Single or accumulation, which one do you prefer when it comes to sport betting

[Samlucky O]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I think it depends on personal option. Because single bet is less riskier compared to multiple. In multiple its just like predicting the impossible. Or you can say that the percentage is %50 50 in single bet. why multiple is %80 20 which is almost impossible to win or more difficult to predict.

[1714606642]

1714606642

[1714606642]

1714606642

[el kaka22]

I do agree that accumulation is the better one. I just feel like it is a lot more fun to have that kind of odds, we are talking about very very low chance to win, like 10% or lesser, and that makes it more fun for me because you do not have to win each one, you just need to win a certain amount and you make a profit.

I can lose 5 times in a row, and win on sixth and I am still in profit, which is why it's so great. Plus when the odds are that low, you think that it's like rare that you would win, but that's usually on favourites. You could have teams that have 1.20 to win, that is almost like a sure thing, but bundle 10 of them together and you have a great return on your bet, so it's really a fun thing to bet on, and I like doing that.

[SmartGold01]

Single bet always had the high probability of winning but it will require you to stake very high since there odds are usually small sometimes if you don't have enough cash in your balance you will stake and have very little cash out that's why you need to combine multiple bets to at least boost your odds to have a good pay out, what I noticed again is that having small odd doesn't really matter what counts is consistency inasmuch as you have a small odd you can keep gambling go increase your balance but sometimes it doesn't work that way we may plan it.

[Antotena]

Single bets and accumulated bets are the same because as long as they can place bets according to the money they can afford, they will be fine and still enjoy the gambling game. Placing a bet for both is equally profitable, especially if they place a bet with small money so that they don't lose a lot of money if they lose. Only greed will make them experience large losses in gambling because they will not see that they have to stop gambling before they experience even more losses immediately. If their target is to collect a lot of wins, they can use accumulated bets but must be able to place bets on teams that have the potential to win more to get more winning money.

Single bets and accumulated bets are not the same because one has lower risk and one has high risk, one has potential to give you huge return and one has potential to give you less return. It's more like the lower the risk, the lower the return for single bets while accumulated bets has higher risk with higher return. Single bet can only have high return when the risk is high. In some bookies, you can bets that a particular player will be the one to score the first goal and you will have a single bets with high odd but of course it will have high risk because such might not happen.

If you place bets on accumulated odds, you can make huge money and recover quickly from loss but they are hard to achieve but when you do, you will recover all you have been losing to the bookmakers. Playing a 100 odd games a day with over 2.5 in some matches might be hard but in a month, if you are serious and very good at predictions, you can make that in atleast twice in a month and after calculations, you might lose 28x and win 200x, subtract that from your profit and loss, you will have 72x profits. This is only possible if you know what you are doing.

[stomachgrowls]

They say parlays are for suckers but I still prefer them 

There are different views about Parlay and system bets, but I learn one thing from the experience after staying into chats and other conversations with different punters about this all mostly love to stay with one bet because they feel its good but sometime if we odds issue then they sometime like to have one more but with few peoples those want to become rich quickly and also busted very quickly they prefer Parlay and system bets which have too much risk and many times happen to me as well while we have 5 or 6 teams parlay this busted at the last or second last bet which is more painful, but now I believe going with one bet is much but for fun we can jump into bets with more teams as well.

Speaking about parlays then it wouldnt really be always talking about on the money that you could really be able to get or odds that you could be able to hit but also there are bettors who do really like to see those consecutive win and would be telling to themselves that they had made out the right call but it cant really be denied that when it comes to parlays or multiple bets then those potential winnings which it is really the main reason on why most bettors are really that interested into it which you can really be able to win up some big money out of those peanuts but it will really just that depending on how many games you are really that
setting it on. The higher the number of games the higher potential winning but of course the feeling that it could give when you do bust up that last bet of that parlay could give out that kind of nightmare feeling. 

When it comes to choices then it would really be that determining into your funds on which if you could be having those single bet with all in type of bet or having those accumulation
on which it would falls down into someone's preference in the end of the day.

[_act_]

I do agree that accumulation is the better one. I just feel like it is a lot more fun to have that kind of odds, we are talking about very very low chance to win, like 10% or lesser, and that makes it more fun for me because you do not have to win each one, you just need to win a certain amount and you make a profit.

Accumulation is the better one? I will say no that it depends. If you want to gamble with very small amount of money, you can go for accumulate and be expecting loss. If you want to gamble with higher amount but also it should not be high amount of money but small, but in a way bigger than the one you used for accumulation, you should go for single bet. Single bet is better though but not that better than accumulating like 2 to 3 matches, but if the accumulation is getting longer, accumulated bet is not better at all in this regard.

[Davidvictorson]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

In my opinion, smaller accumulators are better than big accumulators or vice-verse. I don't do accumulators at all unless they are played at different times so I can place single bets on the exchange but roll the full returns of each bet on to the next. I missed out on one game some weekend ago on accumulations, I was so pained, missed out on a fortune, needed 3 goals in one of the club matches during that game and finished two nil, had a decent cash out offer but thought I'd brave it for once, ended up losing a lot of money.

[Yatsan]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

I think it depends on personal option. Because single bet is less riskier compared to multiple. In multiple its just like predicting the impossible. Or you can say that the percentage is %50 50 in single bet. why multiple is %80 20 which is almost impossible to win or more difficult to predict.

Both has its own risk and the amount of possible loss could still be managed by the amount you will be betting. Accumulated bets is harder to win but will give you bigger returns using small capital. With single bets you may lessen the risk of losing due to low odds, but cannot expect big in return if you won't be putting big amount in your bet. On my end, accumulated betting is a better option; risk is higher but you won't have to lose that much unlike with single bet that you will be needing to increase its size to get a desired return amount. If you know the sports you are betting for, then bigger odds would still possible to be reached. It is lower odds which is more fearsome to go all out with.

Single bet always had the high probability of winning but it will require you to stake very high since there odds are usually small sometimes if you don't have enough cash in your balance you will stake and have very little cash out that's why you need to combine multiple bets to at least boost your odds to have a good pay out, what I noticed again is that having small odd doesn't really matter what counts is consistency inasmuch as you have a small odd you can keep gambling go increase your balance but sometimes it doesn't work that way we may plan it.

Nothing works consistently in gambling. Let's say you won 9/10 matches with single bets and your total earning is $200 from a capital of the same amount on each bet (just an example). Now given that profit won't be big with small odd single bet, the winnings could be erased with one single losing bet. High rolling amount and low rate of return and this is the opposite of accumulated bet wherein you could lose $200 on 9 bets but earning more with a in a parlay bet due to odd multiplier.

[Rruchi man]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

People who are more likely to play accumulated bets are gamblers who who will use little money to try to win much. They loose a lot to the benefit of the betting platform, and only rarely win.

Single bets with a good amount of money increases a gamblers chance of winning the betting platform.

I personally prefer single bets, and accumulated on rare cases when the games are less than three.

[blockman]

I typically do single bets. I want to look each alone with the bets that I do and that's why I like it doing one after the other before placing new bets. I agree to the suggestion about if you don't have much money and you just typically want to gamble it, say lose or win, do it on a parlay bet. That's like where your luck is going to be determined and shall see if you've made it or not. Small amount but potential high win. I don't go into parlay honestly but I see friends of mine that are liking it. That's why I am steady on single bets which is definitely I am having fun with and my mind is only one bet to think of.

[arimamib]

I do agree that accumulation is the better one. I just feel like it is a lot more fun to have that kind of odds, we are talking about very very low chance to win, like 10% or lesser, and that makes it more fun for me because you do not have to win each one, you just need to win a certain amount and you make a profit.

Accumulation is the better one? I will say no that it depends. If you want to gamble with very small amount of money, you can go for accumulate and be expecting loss. If you want to gamble with higher amount but also it should not be high amount of money but small, but in a way bigger than the one you used for accumulation, you should go for single bet. Single bet is better though but not that better than accumulating like 2 to 3 matches, but if the accumulation is getting longer, accumulated bet is not better at all in this regard.

The choice between making a single bet and accumulating bets depends on personal preferences, risk tolerance, and the level of analysis put into the betting strategy. I put accumulating bets on easier predicting games with small odd each. It's like a waste putting single bet on a game with small odd.

Accumulating bets allow you put a bet with a small amount of money. You have the potential to generate higher returns with the same initial investment by accumulating bets. Single bets are straightforward and easier to manage. There is no need to track multiple events simultaneously. With a single bet, you can concentrate your analysis and research on one event, potentially leading to more informed decision-making.

[Franctoshi]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

All my precious time I spent in playing accumulated games in sports betting, I only won about 5-10 of my games I can't vividly recall the exact number, most of my slips then used to end up with cut one and so annoying, when I started seeing more wins was when I switched to single betting and since then I hardly stake accumulated games but on occasions.

[gagux123]

I believe that like some I also prefer the single bet

Of course, i know the risks are lower and you have fewer worries... while in accumulation it is clear that your gains are greater, but there are several other variables that you need to worry about, especially the risks!!
In my opinion, single bets are practical and simple, another point that I also find relevant is that single bets are a great way to increase your profit in general.

[Darker45]

I mostly place single bets. Parlays are good but risky. And because I don't do extensive research on my bets as I'm betting small amounts and only for fun, the risk is higher. Also, I'm only betting on one or two odds every now and then.

I mostly do parlays during NBA playoffs. As far as my experience is concerned, the disappointment is high especially if the only game that causes the entire parlay bet to crumble is a big upset. I once had a five-leg parlay that didn't win only because a team that has the highest probability of winning was defeated.

[Coin_trader]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet for me as I’m not a pro on sports and I have limited time to analyze a match which I can place a bet. Parlay is really more profitable than single bet but it takes a lot of courage and analysis skills in able to become successful to this.

Placing a parlay bet while you have meh analysis skills suicidecrazy bets. Single bet is still the best for mediocre gambler in sports betting. Mediocre gambler dominates the sports betting game so single bet will probably the winner on this discussion unless many suicidal crazy bettor here.  

PS: Change the word suicide to crazy just in case someone salty read my comment wrong.

[maydna]

~snip~

Single bets and accumulated bets are not the same because one has lower risk and one has high risk, one has potential to give you huge return and one has potential to give you less return. It's more like the lower the risk, the lower the return for single bets while accumulated bets has higher risk with higher return. Single bet can only have high return when the risk is high. In some bookies, you can bets that a particular player will be the one to score the first goal and you will have a single bets with high odd but of course it will have high risk because such might not happen.

If you place bets on accumulated odds, you can make huge money and recover quickly from loss but they are hard to achieve but when you do, you will recover all you have been losing to the bookmakers. Playing a 100 odd games a day with over 2.5 in some matches might be hard but in a month, if you are serious and very good at predictions, you can make that in atleast twice in a month and after calculations, you might lose 28x and win 200x, subtract that from your profit and loss, you will have 72x profits. This is only possible if you know what you are doing.

It does have different risks and it depends on how big we are going to place the bet. We can do it as long as we can accept the risk, whether a single bet or an accumulation bet. If not, we can just place a single bet. Otherwise, we will experience more losses. However, some gamblers are more interested in placing accumulation bets because of the factor of getting bigger wins than if they placed a single bet. It also depends on a person's habits in placing bets because I know some friends are more comfortable placing single bets, and they never want to place accumulation bets.

If we have the skills, we can place any bet and hope to win. But those who don't have good skills hope to get big wins by placing accumulation bets and that's normal. Apart from that, we also have to focus on the bets because of the large number of bets we place. Most people don't know what they are doing but still do it because they are tempted by the big wins they can win. But that won't always happen, especially since this is gambling. So we should only place bets with money we can afford.

[Natalim]

I just wish to see people view about single bet and accumulated bet. Which one do you till can be profitable when it comes to gambling. Although I normally do the two but in most cases I prefer accumulated bet to single bet.

Single bet over accumulated bet or parlay. We are gambling with chances here and single bets have bigger chances of winning compared to accumulator.

Accumulator may look attractive mate but you have a very slim chance specially if you'll increase the parlay legged.


Here's a real picture of parlay and its chances.
https://frontpagebets.com/betting/basics/parlays/article_b50cc0d6-14f2-11ee-beaa-67c28cd71cb6.html

Parlay Size Odds of Winning
# of Legs   Odds of Winning
Two Legs   27.47%
Three Legs   14.37%
Four Legs   7.52%
Five Legs   3.94%
Six Legs   2.06%
Seven Legs   1.08%
Eight Legs   0.56%
Nine Legs   0.30%
Ten Legs   0.15%

[SmartGold01]

Snip

Nothing works consistently in gambling. Let's say you won 9/10 matches with single bets and your total earning is $200 from a capital of the same amount on each bet (just an example). Now given that profit won't be big with small odd single bet, the winnings could be erased with one single losing bet. High rolling amount and low rate of return and this is the opposite of accumulated bet wherein you could lose $200 on 9 bets but earning more with a in a parlay bet due to odd multiplier.

Yes you are correct we can't totally rely on any of this bet because they all work with probability and if the luck isn't there we can still find it difficult to achieve a winning even though is the smallest odd we can still lose them therefore there is no assurance in single or multiple bets.
Just that with multiple bet combination we can have a high odd with no specify winning chance and is 50/50 base game.

[dezoel]

It depends on the level of risk you are willing to take and your confidence in the games that you are willing to bet on. Single bets are less risky than parlays because when you make a single bet, you get to have the reward at the end of the game and that's it, but when you are playing a parlay, you will have to wait for the results of all the matches or bets that you've made and a single lost bet will cost you the parlay and the money is gone for good.

So, I would say it depends on the knowledge and experience and the level of risk a bettor is willing to take. I would only do parlays if I knew that I was going to win or at least have way more chances of winning than losing. Otherwise, I would go with a single bet while having a higher bet amount on a match that I'm confident about.

[Findingnemo]

Single bet is the only kind of betting that I have ever done when it comes to sports betting so I guess I am not gonna risk all the winnings to win more and the Parlay is more like going all in after every winning streak in dice or crash game even though you realize that the chances of losing all the previously won rewards just over one loss.