A Bet on COPA - versus - Craig Wright $1.1 million dollars !

[LeezHamilton]

A Bet on COPA - versus - Craig Wright $1.1 million dollars !

Until the last Friday, and on the light of Craig Wright's cross examination in the UK High Court,  what the Justice James Mellor will decides -  to make his judgement ?

If you bet on it and you are right on your betting either a. or b. bellow, you will win the ticket to enter a Virgin Block reward of 50 Bitcoin. How much you will get will depend on how many people enter in the betting ?  

a. You must clearly state that  Craig will not win the case because he is a brazen liar and fraud
b. you must clearly state that COPA will not win the case because Craig is a Holy Ghost.

If you can bet on this matter in this thread definitely you will be entering in a celebration and dinner party and will get the chance to win up to $1.1 million dollars from a Virgin Bitcoin Block of Satoshi Nakamoto.

The Block is #78001   14eN6TKrcbxmDeYK77RbzbJZm7iSDVT94g


ie: betting on this Bet has a sets of rules, once you make your comments, you can request for the rules.

[1714535000]

1714535000

[1714535000]

1714535000

[1714535000]

1714535000

[DaveF]

Except for the fact that you don't have 50BTC or any sort of access to that block it all sounds so legit.
Don't you have someplace else to troll.

[NeuroticFish]

It's a known thing that making bets with newbies is a total losing "business".

If for some reason the non-newbie loses he will have to pay or lose credibility.
If the non-newbie wins the newbie will disappear.

So yes, a very good business for newbies and a very bad one for the rest.

I see @LeezHamilton has same kind of thinking like his idol.

[foggyb]

Obviously CR will lose because its clear to everyone now that he is a fraud and needs to find himself a good therapist.

But I don't trust that you have a block of bitcoin to give away.

[Stalker22]

The Block is #78001   14eN6TKrcbxmDeYK77RbzbJZm7iSDVT94g

If you can sign the message from that address, and prove that you really have access to 50BTC, that would be great!

Otherwise, you are "a brazen liar and fraud". Just like CSW.

[alani123]

Ok, I bet Craig Wright will lose.
Now gimmie the money.   I'd be really ager to see the rules but I'm not setting my hopes too high before I see a bitcoin signed message.

[AmoreJaz]

The Block is #78001   14eN6TKrcbxmDeYK77RbzbJZm7iSDVT94g

If you can sign the message from that address, and prove that you really have access to 50BTC, that would be great!

Otherwise, you are "a brazen liar and fraud". Just like CSW.

i am betting that the OP has nothing to do with that address. maybe, he just stumbled upon on this addy containing about 50BTC and 547 sats.

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/14eN6TKrcbxmDeYK77RbzbJZm7iSDVT94g

and now, he is trying to deceive users that he is the owner and trying to play game that can possibly fish some gullible users. that is right, he is CSW in the making! huh...
very shady move, if you want to bet, you can request the rules? typical scam tactic. why not make it public if he's totally running legit here?

[curiousNoone]

well what's to lose when you're broke anyway lol


A bob:  Craig will not win the case because he is a brazen liar and fraud
 

[Text]

a. Craig will not win the case because he is a brazen liar and fraud

There are allegations of forgery and manipulation against Craig Wright https://bitcoinnews.com/legal/craig-wright-vs-copa-forgery-allegations/

[DapanasFruit]

I don't care if you have the prize of $50 in BTC or you don't have it and you are just posting it here for entertainment purposes so here is my bet:

a. You must clearly state that  Craig will not win the case because he is a brazen liar and fraud.

Now, in the world of legal parlance, we actually don't know what will be the final result of this case but I am hoping that this can go well with COPA so we can send a strong message to Craig Wright to stop all his brazen claims to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto even if he is suffering from autism.

[WhyFhy]

a. You must clearly state that Craig will not win the case because he is a brazen liar and fraud

If your telling the truth CW could win. Only if your telling the truth.

Sign it.   I bet Craig would if he could!

[LeezHamilton]

If whether you think I am just making a joke to entertain you that is fine.
If you think I am trying to scam you then that you must provide evidences that
I am trying to scam you. Any way what so ever is your opinion, your opinion is merely your opinion.

Have I asked you to bet your money or Bitcoin against or for your betting on the this Bet ?  No. Full Stop no.
Therefore, this is the facts, I am asking you to cast your opinion for betting.  If your opinion is correct then I will be happy to publish the rules and who knows how many people will cast their opinion ?

There is the catch- I will invite all of you those who are casting their opinion to grand bloody Bitcoin Drama live and attend the conference may be in London, where the winning party of the COPA -v-Craig Wright will be invited to celebrate their victory. In that even, I will be happy to introduce the real mystery of Bitcoin Historical facts with proof-of-work plus an extraordinary evidence on my side that I am not a a scam. Of course all the scammers say that they are not scammers. Whatever you think of me is your opinion, opinion is opinion unless otherwise it provides sufficient evidences with rational codex for the opinion.

If I wanted this case to take on step further to a commercial betting then I could have done that in a different arrangement and operation, where every body who will participate in betting will bet their own money say $100 dollars, and if you win you will get 100 times or 1000 times returned. But as I do not believe in commercial betting so I just have published it as an open discussion and dialogue for casting your bet, who knows, no body know me here as I am a Newbie here in this forum, So, please be a bit simple  and do not think I am promoting betting and commercialising Bitcoin betting for living. Betting is forbidden where you bet your money in expectation that you will win or lose your money.

So, I will publish the rules in a later date.

Thank you for your comments.








 

[pooya87]

a. You must clearly state that  Craig will not win the case because he is a brazen liar and fraud
b. you must clearly state that COPA will not win the case because Craig is a Holy Ghost.

Both choices seem to be trying to serve some agenda. You aren't and cannot bet on whether Craig is a liar or a "holy ghost" (whatever that means!) based on the court's decision. The only thing that is being bet on here is who will win in the court:
a. Craig wins by manipulating the system
b. Craig loses as he fails to manipulate the system

In other words if Craig wins this case, it won't make him any less of a liar and a fraud than before and even if he loses it still is not the proof we need to know he is a liar and a fraud.

If you think I am trying to scam you then that you must provide evidences that
I am trying to scam you. Any way what so ever is your opinion, your opinion is merely your opinion.

Wrong.
You are the one who started this bet and are offering payment. So it is you who has to prove lack of scam by providing proof of funds.

[avikz]

When you do not have 50 Bitcoins. But anyway I will share my thoughts.

My option is that - Craig Wright will loose because he is a lier.

That's the ideal outcome I would want to see. However I doubt that the court will go to that route. They very welcome rule out COPA here.

This particular conspiracy is much larger than we can think.

[Stalker22]

If whether you think I am just making a joke to entertain you that is fine.
If you think I am trying to scam you then that you must provide evidences that
I am trying to scam you. Any way what so ever is your opinion, your opinion is merely your opinion.

Well, in arguments like this, whoever makes some big claim has to be the one to prove it.  So yeah, since you offered up this "Virgin Block award of 50 Bitcoin" - which folks doubted - really the burden of proof is on you.  I mean you started all this by promising the prize right? So you gotta back your word up now that people are skeptical.

Betting is forbidden where you bet your money in expectation that you will win or lose your money.

What are you talking about? Betting is not forbidden. In fact, we have entire boards dedicated exclusively to betting and gambling.

[DooMAD]

OP appears to struggle with the same personality disorder Wright has.  They think they can just make shit up and people will simply believe them if they sound confident enough.

They claim they're a journalist.  That would imply they write professionally, for a living.  Yet their entire post history reads as though it was written by someone in early education.  Astoundingly poor syntax and grammar.  If a legitimate publication is paying them to write garbage like that, there's something very wrong with their hiring policy.  

Everything about this account is incredibly suspicious.