Eh, If I were affected I'd probably stop using them even after they reimburse me. This blind signing aside, they made many questionable decisions in the last few months that users should be aware of.
Did you imply about their new product, Ledger Recover?
Ledger Recover and
Ledger Recover FAQsThat new product from Ledger is sucky as the root cause to use a hardware wallet is to have our control on our wallet private keys/ wallet mnemonic seeds and don't rely on any party to have access to private keys, wallet seeds and our bitcoin.
Months ago, with release of Ledger Recover product, they give Ledger users an option to back up wallets with engagement of three parties. It sucks!
The more worrying thing is the reliance on their connectkit by dapps developers. They should improve their internal security and fix how a new update is published so that one phishing attack doesn't result in the same thing, while developers try to build/use alternatives so that they don't make chain attacks easier. CMIIW.
It is bad idea from Ledger developers but users themselves have own responsibilities too.
Hardware wallets must be used for storing their main capital.
If they want to interact with smart contracts, new projects, they must move their cryptocurrencies from a hardware wallets to some different smaller wallets. And they can use those wallets for smart contract interaction explorations, with other wallets like Metamask, MyEtherwallets and more.