What Work Now May Not Work Tomorrow

[swogerino]

I always tell and advise my friends who are new to gambling to never look for a pattern in luck-based games because there is none even the ever-popular martingale is not a guarantee that you can find a pattern that will give you a continuous win.

I have a friend who boasted that he had found a pattern where it allowed him to win 10 successive bets on Mine Sweeper, he used that pattern two successive days with success but unfortunately for him on the third day those patterns are not working anymore even on the 4th and fifth days, now he is back on the drawing board again..

I told him that the house edge plays out and since this is luck based game what works now may not work tomorrow every day is a new session with new patterns

How about you have you at one time of your gambling experience experienced finding patterns that you think are effective and consistent only to find out later after several days that it's not working anymore..

And are you still looking for patterns that you think will work in the long run for you.

I tried sometimes mostly from desperation rather than thinking it will be a working way in slot machines and I saw someone saying that in some Pragmatic slots if you happen to have 9 consecutive lost if you 5x your bet it will be a win and he was talking about buying the bonus not normal play.Two times it happened to work and I was happy as a baby only to see that after these two times the loses were even bigger and even more than 9 consecutive lost buy bonus feature.So yes it does not work as the house edge will keep hitting you hard.

[doomloop]

What Work Now May Not Work Tomorrow pattern do exist but I agree that is going to work everytime. Like your friend i usually do play a mines game i use pattern that bomb usually dont in the same place. It work like 3 times in a 5 games but only work if you setting the bomb 1 and you can only take profit 1 tiles that gives u only 0.04x which is very low.

What's the point? If you are losing 2 bets out of 5, you are losing 2x, and winning 3 bets for 0.04x would only give you 0.12x which means you are losing 1.88x with this pattern. In mines, it can only sometimes be profitable if you go ahead and open quite a few tiles if you open the bomb once. If you manage to open more tiles, it means you will get a higher multiplier than what you have lost just now and that will make it even.

However, at the end of the day, it's gambling, and it won't let you keep winning. Sometimes, you wouldn't be able to open more than 3 tiles, it starts to feel like the bomb moves when you start opening tiles and it moves near the tiles where you are opening and boom, you lose. That's how gambling is, it's a game of chance and your chances of losing are mostly higher than winning.

[coin-investor]

What Work Now May Not Work Tomorrow pattern do exist but I agree that is going to work everytime. Like your friend i usually do play a mines game i use pattern that bomb usually dont in the same place. It work like 3 times in a 5 games but only work if you setting the bomb 1 and you can only take profit 1 tiles that gives u only 0.04x which is very low.

However, at the end of the day, it's gambling, and it won't let you keep winning. Sometimes, you wouldn't be able to open more than 3 tiles, it starts to feel like the bomb moves when you start opening tiles and it moves near the tiles where you are opening and boom, you lose. That's how gambling is, it's a game of chance and your chances of losing are mostly higher than winning.

For the longest time I've been gambling I always proved that there is no such thing as a pattern one can follow to guarantee winnings, it's an illusion and people should stop believing in any pattern even if a so called expert in gambling told you that it's possible.

It's unfortunate in my case that I found this out after incurring big losses but it's better to learn late than never admit that such a pattern exists.

Thank you to all who participated in this discussion I will be locking this thread and we will move on to the next discussion.