Join Bitcoin Forum COLLECTIBLES EXCLUSIVE ARTWORK PROJECT with Crypto Artist 1Dq

[1Dq]

I'm back with exciting news!

Everything is prepared for making Bitcollector PRINTS.

The canvas was professionally scanned and I digitally brought it as close to the original as possible.

Here it is (in smaller size so our prints outshine any other attempts  ):






The digital copy is super large, so we could make human size copies, however I believe the original canvas size might be best for prints.
In case anyone wants a huge-ass version let's discuss that option as well.

Now we just need to settle on points below and we're set to go (based on already proposed methods and ideas from many of you):

* Print size. Canvas size is 40x30cm 15,7˝x11,8˝ and I propose we make the prints in that same dimension.
* Number of prints. Maybe go for the BTC magical number 21? I've had inquiries so far for at least 10-15, but I wouldn't scatter them too wide, but keep them at valuable collectible level.
* Personally tagging copies. I propose numbering and signing each one personally as the author.
* Sell method. I propose (as others suggested) a raffle.
* Print price. All material (not counting countless hours) and shipping costs on my side will sum up to 10-20€/piece. I was thinking 50€/piece for a raffle entry spot? However, I'm offering...
* Project member discount in the form of free shipping for everybody that has contributed here. I was also thinking there would be a reserved spot for each of you in the first couple of days of the raffle.

These will be my first ever prints, I'm super hyped and want to get everything done perfectly.

Let me know what you think about above points and in a week or two these might already be on their way to you!

Cheers.

[Cryptogreatdane]

Super cool. Love the idea of 21 signed and numbered prints. I think the raffle price is very reasonable considering you get a print and a chance for the original, it might even be too reasonable. Regarding reserving spots for interested parties. I personally like this idea for my own selfish reasons. If there are already 15 people interested the other six spots will sell out in 5 minutes. If for some reason you decide not to hold raffle spots for interested parties, maybe you could just realease the time you are going to start the raffle. That way those interested can jump online at that time. Super excited about this project and our artistic representation.

[krogothmanhattan]

  I want a numbered poster please! And if your going to sell the original then make it an auction or outright sale.

  No raffles for me. But its your choice!  Goodluck!

[1Dq]

Super cool. Love the idea of 21 signed and numbered prints. I think the raffle price is very reasonable considering you get a print and a chance for the original, it might even be too reasonable. Regarding reserving spots for interested parties. I personally like this idea for my own selfish reasons. If there are already 15 people interested the other six spots will sell out in 5 minutes. If for some reason you decide not to hold raffle spots for interested parties, maybe you could just realease the time you are going to start the raffle. That way those interested can jump online at that time. Super excited about this project and our artistic representation.

  I want a numbered poster please! And if your going to sell the original then make it an auction or outright sale.

  No raffles for me. But its your choice!  Goodluck!

I've gotten multiple initiatives from members against having the original raffled with prints. They want a fair shot at the original, instead of a random pick, so I believe a separate auction way to go.

I still think reserved spots for project members is a good idea for those 21 prints. We could also still decide to go for more prints, but 21 is such a symbolic number.
Or I can offer a second, unnumbered print run, but does that still diminish the original print?

[Cryptogreatdane]

The intial idea of the "buy a print" and get a raffle spot for the original was opportunity for everyone to get a chance at a great original piece. Obviously their are some who are willing pay a large sum for the painting outright. I just liked the spirit of the initial idea.

Ultimately the artist put a lot of time and money into this project and I support whatever they decide to do.

[1Dq]

I did a test print run and I'm back with the results.







I tried four types of paper, from thin glossy to thicker textured.
I like the textured one best, which is no surprise as it looks the closest to the original.

Which do you like best?

The thicker one might presents a problem of shipping, as I wanted to use a cylinder shaped cardboard sleeve, but at that size I need to roll it really tight and it starts deforming.
So far, I haven't found a company that produces a thicker one of the same length, because using longer would significantly higher the shipping cost.

The other option is to send unrolled prints sandwiched between solid cardboard sheets and placed in bubble wrapped envelopes.

What are your experiences with print delivery, would this option be ok? I always thought that the cylinder one is more sturdy for sending over large distances and handling by multiple personnel.

Besides that I'll also need to tweak the hues a little bit to get it closer to the original and make another print run with selected paper.

I intend on numbering them in the bottom left, next to my signature.


And then finally - the auction!

[krogothmanhattan]

  Came out looking great!  I prefer thicker but if it is an issue and also lot more expensive to ship then please go thinner and roll it!

[1Dq]

Did a bit more print testing.

As I plan to make more of my artworks available as prints I want to see what my options are.

Also waiting for my photographer to make shots of signed prints.

Expect the auction for the limited set of 21 prints of Bitcollector to be up Tuesday or Wednesday!

Cheers.

[aoluain]

I tried four types of paper, from thin glossy to thicker textured.
I like the textured one best, which is no surprise as it looks the closest to the original.

Which do you like best?

The thicker one might presents a problem of shipping, as I wanted to use a cylinder shaped cardboard sleeve, but at that size I need to roll it really tight and it starts deforming.
So far, I haven't found a company that produces a thicker one of the same length, because using longer would significantly higher the shipping cost.

The other option is to send unrolled prints sandwiched between solid cardboard sheets and placed in bubble wrapped envelopes.

What are your experiences with print delivery, would this option be ok? I always thought that the cylinder one is more sturdy for sending over large distances and handling by multiple personnel.

Besides that I'll also need to tweak the hues a little bit to get it closer to the original and make another print run with selected paper.

I intend on numbering them in the bottom left, next to my signature.


And then finally - the auction!

The prints look great, nice colour and clarity!

Regarding shipping, I can give some info regarding my experience with the colouring
book project I did.

I wanted the paper to be really good quality and a heavyweight stock, this meant
the cover had to be thicker also. The result in this made the packaged unit heavier than
I anticipated so the postage price was also more than I anticipated.

There is no point going to the trouble of producing a lovely art piece and then risking it
being damaged in the post.

I also did a poster project and most people opted for a rolled copy. It depends on what
size tube you use to roll the prints, a wide tube obviously will deform the prints least.

[Cryptogreatdane]

I tried four types of paper, from thin glossy to thicker textured.
I like the textured one best, which is no surprise as it looks the closest to the original.

Which do you like best?

The thicker one might presents a problem of shipping, as I wanted to use a cylinder shaped cardboard sleeve, but at that size I need to roll it really tight and it starts deforming.
So far, I haven't found a company that produces a thicker one of the same length, because using longer would significantly higher the shipping cost.

The other option is to send unrolled prints sandwiched between solid cardboard sheets and placed in bubble wrapped envelopes.

What are your experiences with print delivery, would this option be ok? I always thought that the cylinder one is more sturdy for sending over large distances and handling by multiple personnel.

Besides that I'll also need to tweak the hues a little bit to get it closer to the original and make another print run with selected paper.

I intend on numbering them in the bottom left, next to my signature.


And then finally - the auction!

The prints look great, nice colour and clarity!

Regarding shipping, I can give some info regarding my experience with the colouring
book project I did.

I wanted the paper to be really good quality and a heavyweight stock, this meant
the cover had to be thicker also. The result in this made the packaged unit heavier than
I anticipated so the postage price was also more than I anticipated.

There is no point going to the trouble of producing a lovely art piece and then risking it
being damaged in the post.

I also did a poster project and most people opted for a rolled copy. It depends on what
size tube you use to roll the prints, a wide tube obviously will deform the prints least.

are you selling the prints or auctioning the prints. If auctioning how are you handling the 21 print auction. Multiple lot auctions can be tricky unless you go 1 at a time.

[1Dq]

The prints look great, nice colour and clarity!

Regarding shipping, I can give some info regarding my experience with the colouring
book project I did.

I wanted the paper to be really good quality and a heavyweight stock, this meant
the cover had to be thicker also. The result in this made the packaged unit heavier than
I anticipated so the postage price was also more than I anticipated.

There is no point going to the trouble of producing a lovely art piece and then risking it
being damaged in the post.

I also did a poster project and most people opted for a rolled copy. It depends on what
size tube you use to roll the prints, a wide tube obviously will deform the prints least.

I think I prefer a bit more expensive shipping, but the best paper and packaging.
But most of all I need to start somewhere and learn from there!   

are you selling the prints or auctioning the prints. If auctioning how are you handling the 21 print auction. Multiple lot auctions can be tricky unless you go 1 at a time.

I believe I saw auctions with numbered lots people can bid on. I'll just make 21 ones and anyone participating can go: user lot nr.  bid price
I need to be vigilant and keep score updating bids of course, but there shouldn't be any confusion.

[Cryptogreatdane]

Just a suggestion to talk with MJ or mopar about best way to handle a 21 print auction. Ive seen plenty go sideways. If 30 people bid 5 times each thats 150 posts. Nearly impossible to keep track of. You may have to auction 5 at a time or just sell at the price you want.

[minerjones]

Just a suggestion to talk with MJ or mopar about best way to handle a 21 print auction. Ive seen plenty go sideways. If 30 people bid 5 times each thats 150 posts. Nearly impossible to keep track of. You may have to auction 5 at a time or just sell at the price you want.

Yeah, it usually gets a bit crazy at the end when bids start coming in for each lot every few seconds.
It is doable, but sorting the bids and declaring winners does take some time.
Best bet is for interested bidders to focus on a certain lot(s) as a lot of the confusion sets in when people start bidding on a certain lot, get outbid and then switch to a different lot with a lower price.

[krogothmanhattan]

Just a suggestion to talk with MJ or mopar about best way to handle a 21 print auction. Ive seen plenty go sideways. If 30 people bid 5 times each thats 150 posts. Nearly impossible to keep track of. You may have to auction 5 at a time or just sell at the price you want.

Yeah, it usually gets a bit crazy at the end when bids start coming in for each lot every few seconds.
It is doable, but sorting the bids and declaring winners does take some time.
Best bet is for interested bidders to focus on a certain lot(s) as a lot of the confusion sets in when people start bidding on a certain lot, get outbid and then switch to a different lot with a lower price.

   I agree with this....It happened to me years ago and it was quite impossible to keep up.

[1Dq]

Just a suggestion to talk with MJ or mopar about best way to handle a 21 print auction. Ive seen plenty go sideways. If 30 people bid 5 times each thats 150 posts. Nearly impossible to keep track of. You may have to auction 5 at a time or just sell at the price you want.

Yeah, it usually gets a bit crazy at the end when bids start coming in for each lot every few seconds.
It is doable, but sorting the bids and declaring winners does take some time.
Best bet is for interested bidders to focus on a certain lot(s) as a lot of the confusion sets in when people start bidding on a certain lot, get outbid and then switch to a different lot with a lower price.

I'll think about this a bit more, but I have to say it makes me kinda excited to imagine that kind of chaos and sorting it out.

Thanks for all the advice guys!

[1Dq]

Here we go everybody:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5498859.0

As promised everyone that contributed to the brainstorming has a reserved spot for until Friday + free shipping!

Cheers!

[Eclipse33]

This is one of the most badass projects I have seen on this board yet, this is a great use of talent.

Thankyou.