⭕ BitList.co - Mixers ' Exchanges ' Services ' Casinos

[NotATether]

What a mess with Bitlist threads and the red circle icon. Suddenly, it's everywhere,  It's getting harder and harder to know which one is for what. A small change on the icon adapted to the discussion would be useful, a different colour or maybe not complete the whole circle for discussions about development.

It sounds reasonable, but of those that could be used across various topics, I only see a few worthy emoji. But if we look at it through the lens of social identity, a single symbol for all threads + including the full domain name ... would ultimately benefit the project as a whole.

I think it would make the threads a lot more clearer if you put a one-word subject inside brackets, like this:

Code:

[SIG] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Code:

[NINJASTIC] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Code:

[TELEGRAM BOT] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Code:

[ANN] ⭕ BitList.co - lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

or some variation of that.

Keep it short and simple, so it doesn't get cut off in the browser HTML.

[icopress]

A little creativity before the New Year 

[LoyceV]

What a mess with Bitlist threads and the red circle icon. Suddenly, it's everywhere,  

All I see is Opera browser

I think it would make the threads a lot more clearer if you put a one-word subject inside brackets,

I like this idea. Name changes always makes it more difficult to find back what I'm looking for.

[TryNinja]

The services page is getting more and more complete.

Added a few things:
- Escrow information
- Better indication of PGP signed letters
- AML risk information

For example: https://bitlist.co/service/mixtum

[Pmalek]

I am looking at the list of exchanges on BitList and I was wondering about the 'Not Safe' tag displayed next to some of the brands. For example, FixedFloat and Godex are rightly marked as not safe exchanges. On the other hand, ChangeNOW isn't, but that service has for a long time been associated with scams, confiscation of cryptocurrencies, and unfair practices. What are the requirements to mark an exchange as not safe?

[TryNinja]

I am looking at the list of exchanges on BitList and I was wondering about the 'Not Safe' tag displayed next to some of the brands. For example, FixedFloat and Godex are rightly marked as not safe exchanges. On the other hand, ChangeNOW isn't, but that service has for a long time been associated with scams, confiscation of cryptocurrencies, and unfair practices. What are the requirements to mark an exchange as not safe?

Anyone can suggest changes to the list.

For Changenow, I found a report from Trêvoid about their practices and I agree they should have the not safe tag. Done!

[Trêvoid]

I am looking at the list of exchanges on BitList and I was wondering about the 'Not Safe' tag displayed next to some of the brands. For example, FixedFloat and Godex are rightly marked as not safe exchanges. On the other hand, ChangeNOW isn't, but that service has for a long time been associated with scams, confiscation of cryptocurrencies, and unfair practices. What are the requirements to mark an exchange as not safe?

Anyone can suggest changes to the list.

For Changenow, I found a report from Trêvoid about their practices and I agree they should have the not safe tag. Done!

ChangeNow definitely an unsafe exchange. Over the past year, there have been numerous reports I have seen from users and my clients who have not received refunds. While small transactions process smoothly, larger ones often trigger KYC checks. Even after completing verification, support becomes unresponsive and refunds are either denied or delayed for a long and long extended periods.

[Pmalek]

ChangeNow definitely an unsafe exchange. Over the past year, there have been numerous reports I have seen from users and my clients who have not received refunds. While small transactions process smoothly, larger ones often trigger KYC checks. Even after completing verification, support becomes unresponsive and refunds are either denied or delayed for a long and long extended periods.

That's probably because they never had the intention to refund the clients they demand KYC verification from in the first place. They only want to put a name on file, collect as much data as they can, and share the information with their partners in crime. Those who are persistent, make a lot of noise, and cause negative press to their service will probably get their money back just to make them shut up and not draw negative attention to the exchange anymore.