Jeffery Epseitn, his client list, and his ties to Israel

[legiteum]

Well, as a US citizen, I'm a lot more concerned about what the current frontrunner to be our country's next president is mixed up in rather than a non-political actor like "Hunter Biden" is doing.

What Hunter was doing?

I don't care. He's not president. He's not an elected official. He's not part of our government. There is no sign he ever will be any of those things.

I also don't care what Barron Trump is doing either...

[1714717797]

1714717797

[1714717797]

1714717797

[1714717797]

1714717797

[Medusah]

Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is going on?  So there is a list with these names.  What am I supposed to do with it?  Conclude that everyone inside is a pedo? 

Seriously.  Is there more than that as evidence or is that all?

[legiteum]

Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is going on?  So there is a list with these names.  What am I supposed to do with it?  Conclude that everyone inside is a pedo? 

Seriously.  Is there more than that as evidence or is that all?

Now you see why even Fox News isn't covering the Epstein story....

[DireWolfM14]

What Hunter was doing?

I don't care.

You're a moron.  And getting ignored.  Have a nice life.

[legiteum]

You're a moron.  And getting ignored.  Have a nice life.

I'm not sure that's the best way to convince people of your viewpoint...

[DireWolfM14]

For those of you who think MSM is the only source of reliable news, here's some info the Zionist don't want you to learn.  You'll never hear of this on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, or Fox.  These are entertainment venues, not reliable news sources.  They manufacture division between Republicans and Democrats ignoring the fact that they are indeed one party meant to distract you from what's going on behind the scenes.  Only a retard is incapable of seeing through the charade.

https://nitter.net/Timayenis/status/1744779802454761579#m

Follow the rabbit hole at the peril of all preconceptions you have for our "greatest ally."

For years Palestinians have been claiming that the corpses of their sons who've been taken "prisoners" and die suddenly for inexplicable reasons while in captivity are returned to their families with evidence of organ harvesting.  Even Ziopedia can't hide the truth, despite attempting to whitewash a documented and reported allegation as a "tabloid" hit piece.  But further in the article they go on to say this:

In December 2009, a 2000 interview with the chief pathologist at the L. Greenberg National Institute of Forensic Medicine Yehuda Hiss was released in which he had admitted taking organs from the corpses of Israelis, Palestinians and foreign workers without their families' permission. Israeli health officials confirmed Hiss's confession but stated that such incidents had ended in the 1990s and noted that Hiss had been removed from his post.

[TwitchySeal]

For those of you who think MSM is the only source of reliable news, here's some info the Zionist don't want you to learn.  You'll never hear of this on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, or Fox.  These are entertainment venues, not reliable news sources.  They manufacture division between Republicans and Democrats ignoring the fact that they are indeed one party meant to distract you from what's going on behind the scenes.  Only a retard is incapable of seeing through the charade.

https://nitter.net/Timayenis/status/1744779802454761579#m

Follow the rabbit hole at the peril of all preconceptions you have for our "greatest ally."

For years Palestinians have been claiming that the corpses of their sons who've been taken "prisoners" and die suddenly for inexplicable reasons while in captivity are returned to their families with evidence of organ harvesting.  Even Ziopedia can't hide the truth, despite attempting to whitewash a documented and reported allegation as a "tabloid" hit piece.  But further in the article they go on to say this:

In December 2009, a 2000 interview with the chief pathologist at the L. Greenberg National Institute of Forensic Medicine Yehuda Hiss was released in which he had admitted taking organs from the corpses of Israelis, Palestinians and foreign workers without their families' permission. Israeli health officials confirmed Hiss's confession but stated that such incidents had ended in the 1990s and noted that Hiss had been removed from his post.

Wait till that twitter account finds out what the Catholics have been up to.

[DireWolfM14]

Wait till that twitter account finds out what the Catholics have been up to.

Is it possible for anyone on this site to make an valid argument, or is deflection all you can muster?

The molestation allegations levied on Catholic priests have been well documented, but I have yet to hear of large-scale human trafficking rings run by Catholic clergy.  There's no evidence suggesting Catholics at any level have a coordinated blackmail ring designed to ensnare world leaders.  Quite the contrary in fact, there is evidence suggesting that the Pope himself has been compromised by Zionists.

[TwitchySeal]

Wait till that twitter account finds out what the Catholics have been up to.

Is it possible for anyone on this site to make an valid argument, or is deflection all you can muster?

The molestation allegations levied on Catholic priests have been well documented, but I have yet to hear of large-scale human trafficking rings run by Catholic clergy.  There's no evidence suggesting Catholics at any level have a coordinated blackmail ring designed to ensnare world leaders.  Quite the contrary in fact, there is evidence suggesting that the Pope himself has been compromised by Zionists.

I feel like if the American conspiratards decided to focus on Catholics instead of Jews they'd find a lot more material that's actually based in reality to work with. You've got thousands of Priests molesting hundreds of thousands of children while leading weekly services where they pretend to eat human flesh and blood.....all this from the church responsible for the Inquisition.  <<<<----And all of that is real.

[DireWolfM14]

~

Can we agree that molesting and trafficking children is bad?
Can we agree that corruption in our government is bad regardless of who's behind it?
Can we agree that any foreign nation having blackmail material they use to control our leaders is bad?
Can we agree that something needs to be done about all the above?

[legiteum]

~

Can we agree that molesting and trafficking children is bad?
Can we agree that corruption in our government is bad regardless of who's behind it?
Can we agree that any foreign nation having blackmail material they use to control our leaders is bad?
Can we agree that something needs to be done about all the above?

Everybody is worried about those things. Obviously.

But without evidence, there's nothing anybody can do. In other words, what is that "something" that you want done? Should somebody be brought up on charges? If so, who? On what charges? With what evidence?

You see, this is why you can't only go by conspiracy theory sites. In the real world, you can't send somebody to prison based on what somebody said on a podcast.

[BADecker]

~

Can we agree that molesting and trafficking children is bad?
Can we agree that corruption in our government is bad regardless of who's behind it?
Can we agree that any foreign nation having blackmail material they use to control our leaders is bad?
Can we agree that something needs to be done about all the above?

Everybody is worried about those things. Obviously.

But without evidence, there's nothing anybody can do. In other words, what is that "something" that you want done? Should somebody be brought up on charges? If so, who? On what charges? With what evidence?

You see, this is why you can't only go by conspiracy theory sites. In the real world, you can't send somebody to prison based on what somebody said on a podcast.

Except for circumstantial evidence.

When a man (or woman) hires an attorney, what he has done is given his power over to the attorneys and the judge. That's part of the reason why circumstantial evidence holds so much weight.

When the accused goes to court, he needs to stand present, not represented by anyone, not even himself. Why does he need to have representation, since he is present to speak for himself?

If the court won't hear him without be represented, he needs to file a claim against the judge for not letting him go.

If the court hears him, he has the right to face his accuser... cross examine his accuser. Let the accuser take the oath or affirmation, and get on the stand to testify. If the accuser is the State or other governmental entity, it can't place it's hand on the Bible and take the oath, and then walk onto the stand to answer questions by the accused. No case.

If there is a man or woman in the accuser group, let the man or woman get on the stand and show the harm or damage that the accused supposedly did. Then, let there be evidence and at least one witness.

If people did it this way, a lot of things would straighten up... including drug cases where the accused didn't harm anyone.

[legiteum]

Except for circumstantial evidence.

When a man (or woman) hires an attorney, what he has done is given his power over to the attorneys and the judge. That's part of the reason why circumstantial evidence holds so much weight.

When the accused goes to court, he needs to stand present, not represented by anyone, not even himself. Why does he need to have representation, since he is present to speak for himself?

If the court won't hear him without be represented, he needs to file a claim against the judge for not letting him go.

If the court hears him, he has the right to face his accuser... cross examine his accuser. Let the accuser take the oath or affirmation, and get on the stand to testify. If the accuser is the State or other governmental entity, it can't place it's hand on the Bible and take the oath, and then walk onto the stand to answer questions by the accused. No case.

If there is a man or woman in the accuser group, let the man or woman get on the stand and show the harm or damage that the accused supposedly did. Then, let there be evidence and at least one witness.

If people did it this way, a lot of things would straighten up... including drug cases where the accused didn't harm anyone.

What are the names of the people who should be prosecuted in the Epstein orbit? Under what charges should they be charged? What specific evidence gives rise to each of these charges?

If you were actually concerned about all of those things you mentioned before, then it sure seems like you'd be trying to learn the answers to those questions.

[BADecker]

Except for circumstantial evidence.

When a man (or woman) hires an attorney, what he has done is given his power over to the attorneys and the judge. That's part of the reason why circumstantial evidence holds so much weight.

When the accused goes to court, he needs to stand present, not represented by anyone, not even himself. Why does he need to have representation, since he is present to speak for himself?

If the court won't hear him without be represented, he needs to file a claim against the judge for not letting him go.

If the court hears him, he has the right to face his accuser... cross examine his accuser. Let the accuser take the oath or affirmation, and get on the stand to testify. If the accuser is the State or other governmental entity, it can't place it's hand on the Bible and take the oath, and then walk onto the stand to answer questions by the accused. No case.

If there is a man or woman in the accuser group, let the man or woman get on the stand and show the harm or damage that the accused supposedly did. Then, let there be evidence and at least one witness.

If people did it this way, a lot of things would straighten up... including drug cases where the accused didn't harm anyone.

What are the names of the people who should be prosecuted in the Epstein orbit? Under what charges should they be charged? What specific evidence gives rise to each of these charges?

If you were actually concerned about all of those things you mentioned before, then it sure seems like you'd be trying to learn the answers to those questions.

Lol. So, what do you think they will do when they find Epstein guilty? Lol. Throw him in prison? Lol.

[DireWolfM14]

Except for circumstantial evidence.

There are boxes of hard evidence, such as video tapes, CDs, and hard drives that were confiscated.  The evidence was found in safes in the New York property belonging to Epstein.  The FBI is possession of it all.  This was reported by the New York Times.

Now, those who trust the government with everything from their health to their children's indoctrination will suggest that since the FBI has that information and hasn't acted on it, that in itself is evidence that there's nothing there.  The same FBI that got caught trying to hatch a false-flag kidnapping attempt of Governor Whitmer.  The same FBI that hired Ray Epps to incite a riot at the capitol.  The same FBI that arrested parents who got incensed when they learned their daughters were raped in a Virginia school bathroom.  The same FBI that interfered with the 2020 Election by suppressing the story of Hunter Biden's laptop (which they've had for 7 years now.)  The same FBI that refuses to investigate ballot harvesting during the 2020 election, despite significant video evidence.  The same FBI that tries to entrap US citizens (including me on several occasions) because they had the audacity to own a gun shop.  The same FBI getting their marching orders from Merrick Garland.  That FBI.  

Could it be they are protecting their own?

[legiteum]

Lol. So, what do you think they will do when they find Epstein guilty? Lol. Throw him in prison? Lol.

So only Epstein is (was) guilty of anything? Good to know. I guess we can put the "list" in the OP to bed then, eh?

[legiteum]

[...] That FBI.  

Could it be they are protecting their own?

I can see how important it is for people to believe in all of these conspiracy theories now. All one has to do is say they believe, and they can justify absolutely anything.

This way you can choose to believe the FBI and the courts etc. when it aligns with your political goals, and deny hard evidence when they don't. Very effective, I must say.

[BADecker]

Lol. So, what do you think they will do when they find Epstein guilty? Lol. Throw him in prison? Lol.

So only Epstein is (was) guilty of anything? Good to know. I guess we can the the "list" in the OP to bed then, eh?

I'm rather happy for you, that you have finally settled it for yourself.

[TwitchySeal]

~

Can we agree that molesting and trafficking children is bad?
Can we agree that corruption in our government is bad regardless of who's behind it?
Can we agree that any foreign nation having blackmail material they use to control our leaders is bad?
Can we agree that something needs to be done about all the above?

Agree to all.

Can we agree antisemitism is bad?

[DireWolfM14]

Can we agree antisemitism is bad?

There it is, the last resort of one who has no argument.

Please define what a Semite is, and let me know how I can be an antisemite.  Keep in mind, I'm 100% of Palestinian ethnicity, I speak fluent Arabic, I can trace my father's family to a small West Bank town for 8 generations, and my mother's family to a small city in the West Bank for 5 generations.

I'll wait for your apology.