🟢 Rainbet.com | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Competitive Rewards 🎁

[pawanjain]

Well actually, that era ended I would say even in 2017 or max 2021 hype cycle. Many people on this forum if you look at the newbies only know dice thru Stake or even Rainbet, they didn't experience pure Dice sites.

I even would disagree that people in those days found it harder to buy/sell. P2P was alive and strong, we had localbitcoins. People only went on exchanges later on and now that's the norm.

Freebitco? Please don't mention this scam anymore, they even had the shittiest dice known to man

Oh yeah, I remember those good old days. Trading on localbitcoins felt as if we are buying drugs on silk road, LOL.
Even I had got my initial satoshis from freebitco.in and I am thankful to them for that but it has eventually turned out to be scam.
They had a good reputation back then but they have ruined it all now.

[Pmalek]

I won a free bet from a competition organized by Rainbet a few days ago. It was issued to my account in one day. Unfortunately, I was unlucky with it and picked the wrong team. My initial idea was to wait for the European championship qualification matches in football that begin tonight. Instead of that I bet on the UEFA Champions League matches for women yesterday and messed it up. I never expected that the Juve ladies would beat Atletico Madrid in Spain, but that was exactly what they did.

I'll make up for it next time.
Thanks Rainbet and jeremypwr!

[buwaytress]

So the question asking about freebets, Trofo answered, and then the comment got deleted. Seems obvious some people never gambled?

Another day, another freebet. Have to say the limits are somewhat restrictive, but since the freebet has practically no expiry (all right 360 days, if I don't use it in a year, when will I?) I think it's all right.

You said it all, most of our free bets will look the same with odds restrictions but at least they end up winning ones when I don't put them on odds 50+, which was my usual MO. Anyway here is my treble, combining some eSports and Tennis. Combo I was unable to do on some other bookies and it is nice that I can bet on eSports and Sports on the same ticket here.

True that. My very first bet was a win, at almost the max 3.5. I don't even know why I played my second on women's football. Should have waited patiently for the next string of EPL games.

It's probably a very good term, I prefer 1-year validity to "go to town with odds" on freebets.

~
This has to be one of the longest time limits for using free bets  from all crypto casinos I used.
Just beware that once you activate free bet you will only have few days to place a bet.
~
Do you remember minimum odds needed for free bets on Rainbet and other casinos?
I am collecting all information about this subject for my new topic.

Like Trofo (and I) said, you have 1 year. Activating it simply allows you to use it for your next bet.

Don't recall the minimum as Trofo said, 1.8 sounds right, it's what I have in my (unreliable) memory bank. Send me another freebet and I'll remember though, mafia?

[notblox1]

Like Trofo (and I) said, you have 1 year. Activating it simply allows you to use it for your next bet.

Don't recall the minimum as Trofo said, 1.8 sounds right, it's what I have in my (unreliable) memory bank. Send me another freebet and I'll remember though, mafia?

I like that one year as longest waiting period from all crypto casinos I know 
Minimum odds is 1.8 confirmed and that is slightly higher, but than you have chance to win more money with your bets.
Another thing I like with Rainbet is that you cant miss that you received free bet,  you will see notification and big popup about received bonus.

[slaman29]

Well actually, that era ended I would say even in 2017 or max 2021 hype cycle. Many people on this forum if you look at the newbies only know dice thru Stake or even Rainbet, they didn't experience pure Dice sites.

I even would disagree that people in those days found it harder to buy/sell. P2P was alive and strong, we had localbitcoins. People only went on exchanges later on and now that's the norm.

Freebitco? Please don't mention this scam anymore, they even had the shittiest dice known to man

Oh yeah, I remember those good old days. Trading on localbitcoins felt as if we are buying drugs on silk road, LOL.
Even I had got my initial satoshis from freebitco.in and I am thankful to them for that but it has eventually turned out to be scam.
They had a good reputation back then but they have ruined it all now.

lol yeah, the ads were crazy back then. You could find traders doing face to face cash p2p exchange... minimum $10,000k please!!

Jakarta, Amsterdam, London, NY, everywhere. And then if you joined the channels you saw they were definitely also doing silk road lol

P2P is such a different scene now, for me it hurts our nostalgia to see that you have to go on Binance and Huobi or whatever to find the good ones. Remitano has become scammy, all the others are dying

[Betwrong]

What I like about the minimum 1.8 on free bets is that they are basically not allowing you to win much less than your free bet is. If you are winning your free bet - at least win something, right? It doesn't affect me, because my odds are usually much higher than even 3.5. It's more like 20.0+, actually. Like, for example, this bet I just placed recently:



I think I have good chances despite of the great odds. Wish me luck guys.

[Furious 7]

I think I have good chances despite of the great odds. Wish me luck guys.

You are quite brave in betting but looking at the bet you placed with the odds given it is very comparable for me
x22 obviously it is a very large odds and when we want to test our luck then it is indeed worth betting.

But in this case I personally won't do anything that I consider difficult because for bets like this especially for the bet you placed I will probably stay in the Netherlands for 1x2 while for Finland against Malta I prefer to be in the Under 3 for this match.
The odds will be much different but I think this probability will be more likely to get a win.

[Raflesia]

If you had to pick ONE game on Rainbet to play for eternity,

What would you pick? 👀

Betting games in sports is my first choice but if it comes down to original games or casino games I would probably choose slots at nolimit as the most viable option I would want to do.

I like the duck slot game and on some other sites I also play this as an option for me to pass the time so when there is a choice later if I have free time and more money that I can use to play slots then I will choose duck as the only game I want to do because compared to other games I like duck more in terms of visuals and the game just feels more fun for me to do.

[Kavelj22]

But in this case I personally won't do anything that I consider difficult because for bets like this especially for the bet you placed I will probably stay in the Netherlands for 1x2 while for Finland against Malta I prefer to be in the Under 3 for this match.
The odds will be much different but I think this probability will be more likely to get a win.

I would also stay with Netherlands for 1x2 or choose GG3+ chance because Poland will at least succeed to goal at least once during full time, although i don't expect it to be able to defend against Netherlands attackers. While for Malta and Finland, i guess Finland has greater chances to win the match but not with many goals. Maybe i will bet on correct score 1:0 or 2:0 in favor for Finland.

Using free bets in sportsbetting seems to be more realistic than playing pragmatic. I would enjoy hard chances with sportsbetting to test my chance. It's totally different from other games.

[silpersurfer]

If you had to pick ONE game on Rainbet to play for eternity,

What would you pick? 👀

There are too many games and bets on Rainbet, sometimes I'm confused about where to start, but it's fun because we have so many options to try every week. In the last few weeks, I've tried several games, but the one that interests me the most is...


This is a game I've only recently started playing, but I really like the music and the characters on each icon. Maybe the mechanics are the same as other slots, but it just feels different to me, even though I haven't had any big wins yet.

[Furious 7]

But in this case I personally won't do anything that I consider difficult because for bets like this especially for the bet you placed I will probably stay in the Netherlands for 1x2 while for Finland against Malta I prefer to be in the Under 3 for this match.
The odds will be much different but I think this probability will be more likely to get a win.

I would also stay with Netherlands for 1x2 or choose GG3+ chance because Poland will at least succeed to goal at least once during full time, although i don't expect it to be able to defend against Netherlands attackers. While for Malta and Finland, i guess Finland has greater chances to win the match but not with many goals. Maybe i will bet on correct score 1:0 or 2:0 in favor for Finland.

It is certain that in this gamble we all lost because we had high expectations of the Netherlands for this battle.

I have a pretty good win for under 3 for Finland's match with Malta but Netherlands is definitely hard to take as they drew this match.
Honestly, I seemed to have overestimated the Dutch game which actually canceled out the victory I wanted to get but the Dutch played badly in this match.

Even if you look at the utilization of opportunities for 90 minutes Poland looks much better in terms of play than the Netherlands even though Poland lost in terms of the rhythm of possession in their midfield.

[jeremypwr]

🚨 🚨 UFC 322 PROMO 🚨

Back DELLA to win for DOUBLED profit If there's a KO in any round!

Issued as a freebet up to $100 per user

Odds @ https://rainbet.com/sportsbook/mixed-martial-arts/ufc/ufc-322-della-maddalena-vs-makhachev-2573986153690701834

[Kavelj22]

But in this case I personally won't do anything that I consider difficult because for bets like this especially for the bet you placed I will probably stay in the Netherlands for 1x2 while for Finland against Malta I prefer to be in the Under 3 for this match.
The odds will be much different but I think this probability will be more likely to get a win.

I would also stay with Netherlands for 1x2 or choose GG3+ chance because Poland will at least succeed to goal at least once during full time, although i don't expect it to be able to defend against Netherlands attackers. While for Malta and Finland, i guess Finland has greater chances to win the match but not with many goals. Maybe i will bet on correct score 1:0 or 2:0 in favor for Finland.

It is certain that in this gamble we all lost because we had high expectations of the Netherlands for this battle.

I have a pretty good win for under 3 for Finland's match with Malta but Netherlands is definitely hard to take as they drew this match.
Honestly, I seemed to have overestimated the Dutch game which actually canceled out the victory I wanted to get but the Dutch played badly in this match.

Even if you look at the utilization of opportunities for 90 minutes Poland looks much better in terms of play than the Netherlands even though Poland lost in terms of the rhythm of possession in their midfield.

In an official competition i can't definetly ignore Netherlands when betting on 1X2. It's a big risk when you are betting on many mtches, it's better to follow garanted chances rather than betting on hard chances. Maybe if i chose to play only that one match i will try the hard chance, but you know this would cost a fortune to get a significant winning from the odd. Overall, hard to predict the perfermance quality of small teams, but never ignore their capacities to win or at least get a no-goal drew.

[TonmTong]

But in this case I personally won't do anything that I consider difficult because for bets like this especially for the bet you placed I will probably stay in the Netherlands for 1x2 while for Finland against Malta I prefer to be in the Under 3 for this match.
The odds will be much different but I think this probability will be more likely to get a win.

I would also stay with Netherlands for 1x2 or choose GG3+ chance because Poland will at least succeed to goal at least once during full time, although i don't expect it to be able to defend against Netherlands attackers. While for Malta and Finland, i guess Finland has greater chances to win the match but not with many goals. Maybe i will bet on correct score 1:0 or 2:0 in favor for Finland.

It is certain that in this gamble we all lost because we had high expectations of the Netherlands for this battle.

I have a pretty good win for under 3 for Finland's match with Malta but Netherlands is definitely hard to take as they drew this match.
Honestly, I seemed to have overestimated the Dutch game which actually canceled out the victory I wanted to get but the Dutch played badly in this match.

Even if you look at the utilization of opportunities for 90 minutes Poland looks much better in terms of play than the Netherlands even though Poland lost in terms of the rhythm of possession in their midfield.

In an official competition i can't definetly ignore Netherlands when betting on 1X2. It's a big risk when you are betting on many mtches, it's better to follow garanted chances rather than betting on hard chances. Maybe if i chose to play only that one match i will try the hard chance, but you know this would cost a fortune to get a significant winning from the odd. Overall, hard to predict the perfermance quality of small teams, but never ignore their capacities to win or at least get a no-goal drew.

Surely, it is always dangerous to neglect such a team as the Netherlands in the 1X2 betting, not to mention the fact that you are betting on several matches simultaneously. Safe picks tend to present you with more secure tickets whereas only risky ones will do the trick in the event of a one-game bet. Small teams do win but it is not a good idea to use such upsets every time, it is better to alternate the risk with strong favorites.

[Futurexxx]

In an official competition i can't definetly ignore Netherlands when betting on 1X2. It's a big risk when you are betting on many mtches, it's better to follow garanted chances rather than betting on hard chances. Maybe if i chose to play only that one match i will try the hard chance, but you know this would cost a fortune to get a significant winning from the odd. Overall, hard to predict the perfermance quality of small teams, but never ignore their capacities to win or at least get a no-goal drew.

I don't like gambling on international fixtures because the rate of disappointment you get from most top teams is much higher than that of club side football, and it's because of this reason I mostly skip gambling anytime it's an international week.
Additionally, staking on Netherlands against Poland seems like a dangerous pick because these are teams that are almost on the same strength considering their head to head record, and if you look at the results at the end, it was very obvious why taking such a game looks dangerous, because it might go either side, so I wasn't that surprised as they drew the game.

[TravelMug]

🚨 🚨 UFC 322 PROMO 🚨

Back DELLA to win for DOUBLED profit If there's a KO in any round!

Issued as a freebet up to $100 per user

Odds @ https://rainbet.com/sportsbook/mixed-martial-arts/ufc/ufc-322-della-maddalena-vs-makhachev-2573986153690701834

Unfortunately, Islam Makhachev is too good even if he goes up in weight class as he won in a dominating fashion in the judges scorecard. Although the fight is kinda boring.

Very hard to go against that kind of grappling skills and for nearly all the full fight that's what he did against the champion in Jack Della Maddalena. So he becomes another fighter that holds 2 belts simultaneously.

[Ochan_yazo_tochant]

If you had to pick ONE game on Rainbet to play for eternity,

What would you pick? 👀

So far, I've tried these four games on Rainbet.



They were all really fun, but I haven't found my favorite one yet. I'll have to try more machines maybe I'll find the one. Oh, and this is my winning ticket from last night.

[YOSHIE]

I don't like gambling on international fixtures because the rate of disappointment you get from most top teams is much higher than that of club side football, and it's because of this reason I mostly skip gambling anytime it's an international week.

This is the first time I have seen gamblers who are reluctant to bet on international matches, most gamblers are reluctant to bet on national sporting matches, most of them are often disappointed and annoying compared to international ones.

Like the ongoing match Hungary vs. Ireland, wouldn't we rather have one of the best scores and also with another international match about to hit the field.
Azerbaijan vs. France
Ukraine vs. Iceland
Italy vs. Norway
Germany vs. Slovakia

Isn't it more promising and easier to score compared to national clubs? To be honest, I personally find it 10X easier to bet on international clubs, but the point is that everyone has different ways and views in making sports bets.

[salad daging]

I don't like gambling on international fixtures because the rate of disappointment you get from most top teams is much higher than that of club side football, and it's because of this reason I mostly skip gambling anytime it's an international week.

This is the first time I have seen gamblers who are reluctant to bet on international matches, most gamblers are reluctant to bet on national sporting matches, most of them are often disappointed and annoying compared to international ones.

....

Isn't it more promising and easier to score compared to national clubs? To be honest, I personally find it 10X easier to bet on international clubs, but the point is that everyone has different ways and views in making sports bets.

This has happened to me many times before - betting on international matches is a bit annoying because often the bet loses, perhaps in the analysis of the wrong guess. 

I'm not betting at the moment so it's better to wait for the league to start.

For me it's the same - but there are still some who bet on international matches maybe because they know strong instincts in this match.
For me, it's more exciting when the World Cup starts than betting on the qualifiers.

[Kavelj22]

In an official competition i can't definetly ignore Netherlands when betting on 1X2. It's a big risk when you are betting on many mtches, it's better to follow garanted chances rather than betting on hard chances. Maybe if i chose to play only that one match i will try the hard chance, but you know this would cost a fortune to get a significant winning from the odd. Overall, hard to predict the perfermance quality of small teams, but never ignore their capacities to win or at least get a no-goal drew.

I don't like gambling on international fixtures because the rate of disappointment you get from most top teams is much higher than that of club side football, and it's because of this reason I mostly skip gambling anytime it's an international week.
Additionally, staking on Netherlands against Poland seems like a dangerous pick because these are teams that are almost on the same strength considering their head to head record, and if you look at the results at the end, it was very obvious why taking such a game looks dangerous, because it might go either side, so I wasn't that surprised as they drew the game.

I can't figure out how you have resumed that Netherlands and Poland are at the same level of strength. Their matches against each other can't help you conclude this because their performances may varies from match to another and from tournament to another. Can you tell how many times they met in World Cup Qualifiers? I doubt that they have similar performance characteristics in any of them if you can search for.

I agree with you about that it's not a good choice to bet on those teams in big international tournaments because you can't predict what would happen. Remember Morroco team last World Cup in Qatar and how it surprised us all.