Single or accumulation, which one do you prefer when it comes to sport betting

[Oshosondy]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

You are talking about profit. Know that gambling is risking. Gamblers should first think about loss before thinking about profit because most probably gamblers can lose than gain.

I remember in the past that I will accumulate more than 10 matches, thinking that I would win, i lost most. Out of the many games that I have accumulated in the past, I think I won not more than 2 or 3. My losses were more.

If I accumulated just like 2 or 3 matches, It gives better profit.

I prefer a single match than to accumulate. But if I still accumulate not more than 3 matches, it is still better for me and gives better results than going for high accumulation.

[1715282233]

1715282233

[Strongkored]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet is for those who prefer safety and multi bet is for those who like risk because the risk is proportional to the results that will be obtained if it is correct. Every bettor has different preferences and we will not always be able to find an interesting bet to include in multi, so single bets should still be made and multi bets should be made when we see a chance of winning, and currently I prefer single bets and sometimes use the bet builder feature.

[bitbollo]

I think that single bets are the most profitable because allow to control the progress of a bet.
You can easily make a cashout or just "cover" your loss betting the opposite.
Plus, these kind of bets do not expose gamblers to many factors or events that are unrelated to each other...

[Docnaster]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet is for those who prefer safety and multi bet is for those who like risk because the risk is proportional to the results that will be obtained if it is correct. Every bettor has different preferences and we will not always be able to find an interesting bet to include in multi, so single bets should still be made and multi bets should be made when we see a chance of winning, and currently I prefer single bets and sometimes use the bet builder feature.

Another thing about choice of betting between single bet and accumulated bet is that in single betting, the bettor will focus solely on one game and learn about the outcome which sometimes makes him very nervous. For instance, if in his single betting he predicted the both teams to score, he's very likely to watch the game while hoping that at the end of the day the two teams are gonna score so if there's any attacking play by any of the teams, he'll be nervously limping for a goal which sometimes wouldn't even be converted.

But when a bettor stakes on accumulated games, there are options in the game that he's very likely to forget during time games and might not even worry himself till the end of the whole games in his slip before checking if he won or not. So when a bettor is not good in managing nervity, accumulated betting I think should be preferred.

[odunybiz]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

You are talking about profit. Know that gambling is risking. Gamblers should first think about loss before thinking about profit because most probably gamblers can lose than gain.

I remember in the past that I will accumulate more than 10 matches, thinking that I would win, i lost most. Out of the many games that I have accumulated in the past, I think I won not more than 2 or 3. My losses were more.

If I accumulated just like 2 or 3 matches, It gives better profit.

I prefer a single match than to accumulate. But if I still accumulate not more than 3 matches, it is still better for me and gives better results than going for high accumulation.

What kills most gambler on accumulation is greediness. Imagine when you are try to make millions of dollars with just few cents or $1, then you will need to accumulate more games. The less you accumulate, the higher the chance of winning.

[Hirose UK]

Single bets will make it easier to win, but we have to be able to accept that single bets have very low odd.
However, not all single bets will have low odd because if match brings together team or players who are almost equal in quality of play without significant advantage over one of them then the odd can be more than 2.0 and this is decent odd.
It just that each person strategy will be different in the bets they follow, some are chasing big wins by making multi bets, there are also those who are only concerned with the chance of an easier win by choosing single bet.

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I personally still use both ways of betting but for single bets perhaps only when there are no other interesting matches.
But if there are lot of matches that are interesting and easy to predict, then I will still prioritize multi bets, even though later when there are one or two matches left, I will cash out at least I can get win with fairly large odd.
But we must always be careful and always observe the progress of the match because just one mistake will destroy all our bets.

[traderethereum]

I'm used to doing single bets, although I could do both. But it depends on how much money I have and how much I want to use for each bet.
Often I only place a single bet and there is a possibility that I will place a fairly large bet, especially if I am sure the team I choose can win easily.
But if not, I won't place a big bet and will look for another bet.
Placing a single bet can also prevent confusion in managing the bets we place so we can focus on just one bet.
But if you are used to accumulation betting, it's okay to keep doing it.
It all depends on your betting habits, which will influence how you bet.

[Eureka_07]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I do both. But depends to the match I bet on. Normally, parlay (or 'accumulated') bets are more risky than the first one, but it is definitely more exciting! And it is rewarding too!
I do single bets most of the time. I only play parlay once I feel like doing it, also when there is an attractive promotion with parlay betting.

[gabbie2010]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Sure single bet always have a small odd for instance the odd of the  match between Man City vs Sheffield United was 1.09 too small to earn a reasonable profit, however accumulating that odd with three or four sure games to 2.00 to 3.00 is enough to earn some decent money when staked with small fund, of course there are other options in soccer betting like both team to score, first half draw etc all these options can be accumulated to 2.00 to 3.00 but you have to do extensive research before picking those games, single bet that has a high odd is when a weak team plays a strong team or predicting a correct score I believe those options are unpredictable.

[Cantsay]

I currently have game that will run till 14th of June 2024.

It all depends on what I want to achieve I’m a huge fan of slots and other casino game betting but when it comes to sport betting I usually for accumulated or single game depending on the amount that I want to wager. If I should go for accumulated game I usually risk a very low amount of money on the game, but if I’m looking to either play a game to increase my money( if lucky) without having to have multiple risks I Normally go for single games.

Most of my wins in sport betting are from single games although the sides were not that high, from 1.3 to 2.1 odds with majority of them being ~1.3 odds.

[len01]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I do both but if I bet large amounts I choose to bet on a single bet which is more comfortable and for me single bet can give me a lot time to do analysis.
but when I want to bet with big odds I just use a small bet and choose a parlay bet to try my luck.

most of what I see in the soccer betting section is that many bettors use single bet and parlay bet, they use both because it suits their goals, if they are sure that a single match can produce big profit, they only bet on one match, but when they are curious with some matches they choose parlay bets and I am really sure almost 80% on this forum like both.

[Slow death]

They say parlays are for suckers but I still prefer them 

I don't really understand what you mean by suckers. Can you please explain a little bit more.

As a sports bettor that I am, I believe that he is saying this in the sense that parlay is seen as if it were a bet that the person is making relying solely on luck, this is because the person adds many games and places a bet before the cast is announced. will play and many times when the person makes the parlay they cannot be sure that they will play and sports bettors who consider themselves professionals have criticized multibets. for a concrete example of what I'm talking about: yesterday in the premier league there were two games, the tottenham game in which I had a decent odds and the arsenal game in which I had odds of 1.35

For sports bettors who like parlays, they could make a parlay placing Arsenal to win and Tottenham to win and with that they would have a bet with a very high odds, convinced that Arsenal would have an easy victory because their opponent was a weak opponent who they were coming from a sequence of 3 consecutive defeats, so it was a game in which on paper the arsenal would win easily. but for bettors who do not parlay and make simple bets, they would not bet on the arsenal because it had low odds and because the arsenal in the last few games showed difficulty in scoring goals, so the bettor who makes simple bets would not run the risk of betting on over goals or under goals

Also, the sports bettor who makes simple bets would have bet on Tottenham to win only after he saw the list of the squad that would play and confirmed that Tottenham would play with all its best players, if any good Tottenham player was not in the starting 11 he I wouldn't bet. So this is the difference between the multi bettor and the singles bettor. but multi bets give more profit, especially when the person knows how to place good games in the parlay, in the long term the multi pays off, while simple bets don't pay off in the long term

[jeremypwr]

They say parlays are for suckers but I still prefer them 

I don't really understand what you mean by suckers. Can you please explain a little bit more.

A sucker bet is a gambling wager in which the expected return does not reflect the odds of winning, and is significantly lower.

Code:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucker_bet

[komisariatku]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

If you want a lower risk then a single bet is the right choice but if you want a big prize then a parlay is the right choice with a higher risk. I don't like parlays because they are difficult to win, if I bet on a parlay match then I will use a small bet. To be honest, I prefer single bets with fairly high stakes because it is logical to get a win rather than a parlay

[Natsuu]

I prefer accumulated bets. They allow you to adjust the point spread or totals in your favor for multiple games.  But i know some people whi say single bets are like the low-key option because it’s easier to handle and less risky since each result stands on its own. Your call depends on how much risk you're up for, you can try either

[maydna]

Single bets and accumulated bets are the same because as long as they can place bets according to the money they can afford, they will be fine and still enjoy the gambling game. Placing a bet for both is equally profitable, especially if they place a bet with small money so that they don't lose a lot of money if they lose. Only greed will make them experience large losses in gambling because they will not see that they have to stop gambling before they experience even more losses immediately. If their target is to collect a lot of wins, they can use accumulated bets but must be able to place bets on teams that have the potential to win more to get more winning money.

[jrrsparkles]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Assuming, you are terming Parlay as Multiple betting.

A parlay in sports betting is when a bettor makes multiple wagers (at least two) and ties them into the same bet. If any bets in the parlay lose, then the entire parlay loses. However, if all wagers win, the bettor gets a bigger payout.

I don't prefer sports betting at all, but if I have to choose one then it will be a single bet for sure because parlay is high risk and more likely you will lose if one bet goes the other way than you expected, just bet one time and win or lose the feeling towards will end sooner but if you intend to keep on extending it longer then the consequences may end up as an addiction.

[Cookdata]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I will go with accumulated bets, not because of greed but the chance of recovery of losses from the previous. Let's say for instance: Newcastle is having a match against Manchester City and then because of the form of City, you select a straight win X2 with odd of 1.3, if you bet that game with $100 and it win, you will win $130 in return and if the next time you place another bet on Manchester City with another $100 and they lost, you will have nothing and will be left with $30. Your initial $100 is gone and you are left it $30 and to make back the initial, you will probably need to gamble a lot to get back that money before even starting to think of profits.

Now, if you have $100 on 10 odds with 7 games and all won as you predicted, you will win $1k right and you can bet another $100 in your next game, even if you lose you can still have $900 left in your account and with more strategy, you can win more if luck shine on you. The only challenge I see here is that the more you accumulate games, the harder it becomes to win because there is every chance a single game from that accumulated games will make you lose the bets.

[piebeyb]

I prefer single bets but sometimes I also use accumulation bets, usually it also depends on the money you have if you have a lot of money to bet it's better to bet single bets but if it's only a little and want to get high odds you can use accumulation bets, to be honest I don't understand how The clear accumulation or parlay working system is that I only bet on single bets.

It's also best if I don't try a betting system that I don't know, but I've learned little by little over the past few days about what parlay betting is and also the accumulation bet that you mean, but for now I prefer to bet all my budget money on matches. single, nothing more than that, because even then I also look for possible opportunities to win because I use quite a lot of money, so I have to be more careful when betting. 

[rdluffy]

I place both types of bets, it all depends on the odds and the matches

In the past I bet only on single bets, when I tried multiples I only lost, so I focused on single bets, but after studying some championships better, I found good opportunities and a great championship to bet on multiples.
I'm getting good results this way, so it always depends on the situation

I practically only bet on soccer/football, and the league I've found the best opportunities for multiples so far has been the Portuguese championship, on the others it's 99% single bets

Does anyone here also have a favorite league or championship for multiples? If so, share it with us please