Tucker Carlson Launches New Subscription-Based Site

[BADecker]

This I gotta join. Besides, I needed another cup of coffee, anyway.


Tucker Carlson Launches New Subscription-Based Site


https://www.mediaite.com/news/tucker-carlson-launches-new-subscription-based-site/
"Hey, it's Tucker Carlson. We've been out of work for 7 or 8 months now, hard to know. Time flies when you're unemployed, but actually we have been working in secret and producing an awful lot of material for months now, interviews, etc. And all of it has found its way to TuckerCarlson.com," Carlson told his followers on Saturday.

Carlson added that the subscription service was apart of a larger plan, claiming "We're launching a brand new thing very soon, and we'd love for you to see it. So go to TuckerCarlson.com to see it first."

Users have the ability to "join Team Tucker" by creating an account and paying to become a "Founding Member."

Carlson was fired from the cable news network back in April following the $787 million settlement with Dominion for defamation.

Since his removal, the former primetime host has used his account on X, formerly known as Twitter, to release interviews and monologues, including with Former President Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, Alex Jones, and other right-wing firebrands.

ADVERTISEMENT

Back in October, Axios reported that Carlson had raised $15 million to jumpstart his new media company. The new venture will share video content across social platforms as well as have it's own website and app.
...

[1714779946]

1714779946

[1714779946]

1714779946

[1714779946]

1714779946

[1714779946]

1714779946

[1714779946]

1714779946

[1714779946]

1714779946

[Hispo]

Perhaps it is because I am not a political comentator super star like Tucker is, but I do not understand why he would not just go and take those offers which had already been offered to him by companies like Newsmax. I believe he would do very well there and he is already accustomed to having a format for that kind of organization.
He may not be trying to get back in the status quo but rather start something big by his own, who knows...
It depends on what is really what he wants to achieve, if he wanted to fully influence on USA politics, he could go back to cable networks, for now he seems rather focused on getting some money.

[alani123]

That's where the money is these days.
Milking Republicans out of all their pennies. I guess politics is the new televangelism.
That's how Alex Jones made his Fortune, Rush Limbaugh too, how Trump funded his lawsuits... It just goes on.
History just repeats itself and people never seem to learn anything.

[BADecker]

Tucker has a large enough following that he can become a leader in his own right. Why jump into bed with other media that would ultimately try to limit what he said in one way or another?

Besides, maybe he has some other undisclosed plans. Maybe he will run for President in 2028, and this is only part of his campaign setup.

[Hispo]

Tucker has a large enough following that he can become a leader in his own right. Why jump into bed with other media that would ultimately try to limit what he said in one way or another?

Besides, maybe he has some other undisclosed plans. Maybe he will run for President in 2028, and this is only part of his campaign setup.

At this point, I indeed believe it is just matter of time before Tucker manages to get his name in the ballot for the Republican nomination in 2028, but it won't only depend on himself but also on whether Trump leaves behind some political inheritance on his adult children so it would be them who seek for the presidency in those future elections, instead of Tucker.
Whether we like it or not, Trump still have pretty much the centralized de facto control over the average Republican voter, while Tucker functions more like a propaganda machinery for whoever he works for.

That's where the money is these days.
Milking Republicans out of all their pennies. I guess politics is the new televangelism.
That's how Alex Jones made his Fortune, Rush Limbaugh too, how Trump funded his lawsuits... It just goes on.
History just repeats itself and people never seem to learn anything.

It is quite concerning if you think about it. Politics is supposed to be a tool or a practical way for the people to direct their own destiny and the destiny of their country, one can tell serious politics are close to come to an end when it is perceived as a cash cow, instead. The founding fathers of the USA democracy would be disappointed of it.

[BADecker]

Tucker has a large enough following that he can become a leader in his own right. Why jump into bed with other media that would ultimately try to limit what he said in one way or another?

Besides, maybe he has some other undisclosed plans. Maybe he will run for President in 2028, and this is only part of his campaign setup.

At this point, I indeed believe it is just matter of time before Tucker manages to get his name in the ballot for the Republican nomination in 2028, but it won't only depend on himself but also on whether Trump leaves behind some political inheritance on his adult children so it would be them who seek for the presidency in those future elections, instead of Tucker.
Whether we like it or not, Trump still have pretty much the centralized de facto control over the average Republican voter, while Tucker functions more like a propaganda machinery for whoever he works for.

Tucker doesn't want the Presidency. He's too busy having fun 'propagandizing' the truth to people. He's getting more of the freedom job done this way than he ever could as President.

That's where the money is these days.
Milking Republicans out of all their pennies. I guess politics is the new televangelism.
That's how Alex Jones made his Fortune, Rush Limbaugh too, how Trump funded his lawsuits... It just goes on.
History just repeats itself and people never seem to learn anything.

It is quite concerning if you think about it. Politics is supposed to be a tool or a practical way for the people to direct their own destiny and the destiny of their country, one can tell serious politics are close to come to an end when it is perceived as a cash cow, instead. The founding fathers of the USA democracy would be disappointed of it.

But Trump isn't a politician. That's why the people elected him. He is a businessman, and he got things done in a business-like way - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5269905.msg55119252#msg55119252. Not that Biden hasn't been destroying the nation in a business-like way. But Trump was Making America Great Again.

It's the people who want to invest in making other countries strong that are against a Great America.

[Hispo]

Tucker has a large enough following that he can become a leader in his own right. Why jump into bed with other media that would ultimately try to limit what he said in one way or another?

Besides, maybe he has some other undisclosed plans. Maybe he will run for President in 2028, and this is only part of his campaign setup.

At this point, I indeed believe it is just matter of time before Tucker manages to get his name in the ballot for the Republican nomination in 2028, but it won't only depend on himself but also on whether Trump leaves behind some political inheritance on his adult children so it would be them who seek for the presidency in those future elections, instead of Tucker.
Whether we like it or not, Trump still have pretty much the centralized de facto control over the average Republican voter, while Tucker functions more like a propaganda machinery for whoever he works for.

Tucker doesn't want the Presidency. He's too busy having fun 'propagandizing' the truth to people. He's getting more of the freedom job done this way than he ever could as President.

That's where the money is these days.
Milking Republicans out of all their pennies. I guess politics is the new televangelism.
That's how Alex Jones made his Fortune, Rush Limbaugh too, how Trump funded his lawsuits... It just goes on.
History just repeats itself and people never seem to learn anything.

It is quite concerning if you think about it. Politics is supposed to be a tool or a practical way for the people to direct their own destiny and the destiny of their country, one can tell serious politics are close to come to an end when it is perceived as a cash cow, instead. The founding fathers of the USA democracy would be disappointed of it.

But Trump isn't a politician. That's why the people elected him. He is a businessman, and he got things done in a business-like way - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5269905.msg55119252#msg55119252. Not that Biden hasn't been destroying the nation in a business-like way. But Trump was Making America Great Again.

It's the people who want to invest in making other countries strong that are against a Great America.

A country cannot completely be managed as if was a business by the way, if it is what you are implying, because the first thing a businessperson does is to try to increase the profitability and decrease expenses, which will likely translate to cutting social security and other programs which widely benefit the average person of the country.
Now, if you are instead implying Trump got elected once because he was not part of the DC establishment, then I agree with that formulation.

Though, not being part of the establishment so many people in the USA dislike is enough to get elected, that is why Trump lost against Biden back in 2020. Even as pro establishment Biden is, he managed to get basically half of the nation in his side.

[BADecker]

~

But Trump isn't a politician. That's why the people elected him. He is a businessman, and he got things done in a business-like way - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5269905.msg55119252#msg55119252. Not that Biden hasn't been destroying the nation in a business-like way. But Trump was Making America Great Again.

It's the people who want to invest in making other countries strong that are against a Great America.

A country cannot completely be managed as if was a business by the way, if it is what you are implying, because the first thing a businessperson does is to try to increase the profitability and decrease expenses, which will likely translate to cutting social security and other programs which widely benefit the average person of the country.
Now, if you are instead implying Trump got elected once because he was not part of the DC establishment, then I agree with that formulation.

Though, not being part of the establishment so many people in the USA dislike is enough to get elected, that is why Trump lost against Biden back in 2020. Even as pro establishment Biden is, he managed to get basically half of the nation in his side.

Every country is run completely like a business. The members do their job, then they go home, and the next shift takes over, daily, etc.

Without profit, every country fails. But if they don't fail, they at least become stagnant.

Trump lost to Biden because of fraudulent manipulation of the election system by the super-rich elite, not because the populace was for Biden more than they were for Trump. Check out the videos of Biden's campaign meetings. Biden only had a few hundred attend his campaigns. Trump had thousands and tens of thousands.

It's common sense, if we didn't have the info directly.

[LTU_btc]

Perhaps it is because I am not a political comentator super star like Tucker is, but I do not understand why he would not just go and take those offers which had already been offered to him by companies like Newsmax. I believe he would do very well there and he is already accustomed to having a format for that kind of organization.
He may not be trying to get back in the status quo but rather start something big by his own, who knows...
It depends on what is really what he wants to achieve, if he wanted to fully influence on USA politics, he could go back to cable networks, for now he seems rather focused on getting some money.

I guess that he want to be independent and say whatever he wants. Yeah, probably he would fit well on Newsmax, but one day he can say something what owners doesn't like and he will be cancelked. Because Carlson was doing well on Fox for long time until he got sacked.
Love him or hate, but Tuckers Carlson name probably is big enough to be independent. And yeah, wouldn't be surprised if one day he will go to elections with Republicans.

[btc78]

It depends on what is really what he wants to achieve, if he wanted to fully influence on USA politics, he could go back to cable networks, for now he seems rather focused on getting some money.

being on social media these days get even more coverage than cable networks
things travel fast in social media and with platforms as such i’m sure carlson will just have his name around for sure the very fact that we are talking about him means that he is still very much relevant and therefore could still run for politics in the following election

[BADecker]

It depends on what is really what he wants to achieve, if he wanted to fully influence on USA politics, he could go back to cable networks, for now he seems rather focused on getting some money.

being on social media these days get even more coverage than cable networks
things travel fast in social media and with platforms as such i’m sure carlson will just have his name around for sure the very fact that we are talking about him means that he is still very much relevant and therefore could still run for politics in the following election

Maybe he just wants to be a reporter for truth. I mean, if the truth gets to enough people in the world, they will be able to figure out what to do and how to live. This will make living a lot easier for Tucker, as well.

[Hispo]

It depends on what is really what he wants to achieve, if he wanted to fully influence on USA politics, he could go back to cable networks, for now he seems rather focused on getting some money.

being on social media these days get even more coverage than cable networks
things travel fast in social media and with platforms as such i’m sure carlson will just have his name around for sure the very fact that we are talking about him means that he is still very much relevant and therefore could still run for politics in the following election

Maybe he just wants to be a reporter for truth. I mean, if the truth gets to enough people in the world, they will be able to figure out what to do and how to live. This will make living a lot easier for Tucker, as well.

You must be joking. How are we supposed to talk about Tucker Carlson as a person who wants to become a reporter for Truth, if some months ago he had an interview with a person who claimed to be the ex gay lover of president Obama? Did you even take a look at that interview?
It was obviously a very low attempt by Tucker to try to catch some attention after being fired from Fox. If we are supposed to say someone is doing a favor to the world by reporting the truth, then we should move on from Tucker and talk about organizations like WikiLeaks. Those are the real entities who risk their life and existence to bring us the facts and the truth governments try to hide from us.

Who do you think is doing an important service to all of us, Tucker by talking about Obama's ex gay lover or Julian Assange by exposing the secrets of shady politicians.?  

[BADecker]

~

Maybe he just wants to be a reporter for truth. I mean, if the truth gets to enough people in the world, they will be able to figure out what to do and how to live. This will make living a lot easier for Tucker, as well.

You must be joking. How are we supposed to talk about Tucker Carlson as a person who wants to become a reporter for Truth, if some months ago he had an interview with a person who claimed to be the ex gay lover of president Obama? Did you even take a look at that interview?
It was obviously a very low attempt by Tucker to try to catch some attention after being fired from Fox. If we are supposed to say someone is doing a favor to the world by reporting the truth, then we should move on from Tucker and talk about organizations like WikiLeaks. Those are the real entities who risk their life and existence to bring us the facts and the truth governments try to hide from us.

Who do you think is doing an important service to all of us, Tucker by talking about Obama's ex gay lover or Julian Assange by exposing the secrets of shady politicians.?  

Good point. Maybe Tucker will get to the Assange story some time if he hasn't already. There is a lot of truth and hidden truth out there. Can't get it all in, in one day.

Reporting on Obama simply and his lover shows what the Dem leaders are really like. Many Dem people are honest, average Americans who have been duped by the party. Gotta wake 'em up. I wish Tucker would prove to us if Michelle O. is a man or not, and clear up all the mystery behind it. If she's a he, Obama must have been going that direction for a long time.

Obviously, Tucker is getting attention. You, even, are talking about him. Good. Maybe more people will tune in to him more often, thereby finding out that he makes some of the best media sense around.

[franky1]

this topic just reveals where badecker learns his silly little mindsets from..
always knew it was a fox news/tucker carlson inspired narrative, but now point proven

and no surprise badecker wants to pay a monthly fee on how to learn to sound like an idiot

the issue with joining a subscription is you then get indoctrinated to want to follow the stupidity just to make it feel like your money went to something an idiot then uses in life.. otherwise they have to admit that they wasted money and time if they go against the narrative they paid for

[Hispo]

~

Maybe he just wants to be a reporter for truth. I mean, if the truth gets to enough people in the world, they will be able to figure out what to do and how to live. This will make living a lot easier for Tucker, as well.

You must be joking. How are we supposed to talk about Tucker Carlson as a person who wants to become a reporter for Truth, if some months ago he had an interview with a person who claimed to be the ex gay lover of president Obama? Did you even take a look at that interview?
It was obviously a very low attempt by Tucker to try to catch some attention after being fired from Fox. If we are supposed to say someone is doing a favor to the world by reporting the truth, then we should move on from Tucker and talk about organizations like WikiLeaks. Those are the real entities who risk their life and existence to bring us the facts and the truth governments try to hide from us.

Who do you think is doing an important service to all of us, Tucker by talking about Obama's ex gay lover or Julian Assange by exposing the secrets of shady politicians.?  

Good point. Maybe Tucker will get to the Assange story some time if he hasn't already. There is a lot of truth and hidden truth out there. Can't get it all in, in one day.

Reporting on Obama simply and his lover shows what the Dem leaders are really like. Many Dem people are honest, average Americans who have been duped by the party. Gotta wake 'em up. I wish Tucker would prove to us if Michelle O. is a man or not, and clear up all the mystery behind it. If she's a he, Obama must have been going that direction for a long time.

Obviously, Tucker is getting attention. You, even, are talking about him. Good. Maybe more people will tune in to him more often, thereby finding out that he makes some of the best media sense around.

Sure, I am talking about him because I am generally interested in the political happenings going on in the United States, and whether I like him or not, Tucker is part of the political reality of that country. Actually, I have personally watched some of his episodes back when he was in Fox, just for the sake of listening to all the media of the political spectrum.
Also, if Michelle Obama was actually a man posing as a woman or something like that, why would the Democrat party or Obama himself would continue to hide it? Keeping in mind in the United States it has become socially acceptable not to identify with one's birth gender? Obama has no longer a chance to become president again and Michelle is unlikely to pursue a political career anyways. So why would they hide it?

this topic just reveals where badecker learns his silly little mindsets from..
always knew it was a fox news/tucker carlson inspired narrative, but now point proven

and no surprise badecker wants to pay a monthly fee on how to learn to sound like an idiot

the issue with joining a subscription is you then get indoctrinated to want to follow the stupidity just to make it feel like your money went to something an idiot then uses in life.. otherwise they have to admit that they wasted money and time if they go against the narrative they paid for

It is quite weird and interesting of you think about it, by the way. Most of people do not pay to listen to a very specific narrative and embed in it. I agree with you those who pay for Tucker subscription will rationalize their expense and avoid reality so they can justify the way they chose to throw money away. Kind of sad.

[BADecker]

~

Good point. Maybe Tucker will get to the Assange story some time if he hasn't already. There is a lot of truth and hidden truth out there. Can't get it all in, in one day.

Reporting on Obama simply and his lover shows what the Dem leaders are really like. Many Dem people are honest, average Americans who have been duped by the party. Gotta wake 'em up. I wish Tucker would prove to us if Michelle O. is a man or not, and clear up all the mystery behind it. If she's a he, Obama must have been going that direction for a long time.

Obviously, Tucker is getting attention. You, even, are talking about him. Good. Maybe more people will tune in to him more often, thereby finding out that he makes some of the best media sense around.

Sure, I am talking about him because I am generally interested in the political happenings going on in the United States, and whether I like him or not, Tucker is part of the political reality of that country. Actually, I have personally watched some of his episodes back when he was in Fox, just for the sake of listening to all the media of the political spectrum.
Also, if Michelle Obama was actually a man posing as a woman or something like that, why would the Democrat party or Obama himself would continue to hide it? Keeping in mind in the United States it has become socially acceptable not to identify with one's birth gender? Obama has no longer a chance to become president again and Michelle is unlikely to pursue a political career anyways. So why would they hide it?

Why? If we knew the answers to the why everything, there wouldn't be any fun in life.

There used to be a bunch of videos on Youtube about this. Unlikely as it may seem, what if it were true? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyXOGZCbV5M&pp=ygUUbWljaGVsbGUgb2JhbWEgYSBtYW4%3D

[franky1]

this topic just reveals where badecker learns his silly little mindsets from..
always knew it was a fox news/tucker carlson inspired narrative, but now point proven

and no surprise badecker wants to pay a monthly fee on how to learn to sound like an idiot

the issue with joining a subscription is you then get indoctrinated to want to follow the stupidity just to make it feel like your money went to something an idiot then uses in life.. otherwise they have to admit that they wasted money and time if they go against the narrative they paid for

It is quite weird and interesting of you think about it, by the way. Most of people do not pay to listen to a very specific narrative and embed in it. I agree with you those who pay for Tucker subscription will rationalize their expense and avoid reality so they can justify the way they chose to throw money away. Kind of sad.

for years now badecker has been a subscriber of freedom-phoenix which most of his brainfarts are direct quotes of.. so now we will see a echo of tucker speeches too

in the past he has made a a few posts from different subscriptions where the articles oppose each other but he was determined to say they were both correct. but when asked how can he rationalise his opposing views he just ends up admitting he is just reiterating the stance of his trusted sources, thus just mindless copying

[BADecker]

this topic just reveals where badecker learns his silly little mindsets from..
always knew it was a fox news/tucker carlson inspired narrative, but now point proven

and no surprise badecker wants to pay a monthly fee on how to learn to sound like an idiot

the issue with joining a subscription is you then get indoctrinated to want to follow the stupidity just to make it feel like your money went to something an idiot then uses in life.. otherwise they have to admit that they wasted money and time if they go against the narrative they paid for

It is quite weird and interesting of you think about it, by the way. Most of people do not pay to listen to a very specific narrative and embed in it. I agree with you those who pay for Tucker subscription will rationalize their expense and avoid reality so they can justify the way they chose to throw money away. Kind of sad.

for years now badecker has been a subscriber of freedom-phoenix which most of his brainfarts are direct quotes of.. so now we will see a echo of tucker speeches too

in the past he has made a a few posts from different subscriptions where the articles oppose each other but he was determined to say they were both correct. but when asked how can he rationalise his opposing views he just ends up admitting he is just reiterating the stance of his trusted sources, thus just mindless copying

You seem to forget that Quantum Mechanics allows for two opposite things to both be correct, even at the same time.

Tucker TROLLS CNN With Massive Billboard Outside Their HQ: 'The Corporate Media Is DEAD' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpdXpL9ywz0.

[Hispo]

this topic just reveals where badecker learns his silly little mindsets from..
always knew it was a fox news/tucker carlson inspired narrative, but now point proven

and no surprise badecker wants to pay a monthly fee on how to learn to sound like an idiot

the issue with joining a subscription is you then get indoctrinated to want to follow the stupidity just to make it feel like your money went to something an idiot then uses in life.. otherwise they have to admit that they wasted money and time if they go against the narrative they paid for

It is quite weird and interesting of you think about it, by the way. Most of people do not pay to listen to a very specific narrative and embed in it. I agree with you those who pay for Tucker subscription will rationalize their expense and avoid reality so they can justify the way they chose to throw money away. Kind of sad.

for years now badecker has been a subscriber of freedom-phoenix which most of his brainfarts are direct quotes of.. so now we will see a echo of tucker speeches too

in the past he has made a a few posts from different subscriptions where the articles oppose each other but he was determined to say they were both correct. but when asked how can he rationalise his opposing views he just ends up admitting he is just reiterating the stance of his trusted sources, thus just mindless copying

You seem to forget that Quantum Mechanics allows for two opposite things to both be correct, even at the same time.

Tucker TROLLS CNN With Massive Billboard Outside Their HQ: 'The Corporate Media Is DEAD' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpdXpL9ywz0.

Though, it sounds not make sense to apply quantum mechanics to political analysis though... It is supposed to only be valid for the study of atomic or sub atomic particles.
There is no correlation between whatever tucker Carlson could say and the laws of quantum mechanics. And you would be aware of it if you ever tried to study those laws of physics, though I understand education of that level within the United States is very difficult to afford anyways. So perhaps your ignorance is not completely your fault.

[BADecker]

~

You seem to forget that Quantum Mechanics allows for two opposite things to both be correct, even at the same time.

Tucker TROLLS CNN With Massive Billboard Outside Their HQ: 'The Corporate Media Is DEAD' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpdXpL9ywz0.

Though, it sounds not make sense to apply quantum mechanics to political analysis though... It is supposed to only be valid for the study of atomic or sub atomic particles.
There is no correlation between whatever tucker Carlson could say and the laws of quantum mechanics. And you would be aware of it if you ever tried to study those laws of physics, though I understand education of that level within the United States is very difficult to afford anyways. So perhaps your ignorance is not completely your fault.

The quantum Mechanics usage above, was regarding the statement franky1 made that suggested that some of the articles BADecker posted contradicted each other.

However, QM affects everything. Isn't light a subatomic particle at the same time that it is a wave?