Do we need more influencial women in crypto to help the gender embrace it?

[Chibaba]

Cryptocurrency is gaining popularity among individuals who value anonymity. The gender or identity of those using cryptocurrency is irrelevant, as long as they do not wish to disclose it. People who appreciate the benefits of cryptocurrency will use it regardless of their gender or social status. There is no need for more influential women to endorse cryptocurrency for it to be accepted by the public.

Gender discrimination no longer exists in today's world, but there is no denying that high-risk fields are still dominated by men. But I hope that in the coming years, as the need to make money becomes greater and greater, more women will soon participate in this market.

Many women are already in the crypto space. I can only say we need more taking important role to encourage massive adoption and with women like Gracy Chen recently announced as Bitget CEO is a good step towards onboarding more women. Ye He of Binance is anther notable woman to reckon with and I hope both embark on  the crusade to encourage more women.

[Chibaba]

You could be shocked to know that there might be more female crypto holders than males if we have to total the number of crypto adoptors in the world under a uniform data with but since cryptocurrency supports privacy of users we can't certainly say for sure who's a man or woman. Take the forum for instance, you just by the username of a person say it's a male or a female user and that's the beauty of anonymity in the crypto world.

The most recent survey on gender involved in crypto globally shows less than 40% of the female gender are involved. You may confirm here
https://cointelegraph.com/news/women-in-crypto-an-overview#:~:text=As%20of%202023%2C%20cryptocurrency%20ownership,almost%20close%20to%20155%20million.
and from this figure only Gracy Chen and Yi He seems to be holding important role in this industry.

[sulendra12]

Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

I don't think that helps really much, because I'd prefer the anonymity of the cryptocurrency that offers as a key feature of cryptocurrency. Personally I'd say that in here at least they don't really care if women influences the usage of cryptocurrency but rather than the vision about cryptocurrency in here is really bad and even though they know about cryptocurrency, they are against to use it because of how bad and most likely involved in illegal activities.

[YUriy1991]

I don't think that helps really much, because I'd prefer the anonymity of the cryptocurrency that offers as a key feature of cryptocurrency. Personally I'd say that in here at least they don't really care if women influences the usage of cryptocurrency but rather than the vision about cryptocurrency in here is really bad and even though they know about cryptocurrency, they are against to use it because of how bad and most likely involved in illegal activities.

Diversity is also needed to be able to drive innovation and there are indeed some of them who are able and continue to be involved in investing whether it is in crypto or other businesses but for full time I think not, because by nature they are women where more time will be spent on their families whether taking care of their husbands and children.

For risk matters usually women are not as aggressive as men, they are more likely to use money for positive purposes only, if it is felt risky and fluctuating they will naturally stay away and do not want to be ignored.

[bitterguy28]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency? Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

we need no man or woman to enter or to be named as crypto users just to make this market have more influence because what we need is support from the whole market and if all the crypto investors now will help this market to grow more than what we are doing now and this is what the cryptomarket wanted us to do.

[harapan]

I can guess one of the main features of the crypto space is privacy and I believe lots of person would prefer to keep their identity unknown and am sure that is basically one of the major thoughts on the minds of one of the greatest creators @satoshi nakamoto as he aslo kept him anonymous so if you really come to think of it who knows if Satoshi is even a lady? but who cares we all know that a certain proportion of both genders are involved in the activity around the Crypto space and this adds no impact so let's focus more on what's ahead.

Lots and thousands of people prefers this bitcoin feature thats called anonymity.One of the reasons why bitcoin is difficult to penetrate by false and illegal users is because of the high level of security,decentralized systems and privacy techniques that it possess.
The cryptospace would have experienced so many challenges without this strong and high technological  security improvement.The bitcoin networks security is completely secured and its generally one of the safest investments to rely on in tge cryptospace.
Because of their encryption systems,cybercrimes and attacks are  simply not occurring as a results of legalized security functions.

[Promocodeudo]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency? Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

First of all, women are been controlled by two factors which is what they hear and what they see, personally I will also say that women Believe in quick money thats why they fall victim easily, they only set of women who may be very careful in dealings relating to investment is those ones that are into the system already, a woman is not moved because her fellow woman has investment in crypto instead a man can influence her to invest based on personal relationship, this is also applicable to men, the crypto industry is gaining popularity and adoption with the help of major players in the industry, people like me and you are also contributing our quota to fasten the continuous adoption of crypto worldwide, no matter how we see it, in any investment, be it bitcoin or crypto in general women has less influence though they have there own role to play but men are always the strategic influencer, in conclusion, we won't be needing extra women for more female gender adoption of crypto rather everyone is needed to quicken the movement.

[reagansimms]

The involvement of influential women in the crypto world will help attract other women's interest in getting involved in Bitcoin. Apart from the names mentioned above, there are still many other women who are already involved in Bitcoin. Here we never know how many women have accounts with different user names because they are anonymous, they are more comfortable using pseudonyms to maintain their privacy and don't want their identities to be exposed more widely.

Gender only differentiates men and women, nothing can limit anyone from channeling their desires to do anything that can bring profit to them, including being directly involved in Bitcoin investment. I am happy that Bitcoin is increasingly in demand by all groups of different ages and economic levels, its wider adoption will make Bitcoin increasingly recognized as the most profitable mainstream investment in the future.

[pinggoki]

Actually that would make sense, I mean it would be true for both genders after all. Men don't get influenced by women influencers after all, so it's only logical that women would be more inclined to try cryptocurrency if there's people that they can relate to that would promote it to them or use them. But the problem with this one is that I don't see a lot of women that's interested in cryptocurrency as they find it too intimidating given that there's more male in that space than female, maybe it's just an illusory barrier and they can just get in, I mean people in the cryptocurrency community is pretty welcoming in my opinion, after all we want the same thing, financial freedom.

[GideonGono]

This is a cryptospace where physical contact is very rare, there is no reference to a crypto address whether the owner is male or female which means it really isn't a necessity. Maybe the statistics about gender numbers are true, but we will never know the reality. I have a female friend who is active in several airdrop groups, and people there call her "sir", "bro", "man" even though she is clearly wearing a profile photo of her own face.
So, gender isn't something serious.

I also think that gender isn't that important in crypto, after all it was meant for anonymity of the users so what's the point of it?
For me gender doesn't matter as long as they could contribute to the crypto space, investors or us who use crypto would accept them no matter what their gender would be, it is their work or contribution that would create a name for them.

[btc78]

First of all, women are been controlled by two factors which is what they hear and what they see,

Aren't we all? Many people tend to believe a narrative or concept that they are aware of.

personally I will also say that women Believe in quick money thats why they fall victim easily,

Mate your opinion being personal immediately invalidates what you are about to say. What even is your basis for a claim aside from your own opinion? I know lots of men who not only believe in quick money but also are hoping to get in on it.

they only set of women who may be very careful in dealings relating to investment is those ones that are into the system already

Obviously they will be more knowledgeable as they have already studied what they need to. A man will also be making wrong decisions if he has not studied properly about investments. How do you expect a woman to be in the system without learning first? everyone was once a beginner too.

[fikrett]

First of all, women are been controlled by two factors which is what they hear and what they see,

Aren't we all? Many people tend to believe a narrative or concept that they are aware of.

personally I will also say that women Believe in quick money thats why they fall victim easily,

Mate your opinion being personal immediately invalidates what you are about to say. What even is your basis for a claim aside from your own opinion? I know lots of men who not only believe in quick money but also are hoping to get in on it.

Totally agreed.
I would say we are equal in that regard and in the crypto space overall, and that's not strange or a coincidence

[FortuneFollower]

Obviously they will be more knowledgeable as they have already studied what they need to. A man will also be making wrong decisions if he has not studied properly about investments. How do you expect a woman to be in the system without learning first? everyone was once a beginner too.

It's essential and it isn't about the gender or something along the lines of it - it is simply the truth that no matter who you are, you need to learn.
As a man or a woman, you still need to work as hard as you can to be successful.

[john_egbert]

personally I will also say that women Believe in quick money thats why they fall victim easily,

Mate your opinion being personal immediately invalidates what you are about to say. What even is your basis for a claim aside from your own opinion? I know lots of men who not only believe in quick money but also are hoping to get in on it.

That sounds more like a stereotype, rather than a fact   Even though it may be true for the OP - it still wouldn't make it a fact for everybody.

[HajiBagi]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency? Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

It would be good if many females knew about Bitcoin, but I don't think it is necessary or important because Bitcoin doesn't concern Gender, Bitcoin is very comfortable with the way it is and from my point of view not all women will have an interest in Bitcoin, some women don't have the mind of investing, No matter how strong a woman is if she wants to invest in Bitcoin she will doubting it because she won't trust it, investing in Bitcoin and hold is not for some Gender.

Some women will understand Bitcoin and will invest but that will be a woman who knows Bitcoin and see people who invest in it succeed in it, Cryptocurrency is not about Gender is about having trust in what you are doing, And We should remember that not until the women are involved in cryptocurrency that will make Bitcoin grow.

[alastantiger]

It would be good if many females knew about Bitcoin, but I don't think it is necessary or important because Bitcoin doesn't concern Gender, Bitcoin is very comfortable with the way it is and from my point of view not all women will have an interest in Bitcoin, some women don't have the mind of investing, No matter how strong a woman is if she wants to invest in Bitcoin she will doubting it because she won't trust it, investing in Bitcoin and hold is not for some Gender.

Not all women are doubting the potential of Bitcoin because they have interest in Bitcoin but we shouldn't make investing in Bitcoin to be gender sensitive. Both male and female can decide to invest in bitcoin. Bitcoin doesn't ask for your gender before you can invest in Bitcoin. All gender should come separating on their own to invest in cryptocurrency. We don't have to force them or influence them to do what they didn't what to do. Influencing People to do something doesn't always end well.

Bitcoin has all the potential to attract more women but the women have to be willing to be risk takers. What Bitcoin has to offer to everybody without the help is how decentralized we can enjoy our finances hence when the time is right the female gender will join the market. We shouldn't treat Bitcoin as something that everybody has to agree with or we will be making the wrong steps for the development of Bitcoin.

[dupee419]

It would be good if many females knew about Bitcoin, but I don't think it is necessary or important because Bitcoin doesn't concern Gender, Bitcoin is very comfortable with the way it is and from my point of view not all women will have an interest in Bitcoin, some women don't have the mind of investing, No matter how strong a woman is if she wants to invest in Bitcoin she will doubting it because she won't trust it, investing in Bitcoin and hold is not for some Gender.

Not all women are doubting the potential of Bitcoin because they have interest in Bitcoin but we shouldn't make investing in Bitcoin to be gender sensitive. Both male and female can decide to invest in bitcoin. Bitcoin doesn't ask for your gender before you can invest in Bitcoin. All gender should come separating on their own to invest in cryptocurrency. We don't have to force them or influence them to do what they didn't what to do. Influencing People to do something doesn't always end well.

Bitcoin has all the potential to attract more women but the women have to be willing to be risk takers. What Bitcoin has to offer to everybody without the help is how decentralized we can enjoy our finances hence when the time is right the female gender will join the market. We shouldn't treat Bitcoin as something that everybody has to agree with or we will be making the wrong steps for the development of Bitcoin.

Just to add from what alastantiger said, I think Bitcoin’s popular enough now that it doesn’t need any pushy tactics to attract people. Just letting it grow naturally seems like the best way to keep its development moving in the right direction.

[Samlucky O]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency?

Of course there eee many women who are bitcoin investors aside the few that you have listed, but having the name of more women listed in the table of the top investor does change anything. Because naturally women don't like online investment but physical investment. They want to be in full /total control of their finances, and they are  security conscious or minded so they don't have that spirit of a man in the of investment. So even if more women are listed here to attract more women investors the female gender may never take it seriously even though I know many will still buy buy it wouldn't make no much difference.

Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

Like I said there is no need. Those that will invest will do and those who will not invest will not also invest. That doesn't change the fact that men are still leading in anything financial system.

[Lanatsa]

When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency?

Of course there eee many women who are bitcoin investors aside the few that you have listed, but having the name of more women listed in the table of the top investor does change anything. Because naturally women don't like online investment but physical investment. They want to be in full /total control of their finances, and they are  security conscious or minded so they don't have that spirit of a man in the of investment. So even if more women are listed here to attract more women investors the female gender may never take it seriously even though I know many will still buy buy it wouldn't make no much difference.

Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.

Like I said there is no need. Those that will invest will do and those who will not invest will not also invest. That doesn't change the fact that men are still leading in anything financial system.

Why there's so much talks about what gender like this and like that in speaking about adoption on which we know that this something really that having that inevitable movement yet recognition and attention is really that becoming bigger and bigger as years passing. Doesn't matter on what are the age and gender into those people who do engage with cryptocurrency. This has been created for some obvious reason on which making up that p2p and other utilities on which other projects that offers. People are really just that putting up too much focus on gender and really that believing that women couldn't be able to handle crypto investment.

We do know that there are women investors on this space, it isn't really that obvious just because there's no way on telling on whose behind into those addresses that making up some crypto transactions or simply talking about decentralized and anonymity aspects.

[Easteregg69]

Girls don't know that impermanent loss is only temporary. Don't get everyone winded up about it.