Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board

[ESG]

....

I hope you take this in good faith and not just dismiss me but rather educate me

This isn't kindergarten. If you're here to learn to write posts instead of to learn about Bitcoin, you came to the wrong place.

(I feel like I want to get the blueprint to making quality posts)

Read more, post less.

-accurate and surgical!

[OsaiEmma]

I hope you take this in good faith and not just dismiss me but rather educate me

This isn't kindergarten. If you're here to learn to write posts instead of to learn about Bitcoin, you came to the wrong place.

I never wanted to reply to this but I'd like to say my piece on it, I'm not talking about what I'm here for, that objective is clear, and I've read a lot and learned a lot from people in the forum, things like, security, best investment practices, Bitcoin uniqueness, what Bitcoin community (Bitcointalk) really think about Bitcoin, some tech aspects of Bitcoin, e.t.c alot I've learned.

What I'm talking about is how to interact in the community without having labels like "shitposter" in my profile, or is it that I should just read, and not interact, grow, and participate in forum activities and incentives, if that's it I don't think it makes any sense honestly.

[nutildah]

What I'm talking about is how to interact in the community without having labels like "shitposter" in my profile, or is it that I should just read, and not interact, grow, and participate in forum activities and incentives, if that's it I don't think it makes any sense honestly.

You're not here for the right reasons. You won't "grow" here no matter how many accounts you make, because you're not here to actually learn anything. I just told you what I would do, and you plowed right through it like I'd never even said it. Your posts are bad and I feel you have multiple accounts, therefore my tag is accurate as far as I'm concerned. If you want me to remove it, prove me wrong on one of these two things.

[OsaiEmma]

You're not here for the right reasons. You won't "grow" here no matter how many accounts you make, because you're not here to actually learn anything.

I'm here to be a part of the Bitcointalk community, by learning more about Bitcoin, and engaging actively in the community, and I felt like I have been doing just fine until the day I posted a wrong information on the tech board which I was cautioned and corrected about, before it weirdly escalated.

I just told you what I would do, and you plowed right through it like I'd never even said it. Your posts are bad and I feel you have multiple accounts, therefore my tag is accurate as far as I'm concerned. If you want me to remove it, prove me wrong on one of these two things.

I thought we have been through this but it seems you're still insistent on your point despite the proofs, and points I have made, but it's ok, I don't have any more words for you about my legitimacy and claim of not being an account farmer, if the ones I have made is not enough, so be it.

As I have said before, calling me a shitposter is subjective, and I'm not saying you're wrong cause u guys obviously are more experienced than I am, and I do value experience cause it is the best teacher, so I am asking, give me tips and pointers on making good post, the only I have was by Bitcoin_Arena. He gave good pointers and those that I see I'm having short comings on I take.

I don't want to continue, and this will probably be my last post here, I've given my points, reasoning, and proof, but if it isn't accept, good, nothing I can do about, have a nice day you'll

[TokenTikas]

I don't want to continue, and this will probably be my last post here, I've given my points, reasoning, and proof, but if it isn't accept, good, nothing I can do about, have a nice day you'll

I have gone through all the posts here about your issue. But from what I can see that you keep trying to repeat one particular point, which is that you want people to correct your mistakes and give you better tips and points so you can make good posts. However, you joined this forum around the end of 2024, more than a full year has already passed, yet you are saying you have not gotten good points or tips on how to make better posts here. Honestly, that claim does not really sound reasonable.

Normally, I will try to say something by bringing up one of your early posts from the beginning of your journey in this forum, following the direction of your search for good tips and useful points so that you can make better posts.

Now, i know, yeah I'm a newbie, but in here, gaining merits is so difficult, I was wondering, what is the best way to gain merits, so many people won't want to just give merits, and in my own opinion, I think every newbie should have a kind of startup merit, maybe send able or personal or even both so as to navigate in this space.
For sure, this forum is one of the best forums so far when it comes to navigating in the crypto space, all thanks to the founder of Bitcoin and the whole management team, with that being said, I think this my opinion needs to be taken into consideration, provide a newbie startup merits so as to build from there, thanks

Since you made that post, all the reply posts that came under it were informative, many people even helped you by sharing important links so you could understand the forum better and make good posts. Do you still want to say that you have not get any useful or informative information from this forum?
Without doubt, the replies under that post were informative and they shared important links meant to guide you on how to make better posts in the forum.
Even though it is not really right to speak to you in a scolding way, based on your actions, what LoyceV said is 100% correct, because you have stayed here for more than a year and still keep saying you came here to learn. Nobody will hold your hand and start teaching you after over a year in the forum and then you make these kinds of statements after making mistakes, which is not acceptable. You have already received enough directional ideas from your early posts, so if you check that particular post again, you will find all the necessary information there.

This isn't kindergarten. If you're here to learn to write posts instead of to learn about Bitcoin, you came to the wrong place.

You're not here for the right reasons. You won't "grow" here no matter how many accounts you make, because you're not here to actually learn anything.

Deeply agree with you because even though he has been here for more than a year, he still has not been able to learn anything, so even if he stays here for a longer time, he will not learn unless he is willing to make a real effort to learn.

OsaiEmma,
As a good advice for you, you should stop making this kind of Shit/low-quality posts and try to prove yourself in the right way by making better posts in the forum. Normally, this type of neutral tag does not cause any serious issue, it only serves as a simple warning through the neutral tag, these neutral tags will not affect your progress moving forward.

[ABCbits]

User: Easteregg69

Additional information (optional):
* This user receive at least 2 neutral tag due to spamming.

List of post:

Think about getting a wallet where the battery don't run out.

This reply posted on thread Cake wallet - Discussion and News, where it's a software wallet. So suggesting finding wallet that won't run out of battery doesn't make sense/off-topic, since it's not hardware wallet.

The main reason I am using the wallet is because of bitcoin. I have been unable to make use of sub 1 sat/vbyte fee for bitcoin transaction, I hope this would be possible very soon. It will not be good for people to be wasting money on fee when they can pay far lesser in fee

Don't go below recommended. Or your btc gets stuck in mempool for ages. NOT included in a block.

It's like an auction. Who pays most gets included.

Overbid and you loose money. Stick with fast or recommended.

It's likely user @Karl_3000 made that reply since website such as https://mempool.space/ usually recommend fee below 1 sat/vB. So his suggestion isn't helpful in this case.

Both post are off-topic.

User: walletrecovery

Additional information (optional):
* Alt of known scammer, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg54255920#msg54255920.

List of post:
--snip--

This user spam on technical board again. See his deleted posts, https://bitlist.co/search?author=walletrecovery&only_deleted=true&limit=20&sort_by=date_desc.

[ABCbits]

User: BLEIOT

Additional information (optional):
* I suspect this user also use AI/chatbot generated text.

List of post:

FORMAL DISCLOSURE: SYSTEMATIC RF SURVEILLANCE & TARGETED ASSET EXFILTRATION
Subject: Unauthorized Industrial BLE Mesh Infrastructure Deployment
Complainant: Andrii Kempa (Ex-Managing Partner, Weltrade / Hashing24)
Legal Reference: US District Court, Central District of California (Case No. CV25-8022-JFW(KS))

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This submission documents a persistent, transnational pattern of physical and digital interference targeting a FinTech executive. The observed activity involves industrial-grade Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) mesh nodes deployed in public and controlled environments, enabling proximity surveillance, coordinated tracking, and potential data exfiltration related to proprietary Nano-Chip and quantum encryption research.

II. CONTEXT OF TARGETING
Following the termination of high-level corporate engagement in Los Angeles, the complainant experienced sustained pressure, including occupational downgrading attempts and physical threats. The targeting pattern indicates interest in intellectual property associated with Neuro-Quantum Systems and silicon-level vulnerabilities in containerized environments (e.g., BIP-360 concepts).

III. RF FORENSIC FINDINGS
Data collected across urban infrastructure (courthouses, police facilities) and isolated terrain (Wilson Canyon) demonstrates consistent presence of coordinated BLE activity.

Hardware Signatures

• Industrial Identifiers: Repeated detection of B4JA / B3BA / B4FA prefixes, consistent with Telink (TLSR82xx) and Realtek embedded BLE SDK ecosystems.
  
• Telematics Devices: rPP20 / DLDNFE modules (ThinkRace/Topin class) exhibiting static UUID persistence (>31 days), inconsistent with BLE privacy standards (RPA rotation).
  

Behavioral Characteristics (C2 Indicators)

• Deterministic Timing: Fixed broadcast lifetimes (10s, 18s, 50s) indicating firmware-level TTL control rather than OS-driven behavior.
  
• Synchronized Termination: Near-simultaneous cessation of advertising across multiple nodes, consistent with centralized command execution (e.g., HCI-level control).
  

IV. ESCALATION INDICATORS
Documented incidents aligned with RF observations include:

• Physical Attacks: Recorded assaults with medical and police documentation (LAPD / Costa Mesa PD).
  
• Environmental Exposure: Reported toxic exposure events with measurable physiological effects.
  
• Data Loss: Repeated compromise of storage devices containing encrypted research data.
  

V. CONCLUSION
The repeatable detection of industrial BLE mesh signatures across unrelated environments supports the presence of a mobile, coordinated RF infrastructure. The observed timing determinism and synchronization patterns are consistent with managed embedded systems, not consumer devices.

This case warrants independent investigation into:

• Supply chain origins of B4JA-class hardware
• Use of BLE mesh systems for proximity surveillance
• Potential implications for hardware-level security and cryptographic asset protection

Technical Appendix & Logs:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5570872.msg66269664#msg66269664

This reply is off-topic and unhelpful, because the thread title is "Is Hashing 24 still operating?".

Hello, regarding the draft BIP-360 (P2QRH) and the QuBit project: while the transition to Falcon/Dilithium protects the mathematical integrity of a transaction against Shor’s algorithm, I am concerned about the physical layer de-anonymization of the signing hardware itself.

Over the last few months, I’ve conducted a series of BLE Forensic Isolation Tests across Los Angeles (from DTLA to remote mountain trails). My data shows that modern BLE/IoT stacks are forming coordinated, non-stochastic mesh networks that effectively "fingerprint" physical locations and devices, regardless of the address type used on-chain.

The Evidence (803 device records across 5 locations):
My analysis of 7 sessions (including urban centers like Melrose and isolated spots like Wilson Canyon) reveals a persistent coordination pattern. For instance, in Session S4 (Central Library), I observed a "Max Wave" of 59 devices terminating their broadcast in a single synchronized event within a 96s window. Even in zero-infrastructure mountain areas (M1-M3), devices like rPP20 maintained static UUIDs for over 31 days, violating BLE privacy standards.

The Problem for BIP-360:
Falcon signatures are significantly larger (~10x-20x) than ECDSA/Schnorr. This requires more processing time and longer radio-silence-breaking transmission windows. If the silicon-level BLE/IoT stacks contain factory-level "debug" backdoors or coordinated termination triggers (as my logs suggest), the moment you sign a "quantum-safe" bc1r transaction, you are potentially broadcasting a unique RF-fingerprint that links your physical identity to your UTXO.

Question for the developers:
How can BIP-360 ensure privacy against silicon-level backdoors? Does the proposal consider mandatory "Radio Silence" protocols for signing devices to prevent key-to-device correlation during the extended signing window of post-quantum algorithms?
For those interested in the raw data on these coordinated BLE clusters and the "Mountain Isolation" proof, I’ve posted the full forensic logs here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5570872.msg66506991#msg66506991

1. BIP 360 doesn't enforce Falcon or other QC resistant cryptography usage.
2. BIP 360 output type is P2MR, not P2QRH.
3. BIP 360 address use bc1z prefix, not bc1r.

[ABCbits]

Edit: shortly after i create this post and report their post, 3 of those account got nuked.


If you ask whether neutral tag works, check this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5575985.msg66467314#msg66467314.


User: ContentWriter

Additional information (optional):
* This user received at least 4 neutral tag with reason spamming or speaking nonsense.
* This user received at least 1 accusation of spamming with AI, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg64254917#msg64254917.

List of post:

This post is unhelpful since it's only agreeing with quoted post.

The main issue I see in LN is setup. Not many people have the patient to learn how to set it up correctly and even if they try, it's still so uncommon that most people who know about Bitcoin prefer the simpler on-chain payment. If LN could be made easy to use, there's no reason why merchants and customers won't use it. It would be nice for a UI to enable the switch from on-chain payment to LN by just flipping a switch instead of the laborious configuration involved in LN.

The mentioned issue is misleading, since another user already mention there are ways to accept LN without technical knowledge on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578124.msg66535532#msg66535532.


User: Cryptomann4562

Additional information (optional):
* This user received at least 2 neutral tag with reason spamming with AI.

List of post:

Plain spam, because mining is still alive today and new block regularly mined.

This post is unhelpful since it only rephrase/repeat what other member have said, in particular https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573854.msg66387862#msg66387862.

This post is unhelpful, because it doesn't answer question of the thread.


User: Claudio973

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

This reply is off-topic, because the thread topic about Bitcoin mining difficulty, not how hard to mine Bitcoin.

Mining Bitcoin through phone is actually hard but we can use our phones to mine other cryptocurrency and actually convert them or use them to buy Bitcoin. I have seen a situation where a friend of mine uses his phone to mine Bitcoin back in the year 2021 and he generated 1 btc while doing it. When you have the  right website where you can mine using phone, everything will be possible and you can use it to generate Bitcoin.

Other users explained why mining with phone can't obtain that much Bitcoin,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5570249.msg66529403#msg66529403
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5570249.msg66529461#msg66529461


User: JetSeason

Additional information (optional): -

List of post:

Joining mining pool won't help because OP of that thread mention they only own some computer (no ASIC).

Mining in Iran is still technically possible, but the war and energy situation have made it riskier and less predictable than before. Iran became a big mining hub because of cheap subsidized power, but that same grid is now under strain and subject to outages and even potential disruptions from conflict.

More background on how war and energy pressure could impact mining:
https://www.wired.me/story/irans-crypto-sector-was-a-lifeline-through-sanctions-war-could-shut-it-down

It's not technically possible, when internet on Iran is almost down 100% according to https://mastodon.social/@netblocks/116209365909674855. Other news also report some area experience electricity outage.