🖤

[chaser15]

There's no space to be filled in the first place. The usual advertisement of gambling-related projects and services here will just be on usual. The same with other projects and services at different boards. I don't know why we should put a connection between the mixer case and casino.

Maybe let's just allow the campaign manager to address this. In the first place, they are the one who knows who will be fit on the campaign they managed. I don't see casino owners will take advantage of the case with mixers here. They have their own competition directly at the gambling industry.

Aside from that, the service that gambling companies should improved is about their platform itself, not the way they are promoting their brand here.

[redsun114]

Many of those top quality posters who joined mixer campaign aren't gamblers, so the drawback they might not post in gambling board.

I'm not sure if we will see a new casinos campaign very soon after the mixer ban begin, but the current casinos can volunteer hiring them, just like some top users are wearing Duelbits signature.

But, how did you know that they are not gamblers? It's possible that a user isn't picky, and there is an opening in the mixer campaign, so they joined it. Or the pay rate for it, and other conditions are much better, so they switch on it. If you are on a gambling campaign, like it or not, you will be making some gambling posts. It was only a few posts anyway, and most of the posts are still going to be spread in many areas of the forum.

Mixers and casinos are different services. So even if there is a new casino that will spawn, right after the banning date, I am sure it has no relation to the mixer. And even if let say a mixing service will create a casino with a mixing feature, they won't still be allowed here.

[bettercrypto]

So after mixers got banned, there will be a need to fill their empty space, soon we shall see new casinos coming in to play to compete with current services

Any casino who does why you are predicting will be thoroughly investigated for being a funnel for money laundering. There are more traffic to mixers than online casinos. Casinos have a low to medium budget which is why at some point during a signature campaign, some participants are removed because of budget cuts. Mixers on the other hand have a lot of money to throw around.

I don't know what ops stands to gain from this discussion a and just like I made my point clear in the first comment,  there is no basis for both casino and mixer to get any form of comparison and for sure we have to look out for some of the possibilities that can make a gambling site misunderstood for being a tool for money mixing but also we should know that,  for as long as casinos have the wagering requirements for each deposits,  same goes with the risk that those that may seek to take casino as a mixing tool.

This is why most of them don't take casinos for money laundering because there is a high possibility of losing some or all the deposits and so long as it is included in the terms of service,  the gambler may not have any case against them and at some point be seen as a noon mixing avenue.

That's what I was thinking about when he wanted to release this topic that they did. I just don't know if I'm thinking about this topic correctly, Op. Maybe what he wants to release is that the owners of the mixers can move into the gambling business here in the crypto industry.

But I'm not sure if this is what he meant to convey in this section. Then another thing is that gambling in the mixer is not the same; the difference between them is, to be honest, very large. So, it should not be compared to gambling, in my opinion.