Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board

[ABCbits]

To make it easier, maybe you can add some code to your OP, where it's easier for everyone to report, similar like:

Code:

Account: 
List of posts containing false/fake information: 
Case status: still open / solved by moderators

And add below the form that it would ne nice to correct all false/fake informations.

That's great idea. I'll think about the format and edit this thread later.

Thanks @ABCbits, just to summarise I have done the following:

(1) I deleted my post in the thread in relation to tails, as it was incorrect.
(2) My post in the bitcoin inheritance thread was already deleted by a moderator.
(3) I have updated my post in relation to the attack scenarios to include the new insights you shared:

Edit: Update to this post, I have been corrected by @ABCbits, you can actually perform this type of attack without a 51% hashrate successfully, but on a single transaction with only a few confirmation, a good calculator is here: https://jlopp.github.io/bitcoin-confirmation-risk-calculator/

That was quick, i appreciate your action.

[1714662442]

1714662442

[ABCbits]

User: Kamasylvia

Additional information (optional):
* This user also suspected using AI, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg63976679#msg63976679.

List of post:

Perishable UTXOs and the concept you propose for their handling is an intriguing idea. However, it is important to consider some challenges and potential implications before implementing such a change into the Bitcoin protocol.

Quantum computing: While your intention to avoid quantum computing vulnerabilities is commendable, the proposed implementation may have limitations. It assumes that all Bitcoin users will upgrade their addresses to a quantum-resistant format within a certain timeframe. If users fail to do so, their UTXOs could become unspendable, potentially leading to loss of funds for those users.

Concept of perishable UTXO actually let miner take UTXO (above certain age) for themselves. So saying "their UTXOs could become unspendable" is simply wrong.

Batal mengrim Bitcoin dari Electrum ke wallet exchanger gara-gara fee nya lumayan tinggi.. bahkan ane tadi waktu ingin mengirim sempat di angka lebih dari 1200 sat/vB
Soal tingginya fee transaksi di jaringan blockhain Bitcoin... ane rasa ini ada hubungannya dengan launchingnya sistem berbasis Bitcoin yang baru bernama "Runes"

Seperti sebelum-sebelumnya, tingginya fee ini pasti akan normal lagi dalam beberapa waktu kemudian setelah hype nya turun. Sembari holding BTC untuk menyambut halving Bitcoin yang sudah terjadi pagi tadi.

Wah sepertinya Casey Rodamor lagi-lagi membuat ulah, jika sebelumnya dia menciptakan Ordinals, sekarang dia kembali dengan ide baru yakni Runes yang sama-sama berjalan di Jaringan Bitcoin. Yang membuatnya berbeda jika Ordinals adalah berjenis Non-fungible token (NFT), sementara kalo Runes adalah fungible token yang hanya merupakan meme coin. Release Runes dimulai saat jaringan Bitcoin mencapai block height 840.000.

Yang sedikit aneh meningkatnya fee transaksi di jaringan Mainnet Bitcoin, ternyata juga menular ke Jaringan Testnet Bitcoin, yang saat ini untuk Recommended fee (6 Blocks) telah mencapai level 48.5 sat/vB. Padahal biasanya untuk jaringan testnet rata-rata fee rekomendasiny ada di sekitaran 0.2 - 1 sat/vB. Ane sempet mencoba melakukan transaksi dengan menggunakan fee rekomendasi 48.5 sat/vB di jaringan testnet, ternyata baru mendapatkan 1 konfirmasi block setelah menunggu 21 Menit.

Memang terkadang ada keterkaitan antara biaya transaksi di jaringan utama (Mainnet) dan jaringan uji coba (Testnet) Bitcoin. Ketika ada peningkatan permintaan dan biaya transaksi yang tinggi di jaringan utama, mungkin juga mempengaruhi tingkat fee yang direkomendasikan di jaringan testnet.

Meskipun jaringan testnet berfungsi sebagai lingkungan uji coba, banyak orang menggunakan testnet untuk menguji aplikasi, protokol, dan smart contract sebelum diterapkan di jaringan utama. Jika ada peningkatan aktivitas pengujian di testnet, maka permintaan untuk melakukan transaksi di testnet juga bisa meningkat, sehingga mempengaruhi biaya transaksi yang direkomendasikan.

Dalam kasus Agan menggunakan fee rekomendasi 48.5 sat/vB di jaringan testnet dan mendapatkan konfirmasi dalam 21 menit masih tergolong baik. Biasanya, jaringan testnet mungkin lebih cepat dalam mengonfirmasi transaksi, tetapi jika ada peningkatan aktivitas, waktu konfirmasi bisa meningkat.

Ini adalah aspek yang perlu dipertimbangkan saat menggunakan jaringan testnet, terutama jika ada keterkaitan dengan situasi di jaringan utama. Penting juga untuk memperhatikan rekomendasi biaya transaksi yang diberikan oleh dompet atau layanan Bitcoin yang Agan gunakan, karena setiap platform dapat memiliki metode perhitungan fee yang berbeda.

For reference, this post written using Indonesian language.
1. Usually there's almost no correlation between mempool activity on mainnet and testnet. See https://mempool.space/graphs/mempool#1y and https://mempool.space/testnet/graphs/mempool#1y.
2. Both mainnet and testnet have same 10 minutes block time. So saying testnet might be faster to confirm a transaction is wrong.
3. There's no need to pay attention to mainnet for determining fee for creating TX fee.

AntMiners are primarily designed for mining Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH), which both utilize the SHA-256 algorithm. However, there are also models available that can mine other cryptocurrencies which are compatible with the SHA-256 algorithm.

On the other hand, WhatsMiners, specifically WhatsMiner M20 series, are capable of mining various cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and other coins that use the SHA-256 algorithm. They can also mine other algorithms such as Scrypt and X11.

Both AntMiners and WhatsMiners come with pre-installed firmware that allows them to mine specific cryptocurrencies. However, it's possible to download and install custom firmware or software to modify their mining capabilities. This can enable you to tweak settings, optimize performance, or mine different cryptocurrencies. However, it's important to note that modifying the firmware may void the warranty and any potential support from the manufacturer.

Regarding operating systems, AntMiners and WhatsMiners run on custom-built firmware that serves as their operating system. These firmware versions provide an interface for configuring the devices, monitoring mining statistics, and managing your mining operations.

In terms of algorithm modification, the default algorithm for AntMiners is SHA-256, and for WhatsMiners, it depends on the model but typically includes SHA-256, Scrypt, and X11 algorithms. While it may be possible to modify the firmware to support different algorithms, it's generally not a straightforward process and can be challenging. It's essential to ensure compatibility and consider the power and performance limitations of the hardware before attempting any modifications.

When considering mining equipment, it's crucial to research the specific models you're interested in, as there are various versions and generations available with different capabilities and specifications. Additionally, mining profitability can vary depending on factors such as electricity costs, network difficulty, and market conditions.

1. AntMiner is name of a company. They create all kinds of ASIC, not only SHA-256 ASIC.
2. WhatsMiners is brand name from company MicroBT. They also  create all kinds of ASIC, not only SHA-256 ASIC.
2. Looking at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155468.0 and https://www.asicminervalue.com/miners/microbt/whatsminer-m20s, there's no mention that WhatsMiner M20S support either X11 or scrypt.

Yes, you are correct that Bitcoin's use case has evolved over time due to changes in opcode rules. Opcodes enable the execution of specific operations within a Bitcoin transaction. When new opcode subsets are released, it can modify the rules of Bitcoin by allowing for different data sizes and validation processes.

The introduction of new opcodes can increase the data capacity of a transaction, allowing for the inclusion of additional information that may not be directly related to the intended purpose of the transaction. While some Bitcoin nodes may not validate or analyze the content of such added data, it still becomes a part of the transaction.

1. Opcodes on Bitcoin does more than allowing different data sizes or verification. Other reader may check https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script to verify my statement.
2. Actually only node with outdated software or using software which intentionally doesn't implement certain stuff unable to properly validate unsupported/unknown opcodes.



1. TX fee on sidechain usually is extremely low, so using LN bring little benefit in terms of TX fee.
2. Whether you open LN channel from Bitcoin mainnet or sidechain, you get same benefit (microtransaction and fast confirmation).


User: marcosadelacruz

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

I have been thinking a lot about this topic these days, but we must keep the following in mind:

Risks:

- Protocol complexity: Adding tokens and smart contracts introduces extra complexity to Bitcoin's protocol. This could expand the attack surface and raise the likelihood of vulnerabilities that might compromise the network's security and stability.
- Potential implementation errors: Whenever new features are introduced, there's always the risk of implementation errors that could be exploited for malicious attacks or cause network failures. This could undermine trust in Bitcoin and impact its adoption and value.
- Scalability impact: Incorporating functionalities like tokens and smart contracts might strain Bitcoin's network and hinder its ability to scale effectively. This could lead to network congestion, higher fees, and longer confirmation times, negatively affecting user experience.

Benefits:

- Expanded use cases: Implementing BRC-20 could allow for a wider range of use cases on the Bitcoin network, attracting new users, developers, and businesses to the ecosystem. This could drive adoption and long-term value for Bitcoin.
- Interoperability with other ecosystems: Compatibility with tokens and smart contracts could streamline interoperability between Bitcoin and other blockchain ecosystems, fostering collaboration and synergy among different projects and communities.
- Continuous innovation and development: Bitcoin's ability to adapt and evolve is crucial for its long-term sustainability. Implementing new functionalities like BRC-20 could encourage innovation and ongoing development in the Bitcoin ecosystem, strengthening its position as a market leader in the cryptocurrency space.

For reference, this reply was created under BRC-20 thread.
1. BRC-20 isn't smart contract.
2. BRC-20 doesn't offer feature to add turing-complete script either.
3. BRC-20 (which rely on Ordinal) isn't part of Bitcoin protocol. So it can't be exploited to cause Bitcoin network failure or add vulnerability to Bitcoin network.

[ABCbits]

User: cherryJOH

Additional information (optional):
* This user perform SEO and advertising spam for a website called "coincarp dot com".
* Link on post i mentioned has been edited in order to avoid giving the spammer free backlink.

List of post:

Bitcoin Runes, or simply ‘Runes’, is a protocol that has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain. It represents a new type of fungible token (FT) that is native to the Bitcoin network. The concept was introduced by Casey Rodarmor, the founder of the Ordinals protocol, which itself was a significant step forward in enabling NFT-like functionality on Bitcoin.

The Technical Innovation

Runes are designed to be a user-friendly, UTXO-based alternative to existing tokenized protocols like Ordinals, ORC-20, BRC-20, and Stamps. The protocol aims to minimize the creation of ‘junk’ UTXOs, thereby promoting more responsible UTXO management and reducing the blockchain footprint. This is achieved by embedding tokens within Bitcoin’s unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs), which is a departure from other protocols that may contribute to blockchain bloat.

Market Response and Potential

The market has shown a keen interest in Runes, with projects like Rune Alpha leading the charge. Rune Alpha is a cutting-edge block explorer and integrated application for the Rune protocol, providing a portal to delve into transactions, handle data, and offer extensive support for Rune12.

Conclusion

The introduction of Runes is a testament to the ongoing evolution of the Bitcoin network. It reflects a growing trend towards integrating more complex functionalities while maintaining the network’s core principles of decentralization and efficiency. As the protocol continues to develop, it could potentially open up new avenues for tokenization on Bitcoin, offering a more streamlined and intuitive approach to managing fungible tokens on the blockchain.

In summary, the Bitcoin Runes project is a fascinating development that showcases the adaptability and innovation within the Bitcoin ecosystem. It holds the promise of enhancing the utility of the Bitcoin blockchain while staying true to its foundational ethos.
coincarp dot com/currencies/wanko-manko-runes/
coincarp dot com/currencies/satoshinakamoto/

1. Link he mentioned have no correlation with what he said.
2. It's not revoluionary. If you bother check OmniLayer documentation which created in last decade, it already utilize UTXO and OP_RETURN to create token on Bitcoin network.
3. Runes isn't part of Bitcoin network or protocol, so saying "or simply ‘Runes’, is a protocol that has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain" and "the Bitcoin Runes project is a fascinating development that showcases the adaptability and innovation within the Bitcoin ecosystem" is very misleading.
4. Saying Runes could maintain Bitcoin network's efficiency is ridiculous, when other Bitcoiner forced to pay higher TX fee rate and contribute to mempool/network congestion.

[ABCbits]

User: MicroScript

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

By configuring your Raspberry Pi 5 to adopt both an IPv4 and IPv6, Core Bitcoin will use an IPv6 addressing whenever it is available. Certainly, TOR can be the best way to solve the issue of inbound connections in order not to freak out the central server. The TOR bridges in place ensure complete anonymity provided in TOR. Responding to any possible problem of CGNAT or unstable IPv4 to make your full node approachable and anonymous.

1. Bitcoin is decentralized, so there's no thing such as "central server".
2. Tor Bridge is designed to avoid censorship, see https://support.torproject.org/censorship/censorship-7/. In addition, there's no thing such as complete, absolute or 100% anonymity.

The bitcoins from lobstr wallet er not real are they ?

I have just received 0.03 BTC but I can not swap them or do anything but send them

https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/tx/7ef95f23fc76be72d6ac117dbe4a0f97eb6e9a5c76d616255d65fd1d314de983

Your Bitcoins in Lobster Wallet are actually real. Lobster is a wallet for Stellar Network, not Bitcoin. Your transaction is not related to Bitcoin. It is related to Stellar Lumens (XLM). It is not possible to trade bitcoins in your Lobster Wallet because Lobster Wallet is designed for Stellar. For Bitcoin transactions, you need to use a Bitcoin Core wallet or a hardware wallet like Ledger or Treasure.

1. Statement "Your Bitcoins in Lobster Wallet are actually real." and "Lobster is a wallet for Stellar Network, not Bitcoin." are conflicted.
2. Bitcoin Core and hardware wallet aren't the only Bitcoin wallet out there.

Thank you.
i compiled it but i dont know how to mine the genesis block.
can you help me?

The blockchain client must be configured to mine the Genesis block. Your blockchain client's configuration file for mining should include the algorithm, Coinbase address, difficulty target, and more ancillary settings. After configuring now start mining using the 'start mining' command or you can give the mining command through the user interface. After starting mining you need to monitor whether the correct blocks are being mined successfully. You can verify with Blockchain Explorer whether the Genesis block has been successfully added to the blockchain after it has been mined.

1. The thread talks about modifying Bitcoin-Qt 0.6.2 client. So statement "The blockchain client must be configured to mine the Genesis block" is wrong since genesis block is hardcoded on Bitcoin. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block.
2. If you create your own altcoin, that means you also need to run your own block explorer for your altcoin.

[MicroScript]

1. Bitcoin is decentralized, so there's no thing such as "central server".
2. Tor Bridge is designed to avoid censorship, see https://support.torproject.org/censorship/censorship-7/. In addition, there's no thing such as complete, absolute or 100% anonymity.

Thank you for your opinion and clarification of my point. Your statement that Bitcoin uses a decentralized network is fully correct, and I was mistaken here. Also, I realize that TOR provides a high level of anonymity but isn’t always secure. My goal was to show the advantages of TOR against other DNS in terms of privacy and network access, but I see my misunderstanding of professional terms as troubling. Once again, thank you for the comment!

1. Statement "Your Bitcoins in Lobster Wallet are actually real." and "Lobster is a wallet for Stellar Network, not Bitcoin." are conflicted.
2. Bitcoin Core and hardware wallet aren't the only Bitcoin wallet out there.

I want to clarify. Although other Bitcoin wallets exist, including Bitcoin Core and hardware wallets, my goal was to mention additional alternatives just for Bitcoin since that was a proper answer to the question context. Concerning this, I should’ve explicitly stated that different wallets could be used, and I am sorry if I sounded unclear. Thank you for your comment.

1. The thread talks about modifying Bitcoin-Qt 0.6.2 client. So statement "The blockchain client must be configured to mine the Genesis block" is wrong since Genesis block is hardcoded on Bitcoin. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block.
2. If you create your own altcoin, that means you also need to run your own block explorer for your altcoin.

I appreciate your clarification. According to my very best knowledge, the Genesis block for this particular fork of Bitcoin (Bitcoin-Qt 0.6.2) is hard coded in and therefore can never be mined. I'm grateful for your pointing that out. Also, you're right an altcoin would involve running your very own block explorer which can monitor transactions and blocks. I apologize if my earlier remarks left any ambiguity, and am grateful for the chance to make myself clearer.

[nutildah]

Wow, you used ChatGPT to counter the failures of using ChatGPT that were just pointed out to you. Simply stunning!

You really shouldn't be here at all -- its obvious you're trying to rank up an account for the purpose of getting in some kind of sig campaign, but you'll never get there if you lack the ability to generate any kind of original thought.

[MicroScript]

Wow, you used ChatGPT to counter the failures of using ChatGPT that were just pointed out to you. Simply stunning!

You really shouldn't be here at all -- its obvious you're trying to rank up an account for the purpose of getting in some kind of sig campaign, but you'll never get there if you lack the ability to generate any kind of original thought.

You misunderstood. You're relying on an AI to say my explanation is written with chatgpt. It is not fair to blame anyone depending on AI because AI may not be 100% accurate.
Proof From Copyleaks: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s3v3iuSePnsDktnc-eJL_ZhpFGSwCI0R/view?usp=drive_link

Edited:

When you wish to report a post as being "AI spam," particularly for posts that might not be explicit spam but still generated by AI, you can include a reference link in the report to your own post in this thread, which will contain results from AI detector analyses of the post. When adding an offending account to this thread for the first time, your post should include three or more examples of AI-generated posts by that account. Subsequently, each time the account makes an AI-generated post, those posts can be individually added to this thread, if necessary.

See here your post says 47% generated by AI but that doesn't mean you wrote it with AI. I mean these detectors don't always give 100% accurate results.
QuillBot Proof: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GKC3GP11NzBWPbfd_zEsX9YhwrUpUstb/view

[nutildah]

You misunderstood. You're relying on an AI to say my explanation is written with chatgpt. It is not fair to blame anyone depending on AI because AI may not be 100% accurate.

I looked through some of your other posts and it appears you are using some kind of text spinner or other program to write your posts for you, and then manually tweaking them slightly so as to avoid being detected. Furthermore, I strongly believe you created this account for the purpose of cheating contests (as well as getting into some kind of shitty sig or review campaign). Hard to say who your main account is but I'm sure you have more than one and am in the process of narrowing them down.

[MicroScript]

I looked through some of your other posts and it appears you are using some kind of text spinner or other program to write your posts for you, and then manually tweaking them slightly so as to avoid being detected. Furthermore, I strongly believe you created this account for the purpose of cheating contests (as well as getting into some kind of shitty sig or review campaign). Hard to say who your main account is but I'm sure you have more than one and am in the process of narrowing them down.

You cannot accuse me without sufficient proof. I did not use any text spinner or any other tool. I also checked some of your posts and also got 47%, 13%, 24% ai generated. Now what if i say that you also use text spinner to write your post.

Edited:
You are blaming me depending on ai. If you have to blame, check with your own brain and then blame. Your statements are fully dependent of an ai detector.

[nutildah]

You cannot accuse me without sufficient proof. I did not use any text spinner or any other tool. I also checked some of your posts and also got 47%, 13%, 24% ai generated. Now what if i say that you also use text spinner to write your post.

So that means there's less than a 50% chance that any of those posts used AI, which means they most likely weren't created using AI. Whereas the excerpt from your post I highlighted came back with a 94% chance... Admittedly yes, I don't have enough evidence to report your posts as being AI-generated (using my own standards), so I'm not gonna do that.

The main difference between you and me is your posts suck. They contain illogical blather of no substance, yet are of better-than-average grammatical construction. This suggests you are at the very least using some kind of editing tool. Still, you put zero thought or effort into what you do here and are just churning out nonsense in hopes it will magically lead to a payday. Not to mention the other half your posts are guesses for contests.

I'd say there's zero chance you aren't currently running multiple accounts on this forum, but this one will not get as far as you had hoped.

In any case, I hope you've at least learned to stay away from posting in the technical boards as you clearly know nothing when it comes to the technical details of bitcoin, and your idiocy could actually end up costing money for anyone who somehow took you seriously.

[MicroScript]

So that means there's less than a 50% chance that any of those posts used AI, which means they most likely weren't created using AI. Whereas the excerpt from your post I highlighted came back with a 94% chance... Admittedly yes, I don't have enough evidence to report your posts as being AI-generated (using my own standards), so I'm not gonna do that.

The main difference between you and me is your posts suck. They contain illogical blather of no substance, yet are of better-than-average grammatical construction. This suggests you are at the very least using some kind of editing tool. Still, you put zero thought or effort into what you do here and are just churning out nonsense in hopes it will magically lead to a payday. Not to mention the other half your posts are guesses for contests.

I'd say there's zero chance you aren't currently running multiple accounts on this forum, but this one will not get as far as you had hoped.

In any case, I hope you've at least learned to stay away from posting in the technical boards as you clearly know nothing when it comes to the technical details of bitcoin, and your idiocy could actually end up costing money for anyone who somehow took you seriously.

You said my posts suck. You show me which of my posts seemed to suck to you. If it really happens, I will fix it. But don't make any comments without any proof. You said my post is illogical. Point out that which is illogical. I am using only one account on this forum.

[ABCbits]

1. Bitcoin is decentralized, so there's no thing such as "central server".
2. Tor Bridge is designed to avoid censorship, see https://support.torproject.org/censorship/censorship-7/. In addition, there's no thing such as complete, absolute or 100% anonymity.

Thank you for your opinion and clarification of my point. Your statement that Bitcoin uses a decentralized network is fully correct, and I was mistaken here. Also, I realize that TOR provides a high level of anonymity but isn’t always secure. My goal was to show the advantages of TOR against other DNS in terms of privacy and network access, but I see my misunderstanding of professional terms as troubling. Once again, thank you for the comment!

1. Your original post didn't mention DNS.
2. I don't understand why you compare Tor with DNS.

1. Statement "Your Bitcoins in Lobster Wallet are actually real." and "Lobster is a wallet for Stellar Network, not Bitcoin." are conflicted.
2. Bitcoin Core and hardware wallet aren't the only Bitcoin wallet out there.

I want to clarify. Although other Bitcoin wallets exist, including Bitcoin Core and hardware wallets, my goal was to mention additional alternatives just for Bitcoin since that was a proper answer to the question context. Concerning this, I should’ve explicitly stated that different wallets could be used, and I am sorry if I sounded unclear. Thank you for your comment.

And how about the conflicting statement i pointed out?

1. The thread talks about modifying Bitcoin-Qt 0.6.2 client. So statement "The blockchain client must be configured to mine the Genesis block" is wrong since Genesis block is hardcoded on Bitcoin. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_block.
2. If you create your own altcoin, that means you also need to run your own block explorer for your altcoin.

I appreciate your clarification. According to my very best knowledge, the Genesis block for this particular fork of Bitcoin (Bitcoin-Qt 0.6.2) is hard coded in and therefore can never be mined. I'm grateful for your pointing that out. Also, you're right an altcoin would involve running your very own block explorer which can monitor transactions and blocks. I apologize if my earlier remarks left any ambiguity, and am grateful for the chance to make myself clearer.

If you already know genesis block on Bitcoin is hard coded, i don't understand why you write statement "The blockchain client must be configured to mine the Genesis block." ?


And while we're at it, there are other questionable reply made by you.

Hello

I want to broadcast Bitcoin transactions using python's socket library.Now I can sign a transaction. But when sock is used to link other nodes, it is not known what information should be transmitted.The node I am linking to is protocol version 70016.I tried to find information on bitcoin.org.

This is the site I was looking for:
https://developer.bitcoin.org/reference/p2p_networking.html#protocol-versions

But it doesn't show how protocol 70016 works.I want to know which website I should visit for the 70016 version of the Bitcoin protocol.

Kindly check the Bitcoin core source code https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin to know the details about Bitcoin protocol version 70016 and explore Bitcoin Improvement Proposals so that you can understand how it works and understand broadcast transactions using Python's socket library.

This is very vague answer. Bitcoin Core has tons of code and most people don't know where to start inspecting the code. In addition, there are 163 BIP out there.

how does this work in Wasabi wallet? do I simply have to leave the CoinJoin running until 100% privacy is reached for my wallet? and is 100% possible or will it get near 100%? If hundred percent is reached, is it better to leave the coins on the current wallet or send everything to a new one?

The level of privacy attached to CoinJoin in the Wasabi wallet is not concrete but depends on the number of people participating and the quantity of the mixed amount. It drives privacy to 100; however, not every time it is left running leads it, it always improves it. As such, after one is contented with the privacy, it is ideal to move the coins to another wallet.

FAQ on Wasabi Wallet website says different thing.

Why does the privacy progress change if I select a different coinjoin strategy?

The privacy progress is influenced by the anonymity score target. If the coinjoin strategy is changed to one with a different anonnymity score target, this will cause the privacy progress to increase or decrease.

From those quoted FAQ, we can see chosen CoinJoin strategy is major factor on how Wasabi Wallet calculate percentage of privacy progress.

[LoyceV]

2. I don't understand why you compare Tor with DNS.

This guy should stay away from the tech boards. I regret Meriting him, he's now on my ignore list.

@MicroScript: The tech boards aren't meant to post BS, they're meant to help people with useful information. If you can't provide that, go to Beginners or Off-topic or something. Or just don't post. Maybe you got the wrong idea from my Merit on your first post, and you think you can repeat that. By now, 54 posts later, you should realize it doesn't work that way.

[MicroScript]

Ok, but what should I do now? Do I have to delete all my posts from the Development & Technical Discussion board and the Bitcoin Technical Support board?

[LoyceV]

Ok, but what should I do now?

Stop posting about things you don't understand.

Do I have to delete all my posts from the Development & Technical Discussion board and the Bitcoin Technical Support board?

That would be a good start. It's not helpful, and can give people the wrong idea. Comparing Tor to DNS is like comparing your car engine to a street sign.

[MicroScript]

I have deleted all my posts from the technical board. I apologize to all forum members for sharing wrong and confusing data on technical boards. I will not share any wrong data again in future.