How do you see a gambling review website that has its own gambling website?

[8rch7]

Of course, the credibility and accuracy of these reviews will be questioned, especially if they are not new comers in the world of online gambling. will definitely be more careful and also critical regarding the review. different from newcomers who may not be as alert.

Because reviews like that can be engineered, made by their own team, or others to support better reviews on their platform, by providing the addition of an honest review. Personally, I prefer a gambling platform that already has a pretty good reputation on this forum, so the plus and minus reviews are usually honest based on the experience of many memes here. At least that can be a more reasonable review later. Apart from that, we have to understand and be open to various new things here.

I think credibility, accuracy and honest reviews must be questionable exactly for beginner in gambling platform than real gambler have more experienced with gambling site want to review. Usually new gambling platform will try get engagement with paid reviews and participants not limit for experienced or real gambler only but also for all users with good or positive review will get payment.

Better be loyal with gambling platform have good reputation in forum, less problem withdrawing and deposit of user amount until how friendly account keep existing without any problem freeze yet. Trying with new gambling platform is not enough by seeing review only due many gambling have their own teams to make review and some time give paid offer review with priority positive review only will publish at their gambling site.

[Slow death]

Well, in the cryptocurrency market, ethics seem to me to be distant for some people. on review sites, the owners of the review sites make reviews based on what will make them more money, if the owner of a casino gets in touch with the owner of the review site to propose that he speak well of his casino in exchange for receiving a payment is protection at the casino, when I talk about protection I mean that the casino will always guarantee that it will pay referral commissions when the owner of the review site creates an account at the casino and has a lot of referrals, with these types of agreements many review site owners review sites have accepted it. They know that even if the casino becomes a scam and makes selective payouts, they will always be able to make withdrawals.

just note that even when many people are accusing the casino of being a scam, on many review sites the casino that is being accused of being a scam will continue to be on the review sites without being accused by the review sites, this is because those review sites are receiving money from casino scam. Now if review sites are capable of doing what I just said, then they wouldn't think too much about listing their own casino and putting really good reviews. Unfortunately, honesty and ethics are something that are distant for many people today. money has become something extremely important to the point that many people sell their souls

[348Judah]

Better be loyal with gambling platform have good reputation in forum, less problem withdrawing and deposit of user amount until how friendly account keep existing without any problem freeze yet. Trying with new gambling platform is not enough by seeing review only due many gambling have their own teams to make review and some time give paid offer review with priority positive review only will publish at their gambling site.

I think I've also once agreed with this that it's better to get used to the gambling platforms present on this forum than us going in search of something else busy beating around the bush, it's just because we wanted to have something more reliable of, we can't use a gambling platform we may not have access to them or their representative, here on this forum, for the sake of the ones that have their announcement thread, we can engahe them through their representative and the reviews left on them by other members of this forum could as well be legit.

[bakasabo]

When money is on the horizon, the concept of ethics often fades into the background. People are ready to do anything for money; including writing fake reviews and deleting scam accusation. When someone plans to make a context page it is hard to stay independent, hard to resist the lust of monetizing your website. I think in I can trust a gambling review site only if I am ready to lose some money doing casino test, as I can fully trust only myself and my experience.

[jrrsparkles]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

If it's been publicly known that both sites are under the same ownership then we don't have to believe anything that say about their gambling sites and their competitors because its obvious that they will try to boost their own brand over anything and in real world there won't be any cause as you said it conflicts both so people won't obviously trust their reviews.

[erep]

When money is on the horizon, the concept of ethics often fades into the background. People are ready to do anything for money; including writing fake reviews and deleting scam accusation. When someone plans to make a context page it is hard to stay independent, hard to resist the lust of monetizing your website. I think in I can trust a gambling review site only if I am ready to lose some money doing casino test, as I can fully trust only myself and my experience.

Some gambling review sites publish casino review posts to get referrals from each visitor, so their aim is to get commissions and monetization from visitors and traffic from search engines, they receive orders from fake casinos to compile fake review posts to increase their reputation and they have to make every visitors must be interested in visiting the casino site, but they do not use fake casinos to gamble, I suggest to be careful looking for information on each casino site in search engines and focus the search for information on the bitcointalk forum which has real reviews from those who have experience reviewing sites starting from coding, service, security, and other things related to reviews of online casinos.

[DanWalker]

When money is on the horizon, the concept of ethics often fades into the background. People are ready to do anything for money; including writing fake reviews and deleting scam accusation. When someone plans to make a context page it is hard to stay independent, hard to resist the lust of monetizing your website. I think in I can trust a gambling review site only if I am ready to lose some money doing casino test, as I can fully trust only myself and my experience.

As people start gambling for money, they may compromise the ethics of gambling review websites, which often leads to one-eyed reviews or gagging of red information.

So the only method to gather personal experience of betting is to know the process of gambling and be connected with any casino. other way you could know about betting process from any of your gambling friends. However, you will not find any gambling friends who will speak against gambling or show you negative aspects, lol.

So, in this case, you could trust betting review website or blog. But you have to be aware about review sites or blogs such as the affiliation system, does the site has its own blog/review system or not, and transparency, although you will find many positive and negative comments on review sites, it is also prominent to be cautious and aware of the site's function and purpose. The final thing is obviously personal experience is far better than trusting someone else experience from unknown gambling review websites. you will never know is those story true or false.

[Sunderland]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

Yeah and I prefer to say "definitely" rather than a "possible" conflict of interest.
There must be a hidden agenda behind of that and any sites no matter if it a gambling review site or other site which is under the casino company should be considered as one of their marketing tools.

[tbterryboy]

When money is on the horizon, the concept of ethics often fades into the background. People are ready to do anything for money; including writing fake reviews and deleting scam accusation. When someone plans to make a context page it is hard to stay independent, hard to resist the lust of monetizing your website. I think in I can trust a gambling review site only if I am ready to lose some money doing casino test, as I can fully trust only myself and my experience.

You are right but usually reviews are covered with facts and information. Read any BTCGOSU review for example, they cover information such as the withdrawal time, minimum amounts, wager requirements and KYC information. With so much data, it's hard to manipulate the rating. I mean you cannot say a casino is 10/10 when they have no promos, slow withdrawals and more.

However, as you mentioned, they can delete negative comments and retain only positive reviews about their casino so it can be manipulated.

I usually try casinos myself with a small amount before depositing big so reviews help but I believe in testing out the casino myself and then decide whether it's worth continuing or not.

[justdimin]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

Definitely, there is a conflict of interest and such sites should either get their casino reviewed by a third party or just refrain from rating their casino.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

I would never trust such a rating because regardless of what they say, it will be influenced. One such example is CoinMarketCap. We know they were acquired by Binance and now if you visit their exchange's rating it shows Binance as No.1 which may or may not be true but it looks shady.

That section "Exchanges" didn't even existed I believe before it was acquired so these things are obviously to popularize their own exchange. By the way, never go with one review and check for multiple reviews which will help you understand the site better. You might search 1xbet and find some good reviews but when you search more, you find out about their shady practices.

[Lorence.xD]

When money is on the horizon, the concept of ethics often fades into the background. People are ready to do anything for money; including writing fake reviews and deleting scam accusation. When someone plans to make a context page it is hard to stay independent, hard to resist the lust of monetizing your website. I think in I can trust a gambling review site only if I am ready to lose some money doing casino test, as I can fully trust only myself and my experience.

Some gambling review sites publish casino review posts to get referrals from each visitor, so their aim is to get commissions and monetization from visitors and traffic from search engines, they receive orders from fake casinos to compile fake review posts to increase their reputation and they have to make every visitors must be interested in visiting the casino site, but they do not use fake casinos to gamble, I suggest to be careful looking for information on each casino site in search engines and focus the search for information on the bitcointalk forum which has real reviews from those who have experience reviewing sites starting from coding, service, security, and other things related to reviews of online casinos.

Some of them are really smart that they use some famous person or have enough popularity to advertise which the influencer would think as a quick cash grab where you would just simply mention their name or make a video of you playing it, cause that's what I'm mostly seeing in the internet nowadays. Even newbies would fall for it as they see streamers play it. When people now tend to say that it is a fake or a rug-pull casino, they would just simply have an alibi that they are paid and not aware of that issue which is a shtty thing to do. People should not always feel FOMO as some people are part of the scammers or paid to lure people into their game and always do their own research, and find out the team of the project if it's legit.

[arjunmujay]

I believe in sites that give some kind of good signals. But don't believe it 100%. Because back again personal observation is better when compared to fully trusting reviews from websites. Even though it includes large and well-known websites.
Just take good and make it a reference of the research you are using. That way the results will be more extraordinary than just trusting others.

[pinggoki]

When money is on the horizon, the concept of ethics often fades into the background. People are ready to do anything for money; including writing fake reviews and deleting scam accusation. When someone plans to make a context page it is hard to stay independent, hard to resist the lust of monetizing your website. I think in I can trust a gambling review site only if I am ready to lose some money doing casino test, as I can fully trust only myself and my experience.

It's sad but that's the truth, ethics is intangible while cold hard cash is real as it can be and there's more personal consequences and implications to having no money than having no morality. That's why it's our duty that if we ever see something wrong, we have the responsibility to correct it and at the same time makes it so that there's no way that evil or immorality triumphs, the only reason that's the other way around is because the good men don't do anything. It's not really that difficult to do a page where it's not monetized especially if you've got a principle that you follow to detail, sometimes that's how things should be, that you should be incorruptible through the face of temptations, there's nothing wrong in monetization through advertisement though, it's how you do the advertisement that matters and if they're the casino that reached out to you then they don't have a right to complain about your demands to advertise their casino and their services.

[ethereumhunter]

I believe in sites that give some kind of good signals. But don't believe it 100%. Because back again personal observation is better when compared to fully trusting reviews from websites. Even though it includes large and well-known websites.
Just take good and make it a reference of the research you are using. That way the results will be more extraordinary than just trusting others.

We can use casino sites that have reviews about each casino but we should look elsewhere for information so we can find a casino that suits us. We also can't directly trust their reviews because we don't know how they rate a casino so it would be better if we could get other information about a casino. In finding a suitable casino, we have to try them one by one and do not depend on the reviews given, but they can provide knowledge and information for us, making it easier for us to have a list of casinos that we can check. For this reason, we as gamblers must be careful in choosing a casino and look for honest reviews so that we can find a casino that is suitable for us when gambling.

[Taskford]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

Yeah and I prefer to say "definitely" rather than a "possible" conflict of interest.
There must be a hidden agenda behind of that and any sites no matter if it a gambling review site or other site which is under the casino company should be considered as one of their marketing tools.

Some maybe do that for extra profit and exposure to their project. Also as long as they write real time review with no biases intended then I think everything is fine there.

But if they just create that in form of attack on their competitor then I guess they are not good to follow also I would rather think about playing on their casino since that is not how a reputable casino work. That's shady act just to destroy the reputation of other casinos.

Its important for us to know what's right and wrong so that we can filter out those real things also the fake ones so we can avoid getting on risky situations.

[slapper]

I am asking this question because, for me, there could be a possible conflict of interest here.

As a review site running its own gambling site, there might be a concern that they could potentially undermine their competitors on their website to boost their own standing in the competition. This could involve making biased or false statements to praise their own website.

While I'm not certain if this is happening in the real world, it raises the question of whether you would trust a review website in such a case.

Yeah and I prefer to say "definitely" rather than a "possible" conflict of interest.
There must be a hidden agenda behind of that and any sites no matter if it a gambling review site or other site which is under the casino company should be considered as one of their marketing tools.

Some maybe do that for extra profit and exposure to their project. Also as long as they write real time review with no biases intended then I think everything is fine there.

But if they just create that in form of attack on their competitor then I guess they are not good to follow also I would rather think about playing on their casino since that is not how a reputable casino work. That's shady act just to destroy the reputation of other casinos.

Its important for us to know what's right and wrong so that we can filter out those real things also the fake ones so we can avoid getting on risky situations.

Reviews can boost credibility and exposure when done appropriately. They allow firms to demonstrate their strengths honestly. An honest, real-time casino review builds trust and sets a high standard for the industry

I agree with your reservations about this practice's dark side. Any discerning client will be alarmed by reviews used against competitors. I think such approaches reflect poorly on the casino's ethic. As a person who values ethics, I'd avoid such businesses. Consumers must learn to distinguish between legitimate and harmful material. Staying educated and making values-based decisions is key. Finally, we must encourage fair and honest enterprises

[LUCKMCFLY]

<snip>

Well, we all know that this casino will always be a neological model to follow , our basis for all of this is that many things will always be generated at the expense of what being reviewers can mean, the fact that you have businesses or companies that It has to do with the same thing that makes reviews, for me it is absurd to think that the reviews of the site will never be negative, even if they were, of course I say this in a tone of Speculation , things are obvious, but I think the good Reputation will always be carried out in good way s, things in casinos are now quite competitive, some casinos are very large and have many players, they have built their community, they have their own audience and this has made them clear that things be for them, so now competing against these big casinos things can be very Difficult, the casinos that have the highest Reputation are the ones that are most difficult to compete Against , we have seen that now there are fewer Casinos , I think it is also because The same system makes them demand a lot of money and things are different , because they only survive as always those who have more.

Casinos are platforms that are very given to Things so that things can be seen well, and they can generate a difference. In this case, I am one of those who watches casinos a lot so that they can generate more things to Entertain or keep their clients and that they Increase much more , that is what is sought, personally I have always said something when a casino is in Search of being better , then the good things come to light , such as marketing, being in various contests, doing advertising That it is Necessary so that they can make the difference, attract with good bonuses , but being a little fairer, these bonuses should be with fewer requirements so that the players like it more, is what I say, and they do not have so many Requirements of Bets.