Judge orders Craig Wright to pay over $1M

[ABCbits]

$1m is too small, he should fine more. Lol. Sigh, this person is not yet done for what he wants that he will never get, ever.

I agree. I bet profit from deceiving people into buying BSV while believing BSV is true Bitcoin or that he's Satoshi far exceed $1M.

If i'm one of those who support him (which i will never be), i should drop it already lol. It's been a very long time already yet he didn't prove anything, because obviously he is fake.

I recall one of his major supporter already do such thing.

[jossiel]

$1M is easy fine for CSW and it should be more to stop this man from his madness.

He can easily pay that. I think that all of this distraction that he has been doing is all about for giving himself a favor to confuse people what really is the real bitcoin for which he's got as BSV.

Well, Coinbase is doing the right thing about his coin.

BREAKING! Coinbase To Delist Bitcoin SV (BSV) On January 9, 2024

[Lucius]

~snip~
Well, Coinbase is doing the right thing about his coin.

After years of supporting that scammer, do you think we should applaud them for that move? They don't do it for some noble reason, but because obviously no one trades with that shitcoin anymore. All those CEX who listed that fork coin just showed that they are no better than whoever is behind it, and that's the whole truth.

[AnonBitCoiner]

$1M is easy fine for CSW and it should be more to stop this man from his madness.

He can easily pay that. I think that all of this distraction that he has been doing is all about for giving himself a favor to confuse people what really is the real bitcoin for which he's got as BSV.

Well, Coinbase is doing the right thing about his coin.

BREAKING! Coinbase To Delist Bitcoin SV (BSV) On January 9, 2024

Good to see that Coinbase finally taking a Stand and delisting this Faketoshi's Shitcoin from their exchanges.. this coinbase delisting and $1 million court fine will teach him a good lesson. but as you said that is a small amount for this scammer, he can pay off this easily considering all the money he've made from BSV.

~snip~
Well, Coinbase is doing the right thing about his coin.

After years of supporting that scammer, do you think we should applaud them for that move? They don't do it for some noble reason, but because obviously no one trades with that shitcoin anymore. All those CEX who listed that fork coin just showed that they are no better than whoever is behind it, and that's the whole truth.

whatever Coinbase's intention is behind that delisting. I think that's a good move for Everyone who knows what is real bitcoin. it might be helpful for new users too to recognize what is the real Bitcoin. Craig Wright have been deceiving people for so many years.  if More CEX start to delist his coin. he'll loose all the supporters slowly.

[Kakmakr]

~snip~
Well, Coinbase is doing the right thing about his coin.

After years of supporting that scammer, do you think we should applaud them for that move? They don't do it for some noble reason, but because obviously no one trades with that shitcoin anymore. All those CEX who listed that fork coin just showed that they are no better than whoever is behind it, and that's the whole truth.

Lucius, those idiots did not support Craig Wright when they allowed his shitcoin to be traded, they were simply riding a profit potential opportunity, because Craig Wright gave them free marketing with all the controversy surrounding his shitcoin and his claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto.

They also knew that his supporters will buy into the whole hype scenario and they will profit by supporting it. They entered Bitcoin to make a profit and they keep with that business model when they make decisions like that. 

[Bananington]

That is the screenshot of the first paragraph on the articles provided by OP. This phrase is ridiculous 'The legal battle over Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity and Bitcoin rights'. Why would someone battling over to be recognized as Satoshi, they will get more problem than profit, and the real Satoshi knows that, that's why they choose to become anonymous, and the right for Bitcoin, what will they get by getting right to Bitcoin, it's a decentralized anyway.

There has always been more than one cases brought by these insane persons claiming to be Satoshi. I don't think there should much feud if one claims to be someone they aren't without proof. It just means they are lying.
Craige should have the means to pay off the fine because I believe he has the backings of some persons during his schemes.

News as this does much to separate the negative reviews brought about by fake crypto currency schemes just to erode or tarnish the reputation of the good and original idea of which BTC upholds.

[Lucius]

Lucius, those idiots did not support Craig Wright when they allowed his shitcoin to be traded, they were simply riding a profit potential opportunity, because Craig Wright gave them free marketing with all the controversy surrounding his shitcoin and his claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto.
~snip~

Everyone can interpret it in their own way, so even though I agree that the first priority for all of them is profit, all those who listed that coin gave CW Faketoshi direct support. Let's imagine what would happen if none of the top 10 CEX listed that coin?

I remember when @hodlonaut asked for the support of various CEXs in his fight against Faketoshi, but no one cared, except for one CEO who wanted to give him some tokens instead of BTC and thus promote his CEX.

[jossiel]

~snip~
Well, Coinbase is doing the right thing about his coin.

After years of supporting that scammer, do you think we should applaud them for that move? They don't do it for some noble reason, but because obviously no one trades with that shitcoin anymore. All those CEX who listed that fork coin just showed that they are no better than whoever is behind it, and that's the whole truth.

Yeah, I know that it's just for business purposes and they have to do the right thing. But it's not too late for them to do it so it's less beneficial for this fraud when it becomes delisted to Coinbase.

Good to see that Coinbase finally taking a Stand and delisting this Faketoshi's Shitcoin from their exchanges.. this coinbase delisting and $1 million court fine will teach him a good lesson. but as you said that is a small amount for this scammer, he can pay off this easily considering all the money he've made from BSV.

Not sure if that's going to teach him his lesson but this is just going to be the start of his misery if the other centralized exchanges will follow the same path as what Coinbase will.

That will have a huge impact on him if all of them will come together and will have the same decision of delisting BSV.

[Botnake]

Why is this person trying so hard to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto? If he was, he could simply login to this forum and make a post and clear it out.
What an idiot I would say. What's your thought on this?

He won't because he can't. Craig Wright is a fake satoshi but he will continue to claim that he is the real one because he probably is planning to promote something once he gain the trust of the people. Imagine if people would believe that he is satoshi, he can just be more than Elon Musk who could influence the crypto space by pumping a certain or coin or promote his own, that's a billion dollars easy money and it will erase all the expense he paid including this $1M that was reported.

[tread93]

I think the whole thing is ridiculous. And now apparently the same folks who split w/ BSV a portion of or that whole team created Ordinals? I'm not so sure I have been meaning to look more into that honestly. There is so much to this case that i've just stopped checking in on it. I remember when he had to report to WPB courthouse and was requesting to show up virtually instead of coming from like Australia or whereever the heck he is from lol

[Mr.right85]

Why is this person trying so hard to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto? If he was, he could simply login to this forum and make a post and clear it out.
What an idiot I would say. What's your thought on this?

It’s really funny though. Like. You know who you are and the someone is coming to tell you. “You ain’t this person” and you see the need to prove it even without anything at stake. Not like your getting to lose a suite at some 7star hotel or not been given the seat you deserve at some event.

I think what he’s been out for is the recognition/fame and his getting it, filling in for the vacuum Satoshi Nakamoto left which has been some of the backbone to the ever thriving Bitcoin.
Well, there are those who’ve hit the strength and funds to take up the case with him but, all I can do now is pay less attention to his continued blabbing like a babe. He’s just what I know him to be and that’s some attention seeking piece of nothing.

[Hamza2424]

Ahh, I wasn't active much in the Bitcoin section, seems like the creepy (  Craig Wright ) person is having some developments in his fictional claim and more likely this time he's facing another expected plenty.

Why this person doesn't just delete himself (from the internet ) haha that can be the only solution for him to repair the personality damage. TBH no one cares about him at least now. I remember I knew nothing about him and his claims, but a post based on the Reddit on this section putted some light for me to study what happened and what he did a few months back.

[Lucius]

Yeah, I know that it's just for business purposes and they have to do the right thing. But it's not too late for them to do it so it's less beneficial for this fraud when it becomes delisted to Coinbase.

Some will say that it's never too late to do the right thing, but I'm not one of those people who can be bought with cheap tricks - if you've been consciously working against Bitcoin for years, then regardless of today's moves, you're still a villain. It's been several years since @fillippone opened a topic about that CEX, so even though the reasons were different, we can still agree that Coinbase the most anti-Bitcoin organisation. Make #DeleteCoinbase great again

[Cookdata]

The legal battle over Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity and Bitcoin rights has taken another turn in recent days, with a British judge rescheduling the trial between Craig Wright and Bitcoin Core developers for Feb. 5.

Why is this person trying so hard to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto? If he was, he could simply login to this forum and make a post and clear it out.
What an idiot I would say. What's your thought on this?

This clown guy is trying so hard to be something he is not.
I'm not sure about the authenticity of this but I think there is a wallet they said Satoshi has that has bitcoin worth a million in it, why didn't Craig prove that to the court and sign a message from the private key or the court is too daft to aske for such evidence or they are enjoying his entertainment.

One thing is clear about this guy, he is trying to live a legacy he didn't build and this could be because he thinks Satoshi will not come public to deny that or trying to claim he is the rightful owner of bitcoin. If Craig is really the original developer of bitcoin, no way he is going to come public and open to people because there are people at the top that want to really have Satoshi under their custody and even the US has never for once invite Craig since he started this madness.

Craig is just attention seeking clown.

[bananaunana]

Of course he can recover the account if he is indeed a real Satoshi.

But Craig Wright is not Satoshi and he won't be able to recover Satoshi's Bitcointalk account.
He will keep making false claims, of course.

He will remain a scammer.

[JoyMarsha]

Judge orders Craig Wright to pay over $1M, accepts new evidence over Satoshi’s identity

The legal battle over Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity and Bitcoin rights has taken another turn in recent days, with a British judge rescheduling the trial between Craig Wright and Bitcoin Core developers for Feb. 5.

Why is this person trying so hard to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto? If he was, he could simply login to this forum and make a post and clear it out.
What an idiot I would say. What's your thought on this?

Someone would want to claim something he is not, at his own expense. That's not being stupid. I find it strange that someone would try to make himself seem so much more important than he actually is, even if it means spending a lot of money to convince people that he is the real Satoshi even though he knows they won't accept or believe it if it is true, if he also can't sign a message with a Satoshi wallet so that everyone can see that he is the real Satoshi.

[pinggoki]

$1m is too small, he should fine more. Lol. Sigh, this person is not yet done for what he wants that he will never get, ever.
If i'm one of those who support him (which i will never be), i should drop it already lol. It's been a very long time already yet he didn't prove anything, because obviously he is fake.

He won't be done anytime soon, I'm sure that he's got more up his sleeves when it comes to the proof that he's the real Satoshi Nakamoto. Totally agree with you that the fine should be higher but I think that there's other ways to make sure that he suffers even more like having a limited access to the Internet in terms of hours per day if not total restricted access to the Internet, that man's going to be experiencing withdrawal because he's not getting enough time online or you know, house arrest if not jail time. I feel bad for those that still on his side though, they might know it already that he's lying but their pride and dignity is at stake so they still continue to support him, I guess they should be careful when people like this pops up in their lives again.