Admin/Mods: Please ban "jvanname"

[JollyGood]

Please check this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478320.msg63373409#msg63373409

You refused to verify your identity by simply changing the TikTok comment? You are asking for money in advance before you verify your identity? You are a scammer.

Well, on that note after reading your nonsensical excuse to not verify your real identity, it is clear you are not whom you claim to be and you are simply tainting the name of someone you have a grudge against. You went through all this charade just for the sake of taking every opportunity in every post you made, just to ensure you posted his name thus tried to associate him with the utter nonsense you continue to post.

I have added you to my ignore list and have also left appropriate negative trust for impersonating someone from the Department of Mathematics & Statistics from a University.

Are you going to add a video to the profile here: https://www.tiktok.com/@jvanname

Are you going to change the TikTok profile from: "Ph.D. in Math. All algorithms are my own." to "The people on this site promote violence against me"

As mentioned before, the smart money is on you coming up with a multitude of pathetic excuses why will be unable modify the text of your own TikTok account but we are all ears. Well?

My services are not free. Please pay me at https://github.com/sponsors/jvanname if you want me to prove myself to you. And then please pay me at https://github.com/sponsors/jvanname for the damages that you have caused by your defamation and annoyances.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

================================================

This "jvanname" account pretends to be the real Joseph Van Name Ph.D. from the University of Florida. He is asking for money before he is willing to verify his identity.

Please ban this account either for soliciting for money under the guise of hijacking the name of a reputable member of society (the real Joseph Van Name Ph.D. from the University of Florida) or for flooding the Reputation board with utter nonsense that should not be allowed to remain.

We are after all hoping to have a forum free from spam.

[1714316760]

1714316760

[1714316760]

1714316760

[1714316760]

1714316760

[1714316760]

1714316760

[JollyGood]

No, I decided to ask the fake "jvanname" to prove he is who he claims to be but he asked for money instead: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478320.msg63373409#msg63373409

Also, a look at his feedbacks shows he has been accused of fraudulent activity going back to 2021 when he asked members to pay money to join his Telegram group but later banned them and did not give refunds. There is a pattern at work here and that is because he is a scammer that is impersonating someone else.

Have you tried to contact the "real" Joseph Van Name?

[philipma1957]

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

his reason is I am stupid.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1043276

his trust numbers are low and he has given only negative trusts with one exception.

I would red flag him and would consider any one that gave him merits to also not that reliable.

But It is the Christmas Season so I will simply wish him a merry fucking christmas as he like fucking people here via the trust ratings he gives.

if you read his first thread compared to his newer threads he seems to have had a change for the worse.

Assuming that he really is the true guy. It appears to me he now suffers from mental illness.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1985289.msg19770722#msg19770722

he started this thread above in 2017

[Poker Player]

I second the motion. Having a retard like that who keeps opening stupid threads while boasting about his supposed superiority because of his supposed PhD does not bring anything good to the forum.

[Vod]

Have you tried to contact the "real" Joseph Van Name?

This would be the best step.   Send the reply to Mr. T. for a quick ban.

But banning for claiming to be someone else would start a precedent, and lead to a lot of extra work.   If you think someone is a liar, go out an expose them.

[Majestic-milf]

 Initially, I felt @JG was asking for a ban for @jvanname simply because he was just obnoxious and he seemed to treat everyone here as serfs beneath him but after going through what was said I feel he deserves to be banned. Who would ask for a fee to reveal their identity these days though? I guess the PhD degree is really getting into him or probably some screws are getting loose for him to feel the world revolves around his little bald head( assuming he's bald )!
 Just to be sure, if he gets banned, what's the assurance that he won't create another account and continue what he's doing here? Asides from him acting like the universe stole his birthright, I've really not had any other issues with him. For me, he's just like a grumpy entertainer who's actually good at what he does and I quite agree with @Vod's suggestion to handle the matter.

[ABCbits]

Just to be sure, if he gets banned, what's the assurance that he won't create another account and continue what he's doing here? Asides from him acting like the universe stole his birthright, I've really not had any other issues with him. For me, he's just like a grumpy entertainer who's actually good at what he does and I quite agree with @Vod's suggestion to handle the matter.

Evading ban isn't allowed on this forum. So if that happens, he might feel frustrated seeing his alt account got banned or nuked (where all of his thread/post also deleted). And it seems he always include name and degree title on end of the post.

[joker_josue]

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

When a user is banned, what is the trust they give?
Are they removed from users who received them, or does it stay there forever?

[jvannameIsFraud]

ban? go NUKE that user insteed, its posts is garbage anyway

[Igebotz]

This "jvanname" account pretends to be the real Joseph Van Name Ph.D. from the University of Florida. He is asking for money before he is willing to verify his identity.

Please ban this account either for soliciting for money under the guise of hijacking the name of a reputable member of society (the real Joseph Van Name Ph.D. from the University of Florida) or for flooding the Reputation board with utter nonsense that should not be allowed to remain.

We are after all hoping to have a forum free from spam.

As Vod has stated, if you suspect someone is impersonating a public figure, the first thing you do is go out and prove that he is not who he claims to be. You are the accuser, and the accused has nothing to prove. The conclusion that he is an impostor because he did not modify a comment on one of his TikTok videos does not hold water.

When did theymos start banning people for impersonation? Isn't that the purpose of the DT system? If you have credible evidence that he is not who he claims to be, the best course of action is to tag, ignore, and move on.

[acroman08]

that guy is unhinged, as I mentioned in the only post I made on one of his threads, that guy has an extreme case of self-righteousness. it'll be a waste of time to argue with people like that.

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

When a user is banned, what is the trust they give?
Are they removed from users who received them, or does it stay there forever?

as far as I know, the tag stays just like the posts the account made before being banned.

[joker_josue]

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

When a user is banned, what is the trust they give?
Are they removed from users who received them, or does it stay there forever?

as far as I know, the tag stays just like the posts the account made before being banned.

This is a bit unfair, continuing with the tag after the account has been banned.
If an account has been banned, the match is no longer trustworthy/credible. So why continue with the tags he left?

[acroman08]

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

When a user is banned, what is the trust they give?
Are they removed from users who received them, or does it stay there forever?

as far as I know, the tag stays just like the posts the account made before being banned.

This is a bit unfair, continuing with the tag after the account has been banned.
If an account has been banned, the match is no longer trustworthy/credible. So why continue with the tags he left?

I am not entirely sure and don't take my word for it but I vaguely remember reading somewhere here in the forum that one of the reasons the tag remains was that the ban has nothing to do with the tag that was given or the tag that was given by the banned account was valid with proper proof.

[uchegod-21]

Admin/Mods: Please ban "jvanname"

Has anyone been banned in the forum in the past because someone called them out to be banned? I'm just curious to know

Have you tried to contact the "real" Joseph Van Name?

This would be difficult for Jollygood, so he chose the easy path by asking the unknown to prove he is the known.

Have you tried to contact the "real" Joseph Van Name?

This would be the best step.   Send the reply to Mr. T. for a quick ban.

When I joined here newly, I heard about;
Lauda,
T-Man
And Vod.
The last name has reappeared, who knows if the first two will be the surprises of 2024.

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

his reason is I am stupid.

LOL

[philipma1957]

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

When a user is banned, what is the trust they give?
Are they removed from users who received them, or does it stay there forever?

as far as I know, the tag stays just like the posts the account made before being banned.

This is a bit unfair, continuing with the tag after the account has been banned.
If an account has been banned, the match is no longer trustworthy/credible. So why continue with the tags he left?

I am only human I do not deserve a perfect record.

  Actually I think it is the real person and that he sees reverse computing as an achievable real thing.  
Only he has not been smart enough to make it happen thus he blames all of us on this forum for his own failure to manifest reverse computing into the 'real' world.
   I have a partner that actually believes in flat earth theory so far he can't prove it and gets a bit frustrated about that. My self being 'stupid' I know shit like reverse computing and flat earth are above my pay grade.
  I also care for a person suffering dementia and have spent 3 long stays in psychiatric wards back in the early 80's (hallucinations drugs) so I know crazy when I am faced with it.
 I usually do not bother trying to fix it. I tend to let it be.

[digaran]

Well, you should be thankful you are not me, deserving 1 tag per week. 😒 now imagine how ph.D would feel, no friends, a totally dead coin that nobody buys or mines, posts getting deleted, everyone attacking him, having the delusion of being a math ph.D, and on top of that getting banned. I kind of feel his pain.

[SamReomo]

I'm not sure that if he deserves a ban or not buyt this guy is totally out of his mind and I believe someone with sane mindset should avoid any conversation with someone like him. He's one of the strangest members I have ever found on this forum because he's someone who doesn't listen to anyone and doesn't understand anything either.

I also believe that strong action should be taken against him if he continues to do something that's against the rules of the forum. As far as I know trolling and freedom of speech is allowed on this forum but if someone breaks the rules of the forum then it's necessary to take some action against that user.

[LTU_btc]

Thanks for raising this question. This user offens everyone who don't agree with him and then pretends that he is victim. I think he have some mental problems, but it's not an excuse. Such things can't be tolerated. But I'm not sure what can be done. Banning him would be an option, but I'm not sure about it. During my time here I saw worse and more annoying trolls, but I don't think that they got banned. I doubt that he earned to be permabanned, but he deserves at least temporrary ban to cooldown.

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

his reason is I am stupid.

You've been here for more than 11 years, you're one of the most active forum members and only now you got your first enemy? What I can say - impreesive.

[philipma1957]

Thanks for raising this question. This user offens everyone who don't agree with him and then pretends that he is victim. I think he have some mental problems, but it's not an excuse. Such things can't be tolerated. But I'm not sure what can be done. Banning him would be an option, but I'm not sure about it. During my time here I saw worse and more annoying trolls, but I don't think that they got banned. I doubt that he earned to be permabanned, but he deserves at least temporrary ban to cooldown.

Well he also is the only person to give me a negative trust.

his reason is I am stupid.

You've been here for more than 11 years, you're one of the most active forum members and only now you got your first enemy? What I can say - impreesive.

He is my second enemy and I have a frenemy.

So 3 people in 11 years and 40,000 plus posts is pretty good record.


I had a perfect record on ebay till someone gave me a neutral .  that was from 2003 to 2022 and over 2000 buys and sells.

I work at it, but you can't please all the people all the time.

[JollyGood]

The account has been deliberately provocative for far too long and not only that, he is a troll who quite clearly has given up on trying to utilise the account via a signature campaign and has resorted to making a nuisance of himself because he has far too much free time on hand.

On top of that, he is misusing the name of someone who does not even know his name is being used in such a manner to create the fiasco in the first place.

I second the motion. Having a retard like that who keeps opening stupid threads while boasting about his supposed superiority because of his supposed PhD does not bring anything good to the forum.