In-depth discussion: When law and morality conflict, how should we choos

[djdiidf]

In the world we live in, law and morality are two indispensable elements. They are independent, but closely connected, and jointly construct the order and harmony of our society. However, when the two conflict, how should we choose and how can we balance them?

Law is a code of conduct formulated and enforced by the state, with clear provisions and strict boundaries. Its core purpose is to maintain social justice and stability and protect the rights and obligations of every citizen. But sometimes, the formulation and implementation of laws may encounter ethical dilemmas. For example, certain legal provisions may be contrary to the moral concepts generally recognized by society, or may cause moral controversy during the implementation process.

Morality is a code of conduct based on people's inner beliefs and social consensus. It is not legally enforceable, but it has far-reaching influence. The power of morality lies in its ability to guide people to make kind and just choices and promote social harmony and progress. However, morality also has its limitations. In the complex real world, moral concepts often vary from person to person, making it difficult to form unified standards.

So, when law and morality conflict, how should we choose? I think we should adhere to the following principles:

**1. Respect the law**: The law is the cornerstone of social order, and each of us should respect and abide by the law. Even if some legal provisions are inconsistent with our moral values, we should express our opinions through legal channels instead of violating the law without authorization.

**2. Promote morality**: Although the law is mandatory, the power of morality cannot be ignored. We should actively advocate and practice moral concepts that are in line with social consensus and guide people to make kind and just choices.

**3. Strike a balance**: In some situations, law and ethics may conflict. At this time, we should seek a balance between the two through in-depth thinking and rational analysis. We must not only respect the authority of the law, but also embody moral and humanistic care.

**4. Promote reform**: If certain legal provisions are inconsistent with moral concepts for a long time, and the conflict cannot be resolved through balance, then we should actively promote the reform and improvement of the law. Contribute to social harmony and progress by expressing opinions through legal channels and participating in legislative discussions.

In short, law and morality are two indispensable elements in social life. We should respect the law, advocate morality, seek balance and promote reform to achieve harmony and unity between the two. In this way, our society can be more just, stable, harmonious and progressive.

[1715198541]

1715198541

[1715198541]

1715198541

[1715198541]

1715198541

[1715198541]

1715198541

[zasad@]

I will still allow myself to quote these wonderful words:

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”
― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged(C)
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/319903-did-you-really-think-we-want-those-laws-observed-said

John Galt Quotes, Dagny Taggart Quotes, and More from Atlas Shrugged
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5314967.msg56276238#msg56276238

[YOSHIE]

In the world we live in, law and morality are two indispensable elements. They are independent, but closely connected, and jointly construct the order and harmony of our society. However, when the two conflict, how should we choose and how can we balance them?

If law and morality are not in line and conflict, of course you can act and choose what is good and bad, in general that is where you will challenge yourself morally and the behavior and decisions that must be taken.

Indeed, the law can be considered a binding rule or a law that has been confirmed, meaning that it is difficult for you to go against it, but if the law does not get justice, Of course, according to Morality, you can judge whether the law is fair and positive or unfair and negative, here you can judge whether it is good or bad whether the law is being implemented well or is contradictory.

In my opinion, if the law is contrary to morality, there is no need to respect it, if the legal decision is unfair, even though the law is a law that has been confirmed, morally we can still judge by seeking justice by considering morally.

[yhiaali3]

Often in contemporary societies, law prevails over morality. In an era that is more inclined towards materialism, laws always prevail over morality.

Often the ruling authorities set laws in a way that suits their interests, and they do not care much whether this conflicts with the general morals of society or not. Do you think that these few ruling groups that formulate laws according to their interests will really care whether they are compatible or conflict with the morals of society? I'm sure the answer is that they don't care at all.

This may happen in some rare cases that do not pose a threat to their interests or in cases that turn into issues of public opinion.

[zasad@]

Often in contemporary societies, law prevails over morality. In an era that is more inclined towards materialism, laws always prevail over morality.

Often the ruling authorities set laws in a way that suits their interests, and they do not care much whether this conflicts with the general morals of society or not. Do you think that these few ruling groups that formulate laws according to their interests will really care whether they are compatible or conflict with the morals of society? I'm sure the answer is that they don't care at all.

This may happen in some rare cases that do not pose a threat to their interests or in cases that turn into issues of public opinion.

I absolutely agree with this.Laws are written by the winners or those who buy the people who write these laws. Morality will be the last thing on people's minds when they realize what these corrupt laws have led to.