How do you see a gambling review website that has its own gambling website?

[Jawhead999]

I see most of users don't feel it's right when the casinos have their own review sites because it can be used to discredit other casinos and promote their own casinos. But what if the owner behind casino create a review site using a different brands? no one will know it.

It could trick the audience because they think the review site isn't affiliated with any casino, but everyone doesn't know the truth.

[EluguHcman]

There is usually strategical tussles amongst gambling sites which stresses on staying on top of the others so as to obtain the attentions of the (customers)gamblers by the means of adverts reviews.
This system is sensitive because where a casino company fails to focus on a reputable and transparent realistical reviews on their gambling sites to ensure an integrified reputations and at the same time not being being biased to the other (s) rather than craving a personal interests without considering the comfort interests of the gamblers to ensure diligence of customers datas amongst other gambling companies specifically based on a falseful reviews by tarnishing the reputations of the other casino companies on a competitive or jealousy manner could be a biased bounce back against the will of its craves because the gamblers are always in to testified the reviews amongst the casino sites if true or false.

I am not so moved by reviews instead I stays attentive to understand a transparency marketing criticisms avoiding
a cross line of private reviews without misleading of informations and the mockery terms of one another against the casino sites just to take the leads.

[maydna]

That's fine as long as the gambling review casino can act fairly toward its competitors and doesn't try to undermine its competitors. But if the gambling review casino has acted to undermine its competitors by providing fake reviews, the site will be abandoned by its followers, and they will not be able to run the casino well. This can happen anywhere, especially if the review site is run by people who are not professionals in the field of gambling and just want to make a profit. They will not be able to develop their business well, and no one will want to gamble at their casino.

They don't need to make reviews of other casinos that are competitors, but they can provide more useful information for their members or for people who find their review sites. If they can do that, many people will likely like it, and it will become one of the review sites that benefits people.

[Distinctin]

That's fine as long as the gambling review casino can act fairly toward its competitors and doesn't try to undermine its competitors.

You will not know this if you dont' have a first hand experience on the gambling site that is on review. So IMO, it's really not good for a review site to own its casinos while actively reviewing others. The biasness will be present, whether they like it or not, it will happen as they want their business to grow since casino operations are more profitable than a review site, as long as both have good audience and market.

[dunfida]

That's fine as long as the gambling review casino can act fairly toward its competitors and doesn't try to undermine its competitors. But if the gambling review casino has acted to undermine its competitors by providing fake reviews, the site will be abandoned by its followers, and they will not be able to run the casino well. This can happen anywhere, especially if the review site is run by people who are not professionals in the field of gambling and just want to make a profit. They will not be able to develop their business well, and no one will want to gamble at their casino.

They don't need to make reviews of other casinos that are competitors, but they can provide more useful information for their members or for people who find their review sites. If they can do that, many people will likely like it, and it will become one of the review sites that benefits people.

It cant be fair if he would really be giving that more positive rating than into those old and known sites into this forum on which on the time that he would really be doing such thing or stuff then it is really that showing
that he's really not that fair or transparent the way they do review on which means that they arent that credible when it comes to review. This is why it would really be that better that you should
really be always sticking on what are the facts, new platforms and sites arent really that bad to launch but it would be better that you should really be that sticking into those sites which are legit
and which are facts. Dont make yourself that easily believe when it comes new things, im not saying that its not legit or trustable but better you should really be vigilant.

If they would really be having that kind of behavior then would be always best that you should be that sticking into those old ones but if you do decide on testing new ones
then always just make use of test amounts that you could really be able to deposit.

[Wexnident]

~

I don't think it matters much? I'm certain I'll take the reviews more objectively though and probably cross-reference it with other review sites, but in the end, that's what I do for other review sites as well anyway. I cross-reference them across various reviews that I stumble upon from forums, groups, to review sites themselves.

I'd say what OP says is viable yes,  but it's only ever a problem if said user was using their site as the sole source of a review. Plus if we were to start minding about fake reviews here, then the same could be said with other reviews. Who knows whether they're paid reviews or not.

[Jaycoinz]

am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

Well it's quite obvious what the answer is, because even now that most casino don't have their own review site, cases like manipulation of review opinion is still done at a very wide margin Because I believe some casino actually even pay off some reviews site to actually boost their status on the website making them stand out. Although I don't know if any casino own any review site that is widely known and popular for gamblers to go and check insight about casino but am very certain if they do they will definitely not make it widely known so gamblers won't have such ill opinion about them being biased about their actual rating the website.

[Johnyz]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

Indeed, there's a conflict of interest here as you might spread false information about your competitor and that can mislead many gamblers.
If you are into gambling business, better not to have any reviews about the site and instead focus on your own site and earn a reputable distinction because your players will matter the most and their reviews are more important as it can affect your reputation. Anyway, I'm not into review that much because i want to experience the site on my own, and i only trust my own reviews though if its a new site, I always look for the honest reviews of their players.

[piebeyb]

I see most of users don't feel it's right when the casinos have their own review sites because it can be used to discredit other casinos and promote their own casinos. But what if the owner behind casino create a review site using a different brands? no one will know it.

It could trick the audience because they think the review site isn't affiliated with any casino, but everyone doesn't know the truth.

Yes, that's why, perhaps in this way, review sites can indirectly increase their casino ratings even though they don't look affiliated, but the danger is that if the review casino becomes big and is supported by many crypto gambling communities in the world, it will certainly bring traffic to their gambling site. I think something like this might actually secretly exist on a review site that actually has its own online casino.

So they can take advantage of their review sites to raise their sites and bring down other sites because of competition, but I also don't want to accuse anyone without evidence but that can happen where for businesses sometimes trying to cheat is a natural thing, but luckily I'm not a site fan review because I prioritize this forum to look for sites that have a good reputation.  

[decodx]

When reading casino reviews online, it pays to question the source.  Many sites that review gambling sites actually have financial ties to the industry.  Casinos themselves may operate review sites, or sites may get money through affiliate programs with gaming companies.  This can bias reviews toward positive ratings and

Before choosing where to play, dig deeper.  Go beyond reviews into first-hand reports from players in forums and communities.  Check casino watchdog sites that focus on fair practices not profits.  And verify licenses, years in business, audits and more details.  The more perspectives found, the better your chances of spotting conflicts of interests versus true transparency.

While reviews can provide useful input on options, take them all critically.  Negative commentary can be valuable too indicating something to investigate further.  By gathering more viewpoints from sources with less vested interests, your choice should ultimately reflect what works for your style and level of play.

[0t3p0t]

It's like social media where people started liking or reacting to their own post which sounds weird to me and looks stupid. Of course without a doubt it's kind of bias because it is on the same platform.

[maydna]

~snip~

It cant be fair if he would really be giving that more positive rating than into those old and known sites into this forum on which on the time that he would really be doing such thing or stuff then it is really that showing
that he's really not that fair or transparent the way they do review on which means that they arent that credible when it comes to review. This is why it would really be that better that you should
really be always sticking on what are the facts, new platforms and sites arent really that bad to launch but it would be better that you should really be that sticking into those sites which are legit
and which are facts. Dont make yourself that easily believe when it comes new things, im not saying that its not legit or trustable but better you should really be vigilant.

If they would really be having that kind of behavior then would be always best that you should be that sticking into those old ones but if you do decide on testing new ones
then always just make use of test amounts that you could really be able to deposit.

Yes, that is unfair because he has given a bad assessment of his competitor, which is not true. His site will not be a recommendation for other gamblers, and they will likely avoid him if they know he is being unfair to his competitors. We're always better off looking for other review sites and comparing the results to see how true they are. And if there is more information we can get, we will know more to determine which casino site we will choose for gambling. We also shouldn't immediately trust review sites like that, so we must immediately find more information.

We should postpone depositing at the casino before we find out other information so that we won't be fooled by the reviews he gives. We must be careful when looking for information in the form of reviews of a casino so that we avoid fraud, which often occurs.

[Taskford]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

They can simply write good contents about there own casino so expect that there are biases there. Much better if you do your own research for finding out on what is the real score regarding on the feedback you are searching on and don't rely to much on those review site since they can possibly manipulate something there.

Since we are in this forum for sure those written feedback became useless since what matter the most is the legitimate post given by users in their ann threads so we should watch that and give more value rather than seeing those questionable feedbacks written on casino owned review sites.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

Before coming up wit a topic of discussion like this, first make sure that there is one of more of such sites you have seen, and if actually there is any or more is such review site that have their own gambling casino that you have seen and sure of, then you are supposed to share it in the op as a reference and an example, not everything that is imaginable that is postable, except on occasion you have a plan of building such a thing and you need to know what the community thinks about such.

And on my last note, I would say that, a review site that have their own gambling casino are not supposed to review their own casino, it's better to allow other review sites to review the casino rather than they reviewing their own casino, it makes absolutely no sense, since there is a very high chances that they won't be completely honest as they should, since it's difficult to find a business that would want to tell their customers that their product is bad in this and that area, so it's better to allow other review sites do that job.

[Lanatsa]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

They can simply write good contents about there own casino so expect that there are biases there. Much better if you do your own research for finding out on what is the real score regarding on the feedback you are searching on and don't rely to much on those review site since they can possibly manipulate something there.

Since we are in this forum for sure those written feedback became useless since what matter the most is the legitimate post given by users in their ann threads so we should watch that and give more value rather than seeing those questionable feedbacks written on casino owned review sites.

This proves out that they are bias and being bias is something not really that wanted nor be liked because they are really not making balanced reviews and being that realistic and since they do know such site
then they would really be positive into it and if newbies would be able to read it up then they would really be that easily to believe or simply this is really just that misleading. They havent been able to established themselves when it comes to trust and credibility but they had already acted on that way on which this is something not really that showing of being honest.
It is really just that fine that they do own a review site but it should not really be that bias towards their site. People would really get mad if ever they would really be getting fooled or believe
into something which it isnt true.

For me then i would really be giving out some time before making any deposit on a new site on which i wouldnt really that make myself do tend to make some risks on depositing
specially if its new but if you are really that curious or having that possible interest then it would be your choice whether you would really be
making deposits or not.

[Woodie]

That screams bias and I wouldn't take their word for it!!

If they really want to be reviewed, why not allow their clients the real users of their products speak their minds out, free from bias and give an honest review...unless what they offer isn't that good and know bad reviews might come from their customers 

But honestly you are the cook, you taste the food and tell everyone that the food is a 10/10...this doesn't even make sense and players should stay away from such platforms 😐

[Quidat]

That screams bias and I wouldn't take their word for it!!

If they really want to be reviewed, why not allow their clients the real users of their products speak their minds out, free from bias and give an honest review...unless what they offer isn't that good and know bad reviews might come from their customers 

But honestly you are the cook, you taste the food and tell everyone that the food is a 10/10...this doesn't even make sense and players should stay away from such platforms 😐

Any bias things would really be totally that negative into someones impressions on which its never been that good that they will really be that bias into the things
and people cant really be able to trust them because they are really that indeed misleading people and misleading is never been that an ethical thing to be done.
So no one would really be liking on trusting up such gambling platform if they do have that kind of behavior on which this is something that
must be avoided in the first place on the time that they are hyping their own platform.

[TelolettOm]

I see most of users don't feel it's right when the casinos have their own review sites because it can be used to discredit other casinos and promote their own casinos. But what if the owner behind casino create a review site using a different brands? no one will know it.

Of course, the credibility and accuracy of these reviews will be questioned, especially if they are not new comers in the world of online gambling. will definitely be more careful and also critical regarding the review. different from newcomers who may not be as alert.

Because reviews like that can be engineered, made by their own team, or others to support better reviews on their platform, by providing the addition of an honest review. Personally, I prefer a gambling platform that already has a pretty good reputation on this forum, so the plus and minus reviews are usually honest based on the experience of many memes here. At least that can be a more reasonable review later. Apart from that, we have to understand and be open to various new things here.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I see most of users don't feel it's right when the casinos have their own review sites because it can be used to discredit other casinos and promote their own casinos. But what if the owner behind casino create a review site using a different brands? no one will know it.

Of course, the credibility and accuracy of these reviews will be questioned, especially if they are not new comers in the world of online gambling. will definitely be more careful and also critical regarding the review. different from newcomers who may not be as alert.

Because reviews like that can be engineered, made by their own team, or others to support better reviews on their platform, by providing the addition of an honest review. Personally, I prefer a gambling platform that already has a pretty good reputation on this forum, so the plus and minus reviews are usually honest based on the experience of many memes here. At least that can be a more reasonable review later. Apart from that, we have to understand and be open to various new things here.

I think that when it comes to making reviews you have to be very impartial, and here the majority of users know the cainso very well, they know very well which ones are in the top 3, and well it is very difficult to that some type of site reviewer then they give us lies, I know that there are many strategies that are always based on making this type of strategies, such as looking for an accountant to make supposed reviews to put a particular casino in a good place just to confuse newbies, because it's just the newbies who can get confused, the rest of us don't, so these types of things are what we should see, if the reviewer is good, then he has to be impartial, otherwise We would have some partial reviewers or something like that, for me at the moment he used to tell me that there is a review site and that that review site has its own casio and everything, well it is obvious that stamps will always be put in an important place, and for me It's not something you can trust.

In my very personal opinion, I would not trust a place like that, on the contrary, I would put a magnifying glass on it, because it would be going to another level, it seems to me that it is something dangerous to do, I might think that the things are very different and I wouldn't trust a place like that, because obviously they are going to bloom themselves, the reason is that we will always do anything to do whatever it takes and remove oil from other casinos, but based on lies it is not something good, I say that lies if and only if they oppose in the first positions, it may be that they put themselves in first place and that is not the case, then that type of thing is the one that is pleasant to us, and one as a player who He has some experience in the sites because he no longer trusts that reviewer , but my first impression of a site like this is once not trusting like that, therefore it is my way of thinking , I respect how others think.

[CODE200]

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

If that's how they are then that tells me what kind of casino they're running, the kind that tries to smear the competitor in a subtle way. I wouldn't be surprised that this has been done before, newspaper companies are secretly owned by some companies and they can use that fact to not advertise a competitor or they can also smear campaign them there but I don't think they're going to be open that they're owning a review website because that's a bad rap for them as a lot of people already automatically think this part where they're undermining the competition so they're most likely to be hiding that fact so as not to make their own brand tarnished or worse get into a scandalous position.