⭕ BitList.co - Mixers ' Exchanges ' Services ' Casinos

[TryNinja]

Update

- Improved uptime monitor to increase accuracy of service status.
- Improved website loading times (main page and service page).

[logfiles]

@TryNinja, Trocador (https://trocador.app/) has been online this whole time. On the monitor, it has been reported to have been offline (https://bitlist.co/service/trocador) for the past 30 days or so. I don't know what is causing this but it could be a bug

Also, the Bitcointalk link to Trocador is this  - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5437542.0 (which is clearly of anonpay within the Trocador app). I think Trocador has no official announcement thread.

[TryNinja]

Trocador (https://trocador.app/) has been online this whole time. On the monitor, it has been reported to have been offline (https://bitlist.co/service/trocador) for the past 30 days or so. I don't know what is causing this but it could be a bug

They use their own DDoS solution which is blocking our uptime bot. I'll add an exception to treat that page as being online.

Also, the Bitcointalk link to Trocador is this  - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5437542.0 (which is clearly of anonpay within the Trocador app). I think Trocador has no official announcement thread.

Well, like you said, there is no official ANN. This is the closest since it's a product from within Trocador.

[irfan_pak10]

Got few suggestion, I have tried image upload function today. Few things,

First can you add one more link where url is also embedded in the image like



Secondly, previously I have using the imagebb, once I upload any image their size Is ~640x360 can you add one link this give this size as well?
Maybe one link where full size etc. you can explore imagebb you check how they work?

[examplens]

Secondly, previously I have using the imagebb, once I upload any image their size Is ~640x360 can you add one link this give this size as well?
Maybe one link where full size etc. you can explore imagebb you check how they work?

In the last link offered, "BBCode (with height)" you have such an option. Just replace your height from the actual 941 to 640 or whatever you want. It will automatically be resized proportionally.
On some forums (I assume with newer SMF versions), clicking on the resized image will enlarge it to full size.

[irfan_pak10]

Secondly, previously I have using the imagebb, once I upload any image their size Is ~640x360 can you add one link this give this size as well?
Maybe one link where full size etc. you can explore imagebb you check how they work?

In the last link offered, "BBCode (with height)" you have such an option. Just replace your height from the actual 941 to 640 or whatever you want. It will automatically be resized proportionally.
On some forums (I assume with newer SMF versions), clicking on the resized image will enlarge it to full size.

Wont it only changes the height, not the width?

I think its a better idea to add such options inside the website as well to re-size the image as well.

[TryNinja]

Wont it only changes the height, not the width?

I think its a better idea to add such options inside the website as well to re-size the image as well.

It keeps the same aspect ratio

Try

Better than having to change both just to distort the image because you lowered more from the width than from the height

[DYING_S0UL]

...snip...

So long story short, I was randomly going through BitList and under the "Unstable" section, I saw a very reputable mixer service which I don't quite remember to be unstable at all (and for obvious reason I won't be naming it, nor post any images). Now if unstable means (assuming), having multiple periods of downtimes, then I don't think that is the case here. I checked its daily uptime, and there weren't anything out of order, mostly online.

There was another service with almost half the time offline, so that made sense. But for this particular service, why is it listed under unstable again? I'm a little confused.

[logfiles]

So long story short, I was randomly going through BitList and under the "Unstable" section, I saw a very reputable mixer service which I don't quite remember to be unstable at all (and for obvious reason I won't be naming it, nor post any images). Now if unstable means (assuming), having multiple periods of downtimes, then I don't think that is the case here. I checked its daily uptime, and there weren't anything out of order, mostly online.

There was another service with almost half the time offline, so that made sense. But for this particular service, why is it listed under unstable again? I'm a little confused.

You can actually name the service here so long as you don't post a link or appear to advertise it. The admin's stance towards Bitcoin mixers softened a bit regarding discussions about them. I checked the website, and I don't see any mixer under the unstable category. I just see one mixer under the offline category, and it's completely offline

Maybe one of the reasons some services appear unstable/offline is because of what TryNinja said here when I asked him to about a certain service whose status appeared offline but on visiting the link it was always online.

They use their own DDoS solution which is blocking our uptime bot. I'll add an exception to treat that page as being online.

[DYING_S0UL]

You can actually name the service here so long as you don't post a link or appear to advertise it. The admin's stance towards Bitcoin mixers softened a bit regarding discussions about them. I checked the website, and I don't see any mixer under the unstable category. I just see one mixer under the offline category, and it's completely offline

Yes, I'm well aware of that now. But the last time, when I accidentally/unintentionally mentioned/posted an image from a mixer, and it was linked to another service that was being promoted here (through sig), I almost got banned. The whole thing made quite the stir at meta and reputation (you probably saw that). Luckily admin reconsidered everything and did not issue any ban to the sig participants (only banning that particular service). Anyway, after that little incident, I'm always hesitant to mention, even talk about any mixer here. Maybe I'm being paranoid for no reason at all.  

Maybe one of the reasons some services appear unstable/offline is because of what TryNinja said here when I asked him to about a certain service whose status appeared offline but on visiting the link it was always online.

They use their own DDoS solution which is blocking our uptime bot. I'll add an exception to treat that page as being online.

I wasn't aware of this ddos thing. Now it makes totally sense. The service is actually coin o mize, and they are known for enforcing very strong ddos guard. So, this exception is applicable for them.

[TryNinja]

So long story short, I was randomly going through BitList and under the "Unstable" section, I saw a very reputable mixer service which I don't quite remember to be unstable at all (and for obvious reason I won't be naming it, nor post any images). Now if unstable means (assuming), having multiple periods of downtimes, then I don't think that is the case here. I checked its daily uptime, and there weren't anything out of order, mostly online.

There was another service with almost half the time offline, so that made sense. But for this particular service, why is it listed under unstable again? I'm a little confused.

If the service has at least one period of downtime in the last 24 hours, it will have the unstable status.

I agree it's currently a bit too harsh, so I changed the conditions to 30% downtime in the last 12 hours.

[NotATether]

~

Unrelated, but you seem to have forgotten to add the .com domain for BitMixList: bitmixlist.com

This is a mirror which serves traffic from a different server.

Thanks!

Edit: Also, why can't I edit my own listing? I find that quite strange.

[TryNinja]

Unrelated, but you seem to have forgotten to add the .com domain for BitMixList: bitmixlist.com

This is a mirror which serves traffic from a different server.

Added!

[kryme]

Hey, just started working on btcprice.app, which is a portfolio tracker, based on the OG Blockfolio app before FTX bought it. I tried to list it on Bitlist as vod recommended here, but it doesn't really fall into a category. I listed it as wallet/tools but was wondering if it makes sense to add portfolio as a category?

[TryNinja]

Hey, just started working on btcprice.app, which is a portfolio tracker, based on the OG Blockfolio app before FTX bought it. I tried to list it on Bitlist as vod recommended here, but it doesn't really fall into a category. I listed it as wallet/tools but was wondering if it makes sense to add portfolio as a category?

I think the Tools category is a good fit for your website.

We can't add a new category unless there is a big number of websites to put there, or things will start to get messy.

[examplens]

I think the Tools category is a good fit for your website.

We can't add a new category unless there is a big number of websites to put there, or things will start to get messy.

When adding a service, is it possible to add it to two different categories?
There are hybrid services that are, for example, aggregators and exchangers at the same time. Or, for example, on altt forum is one service presented as mixer + exchange + casino.

[TryNinja]

When adding a service, is it possible to add it to two different categories?

Yes, it can have up to 3 categories.

[ovcijisir]

Is there plans to update Bitlist website with notifications for Altscoinstalks forum mentions too, similar as for Bitcointalk?

I know that there are Telegram bots with that functionality but it would be great for the people who don't have Telegram, or for people who have Telegram only to check if someone replied them on the forum.

[logfiles]

I would like to understand how this KYC levels work. Let's say a service has never request for KYC verification from any user yet but in their terms of service their is a clause that mandates them to request for KYC verification at any time they want. Is that KYC level classified as level 0 or level 1

For example HodlHodl is classified as KYC level 0 but they have this in their ToS

3.5 Identification and Verification
If required by applicable law or our internal policies, we may at any time introduce mandatory identification or verification procedures. Failure to complete required verification constitutes a violation of this Agreement and may lead to account suspension or termination.

I think it should be somewhere at KYC level 1 or Am I missing something?

[icopress]

[...]

Over the coming months, we will undertake a comprehensive review and update of the services. The KYC ratings also require some minor adjustments. Regarding the specific point you mentioned, the services that were automatically migrated do not have KYC ratings (and are formally listed as 0).

Some services were automatically migrated from a previous version of BitList and were listed as Approved. The amount of retesting required is enormous, so if you notice any discrepancies, please report.