The new crypto real estate idea it's good way to provide liquity

[Parklane777]

The new ... revolutionary real estate owning solution.
With community rewards and so real utility and real possible solution for many people.

Something like this but you are free to add your suggestions.

Overview of Fractional Real Estate Investment with Tron USDT Stablecoin
The concept of fractional real estate investment with Tron USDT stablecoin allows investors to purchase shares in a property and use those shares to live in the building. This innovative approach to real estate investment can be applied to high-end properties in cities such as Miami, London, Monaco, Marbella, New York, and Dubai. In this, we will discuss the best ways to organize this idea to ensure sufficient liquidity and provide calculated examples for a 1 billion USD property.

Calculating the Number of Shares and Share Prices
To begin, we will determine the number of shares and their respective prices for the 1 billion USD property. Let’s assume the property is valued at $1,000,000,000 and we want to divide it into 100,000 shares. Each share will be worth $10,000.

Investment and Liquidity
In order to maintain liquidity and support the fractional ownership model, it is essential to have a significant number of investors purchasing shares. We can calculate the minimum investment required and the total value of shares sold to maintain a healthy liquidity pool.

Minimum investment per share: $10,000

Total value of shares sold: 100,000 shares * $10,000 = $1,000,000,000

Liquidity pool: $1,000,000,000 (total value of shares sold)

To ensure the liquidity pool is sufficient, we can set a minimum investment target of $1 billion, which will be used to purchase shares in the property.

Living in the Property
For investors to live in the property, they will need to purchase a certain number of shares based on the desired living space and the total number of shares available. Assuming the property has 100 apartments, each with a living area of 1,000 square feet, an investor would need to purchase:

1,000 square feet * 100 apartments = 100,000 square feet

Since each share represents 1,000 square feet, an investor would need to purchase 100,000 / 1,000 = 100 shares to live in the property.



Example of Fractional Real Estate Investment
Let’s consider an investor who wants to purchase a 1,000 square foot apartment in the property. They would need to buy 100 shares to live in the apartment. The investor can sell their shares at any time, allowing for flexibility in their living arrangements.

Conclusion
Fractional real estate investment with Tron USDT stablecoin presents an innovative way to invest in high-end properties and live in them. By dividing the property into shares and using the Tron USDT stablecoin for transactions, this approach can provide liquidity and flexibility for investors. With a minimum investment target of $1 billion and calculated examples for a 1 billion USD property, it is possible to create a sustainable fractional real estate investment model.


In my opinion tron usdt ...i find it stable and most logical solution the tron usdt i like btc but for this kind of transactions it need to be stable so stablecoin better solution.

[1715268932]

1715268932

[1715268932]

1715268932

[1715268932]

1715268932

[1715268932]

1715268932

[1715268932]

1715268932

[Vod]

You left out a key aspect - your commission.   The reason you are doing this.  The way you get some free real estate.

Then you can explain why you are worth that commission compared to other developers.

[Parklane777]

You left out a key aspect - your commission.   The reason you are doing this.  The way you get some free real estate.

Then you can explain why you are worth that commission compared to other developers.

Maybe you look over the idea not just my profit.
Im not here to talk about my profit If the idea is good money will follow easy Im not even worry about.

[franky1]

OP wants to sell timeshares...
.. if only he knew how scammy time shares was, he wouldnt be offering them

..
years back when first coming up with the concept of web3 and NFT the idea was simple webhosts could sell their server space for a token where it declares ownership of a certain amount of digital real estate(hosting server space) and then people can create virtual shopping malls online using VR technology so customers could visit the stores in 3D.
this is where virtual shopping mall server space owners would then sell plots/store space within their virtual mall for tokens to become their own real estate game, virtually

however now we just get monkey memes sold as art. and scammy non transferable junk just published to blockchains pretending they can transfer.

..

but lets say the real world land-registry organisation did transform its database where by every "what3words" geolocation was a identity for an area of land. which people could buy in a transferable token, where by instead of traditional 'deeds' it used crypto signed messages of proof of ownership,
something stablecoins dont offer, and would need a different token to emphasis ownership claims.. after all stablecoins are just fiat not owned by a bank

side note.. OP cant do math

Total value of shares sold: 100,000 shares * $10,000 = $1,000,000,000

Liquidity pool: $1,000,000,000 (total value of shares sold)

1,000 square feet * 100 apartments = 100,000 square feet

Since each share represents 1,000 square feet, an investor would need to purchase 100,000 / 1,000 = 100 shares to live in the property.

if each share = 1000 square feet. meaning ONE APARTMENT
then a share cant also be 100,000 shares for 100 apartments
also if he is estimating $1b liquidity then that makes each share(apartment) $10m

if there were 100,000 shares then each share would be ONE square foot. which he suggest be worth $10k/sf

lastly if he was to sell 100 shares, you would get either 100 apartments or 10% of an apartment

[Parklane777]

OP wants to sell timeshares...
.. if only he knew how scammy time shares was, he wouldnt be offering them

..
years back when first coming up with the concept of web3 and NFT the idea was simple webhosts could sell their server space for a token where it declares ownership of a certain amount of digital real estate(hosting server space) and then people can create virtual shopping malls online using VR technology so customers could visit the stores in 3D.
this is where virtual shopping mall server space owners would then sell plots/store space within their virtual mall for tokens to become their own real estate game, virtually

however now we just get monkey memes sold as art. and scammy non transferable junk just published to blockchains pretending they can transfer.

..

but lets say the real world land-registry organisation did transform its database where by every "what3words" geolocation was a identity for an area of land. which people could buy in a transferable token, where by instead of traditional 'deeds' it used crypto signed messages of proof of ownership,
something stablecoins dont offer, and would need a different token to emphasis ownership claims.. after all stablecoins are just fiat not owned by a bank

side note.. OP cant do math

Total value of shares sold: 100,000 shares * $10,000 = $1,000,000,000

Liquidity pool: $1,000,000,000 (total value of shares sold)

1,000 square feet * 100 apartments = 100,000 square feet

Since each share represents 1,000 square feet, an investor would need to purchase 100,000 / 1,000 = 100 shares to live in the property.

if each share = 1000 square feet. meaning ONE APARTMENT
then a share cant also be 100,000 shares for 100 apartments
also if he is estimating $1b liquidity then that makes each share(apartment) $10m

if there were 100,000 shares then each share would be ONE square foot. which he suggest be worth $10k/sf

lastly if he was to sell 100 shares, you would get either 100 apartments or 10% of an apartment

Allright...but idea good ?

[franky1]

not really

its just time shares.. and we all know how unsuccessful those are for the investor
just putting a crypto sticker on a scammy timeshare pamphlet does not make time shares any less scammy

lets give examples
lets say the investments are $1000 a share and say 100 shares is the cost price to build a $100k apartment
and these apartments were locked into the share deal on a 20 year lease


now lets say someone had just 10 shares meaning just 10% ownership of an apartment
watch the fighting where you think your 10% ownership of one apartment, in your eyes makes you think you are entitled to move in next week to an apartment for 2 years of the 20 year lease

you will find out fast the owners of the other 90% of the apartment all want to be first. basically ending up with highest share holder gets first residency slot
meaning you only get your 2 year lease in 18 years time

also as a 10% lease holder, you have to pay 10% of all ongoing repairs, maintenance, HOA, landscaping insurance costs, but not able to enjoy living in it yet

also you cant sell the apartment. all you can do is try to find a buyer of your shares that wants to wait 18 years before they can move in, and are willing to pay ongoing maintenance and management costs

..
this is why real estate investors buy into whole apartment costs so they have more control over everything.. time shares never work, no matter if you snazz it up in crypto jargon

[Parklane777]

not really

its just time shares.. and we all know how unsuccessful those are for the investor
just putting a crypto sticker on a scammy timeshare pamphlet does not make time shares any less scammy

lets give examples
lets say the investments are $1000 a share and say 100 shares is the cost price to build a $100k apartment
and these apartments were locked into the share deal on a 20 year lease


now lets say someone had just 10 shares meaning just 10% ownership of an apartment
watch the fighting where you think your 10% ownership of one apartment, in your eyes makes you think you are entitled to move in next week to an apartment for 2 years of the 20 year lease

you will find out fast the owners of the other 90% of the apartment all want to be first. basically ending up with highest share holder gets first residency slot
meaning you only get your 2 year lease in 18 years time

also as a 10% lease holder, you have to pay 10% of all ongoing repairs, maintenance, HOA, landscaping insurance costs, but not able to enjoy living in it yet

also you cant sell the apartment. all you can do is try to find a buyer of your shares that wants to wait 18 years before they can move in, and are willing to pay ongoing maintenance and management costs

..
this is why real estate investors buy into whole apartment costs so they have more control over everything.. time shares never work, no matter if you snazz it up in crypto jargon

Ok it was just some fast idea i don't have even time to work with anything like this.

[franky1]

as soon as you read the words "fractional ownership" in regards to ability to have residency.. you start playing into the scam of time shares
no one wins but the organiser that takes a cut from all investors

..
if it was a pure play of investing in "buy to rent" where the investment is in property that is then rented out to others and the rental income from that is put into the trust in the form of dividends or increase in share value. thus property value+rental income=share value
where shares are traded based on the value ups vs property costs downs.

then it can be something

but the "ownership" = fractional residency time.. is the biggest scam going because not everyone can get to live in a house when everyone is fighting to live in it all year/6 months of first X years before they sell their stake.

however real estate is still regulated, so it needs to be legit. its not a wild west thing crypto can just enter and take over acting as if there are no regulations