What do you want to see in casino reviews?

[sompitonov]

I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

I also believe that negative reviews are the most valuable because there we can find a reason why we simply will not even enter this casino. If we do not discover this in advance, then in fact it will be a great disappointment for us to discover it ourselves, besides we will simply waste time on registration and other actions. Negative reviews can also be far-fetched, because the player could not be very lucky and lose money, so you need to understand that he can also leave negative reviews, but they will not be justified in any way, because he will simply be offended by this particular casino. To summarize, I want to say that reviews today are not the best guide, but there are still real ones, you just need to be able to find them among all the others.

[1714642059]

1714642059

[1714642059]

1714642059

[1714642059]

1714642059

[Hamphser]

I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

I also believe that negative reviews are the most valuable because there we can find a reason why we simply will not even enter this casino. If we do not discover this in advance, then in fact it will be a great disappointment for us to discover it ourselves, besides we will simply waste time on registration and other actions. Negative reviews can also be far-fetched, because the player could not be very lucky and lose money, so you need to understand that he can also leave negative reviews, but they will not be justified in any way, because he will simply be offended by this particular casino. To summarize, I want to say that reviews today are not the best guide, but there are still real ones, you just need to be able to find them among all the others.

But we should really be careful on trying out to read up some negative reviews since it could really be faked out or something that would really false because we know that when it comes to information that we could be able to read up online then its not all the time that it would be the truth. There would really be competitors who would really be trying out to destroy others reputation on which they would really be
giving out some false feedbacks. This is why on the time that you would really be able to read up some negative feedback then it would be best that you should really be looking for something more and you would really be that verifying whether it does have that legit feedbacks or issues on which this is something on where you would really be basing up your decision whether you would proceed or you would be
finding for another place.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

Yes, it's really a good thing to look at, but in most of the reviews I've seen there are a lot of good things, in some cases they have a box where they say minimum withdrawal, if they have the fee, how much is it? the quantity, all these things, of course I have not seen a review where they talk about each game and its experience, although it would be a good thing, for example on the freebitco.in site, they have a very common and very original dice game and this can mean that when comparing it with other games on other sites like primedice, stake.com or other sites to draw other conclusions, such as saying that on that site that each player has favorite games that are different from the others.

[AmoreJaz]

I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

You can check the pros and cons listed if you want to have a quick look at the negative side of the casino. It is indeed better to read some negative unfiltered reviews so you know what to expect when you try it yourself. But we can't expect every review site to get a glimpse of their actual experience because not many of them are providing comprehensive review of the games. Because you will need a lot of bankroll if you do really want to try those games. And most of the time, they have limited bankroll to begin with.

[uneng]

You can check the pros and cons listed if you want to have a quick look at the negative side of the casino. It is indeed better to read some negative unfiltered reviews so you know what to expect when you try it yourself. But we can't expect every review site to get a glimpse of their actual experience because not many of them are providing comprehensive review of the games. Because you will need a lot of bankroll if you do really want to try those games. And most of the time, they have limited bankroll to begin with.

Unfiltered reviews are good to prevent having an inaccurate opinion based on biased reviews written by people who are directly connected to the casino or are paid to write such positive reviews. On the other hand, we should never disconsider the possibility of negative reviews about a casino being in fact a revenge from gamblers in loss against the casino where they have been losing money. So, they might accuse the casino of shady acts, although nothing they say is true, since they are just accusing the casino because they are mad for having lost money.

I have already seen this kind of accusation against reputable and trusted crypto casinos on this forum. And when it happens it's really problematic, because the gambler becomes a hater of the casino, becoming obsessed about ruining its reputation through repetitive attempts and persecutions. The issue is that a naive gambler can take those accusations seriously and avoid playing at a legit casino for the wrong reasons...

[Dunamisx]

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

Yes, it's really a good thing to look at, but in most of the reviews I've seen there are a lot of good things, in some cases they have a box where they say minimum withdrawal, if they have the fee, how much is it? the quantity, all these things, of course I have not seen a review where they talk about each game and its experience, although it would be a good thing, for example on the freebitco.in site, they have a very common and very original dice game and this can mean that when comparing it with other games on other sites like primedice, stake.com or other sites to draw other conclusions, such as saying that on that site that each player has favorite games that are different from the others.

As time goes by we keep having different dimensions used in making online reviews for the casino gambling platforms, this will determine the way we have actually get them and what they offer, if we have truly achieved an understanding on the idea that concern their platform review to gambler, what the people want is to remain outstanding in everything, which is possible through what we have seen from their reviews online and our personal experience.

[Shamm]

.

Reading the possitive and negative reviews of a casino is a must. Cause the important of reading the negative reviews is we will know what are the possible lapses of that casino, and by the help of that we can avoid such things. Also the best thing to do is to read the positive reviews of course cause we will know that casino is trusted enough or not.  Also the experience of the other gambler are our references to do so Inorder to win a good amount of Money.

[AliMan]

.

Reading the possitive and negative reviews of a casino is a must. Cause the important of reading the negative reviews is we will know what are the possible lapses of that casino, and by the help of that we can avoid such things. Also the best thing to do is to read the positive reviews of course cause we will know that casino is trusted enough or not.  Also the experience of the other gambler are our references to do so Inorder to win a good amount of Money.

You got a good point, everybody should have transparent reviews from any casino because if we just refer on one article or discussion I guess that's a biased idea. Avoiding such scenario doesn't guarantee, because every gambler only fell on promotions and not on the fact that in the long run of betting negative effects will deeply toxicate him.
Just the one friend I had who's addicted with cockfighting, this is more popular nowadays taking online bettors drowned to several debts due to this.
That example is a reality of a review, and hopefully with casino there will be a much better overview with real talks behind it's either good or bad.

[paxmao]

.

Reading the possitive and negative reviews of a casino is a must. Cause the important of reading the negative reviews is we will know what are the possible lapses of that casino, and by the help of that we can avoid such things. Also the best thing to do is to read the positive reviews of course cause we will know that casino is trusted enough or not.  Also the experience of the other gambler are our references to do so Inorder to win a good amount of Money.

Reading the negatives is a great think to do, but it is also worth noticing how they are written. If you think of it, you would normally ignore a site in which you did not have a good experience in general. You just do not waste your time thinking about it, however a negative review is a clear warning sign that there is something really wrong with the site as the user seeked some type of revenge or setting a warning.

[Fatunad]

.

Reading the possitive and negative reviews of a casino is a must. Cause the important of reading the negative reviews is we will know what are the possible lapses of that casino, and by the help of that we can avoid such things. Also the best thing to do is to read the positive reviews of course cause we will know that casino is trusted enough or not.  Also the experience of the other gambler are our references to do so Inorder to win a good amount of Money.

Reading the negatives is a great think to do, but it is also worth noticing how they are written. If you think of it, you would normally ignore a site in which you did not have a good experience in general. You just do not waste your time thinking about it, however a negative review is a clear warning sign that there is something really wrong with the site as the user seeked some type of revenge or setting a warning.

Reading up single negative or a couple ones wont really be something enough for you to make out some conclusions on which if you do have doubts about being that legitimate feedback then you could really be always having that in depth research and analysis in regarding about the site if you are really that eager on playing into it. When it comes to reviews then it could neither be false or something that would really be legit.
Just dont make yourself that get easily believe with just a couple of positive or negative and make out that outright decisions.

[suzanne5223]

.

Reading the possitive and negative reviews of a casino is a must. Cause the important of reading the negative reviews is we will know what are the possible lapses of that casino, and by the help of that we can avoid such things. Also the best thing to do is to read the positive reviews of course cause we will know that casino is trusted enough or not.  Also the experience of the other gambler are our references to do so Inorder to win a good amount of Money.

Reading the negatives is a great think to do, but it is also worth noticing how they are written. If you think of it, you would normally ignore a site in which you did not have a good experience in general. You just do not waste your time thinking about it, however a negative review is a clear warning sign that there is something really wrong with the site as the user seeked some type of revenge or setting a warning.

Reading up single negative or a couple ones wont really be something enough for you to make out some conclusions on which if you do have doubts about being that legitimate feedback then you could really be always having that in depth research and analysis in regarding about the site if you are really that eager on playing into it. When it comes to reviews then it could neither be false or something that would really be legit.
Just dont make yourself that get easily believe with just a couple of positive or negative and make out that outright decisions.

I supported what you said because we can't know the genuineness of a review just by noticing how they are written since we're in a century where online reviews are manipulated for positive/negative reasons. The only way to know the genuineness of casino reviews is through deep analysis with the use of crypto casino analytic website that still maintain good reputation till now.

[Casdinyard]

Before I really dipped my toes in the gambling industry, I was a wary little shit that wouldn't dare step into a casino with poor reviews or people who don't know how to make coherent sentences to prove that the casino they're playing with's reputable or honest. As time goes by instead of complaining bout the lack of a constructive review for casinos I really frequent in, I managed to make sure that I become that type of guy for the casino, just in case someone like me's out there trying to look for a more sensible review amidst the hot pile of shit that some of these players put out.

Anyways, what's always included in my review are these:

1. A review of the UI, I make sure that the user interface of a gambling site's praised for being very intuitive and user-friendly, accessible even if you're a blind bat who can only gamble through echolocations, or whatever. I also make sure to point out any type of concern about the UI, so people receive a more balanced review.

2. I make sure to check out their "provably fair" games and test it myself. I wanna make sure that in one way or another they are able to prove that they are provably fair, a seed number that is readily available for public viewing after the results are put out is more than enough for me sometimes, and when I don't see things like these in a casino, I become a livid lol.

3. Lastly, the speed of payouts. this is a very nuanced concept as payout times depend not only on when the casino's gonna send you your money, but also based on your region, among other things, but I give extra props to casinos who go out of their way to put out amazing features that hasten the withdrawal process for the user. On that note, I also appreciate and make sure they learn about it, when casinos issue more than one way to allow users to withdraw.

[Bitinity]

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

Yes, it's really a good thing to look at, but in most of the reviews I've seen there are a lot of good things, in some cases they have a box where they say minimum withdrawal, if they have the fee, how much is it? the quantity, all these things, of course I have not seen a review where they talk about each game and its experience, although it would be a good thing, for example on the freebitco.in site, they have a very common and very original dice game and this can mean that when comparing it with other games on other sites like primedice, stake.com or other sites to draw other conclusions, such as saying that on that site that each player has favorite games that are different from the others.

The good things are usually about similar things but the bad things are usually different especially if the reviewer took a real experience while reviewing the casino. Why bad things is important to read, because it is warning for me for the worst case. The same when I want to buy specific product, I'll try to find the cons of the product first  because if I look at the pros only, I'll have too much expectation.

[LUCKMCFLY]

You can check the pros and cons listed if you want to have a quick look at the negative side of the casino. It is indeed better to read some negative unfiltered reviews so you know what to expect when you try it yourself. But we can't expect every review site to get a glimpse of their actual experience because not many of them are providing comprehensive review of the games. Because you will need a lot of bankroll if you do really want to try those games. And most of the time, they have limited bankroll to begin with.

Well I also think the same, for reviewers it can be one of the things that slows down their analysis, but in this case things can be very different, for example we as players who only go to the casino to try and see what we like . and what we don't like, if we find the game good or bad, as we feel, we all have different points of view, and we believe that the reviews may not be, but for example when we focus on certain criteria that we look for, many reviewers are very focused on the same criteria, because they almost comply with a pattern and that is what I don't like, because there is no one who goes further, those who go further are ourselves as players, there is a certain discrepancy in that, but Money is the main driver needed for a very complete overhaul.

[Hamphser]

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

Yes, it's really a good thing to look at, but in most of the reviews I've seen there are a lot of good things, in some cases they have a box where they say minimum withdrawal, if they have the fee, how much is it? the quantity, all these things, of course I have not seen a review where they talk about each game and its experience, although it would be a good thing, for example on the freebitco.in site, they have a very common and very original dice game and this can mean that when comparing it with other games on other sites like primedice, stake.com or other sites to draw other conclusions, such as saying that on that site that each player has favorite games that are different from the others.

The good things are usually about similar things but the bad things are usually different especially if the reviewer took a real experience while reviewing the casino. Why bad things is important to read, because it is warning for me for the worst case. The same when I want to buy specific product, I'll try to find the cons of the product first  because if I look at the pros only, I'll have too much expectation.

But not all negative would really be legit, just like on what mentioned above that you would really be needing to make out some verification or would be indepth research before you would be that
believing with those negative reviews because it could really be that false or just been that intentionally be that showing those bad reviews or feedbacks. So it would really be best
that you should be looking for it neither its legit or something not because if you do find out that there are tons of good feedbacks than with those negative ones then it simply shows that it did
really outweighs and something that you would really be considering on treating it up to be a better site rather than to be bad. It would really be on your choice on how you would gonna approach it.

[coinerer]

I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

I also believe that negative reviews are the most valuable because there we can find a reason why we simply will not even enter this casino. If we do not discover this in advance, then in fact it will be a great disappointment for us to discover it ourselves, besides we will simply waste time on registration and other actions. Negative reviews can also be far-fetched, because the player could not be very lucky and lose money, so you need to understand that he can also leave negative reviews, but they will not be justified in any way, because he will simply be offended by this particular casino. To summarize, I want to say that reviews today are not the best guide, but there are still real ones, you just need to be able to find them among all the others.

Yes, negative reviews help point out a site's weak points.  Because of this I also agree with you that negative reviews are more of a boon to a site than positive reviews. Here the sites which come to do a real business in the market always try to find out their weak points. And because of this they don't pay any review site to get good reviews for their site.  Those who intend to scam get excited when they see negative reviews

[sompitonov]

I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

I also believe that negative reviews are the most valuable because there we can find a reason why we simply will not even enter this casino. If we do not discover this in advance, then in fact it will be a great disappointment for us to discover it ourselves, besides we will simply waste time on registration and other actions. Negative reviews can also be far-fetched, because the player could not be very lucky and lose money, so you need to understand that he can also leave negative reviews, but they will not be justified in any way, because he will simply be offended by this particular casino. To summarize, I want to say that reviews today are not the best guide, but there are still real ones, you just need to be able to find them among all the others.

Yes, negative reviews help point out a site's weak points.  Because of this I also agree with you that negative reviews are more of a boon to a site than positive reviews. Here the sites which come to do a real business in the market always try to find out their weak points. And because of this they don't pay any review site to get good reviews for their site.  Those who intend to scam get excited when they see negative reviews

I hope they don't have an option to delete reviews they don't like. Otherwise, they can leave only what they need from real reviews and supplement them with custom ones; if this is the case, then I would not read the reviews at all. It is probably worth paying attention to specialized forums that have existed for a long time and have a good reputation. But we must always remember that where there is big money, there will be those who want to deceive or manipulate. You must always remember this to avoid problems.

[Bitinity]

------

If you read my first post, I've clearly said about "reputable reviewers/review sites" which logically means that the review both negative and positive are mostly legit. Even if I read the negative review on an unknown review site, it is a warning for me which will make me curious and try to find other reviews as comparison.

[D.t.B]

You're right that the review must highlight all aspects of the casino, not just the benefits.

We at Doublethebitcoin focus on the credibility and features of the casinos.
Given we are in the crypto world, there is a higher risk of problems, IMO. On the other hand, you get exclusive games, anonymity, and unique promotions.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

Yes, it's really a good thing to look at, but in most of the reviews I've seen there are a lot of good things, in some cases they have a box where they say minimum withdrawal, if they have the fee, how much is it? the quantity, all these things, of course I have not seen a review where they talk about each game and its experience, although it would be a good thing, for example on the freebitco.in site, they have a very common and very original dice game and this can mean that when comparing it with other games on other sites like primedice, stake.com or other sites to draw other conclusions, such as saying that on that site that each player has favorite games that are different from the others.

The good things are usually about similar things but the bad things are usually different especially if the reviewer took a real experience while reviewing the casino. Why bad things is important to read, because it is warning for me for the worst case. The same when I want to buy specific product, I'll try to find the cons of the product first  because if I look at the pros only, I'll have too much expectation.

But not all negative would really be legit, just like on what mentioned above that you would really be needing to make out some verification or would be indepth research before you would be that
believing with those negative reviews because it could really be that false or just been that intentionally be that showing those bad reviews or feedbacks. So it would really be best
that you should be looking for it neither its legit or something not because if you do find out that there are tons of good feedbacks than with those negative ones then it simply shows that it did
really outweighs and something that you would really be considering on treating it up to be a better site rather than to be bad. It would really be on your choice on how you would gonna approach it.

I think we all have a vision of what is possible or not to do , if we see these Reviews on casinos , we have to identify at Once what is good and bad about a Casino, but based on the fact that things are Basically very good at When it comes to making a rating we see that there are many Reviewers who are new because basically they are very biased because there are some casinos that pay to have good advertising for them, what happens is that they Know each other because they are Novice users , and those are the ones who Basically They lend Themselves to this type of Advertising, now, those of us who know, and have in the forum, well, some Negative Things they say, at least I pay Attention to them. them, but it's not that it's negative, it's that they are points that one needs to know What's the point of a Review deceiving us? then we Spend money, then it is better that things are done Well as they are.