Well, it's also good for the network, since a higher hashrate means more security. What I wonder is whether increasing the energy level for mining won't fuel the narrative that Bitcoin consumes too much energy and is not environmentally friendly.
imagine having 111,111 asics of last gen s19 at 90thash = 10EX at 3.2KWH/asic
imagine replacing with 100,000 asics of s21 at 200thash = 20EX at 3.5KWH/asic
shows that the 2x of hashrate does not mean 2x of electric.
111,111 old asics *3.2kwh=35
5,555KWH
100,000 new asics *3.5kwh=35
0,000KWH
yep 2x hashrate for LESS energy
imagine having 181,818 asics of last gen s17 at 55thash = 10EX at 2.1KWH/asic
imagine replacing with 100,000 asics of s21 at 200thash = 20EX at 3.5KWH/asic
shows that the 2x of hashrate does not mean 2x of electric.
181,818 old asics *2.1kwh=3
81,818KWH
100,000 new asics *3.5kwh=3
50,000KWH
yep 2x hashrate for LESS energy