[ANN] Game of Mages Token ($MAGIO). Play To Earn. Everyone can become a Mage!

[holydarkness]

...instead of something like "2.5% to early investors" and "2.5% to team", or that you said,

If we had planned to do so, we would have written so.

Solana, marketing services, and time spent on development are all investments in the game that we are ready to accept in swap for tokens intended for early investors.

If you have something that can be useful to us, welcome, you can also become an early investor.

LMAO, you're an interesting one, aren't you? You continue on contradicting yourself. First you don't have an allocation for your team, and then you decided to share the early investors pre-sale token with the team because they are "early investors" [paid in time] upon being asked if the tokenomy changed, and after talking in circles, you said that it was the plan from the beginning, and now, when asked why doesn't it show dedicated allocation for team, you said as quoted above.

And regarding the team, I assume that means the decision was made by the two full time employees? Or the part-time also has a vote?

I think we'll leave the process of making internal decisions outside the scope of this correspondence.

Actually, I'll beg to differ and say that the process of making decision of changing tokenomy shouldn't be internal or even happening at all. You ask for a funding here through token sale, it is very unethical to change your business proposal, the one that people use as one of their consideration to invest in your project by buying your token, unilaterally through your internal team's decision, i.e. because you deemed it fit. It doesn't evoke much confidence at all, does it? If it has to happen, it should be through your community agreement.

[Game of Mages]

LMAO, you're an interesting one, aren't you? You continue on contradicting yourself. First you don't have an allocation for your team, and then you decided to share the early investors pre-sale token with the team because they are "early investors" [paid in time] upon being asked if the tokenomy changed, and after talking in circles, you said that it was the plan from the beginning, and now, when asked why doesn't it show dedicated allocation for team, you said as quoted above.

We're walking in circles.

a) we don't have separate tokens for the team (and never have);
b) for us, the team is the same investors (and it has been so from the very beginning).

This may be unusual for you, but it's true.

Actually, I'll beg to differ and say that the process of making decision of changing tokenomy shouldn't be internal or even happening at all. You ask for a funding here through token sale, it is very unethical to change your business proposal, the one that people use as one of their consideration to invest in your project by buying your token, unilaterally through your internal team's decision, i.e. because you deemed it fit. It doesn't evoke much confidence at all, does it? If it has to happen, it should be through your community agreement.

In fact, we do not even request any financing and do not make any business proposal, but inform the community about our project (including the opportunity to purchase tokens before the release of the game at a big discount).

Firstly, we are looking for those who will be interested in playing the game. We will listen to the opinions of users, but we will make the final decisions on how to develop the project ourselves. With all due regard.

There are no plans to change the tokenomics of the project and never have been. We will stick to what is described in the documentation.

But there is always a small chance that conditions will change and what is relevant now will become irrelevant in the future. We will respond to such challenges.

[holydarkness]

[...]
a) we don't have separate tokens for the team (and never have);
b) for us, the team is the same investors (and it has been so from the very beginning).

This may be unusual for you, but it's true.

This previous statement seems to contradict the one above? Or was it just me thinking so?

[...]
However, now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers from tokens intended for early investors - time spent is a more serious investment than money.[...]

As evidenced, the statement was "now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers" instead of "we haveve allocated token to the team and volunteer"

In fact, we do not even request any financing and do not make any business proposal, but inform the community about our project (including the opportunity to purchase tokens before the release of the game at a big discount).

Again, contradictory to the earlier post,

In the future, funds received for tokens put up for open sale will be used to support the development.

This is not asking for financing?

[Game of Mages]

This previous statement seems to contradict the one above? Or was it just me thinking so?

I don't see any contradictions. It seems to me that you misunderstood something somewhere, but I can't explain it to you.

Again, contradictory to the earlier post,

In the future, funds received for tokens put up for open sale will be used to support the development.

This is not asking for financing?

No, this is not an ask for financing. Any player who is interested in playing the Game of Mages will use MAGIO for their game grow.
Tokens in the open sale will be intended for players.

[holydarkness]

This previous statement seems to contradict the one above? Or was it just me thinking so?

I don't see any contradictions. It seems to me that you misunderstood something somewhere, but I can't explain it to you.

Ohh, take your time, no need to rush, do try to explain. I believe I am not the only one misunderstood, your careful and clear explanation might help us get some sense of what you actually planned.

No, this is not an ask for financing. Any player who is interested in playing the Game of Mages will use MAGIO for their game grow.
Tokens in the open sale will be intended for players.

And the fund gained from these token sold are intended to...?

[Game of Mages]

Ohh, take your time, no need to rush, do try to explain. I believe I am not the only one misunderstood, your careful and clear explanation might help us get some sense of what you actually planned.

All information about the initial distribution tokens is on the page https://gameofmages.com/docs/en/token. Info hasn't changed since the beginning. If you have any additional questions, I will answer them.

And the fund gained from these token sold are intended to...?

To cover the operating costs of maintaining the game.

[holydarkness]

Ohh, take your time, no need to rush, do try to explain. I believe I am not the only one misunderstood, your careful and clear explanation might help us get some sense of what you actually planned.

All information about the initial distribution tokens is on the page https://gameofmages.com/docs/en/token. Info hasn't changed since the beginning. If you have any additional questions, I will answer them.

And the fund gained from these token sold are intended to...?

To cover the operating costs of maintaining the game.

Oh well, I clearly don't understand about your tokenomy, the part about presale to early investor and that statement about "now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers from tokens intended for early investors".

And the fund gained from token sale, aside from to cover the operating cost, it'll also be used to develop the game?

[Game of Mages]

The first of our users received 0.24 SOL in a pre-launch airdrop. Congratulations!

A transaction on the blockchain: https://solscan.io/tx/v7rqb9R7x3xLun6ZZYVDSZBUT8VbJZvVMm2T2Wtt5KfRNWxiZpMtxazUbFc2bJaZCLVF3cw34HihDE4fCq5XBDw

The law of large numbers worked. The first winner was our very first investor, who had more than 20 Dragon Eggs NFT in his wallet.



And the answers to the questions.

Oh well, I clearly don't understand about your tokenomy, the part about presale to early investor and that statement about "now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers from tokens intended for early investors".

Not "now", but "always".

And the fund gained from token sale, aside from to cover the operating cost, it'll also be used to develop the game?

Yes, it's an online game. If there is more funding, then we will be able to add new features and quests more often.

There will be less funding - in this case, the development will be slow.

[holydarkness]

And the answers to the questions.

Oh well, I clearly don't understand about your tokenomy, the part about presale to early investor and that statement about "now we are allocating tokens to the team and volunteers from tokens intended for early investors".

Not "now", but "always".

And the fund gained from token sale, aside from to cover the operating cost, it'll also be used to develop the game?

Yes, it's an online game. If there is more funding, then we will be able to add new features and quests more often.

There will be less funding - in this case, the development will be slow.

It's in your own statement, "now" which only later revised to "'always", as can be understood by anyone reading the previous page. And the "extra fund", will be used to add new features and quests, in other words to develop, where less funding will result in slower development, it's not asking for financing, which also known as funding?

[Game of Mages]

It's in your own statement, "now" which only later revised to "'always", as can be understood by anyone reading the previous page. And the "extra fund", will be used to add new features and quests, in other words to develop, where less funding will result in slower development, it's not asking for financing, which also known as funding?

What do you mean by "asking for financing"? We're not asking anyone for anything.

[holydarkness]

It's in your own statement, "now" which only later revised to "'always", as can be understood by anyone reading the previous page. And the "extra fund", will be used to add new features and quests, in other words to develop, where less funding will result in slower development, it's not asking for financing, which also known as funding?

What do you mean by "asking for financing"? We're not asking anyone for anything.

You are offering your token to be sold, some of them will be used for operating cost, some will be used to develop the game further. If I may give another word to describe the current situation: you developed an MVP, and then opening yourself for funding, in form of token sale, in order to develop further and to cover the operating cost --and to compensate the dev team.

[Game of Mages]

You are offering your token to be sold, some of them will be used for operating cost, some will be used to develop the game further. If I may give another word to describe the current situation: you developed an MVP, and then opening yourself for funding, in form of token sale, in order to develop further and to cover the operating cost --and to compensate the dev team.

Yes, you're right.

But this is not a "asking for financing", we will start our project on self-financing. Tokens are important to us as game assets, which are more under the control of the player than non-tokenized game assets.

Of course, if someone supports us, it will help us, if not, we will handle the development on our own.

[Game of Mages]

✨ The New Year Lottery 2024 draw took place today!

The first block on January 13 was block #241467978, but the winner was determined by block #241468092.

🎉 The winner was the holder of Dragon Eggs NFT #5603. Congratulations! 🎉

We will check again tomorrow that there was no mistake in summing up the results and on January 15 we will transfer the prize of 2.024 SOL to the winner's address.

[Game of Mages]

Work on the launch of the game continues.

🪄  Introducing the starting avatars of the game's characters:

[Game of Mages]

According to the tokenomics of the Game, to ensure the value of the MAGIO token, from 40% to 55% of the tokens exchanged for game values are burned.

Today, on February 4, the first burning of 4.5M MAGIO tokens received from the minting of the Dragon Eggs NFT took place.

Transaction Details: https://solscan.io/tx/649WaLt99jAssBhtAMJHjR7fcEBep6gpCE69Dx7rcZ2sr5p3aJvayddNcakVxetxJdHiMDT1nMiWvRB9Je9DfSmR

[Game of Mages]

We recall that the pre-launch airdrop of Magio tokens continues, and inform that the airdrop will be completed on February 25.

Log in to our website's Member Area and every day claim rewards in MAGIO, collect Magic Snowflakes or win a prize in Solana.

[Game of Mages]

✨ The current airdrop is over. All rewards will be transferred to your personal account in the game.

Summarize:
✨ almost 9 million MAGIO tokens have been paid;
🎟 140 lottery tickets have been registered to participate in the NFT-lottery.

An egg of the Legendary Emerald Dragon (Dragon Eggs #3868) will be raffled off among the ticket holders.

💸 We also decided to give the TOP 3 players small rewards in Solana based on collected magic snowflakes.
🥇 Sindbad (958778) | 22 ❄️ | 0.24 SOL
🥈 Omar (679206) |18 ❄️| 0.16 SOL
🥉 User#251042 |17 ❄️| 0.08 SOL

Rewards have already been awarded in member area, they can be withdrawn to the blockchain.

🪄 We're starting soon. Stay tuned!

[Game of Mages]

The game starts on March 17, 2024

🪄 All users will be moved to the game area.

✨ Now you can purchase MAGIO tokens for the game on the Famous Token Market from early users.

✨ Also, until the end of March, you can purchase tokens with a 67% discount by emailing us. Offers from 10 SOL are accepted.

[Game of Mages]

🎁 The Legendary Emerald Dragon (Dragon Eggs #3868) drawing will be held on March 13, Wednesday.


✨ To determine the winner, we slightly changed the rules that we used earlier to determine the winner of the New Year's Lottery in order to choose the winner without going through the blocks.

The detailed rules are in our discord.

[Game of Mages]

✨ The Legendary Emerald Dragon (Dragon Eggs #3868) draw took place today!

The first block on March 13 was #253808888.

🎉 The winner was the holder of ticket #872128 (user Disciple#872128). Congratulations! 🎉

The Dragon Eggs NFT #3868 will be sent today to the winner's address specified in the member area.