue Jones because it would be ridiculous for them to do so for those allegations of them having aliens or whatever.

Also, Alex is not even willing to start paying to those families, hence he declared bankrupcy after years of accumulating millions of dollars from selling silver water to his followers.

You must be joking. Did you ever watch a Jones Infowars podcast? His desk is littered with the evidence and proof. Did you ever look into the evidence and proof? I didn't either.

Then Jones puts the wording of the evidence and proof right on the screen for everybody to see... including the location of the info in law and policy so that anybody can go look it up.

It's true that Jones stretches some of the info to mean some things that the info doesn't necessarily mean. But the other side is that he doesn't always explain how bad and damning some of the info really is. And, like everybody, he makes a mistake or two once in a while.

At least, Jones gets the info out there so that people can look at it for themselves if they have a mind to.

I don't want to remain totally ignorant of what is going on. Do you? Jones shows a lot of what we would never see otherwise.

[jvanname]

I am proudly banned from Twitter. If you use Twitter and have not been banned, then I do not have any respect for you, and I consider you subhuman. By the way, the worship of Elon Musk is idolatry in every religion, so all the Musk worshippers need to be locked up.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

I am proudly banned from Twitter. If you use Twitter and have not been banned, then I do not have any respect for you, and I consider you subhuman. By the way, the worship of Elon Musk is idolatry in every religion, so all the Musk worshippers need to be locked up.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

How do you feel about people who DON'T use twitter, and haven't been banned?

[jvanname]

I have respect for those who have never used Twitter. I also have respect for people who have been banned from Twitter. I also have respect for Dr Phillip Mason for constantly calling out Musk on his @#$%shit and managing to avoid a Twitter ban. But everyone else is a chlurmck.

Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

I have view things on twitter. After all, some news and stuff can only be found on twitter. But I do not have an account, and probably never would get one.

I'm glad that Tucker Carlson started his own network - TCN - https://tuckercarlson.com/. It seems that he has set up at least some of his podcasts there that are not on twitter. This should ultimately make him more popular.

https://tuckercarlson.com/president-donald-trump/

[jvanname]

Stop spamming for Tucker. Stop spamming for Twitter. Stop spamming for Donald Trump. It is really annoying.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

Stop spamming for Tucker. Stop spamming for Twitter. Stop spamming for Donald Trump. It is really annoying.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I agree. A person just wears himself out trying to spam for them. I mean, it's difficult to find any spam while telling their truths.