In The Span Of six months what will make you trust a new casino

[Westinhome]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

The most acceptable phenomenon in the forum was the trusted background of the owners and bankroll never being the trusted gambling site.If the gambling site had the funds for the gambling advertising like review and signature campaign,it mean that the gambling site would have enough funds to handle such campaign.So the gambling site will have the funds for the players who have win the game in their gambling site.This was the basic reason why many trusted gambling site hosting the signature and review campaigns in the forum.It also help to the visibility of the game signature in the forum,this help the gambler to use of that gambling site.

[Slow death]

In my case it depends on 2 scenarios. in scenario 1, if I am a participant in the casino's subscription campaign, I will have to trust the casino during the period in which I am part of the casino's subscription campaign, after that I would just spend playing with little money until the casino has more time operating, even if it had been running for 2 years, I wouldn't put a lot of money into the new casino if I had a lot of money. As I always follow my responsible gaming rules, I am always very careful not to use too many casinos, I only use a few casinos so that I am not putting money in that I cannot afford to lose. Now in scenario 2 where I have never seen the casino before and never participated in the casino's subscription campaign, I keep doing research on the internet to see the casino's reputation

and in the research I do, I look for negative comments about the casino and I'm not interested in the positive comments about the casino, because most of the time the positive comments are fake and don't reflect reality, when I see that the casino has a lot of negative comments and I see that in this forum there are accusations of scams, so I use the casino and I prefer to continue using the old casino which is more reliable. The truth is that using a new casino is not easy, and the person needs to be very cautious and not put too much money into the new casino, I always give exe advice, but I'm always shocked when someone comes to this forum to complain about a new casino and I see that this person deposited a lot of money, I'm wondering what kind of courage this could be

[acroman08]

I chose a responsive representative, getting complaints and scam accusations is inevitable at some point and having a responsive representative will be a great way to address those issues. I want to see a representative who properly handles and acknowledges issues that might be presented to them. 

good reviews from casino review sites and launching a review and signature campaign is not really a great way to base someone's trust in a casino.

[goldkingcoiner]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

I very much rely on the good reviews from trusted members in the Bitcointalk community. If a casino does not have a good reputation here, then I will not even look into it. It is just too risky. And casino review sites are absolutely not trustworthy in my personal opinion, since many of the reviews can be easily faked by some anonymous "reviewers". Also a good community management shows that the casino is trying to communicate with their members.

But if the casino has even one justified scam accusation, which is unresolved, then I will also avoid that casino.

[babygun]

I chose a responsive representative, getting complaints and scam accusations is inevitable at some point and having a responsive representative will be a great way to address those issues. I want to see a representative who properly handles and acknowledges issues that might be presented to them. 

good reviews from casino review sites and launching a review and signature campaign is not really a great way to base someone's trust in a casino.

I agree, an active representation here to handle issues and critic will help for credibility. And in my eyes, if some established members write a positive review (i.e. Efialtis with BTCGOSU), than it further helps to increase the trust in a new casino as it is based on their own opinion and not biased (or paid by the casino).

[bitvalak]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

The points you mentioned are consistent with each other to create my perception that the new casino platform is credible.
About positive reviews on websites, can you trust them 100%? of course not right.
Therefore, to determine whether it is good or not, we also have to look at other factors that are interconnected.

But if asked to choose one, the most important point for me is a fast response from a representative, not a template answer that we often encounter on gambling sites usually.

[Antotena]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

My definition trust comes with my satisfaction and other people satisfaction without any form of cheating anyone. Most of the things you said aren't necessary to trust a campaign like for instance, a casino can launch a signature that will last the time they want in the Forum only to disappear one night. I have run over some old threads in the reputation board with similar situations.

I think Scam accusation is normal, anyone can disagree with a casino and open an allegation against them but when it becomes a normal thing, then they need to be call to order. 1xbit was guilty of that, they made every player looks like a fool, log them out of there accounts and refused to make ammendment about them to date, I think I will go with this this one.

A representative doesn't mean anything, it's just like a person a person that can represent a company, even an account can be bought here to do that and it can end up badly if things escalate badly.

Good reviews might give some intail but if a casino has the intention of pulling a scam, they are going to do it in a way that they will hide somethings from the public, this is not enough to trust a casino. I think out of the options you gave, scam accusation in the long run matters a lot.

[darkangel11]

Since we are in this forum, I'll choose "No complain or scam accusation".

When we trust a gambling site, it always based on their reputation, if they don't have a scam accusation after 6 months of operation, that could only mean that they are an honest casino in providing their service.

That's what most people chose, but there's a catch. What if the casino doesn't have many clients?
They start small, make an ANN thread, first week they only get 5 people to test them out, next week another 10 or so... They try to be fair towards their first clients, offering bonuses, rakeback, free rolls, because they want positive reviews. In the first few months there's only 100 people who played there and none of them were scammed... Doesn't mean the casino isn't planning to run with the money when it reaches enough traffic. We all know casinos that looked fair at first and then did an exit scam. The scam accusation forum is full of them.

There's no single point that makes a casino look trusted. I'd say all of the points listed by OP are important.

[Mr.right85]

Even the best of casinos or sportsbook still get some scam accusations here on the forum and even outside the forum. One of the reasons to this is due to the fact that, you can never satisfy all customers and not all customers have got the best intention for the casino or sportsbook neither will you find everyone of them playing within the terms of service. So yeah, having tjis at the back of your mind, you will always find those scam accusations popping up.

Where I would peg my stake is;
There customer service and approach towards issue resolution.
I think these tells the most of a gambling site that is determined to stay long in the business. It’s not just about the game offerings but, the attention you give to ensuring proper reputation and representation of your brand. Having a good name could be everything and not just on the forum but as a brand to all.

[alastantiger]

Launching a review and signature campaign
Launching a review and signature campaign is at the bottom of my list. A review campaign has only one time clients most of the time. A signature campaign is just an advert. It doesn't measure a casino trust or not.

No complaints or scam accusations?
Yes. This is more like it. Zero scam accusations is a good indicator of a reputable casino. Reputable casinos have trust.

Very responsive representative here?
Yes. I have a problem, I send a message, you respond quick. You automatically gain my trust. And not just my trust but loyalty when it is consistent.

Good reviews from casino review sites?
No. Anyone can write a review for a few bucks. I'll take their reviews with a grain of salt.

[letteredhub]

In trusting a new casino here I'll go with all the options except for the last which is about reviews from review sites many of those reviews found under review sites are actually not what they mean in terms of sincerity as they are a lot of paid reviews in the interest of the casino. But above all I'll holding on to their reputation which everything op mentioned falls under it, when a casino has a good reputation there's no other thing to be worried about regarding their services from deposit to withdrawal and all the rest.

[Rruchi man]

Launching a review and signature campaign?

We have seen scam casino's launch and run signature campaigns.

No complaints or scam accusations?

Yes, this is critical and important. No scam accusations, and quickly resolved complaints is a sign of credibility and seriousness.

Very responsive representative here?

This is a good criteria, because an active representative will be quick to answer to any complaint from any one here in this forum.

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Reviews are good, but they cannot always be trusted.

[Dump3er]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

You mentioned a couple of important things and I will go over them first.

Launching a review campaign would be more trust-engendering to me than launching a signature campaign. If a casino pays for getting scrutinized, I think that is a good sign.

No complaints and scam accusations, I think that one is a no-brainer although it requires some thorough perception from the users when they see a scam accusation as that could as well be unjustified or a smear campaign against a new competitor.

Responsiveness is always important although this leads me to my next point: if everything works flawlessly, obviously the deposits and even more so the withdrawals, responsiveness becomes kind of secondary. The best would be if no issues arise in the first place.

Depending on the standing of the casino review site, then yes it would be very valuable. If the review site itself has a great reputation, it surely reflects positively upon the casino if it's a good review.

[Tipstar]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

Review and signature campaign are a good thing and is part of the overall advertisement. They should be able to attract new users to try and experience the platform.
There can be complains but how they handle is more important. Specially the newer ones need to be very cautious about your image in early days. Even a few stupid users with their stupid complains may play against you.
Responsive representative is a part of overall customer service and that includes response to complaints.
Review from casino review site doesn't hold any importance as we know it's buyable. Better to focus on trustpilot reviews.

[komisariatku]

~snip~

Honestly, I'd rather try a casino that has a signature campaign on this forum. Why is that? because when a casino tries to carry out promotions seriously then it can be a reference that the casino has high dedication in developing its casino. So I felt that was enough to get me interested in trying their casino

Apart from that, I also usually read feedback written by other members on the ANN thread. Then what is the user interface of the site and also how many games do they have. After trying it I will know how the experience at the casino is, if I am comfortable then maybe I will continue playing there and if not maybe I will just try and not go back there again.

[Jawhead999]

Isn't having all of them makes people convinced if the casino is legitimate?

No paid advertising, no scam accusation, responsive, good review = low traffic.
Have paid advertising, have scam accusation, responsive, good review = people will give a time for the casino to resolve/make a decision.
No paid advertising, no scam accusation, not responsive, good review = some people might call them unprofessional.
No paid advertising, no scam accusation, responsive, no good review = looks fine, since people trust the reviews more in this site instead of third parties.

[btc_angela]

I voted for: No complain or scam accusation

I mean they can run their signature campaign here in the beginning or even for months then suddenly when a Scam accusations is raised against them, they didn't close it even if there is a overwhelming proof that it seems to be a scam to us.

And suddenly that campaign will disappear as they've lost their reputation already.

[retreat]

I chose "No complaints or scam accusations", because 6 months is enough time to be able to prove how the services provided by the casino platform are, whether they are good or bad. Later this will be proven by the large number of users who complain or open threads about scam accusations, if there are very few complaints and the representatives are very responsive in handling user complaints, I think that will be enough to convince me to use the casino.

[ethereumhunter]

If I could choose all of those options, I would choose them all because they are requirements so that we can start putting trust in the casino. If one of those options weren't available, I would have waited longer to see the response from friends here and to read further reviews.

But the best answer is "No complaints or scam accusations" because this will give a sign that the casino is on the right track and they can continue to promote the casino. And that will make people start to trust the casino because the casino can maintain its business well. Additionally, if there are no complain or scam accusation, the casino is always trying to be honest with its members.

[arwin100]

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

Launching a review and signature campaign maybe a plus factor for me but doesn't give much weight since anyone can operate a that campaigns so that they can market their casino very well.

What's more important for me is they don't have complains or scam accusation since it can determine that they are good casino since no people claiming something about bad experiences happen to them while gambling on their casino. Also very responsive representative is good addition to have since this could make all question answer more faster and they can give some confidence to people that they will be taken care if there's issue will happen to them.

Good reviews can be manipulated so I don't give much attention on it especially if they have given good feedbacks on unreputable sites.