Drug (cocaine) addicts compromises gambling potentials

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Gambling is not the problem here; the guy was the problem, and he ended up getting himself into two addictions at the same time. They should focus more on trying to save that soul from destroying himself.
 
Let's look at it this way, assuming there was nothing like gambling, and this guy is already in a state where if he doesn't take those drugs, he feels like he is losing it and can't get control of himself.

What do you think will stop him from doing anything possible just to be able to afford those drugs? And the things possible included selling those laundry properties, as it appears that's the only valuable thing he has in his possession. It's just a matter of time, and he will definitely sell the shop off to sponsor his drug habit.

You nailed it, the guy in question who couldn't control himself from drug abuse ventured into gambling which is even worse in my own rating, reason being that drug abuse  was just deleting his money and isn't taking away his concentration from his business. He doubled his problem by including gambling which demands great concentration and by so doing lost interest in his business and list the capital to fuel his addiction life.

Gambling had the perfect opportunity to deal with the guy the way it knows best, it ruined him to the extent he has to sell this properties that once gave him his daily bread and sustained his drug addiction. If he ever recovered from this, he should be considered very lucky cos his problem is not one that can be  solved without much stress as he needs to visit a rehabilitation center too help with his drug addiction.

[Juse14]

Gambling must be done with full control, remembering that because gambling is a type of game that is full of challenges and risks, it really must be played calmly. And if someone is under the influence of drugs, it is certain that he has lost consciousness and someone who is under the influence of drugs tends to be emotional and temperamental. So it will be difficult for him to gamble calmly, which ultimately encourages him to behave recklessly.

And in this case, it's not gambling that's wrong. but it is this person who has misunderstood and interpreted gambling itself. It is wrong to think that gambling can provide profits, it is wrong to think that gambling doubles your money. And we also have to remember, that the casino never forces someone to visit and play at the casino, they only make an offer and the rest is up to you personally, whether to gamble or not.

[uneng]

* Is gambling really to be blamed about the laundry drug addict guy who engaged in gambling in order to gain more money and afford his drugs?
Because to me, he has been a drug addict before began to gamble and he strictly gambled consciencelessly just to make profit and buy himself this assorted unhealthy pills (drugs). So, I don't see anyway of gambling being responsible for his irresponsible reputations with his mentality of what triggered him to gambling and his inabilities to control his gambling.

Gambling, neither drugs were responsible for his choices in life. He was responsible for his own actions. That is how things work in real world. Inanimate objects or activities can't be blamed for individuals' decisions. He decided to do drugs, and then to gamble in order to afford his initial addiction. Consequently, he suffered the consequences for his choices. You can't expect to sow apples and gather oranges... Evil seeds will develop into evil fruits.

* Was the political social influencer right to say getting to an end of online sport bets in the app stores and the moderating of gambling would regain back the devalued currency and attracts a growing economy back to the nation a right acceptable and good research?
As much as I know, individual indulgences has no stake of influences to affect the national economy at where the government folds its hands of governance While counting national welfareness reliably of the vulnerable individuals. Although, getting to an end of online sport bets from the app stores would contribute to manage the number of psychological gambling addictive effects in the country.

The most notorious traits of a social influencer is to be a deceiver, hypocritical, demagogue and populist individual. They use these "skills" to grab the attention of the public, who generates views and engagement for them on social networks. That is how they make money for a living. If they have to lie about creating miraculous solutions to solve society's struggles with simple steps, they will do this without any constraints. Of course banning gambling won't solve all the problems your nation faces, otherwise they wouldn't exist a long time ago, when online gambling popularity wasn't exploding yet.

* Is gambling really to be blamed in ruining lifes?
Even though the online casino gambling as influences on the massive audience, I don't think it has been in any strategic or physically enforced a compulsory venture to anyone that he must gamble.
I don't see gambling walking to the players instead the players walks to the gambles so, directly and indirectly gambling has an influence but has not path to be blamed over individuals irrepressible living on their caused of gambling.

The reply for this question is the same of the first one.

[Yatsan]

Regardless of what reason, addiction will be always negative so what more if the case is one addiction to another? Simply means that the guy really needs help before his obsession of things manifest into worse; robbery and such. If the concern is what behavior to target in order to lessen the occurence, then that's for professionals to decide. Problem is we tend to overlook addiction with symptoms in line with exposure, however that's not only the factor to consider in order to determine whether an individual is addicted already.Bottomline is, he needs professional help.

The individual is highly irresponsible and he is the only one who should be blamed for whatever he ended up or will be.

Gambling is no way near to consider it as a way of increasing the revenue source which is simple knowledge that anyone may know but some think that they can beat the system and make the life better by doing nothing but it happen only for one in a thousand or even higher and the remaining people will be on the other side.

No one is to be blamed; there's no need to do so. What's better is to focus on the solution and that is obviously professional help. Assuming that there are government sectors handling addiction and rehabilitation in his area, it would be a huge help if he will be convinced to get himself treated and best if he will be having the initiative to do so.

Also, it is not always the idea of beating the house but more of pushing one's luck to get rich despite of the losses a gambler already have.

[Quidat]

Gambling must be done with full control, remembering that because gambling is a type of game that is full of challenges and risks, it really must be played calmly. And if someone is under the influence of drugs, it is certain that he has lost consciousness and someone who is under the influence of drugs tends to be emotional and temperamental. So it will be difficult for him to gamble calmly, which ultimately encourages him to behave recklessly.

And in this case, it's not gambling that's wrong. but it is this person who has misunderstood and interpreted gambling itself. It is wrong to think that gambling can provide profits, it is wrong to think that gambling doubles your money. And we also have to remember, that the casino never forces someone to visit and play at the casino, they only make an offer and the rest is up to you personally, whether to gamble or not.

On the time that addiction with gambling becomes severe then you would really be losing up yourself into thinking about the right things on which you might really be that even ended up on
going into the path on taking up some drugs on which it is really just that on extreme kind of situation on which you did really reach out into this point on which you are really just
that basically making yourself or life will be miserable on which you are  really that putting yourself on such big problem if you do make yourself having both
addictions on which one could destroy your health and one could make possibly sleep you in the streets because of having no money.

[Findingnemo]

The individual is highly irresponsible and he is the only one who should be blamed for whatever he ended up or will be.

No one is to be blamed; there's no need to do so. What's better is to focus on the solution and that is obviously professional help. Assuming that there are government sectors handling addiction and rehabilitation in his area, it would be a huge help if he will be convinced to get himself treated and best if he will be having the initiative to do so.

Addiction needs help but gambling or the drug or whatever the person is addicted not force the addicted individual to use it, so the person decides whether knowingly or unknowingly the outcomes which is why we can't blame gambling or online casino method for someone who got addicted to it.

Addiction rehabilitation works differently in every country so if where we live has a good system then we can count on the free support provided by the government or else better take the private centres which obviously comes with the price tag.

[Makus]

This is the more reason why we tell people that, drug addiction is worse than gambling addiction. The risk drug addition tend to pose in our life is more dangerous than we can imagine, it might even kill us before we think of quiting. In this case I won't put the blame of gambling because, the addiction in drug is the cause in the first place. Beside there is no guarantee that gambling will continue to payout for him buy his drugs, fact remains that he only lucky.

[topbitcoin]

Honestly, I feel very uncomfortable if I gamble with drug addicts. They really play with full emotion and without self-control or good emotions. And when they lose, they really don't have the ability to accept that defeat, so in the end they get angry and unclear. I really couldn't play with them, although on the one hand I had an advantage because they played without good control and played carelessly, so it was quite easy for me to win the game in every session. But when I got the win and the addict lost badly, there was no money left. The drug addict's emotions immediately peaked because he didn't want to accept the exhaustion he was experiencing, until finally he forced me to return the money and accused me of cheating. And it's not uncommon for the game to end in a fight. In my opinion, drug addicts should be prohibited from entering casinos, because they can disturb the comfort of other people and will only cause a commotion.

[Ojima-ojo]

Why should we look at it that way, gambling is not to be blame in this situation because the guy was already an addict before going into gambling, and beside he thought that he can use gambling to find his addictions,  not knowing that gambling also is addictive as the substance he was taking so he slid into double addiction and the situation becomes worst for him.


Well why he feels so much impact when he added gambling to the cocaine addictions he was previously suffering from is because both activities takes money and no return for it,  while gambling give you promises of winning and leaving you with your luck, cocaine on the other hand is just lose lose lose with no promise of anything.

[taufik123]

Why should we look at it that way, gambling is not to be blame in this situation because the guy was already an addict before going into gambling, and beside he thought that he can use gambling to find his addictions,  not knowing that gambling also is addictive as the substance he was taking so he slid into double addiction and the situation becomes worst for him.
-snip-

In my opinion too, Gambling should not be over the situation that occurs in drug addicts.
Drug addicts can do anything other than gambling such as getting drunk, committing other crimes in public places to earn easy money.

Gambling will only be a dead end for those drug addicts and not the place.
No drug addict who will play gambling sounds right, they will always lose and they have no control.

[shivansps]

The thread might be lengthy but please "exercise that your investors demanded "patient" if you must achieve valuably along the runs".

A hard drugs (cocaine) addict from Nigeria who has a laundry (wash/dry cleaning shop) for source of his financial needs sustainability is verified to had advanced in his intake of his drugs addiction. To certain point he was not financially stable to purchase the drugs as his usual. While he had learnt about gambling as means of profitablity, he though it was to be so flexible and easy as that to bet and win to he could gain and further purchase the hard drugs or his addictions.
He was attracted to the sport betting after winning in some certain stakes while visiting the bet shop but as time goes, maybe he needed a relaxation to comfortably place his bet in his privacy which triggered him to download and registered on the online gambling sports casino. He had made more counts of losts than his winnings and yet could not take control of his emotions simply because he has a goal of desperacy in chasing profits in the gambling board just to gain some money and afford himself the drugs.
He was no more concentration on his laundry business til he ran out of cash to place more stake which to him to sell laundry accessories so he could fund his online gambling wallet account. And he ignorantly submitted himself to the gambling without realizing how his life is being ruined after countless times his has lost his stakes without a given countable profits any more in drugs addicts, his laundry and so on his gambling habitual ignorantic addition too.

This has attracted to a reminder referencing individuals whom had suicidedly lost their lives, those whom had countlessly lossed their valuables, those whom had been indebted and the atrociousnesses which has indicted individuals because of gambling.
This has also called on the aifs of a political and a social influencer calling to the attentions of the president of Nigeria to bring an end and cut off the accessibilities access to online sport betting in the country in other to main a better orderliness in the society because the states of miles Nigerians undergoes is being mentally worrisome which has also made a caused of depreciations of our fiat currency Naira(#). He further stated that if betting platforms could be moderated, then the lost of the currency values would regain and boosten back it's values. https://punchng.com/experts-fear-rise-in-mental-illnesses-over-addiction-to-betting-apps/

My question>>>
* Is gambling really to be blamed about the laundry drug addict guy who engaged in gambling in order to gain more money and afford his drugs?
Because to me, he has been a drug addict before began to gamble and he strictly gambled consciencelessly just to make profit and buy himself this assorted unhealthy pills (drugs). So, I don't see anyway of gambling being responsible for his irresponsible reputations with his mentality of what triggered him to gambling and his inabilities to control his gambling.

* Was the political social influencer right to say getting to an end of online sport bets in the app stores and the moderating of gambling would regain back the devalued currency and attracts a growing economy back to the nation a right acceptable and good research?
As much as I know, individual indulgences has no stake of influences to affect the national economy at where the government folds its hands of governance While counting national welfareness reliably of the vulnerable individuals. Although, getting to an end of online sport bets from the app stores would contribute to manage the number of psychological gambling addictive effects in the country.

* Is gambling really to be blamed in ruining lifes?
Even though the online casino gambling as influences on the massive audience, I don't think it has been in any strategic or physically enforced a compulsory venture to anyone that he must gamble.
I don't see gambling walking to the players instead the players walks to the gambles so, directly and indirectly gambling has an influence but has not path to be blamed over individuals irrepressible living on their caused of gambling.

You know, gambling is probably not to blame for the fact that a person cannot control himself. Gambling simply brings this out. Secondly, there are people who use games only for entertainment.
In some countries, in order not to completely ban gambling, they did a very smart thing. Games can be played in specially designated areas. These are often expensive resorts or expensive hotels. That is, a person who takes the last money from his family cannot physically get there, and there are only very rich people there who can afford to visit this place

[darkangel11]

You won't see people say that it was "the fault of gambling" in a gambling forum. It's the same as asking people in a drug forum if drugs are to blame for addiction or people. The vast majority will tell you that it's people and IMO this is the way it is, but I'd like to see someone claim otherwise for the sake of the argument.
The way I see it, the existence of an object or action cannot be blamed for people's choices regarding it. When you see berries, you can eat them or not. It's not the fault of the berries that some of them are poisonous.

[Casdinyard]

My question>>>
* Is gambling really to be blamed about the laundry drug addict guy who engaged in gambling in order to gain more money and afford his drugs?
Because to me, he has been a drug addict before began to gamble and he strictly gambled consciencelessly just to make profit and buy himself this assorted unhealthy pills (drugs). So, I don't see anyway of gambling being responsible for his irresponsible reputations with his mentality of what triggered him to gambling and his inabilities to control his gambling.

Gambling is not the problem here; the guy was the problem, and he ended up getting himself into two addictions at the same time. They should focus more on trying to save that soul from destroying himself.
 
Let's look at it this way, assuming there was nothing like gambling, and this guy is already in a state where if he doesn't take those drugs, he feels like he is losing it and can't get control of himself.

What do you think will stop him from doing anything possible just to be able to afford those drugs? And the things possible included selling those laundry properties, as it appears that's the only valuable thing he has in his possession. It's just a matter of time, and he will definitely sell the shop off to sponsor his drug habit.

One way to look at it. But for me, gambling on local brick-and-mortar casinos definitely poses threats to users as most of them act as gateway to other types of addiction, which unfortunately includes getting high and addicted off of drugs.

When you're gambling and you're stressed or you're with people who are just as stressed and desperate for the adrenaline rush as you are, you'll start finding happiness in other things that are just nearby. With a large density of people and money involved local casinos have the highest propensity for introducing drugs to future users, as most of them either make it their base of operations, selling the drugs to hapless gamblers as well as those who need their energy boost for that all-nighter gambling session, or just an outright way to get high and lose track of yourself and the world cause apparently the casino's bright lights aren't enough for them lol. I think this is how the guy got mixed in with some bad apples, cause ain't no way he's getting all his drugs out of a whatsapp contact from the internet lol.

All the more reasons for you to know where your lines should be crossed and what limits you should never go beyond of. Soon as you do that you're safe from any form of addiction and you're also saving your lungs from excessive second-hand smoking that you'll get when you gamble, so all in all it's a massive win-win situation for you!

[Obari]

The miles in the comparison is much,we all know what gambling addiction does to us,that it reduces our level of success in life,it puts us into depression when we weren't supposed to know anything about that,gambling addiction is bad,but drug addiction is worse than that.Drug addiction has to do with what you inhale,take in,this is what goes down to have effect on your mental health.Some of the drugs turns you into an insane person,some of it makes you to be violent in nature,while some of the drugs just puts you in depression ,it makes you feel worthless and useless in life.To.mention but a few,so it's better to be addicted to gambling,than to be addicted to drugs because the effect of drug abuse on man is worse than what gambling addiction can do to man.

[AmoreJaz]

You won't see people say that it was "the fault of gambling" in a gambling forum. It's the same as asking people in a drug forum if drugs are to blame for addiction or people. The vast majority will tell you that it's people and IMO this is the way it is, but I'd like to see someone claim otherwise for the sake of the argument.
The way I see it, the existence of an object or action cannot be blamed for people's choices regarding it. When you see berries, you can eat them or not. It's not the fault of the berries that some of them are poisonous.

bottomline, don't blame any of this habit because it is the person himself who is responsible with his actions. gambling or drugs will always be there, so it is the person himself will be the one who can handle himself on this matter. there are so many vices that a person can be addicted with, and so such vice is not responsible for the screw up of the person as it is the choice of the person in the first place.

[Cryptomultiplier]

My question>>>
* Is gambling really to be blamed about the laundry drug addict guy who engaged in gambling in order to gain more money and afford his drugs?
Because to me, he has been a drug addict before began to gamble and he strictly gambled consciencelessly just to make profit and buy himself this assorted unhealthy pills (drugs). So, I don't see anyway of gambling being responsible for his irresponsible reputations with his mentality of what triggered him to gambling and his inabilities to control his gambling.

It is his cross to bear alone, seeing he loves the high and cherishes the excitement of risk.
Gambling sure is pleasurable and exciting, I can't say about how it feels when one is in an altered state of mind, but while some just loose money, others may experience trauma and emotional disruptions.

* Was the political social influencer right to say getting to an end of online sport bets in the app stores and the moderating of gambling would regain back the devalued currency and attracts a growing economy back to the nation a right acceptable and good research?
As much as I know, individual indulgences has no stake of influences to affect the national economy at where the government folds its hands of governance While counting national welfareness reliably of the vulnerable individuals. Although, getting to an end of online sport bets from the app stores would contribute to manage the number of psychological gambling addictive effects in the country.

There's little sway in what the social influencer said, but the population of those who spend much on gambling or betting don't even measure up to what is spent on hard drugs alone, of which has more impact on the economy as compared to gambling.
Still, gambling can be regulated and sports bet in the app store can be eliminated but it is not of much impact unless gamblers and bettors decide to be more responsible and accountable for their individual finances.

[Quidat]

You won't see people say that it was "the fault of gambling" in a gambling forum. It's the same as asking people in a drug forum if drugs are to blame for addiction or people. The vast majority will tell you that it's people and IMO this is the way it is, but I'd like to see someone claim otherwise for the sake of the argument.
The way I see it, the existence of an object or action cannot be blamed for people's choices regarding it. When you see berries, you can eat them or not. It's not the fault of the berries that some of them are poisonous.

bottomline, don't blame any of this habit because it is the person himself who is responsible with his actions. gambling or drugs will always be there, so it is the person himself will be the one who can handle himself on this matter. there are so many vices that a person can be addicted with, and so such vice is not responsible for the screw up of the person as it is the choice of the person in the first place.

You are the ones who should really be getting blamed in all the things that you are currently experiencing now on which any forms of addictions whether drugs or gambling then it wont really be giving out something good into you on which any forms of addiction is something that wont really be that good to someone. It would be always best that you should really know on how to hover yourself
and having that control on what are the things that you should really be engaging. You would really be compromising all things around if you wont really be that mindful about
on the things that you are dealing with. Also, there's no one to be blamed of but rather only yourself since you are the ones who do make out decisions.

[Wexnident]

* Is gambling really to be blamed about the laundry drug addict guy who engaged in gambling in order to gain more money and afford his drugs?
~

* Was the political social influencer right to say getting to an end of online sport bets in the app stores and the moderating of gambling would regain back the devalued currency and attracts a growing economy back to ~

* Is gambling really to be blamed in ruining lifes?
~

1. He was already thinking of gambling as a source of money. I think at that point he was already lost since, well, gambling isn't a source. It's a form of entertainment. He probably should've simply chosen between the two, drugs or gambling (preferably the latter really since it can be controlled unlike the former).

2. Afaik gambling has always been a form of activity or commerce that encourages growth in the economy since it encourages people to spend money. If people didn't spend money, economy wouldn't move after all now would it? It was an idea you could often see back in the pandemic where the government persuaded people, even with stimulus checks, to spend money so that the economy of their country would continue slowly after the virus has alleviated.

3. The person themselves, not gambling. Otherwise, you would've already seen cigarettes, drugs, alcohol, or any addictive and harmful substance be banned by the government. In the end, those are tools, and mediums for enjoyment. As long as no one can tell that those things "force" you to use them, then it won't ever be banned. At least in a global scale, locally afaik some towns/cities have banned usage or limited them already.

[Weawant]

* Is gambling really to be blamed about the laundry drug addict guy who engaged in gambling in order to gain more money and afford his drugs?
Because to me, he has been a drug addict before began to gamble and he strictly gambled consciencelessly just to make profit and buy himself this assorted unhealthy pills (drugs). So, I don't see anyway of gambling being responsible for his irresponsible reputations with his mentality of what triggered him to gambling and his inabilities to control his gambling.

* Is gambling really to be blamed in ruining lifes?
Even though the online casino gambling as influences on the massive audience, I don't think it has been in any strategic or physically enforced a compulsory venture to anyone that he must gamble.
I don't see gambling walking to the players instead the players walks to the gambles so, directly and indirectly gambling has an influence but has not path to be blamed over individuals irrepressible living on their caused of gambling.

Gambling cannot and will not be blamed for anybody's misfortune, like you did stated, gambling has never gone to anyone rather the people we to it, so it was a. Intentional act these people did engaged in knowing the consequences that follows but then they felt at some point they wouldn't be victims of the situation see day.

Gambling was made to have fun but then just like addict who gambled to enable raise money for his drug, was not at that point gambling for fun but was gambling to make money so his emotions are definitely not the usual, they will be high and cause them to indulge in unhealthy practice so as to be able to fund their account and be able gamble with the hops that they will make more money From gambling but they sadly gets disappointed, the problem is usually in the individual and not in gambling because gambling has no power over you,  you control your finances and your appetite so you cannot blame it on gambling.

[Iroh]

We’re almost always the cause of our own misfortunes. And in this case, the fault lies squarely with the individual. He was probably addicted first to drugs and to continue to get more satisfaction, he’ll increase his intake.
Heard a misconception about gambling and quickly became interested as it seemed like a cool easy avenue to bring in more money. Enough to buy to his fill.
Entering the gambling scene, his desire to win quickly got him hooked as well. He had let his desires control his actions and in furtherance, his life.