Dear applicants of the whitelisting. If your request was ignored you can complain here. Let's make bitcointalk great again
Even if LoyceV considers everyone to be spammers. What right does he have not to inform applicants that their application has been rejected?
I get the impression that it doesn't perform the assigned functions. Even if he is a volunteer, he must perform his assigned functions conscientiously.
Because without sending back responses to applicants stating that their applications were rejected, LoyceV may simply be shirking and not even fulfilling his duties. No one will even know whether LoyceV performing the assigned functions or not. LoyceV can use one phrase to excuse yourself, “I’m tired of sending back replies because my email is full of incoming messages,” and be shirking and not fulfilling his functions. It's impossible to check how well LoyceV performed his functions
But if LoyceV will respond to every letter and reports that "the your application for adding to the whitelists" was rejected, then this will be the best evidence that he really performs the functions assigned to himself
I've been called "Switzerland" for being neutral and subtle.
You're just trying to seem like one.
To be truly neutral, fair and impartial, its not neceesary to join in Foxpup Merit Cycling Club
Truly honest people don't need any clubs to be honest.
I think you're playing to the crowd and trying to appear neutral. And in order to give yourself legitimacy, you joined this FOXPUP club to finally consolidate your imaginary authority.
I'll repeat it again. No amount of clubs will make a person honest and true neutral - if he is shit inside
P.S: This topic is not only about LoyceV. This is a full list of whitelisting-managers:
LoyceV, SFR10, Welsh, hugeblack and Upgrade00. You can complain here about all of them here