The greatest act of collective treason in U.S. history

[BADecker]

Probably the top treason against the US is shown below.


The greatest act of collective treason in U.S. history


https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-12-21-greatest-act-collective-treason-in-us-history.html
Truly, no one has ever seen anything like this in American history.

(Article republished from StateOfTheNation.co)

Numerous members of the U.S. Congress as well as the Judicial Branch have refused to defend the extremely vulnerable open borders of the United States of America.

The very same traitors have flaunted their willful neglect and serial law-breaking where it concerns the protection of the American people from all sorts of threats due to open borders and illegal immigration. These dire threats only exist because of the extremely porous Mexican border.

The very same treasonous members of Congress and the Judiciary are well aware of the ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorists who have easily gained entry into the USA over the past several years.

They are also aware of the countless MS-13 gang members and other hardened criminals from Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Panama, Columbia, and other Central and South American countries who illegally enter the country every month.

Then there are the countless drug traffickers, human traffickers, arms traffickers and other international cartel criminals who cross the open border at will.

Border patrols across the extensive border have also reported massive amounts of contraband and black market items that make their way to and from going both ways.

So, this is the current status of our nation’s border with Mexico—a country overwhelmed by drug cartel violence, drug smuggling and open drug warfare with the 31 state governments as well as the federal government in Mexico City.


...

[1714749599]

1714749599

[1714749599]

1714749599

[legiteum]

This seems a bit one-sided.

[BADecker]

^^^ It IS one sided. Republicans don't do things like this. Do you really want a Democrat in the White House? Look at what the Dem leaders are doing to America. Enough is enough, and was enough a long time ago. Vote for Trump, even if they bar him from being on the ballot in your State.


Emergency whistleblower: RED DAWN ALERT – South American violent CRIMINALS dispersed across U.S. cities in run-up to 2024 CHAOS - https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-12-21-emergency-whistleblower-red-dawn-alert-south-american-violent-criminals-dispersed-across-us-cities.html


WATCH: Unbelievable Scenes as THOUSANDS of Migrants Invade U.S. Border. - https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/12/20/watch-unbelievable-scenes-as-thousands-of-migrants-invade-u-s-border/


While Americans Struggle To Feed Their Families, Illegal Immigrants Waste 5,000 Taxpayer-Funded Meals A Day..... And That Is In Just One U.S. City - https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Illegals_Throwing_Away_Taxpayer_Funded_Food.php


Consider searching on the word "Trump" and the word "ballot" in this website - https://censored.news/

[legiteum]

"Vote for Trump, even if they bar him from being on the ballot in your State." LOL

[BADecker]

"Vote for Trump, even if they bar him from being on the ballot in your State." LOL

Write-in.     

[Hispo]

So, let us assume that there is indeed some treason going on or something like it going on in the highest levels of the house of the representatives and the senate.
What do you think it is going to happen? Or what do you think it would happen?

Personally, I understand there is a lot of frustration going on in the United States, specially in border States of the USA, but regardless one believes about the state of the border and its security, no one is supposed to ignore the human rights and  due process.
Those who are checked and end up being criminals in other countries like Mexico or even Central America are supposed to be put into custody as soon as possible and negotiate for them to be expelled back to their countries, to serve their time there; but one cannot simply to suggest there is a huge treason going on without irrefutable proof, because it could incite citizens to violently target politicians in the House and the Senate (There has already been precedent of it).
Also, I do not think there is any legal basis for any republican to affirm the plan of Democrats is use immigrants to rig elections, it is obvious those people do not have the right to vote and it would take them to give birth in the USA before the next generation had any right to vote. It is common sense.

[Kelward]

Also, I do not think there is any legal basis for any republican to affirm the plan of Democrats is use immigrants to rig elections, it is obvious those people do not have the right to vote and it would take them to give birth in the USA before the next generation had any right to vote. It is common sense.

In any election year, the opposition supporters always capitalize on any issues that they think can bring the present regime to ruins so that their supporting opposition can gain ground to win election. It's advantages is that it can bring the flaws of the present administration to limelight so that electorates can have a good reason to vote them out, on the other hand the same opposition supporters can become biased while supplying information to rubbish the ruling party. So it's very important to back accusations with tangible proofs, so that they don't mislead the electorates.

So I advice Americans to research any news that they hear about the ruling or opposition parties before believing the accusations, because some might be true while others are lies. Like this border issue in discussion, there's no way that the migrants can be eligible to vote because they're not citizens of America, so the border not properly guarded can not be because the ruling party wants them to vote for them in gratitude.

[Ucy]

Issues that'll be created by the illegal migration will ofcourse be used to limit freedom and control the population more and more. I think they believe it's necessary means to impose their agenda on the population. The governments can only do what they are allowed to do, and we here can do nothing if our CREATOR allows it.     I notice from here that they are encouraging the mass migration. And the potential migrants see you as enemy if you try to discourage them knowing what they are moving into is a trap. It seems they are completely deaf and deliberately hardened in order to be destroyed. I hope we have people who will make it back as prodigal son rather than an outright destruction/enslavement

[BADecker]

^^^ The articles below might be part of the trap. Also, the fact that illegals aren't being accepted by much of the population is a trap in itself. Seems that many illegals are returning the way they came, by choice.

Besides below, look here - https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/355400-2023-12-18-texas-governor-signs-bill-that-lets-police-arrest-migrants-who.htm - and here - https://www.google.com/search?q=migrants+site%3Awww.FreedomsPhoenix.com&safe=active&client=pub-1152883605682421&domains=www.FreedomsPhoenix.com&sca_esv=593789920&flav=0000&sig=mFdjidcd_Q5SKS87&hl=en&ei=VgaLZfybOqyf5NoP-cevyA8&ved=0ahUKEwj8nvHLya2DAxWsD1kFHfnjC_kQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=migrants+site%3Awww.FreedomsPhoenix.com&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiJW1pZ3JhbnRzIHNpdGU6d3d3LkZyZWVkb21zUGhvZW5peC5jb21IvClQshFYlihwAngAkAEAmAHMAaABpAmqAQUwLjYuMbgBA8gBAPgBAeIDBBgBIEGIBgE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp.


Texas takes on Biden: Gov. Greg Abbott enacts sweeping new powers allowing cops to arrest illegal migrants and boot them back to Mexico - setting up showdown with the White House


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12879551/Texas-migrant-arrest-Biden-law-Greg-Abbott.html
Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Monday set himself on a collision course with Joe Biden as he enacted sweeping powers to deal with the migrant crisis.

The laws will enable cops to arrest illegal migrants and allow judges to boot them back across the Mexico border. The Republican governor said it could slash the number of crossings by up to three quarters - but the Biden administration is bound to attack its constitutional legality.

It comes as 2,000 migrants are crossing the frontier everyday, with Texas bearing the brunt of the crisis. Biden has failed to confront the spiraling humanitarian disaster at the border and even received criticism from within Democratic ranks.

Opponents have called Abbott's measure the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since a 2010 Arizona law - denounced by critics as the 'Show Me Your Papers' bill - that was largely struck down by the US Supreme Court.

The law will likely face a quick legal challenge by the White House, which has pushed back on the Governor's previous attempts to reduce the flow of migrants.

The law, known as SB4, takes effect in March and allows any Texas law enforcement officer to arrest people who are suspected of entering the country illegally. Those who re-enter face penalties ranging from 180 days in jail to 20 years in prison.

Abbott, who signed the law in front of a section of border fence in Brownsville, Texas, predicted the number of people crossing illegally into Texas would drop by 'well over 50 percent, maybe 75 percent.' He did not offer evidence for such an estimate. [VIDEO]
...

[legiteum]

I guess if blue states are allowed to take in as many immigrants as they want regardless of federal laws then this will probably be a deal that would work out for everybody, right?

[BADecker]

I guess if blue states are allowed to take in as many immigrants as they want regardless of federal laws then this will probably be a deal that would work out for everybody, right?

It might be a good idea if you could keep the illegals in the blue States.

The interesting thing is that over the last 150 years there were times when the US allowed and invited migrant workers to come up over the border. The difference is that this time the illegals are full of militant soldiers from many countries... coming into Mexico through many of its borders.

US citizens need to load up on guns if they want to keep their property and lives... mostly people in the blue States... because their local governments are often shutting down the police there.

[legiteum]

I guess if blue states are allowed to take in as many immigrants as they want regardless of federal laws then this will probably be a deal that would work out for everybody, right?

It might be a good idea if you could keep the illegals in the blue States.

The interesting thing is that over the last 150 years there were times when the US allowed and invited migrant workers to come up over the border. The difference is that this time the illegals are full of militant soldiers from many countries... coming into Mexico through many of its borders.

US citizens need to load up on guns if they want to keep their property and lives... mostly people in the blue States... because their local governments are often shutting down the police there.

Wow, militant soldiers are the worse kind of... soldiers. That sounds terrible.

[BADecker]

I guess if blue states are allowed to take in as many immigrants as they want regardless of federal laws then this will probably be a deal that would work out for everybody, right?

It might be a good idea if you could keep the illegals in the blue States.

The interesting thing is that over the last 150 years there were times when the US allowed and invited migrant workers to come up over the border. The difference is that this time the illegals are full of militant soldiers from many countries... coming into Mexico through many of its borders.

US citizens need to load up on guns if they want to keep their property and lives... mostly people in the blue States... because their local governments are often shutting down the police there.

Wow, militant soldiers are the worse kind of... soldiers. That sounds terrible.

Thanks for helping me get the word out.     

[Hispo]

I guess if blue states are allowed to take in as many immigrants as they want regardless of federal laws then this will probably be a deal that would work out for everybody, right?

It might be a good idea if you could keep the illegals in the blue States.

The interesting thing is that over the last 150 years there were times when the US allowed and invited migrant workers to come up over the border. The difference is that this time the illegals are full of militant soldiers from many countries... coming into Mexico through many of its borders.

US citizens need to load up on guns if they want to keep their property and lives... mostly people in the blue States... because their local governments are often shutting down the police there.

You gotta fix your narrative or tell Trump to fix his, because last time I checked his speeches, those who were crossing the border between Mexico and the United States (according to Trump) were coming from mental asylums from all over the world, not only mental asylums but also common hospitals, so while Trump implies those who are crossing into your country are people who could be medically disabled, you come here and imply otherwise, that those who are coming to your country could be militants from foreign regimes.
If I had to guess why you are contradicting your leader in such a way, I would say you are trying to switch the narrative from the ill / diseased people who could barely defend themselves towards something which is more effective in terms of further fear mongers those who are already willing to harbor xenophobic thoughts and stereotypes.
The fact is that xenophobia does not work the way you think it does, it does not matter whether someone is legally in the USA or not in the eyes of many in the Trunk base, because the people how are there legally do not wear an Armband all times for you to tell they are legal or not, the first things people notice is the color of their skin, their accent and their way to speak, whatever papers they have or lack in the pockets is irrelevant when racist people continue to push those kinds of narrative.

[BADecker]

Fortunately there are groups in all the States who have reasons for wanting their State to leave the US. They may not all be proponents of the ideals that Texas and California groups have for wanting to leave, but the secession idea is growing. Why? Because of the criminal acts of the US government, and because of having no need for a Federal government in this day of modern communications and transportation.

The difference with Texas is that Texas has wording right in their Organic Act with the US government. They have the right to voluntarily secede, written right into their Organic Act, where other States must request permission to secede.


Texas Secession Movement Scores Massive Victory Against Establishment Politics


https://banned.video/watch?id=658c769ad73929b3eef63825
Daniel Miller is President of the Texas Nationalist Movement and author of the book TEXIT: Why And How Texas Will Leave The Union. A featured guest on FoxNews, CNN, CNBC, BBC News, RT-TV and many other news outlets, Miller has been a vocal proponent of a fundamental reexamination of the relationship between all states in the Federal union. You can support Daniel and his work by visiting TNM.ME or following him on X @TheTexianDM.
...

[OgNasty]

What’s happening at the border really is insane. I can’t believe that even democrats aren’t screaming about what is happening. Worse, they’re hoping to keep voter laws muddy with regards to voter IDs with the thought these people will vote. It’s crazy to me that these immigrants can’t vote in their own countries without ID, but they can vote here…

[legiteum]

What’s happening at the border really is insane. I can’t believe that even democrats aren’t screaming about what is happening. Worse, they’re hoping to keep voter laws muddy with regards to voter IDs with the thought these people will vote. It’s crazy to me that these immigrants can’t vote in their own countries without ID, but they can vote here…

They can't vote here. There's no evidence any of them voting.

[Hispo]

What’s happening at the border really is insane. I can’t believe that even democrats aren’t screaming about what is happening. Worse, they’re hoping to keep voter laws muddy with regards to voter IDs with the thought these people will vote. It’s crazy to me that these immigrants can’t vote in their own countries without ID, but they can vote here…

They can't vote here. There's no evidence any of them vote.

Right, one must have evidence st hend when talking about something as serious as slledged massive voter fraud in the United States, using illegal immigrants to carry it all out.
Regardless of it, he has got a point when he talk about implementing voter IDs or some mechanism of identification so it is less likely for anyone to try to vote in behalf of anyone else. I wonder what are the counter points or alledged disadvantages about setting up an ID system for people to vote in the USA.
Last time I checked it was about people not having a reliable way to proof their citizenship, specially those who belong to the elderly population. But to me that does not make much sense, how is suppose to population of an entire county not be sure to be able to proof their citizenship? What would imply millions of them would not be able to apply for a passport of other national services which are supposed to be important entitlements.

In the case of my country, we indeed need to use both our finger prints and also our personal ID in order to vote.

[legiteum]

What’s happening at the border really is insane. I can’t believe that even democrats aren’t screaming about what is happening. Worse, they’re hoping to keep voter laws muddy with regards to voter IDs with the thought these people will vote. It’s crazy to me that these immigrants can’t vote in their own countries without ID, but they can vote here…

They can't vote here. There's no evidence any of them vote.

Right, one must have evidence st hend when talking about something as serious as slledged massive voter fraud in the United States, using illegal immigrants to carry it all out.
Regardless of it, he has got a point when he talk about implementing voter IDs or some mechanism of identification so it is less likely for anyone to try to vote in behalf of anyone else. I wonder what are the counter points or alledged disadvantages about setting up an ID system for people to vote in the USA.
Last time I checked it was about people not having a reliable way to proof their citizenship, specially those who belong to the elderly population. But to me that does not make much sense, how is suppose to population of an entire county not be sure to be able to proof their citizenship? What would imply millions of them would not be able to apply for a passport of other national services which are supposed to be important entitlements.

In the case of my country, we indeed need to use both our finger prints and also our personal ID in order to vote.

Voter ID is a solution in search of a problem. The US has almost no voter fraud at all--a few dozen cases out of billions of votes in the last few decades.

Republicans have been rebuffed in the past few years because after all of the hype and conspiracy theories, all they are doing is making voting a pain in the ass for no reason. Imagine they passed a law saying you need to prove your ability to pay before entering a restaurant: people would hate that (and restaurants would lose customers). Now imagine one of our political parties concocting a "crisis" around people coming to restaurants and not paying--even though there is absolutely no crisis. This is what the Republicans are doing here.

All that said, it would appear that Republicans have backed off the "voter fraud" thing a lot because they were probably suppressing their own voters as much as the other side.

[BADecker]

I guess if blue states are allowed to take in as many immigrants as they want regardless of federal laws then this will probably be a deal that would work out for everybody, right?

It might be a good idea if you could keep the illegals in the blue States.

The interesting thing is that over the last 150 years there were times when the US allowed and invited migrant workers to come up over the border. The difference is that this time the illegals are full of militant soldiers from many countries... coming into Mexico through many of its borders.

US citizens need to load up on guns if they want to keep their property and lives... mostly people in the blue States... because their local governments are often shutting down the police there.

You gotta fix your narrative or tell Trump to fix his, because last time I checked his speeches, those who were crossing the border between Mexico and the United States (according to Trump) were coming from mental asylums from all over the world, not only mental asylums but also common hospitals, so while Trump implies those who are crossing into your country are people who could be medically disabled, you come here and imply otherwise, that those who are coming to your country could be militants from foreign regimes.
If I had to guess why you are contradicting your leader in such a way, I would say you are trying to switch the narrative from the ill / diseased people who could barely defend themselves towards something which is more effective in terms of further fear mongers those who are already willing to harbor xenophobic thoughts and stereotypes.
The fact is that xenophobia does not work the way you think it does, it does not matter whether someone is legally in the USA or not in the eyes of many in the Trunk base, because the people how are there legally do not wear an Armband all times for you to tell they are legal or not, the first things people notice is the color of their skin, their accent and their way to speak, whatever papers they have or lack in the pockets is irrelevant when racist people continue to push those kinds of narrative.

You appear miss the point greatly. Regarding the things that I say that differ from the things that Trump says, I usually am repeating something somebody else says. However, most of the time when these things seem to be Trump contradictions, they are really in addition to. But you know this. At least you have shown yourself to be smart enough in the past. So, why are you playing dumb now? Could it be that you are against making America great again, too?

As for Trump being my leader, he's not. He is the leader of the United States Government... way more than Biden, even now. So, why is Trump putting up with the court cases and all, and how can he be the leader under these circumstances? Because he is allowing the Biden people to show their true colors. And average people - even poor blacks - are understanding more and more. That's why Trump's ratings are still going up. It's much easier for Trump and the rest of us to let the Dems destroy themselves than going out there and directly fighting them.