⭐ JackpotInsight.com - 💰 Online Crypto Casino Fair Guide

[CasinoX]

We are Jackpot Insight, a crypto casino online guide.

Whether you're a seasoned player or a newcomer to the scene, our comprehensive review platform is your passport to the most reputable and rewarding crypto casinos in the digital sphere.

Why should you visit us?

• First of all, we offer fair, detailed, and impartial reviews of the top crypto casinos, providing insights into their features, strengths, and weaknesses.
• Second, our community is free to share their experience, and our community ratings are used to show the casino's final ratings.  
• Casino listings are free, there is no charge involved in the listing process.  
• Also, we have planned to add a blacklist, where will be flagged untrusted casinos or casinos with predatory terms.  

We want to review a minimum of 2-3 casinos monthly

Feel free to suggest for review your preferred casinos, also, feel free to suggest new topics to cover.

[CasinoX]

Reserved!

[CasinoX]

https://jackpotinsight.com/10-crypto-gambling-statistics-infographic/

10 Crypto Gambling Stats - Infographic. It's free to copy/redistribute on your websites. No backlink is required, but it will be highly appreciated.

[Solosanz]

In what criteria you can include those casinos as anonymous casinos? I'm sure all of them ask to create an account, not accept VPN usage and they have mandatory KYC terms, which mean those stuffs make this casino is not anonymous.

It doesn't mean they're bad, few of them have a good reputation, but they're just not anonymous.

[CasinoX]

Hey! Thanks for your feedback!
I will check again for KYC terms on these casinos!

EDIT: Yes, you are right. The only one who is partially NO KYC is winz.io ( according to their tos, KYC is mandatory for >2k EUR withdrawals, or >7BTC or equiv)

[panjul07]

Check out and Play at the best Bitcoin and crypto casinos. No KYC or verification. Play now at your favorite crypto casino and win big!

That's quoted from your Crypto Casino page while the listed casinos are mostly has the terms to ask KYC.
Stake for example, new users will not be able to deposit/withdraw if they do not do the KYC level 1.
Fortunejack is one other case, as long as I know they are now more strict where most players are asked to complete KYC for withdrawal.
So basically the information you gave in bold part is basically a misleading information, better to remove it.

[iv4n]

Check out and Play at the best Bitcoin and crypto casinos. No KYC or verification. Play now at your favorite crypto casino and win big!

That's quoted from your Crypto Casino page while the listed casinos are mostly has the terms to ask KYC.
Stake for example, new users will not be able to deposit/withdraw if they do not do the KYC level 1.
Fortunejack is one other case, as long as I know they are now more strict where most players are asked to complete KYC for withdrawal.
So basically the information you gave in bold part is basically a misleading information, better to remove it.

Nice catch... Many casinos have strict rules now, but even without that, it's foolish to say that "there's no KYC verification", in many casinos it's not mandatory, but the casino can ask any player for that at any given moment. Except for freebitcoin, I am not sure there is any other site that is completely KYC-free, so I agree that this info is misleading.



I am not sure how much we can trust these numbers, but this is interesting if it's really true. I can't believe that so many people bet on their mobile phones, and it's much more interesting that so many people bet with BTC or ETH, I thought there areplenty of people using many other coins as well.

[Agbe]

You are welcome. I have checked the site and some of the reviews and I must recommend you for that. First of all you website is nice and the casinos under your review are all good. Some of them are already active in this forum. And your statement to review 2-3 casinos every month is good. And the factors you use for the reviewing is good. But according to winz.io KYC, I don't think any casino in the industry is KYC free because at the time of withdrawal huge KYC is always asked. Therefore since they are asking KYC from big amount let them ask at the time of registration so that when the gambler win big and KYC is asked to withdraw the money the process will not be much again because KYC has been don at the beginning.

[Cantsay]

I see that others have already started pointing out errors that needs to be fixed - do well to make the right changes that is needed to be done.

With that being said, I just tried navigating through your site to read some of the reviews on your website but I found something strange - I tried to filter the reviews based on “popularity” but the result that came out first was shocking because I saw “KatsuBet” at the top of the list while sites like stake, bcgame and the rest were at the bottom - and I tried doing a keyword search to see how popular katsubet really is here in the forum but I got less than 40 result on ninjastic.space.
It would be nice if you clarify what you used to judge the popularity of a site because right now the review seating at the top of your list is not known to many gamblers here.

[CasinoX]

Check out and Play at the best Bitcoin and crypto casinos. No KYC or verification. Play now at your favorite crypto casino and win big!

So basically the information you gave in bold part is basically a misleading information, better to remove it.

True! My bad. Removed!

Thanks for your useful feedback!

[CasinoX]

With that being said, I just tried navigating through your site to read some of the reviews on your website but I found something strange - I tried to filter the reviews based on “popularity” but the result that came out first was shocking because I saw “KatsuBet” at the top of the list while sites like stake, bcgame and the rest were at the bottom - and I tried doing a keyword search to see how popular katsubet really is here in the forum but I got less than 40 result on ninjastic.space.
It would be nice if you clarify what you used to judge the popularity of a site because right now the review seating at the top of your list is not known to many gamblers here.

Ah, sorry for this little confusion This filter is about popularity on our site which is based on overall ratings, community comments, reviews, etc. Not sure what can I do to avoid confusion in this particular case.

[notblox1]

Feel free to suggest for review your preferred casinos, also, feel free to suggest new topics to cover.

From bigger casinos I would like to see your review for Sportsbet.io and Livecasino.io
This websites I use all the time and I have only good things to say about them, and I dont see them listed on JackpotInsight.
I have few more smaller casinos for suggestion but maybe I could post them in future.

[Cantsay]

Ah, sorry for this little confusion This filter is about popularity on our site which is based on overall ratings, community comments, reviews, etc. Not sure what can I do to avoid confusion in this particular case.

Oh I see, I thought you were using general metric but since it’s based on your site reviews then there’s no issue, can also try to look for a way to let them know (maybe when users hover over the “sort by popularity” then it’s will bring out some little note for them to see).


I also just discovered another feature - that I can compare different casinos (and even have the choice to choose more than two) that’s really nice. But I also noticed a little bug.

I tried searching for the casinos that I want to compare but then I noticed that the search bar had the same color as the background making it difficult for users to spot it easily - it would be better to change the color so that it can be easily noticed.

Here’s what I mean.

[Slow death]

Hey! Thanks for your feedback!
I will check again for KYC terms on these casinos!

EDIT: Yes, you are right. The only one who is partially NO KYC is winz.io ( according to their tos, KYC is mandatory for >2k EUR withdrawals, or >7BTC or equiv)

well, you had another thread on that forum and in the other thread you created in July last year I commented on the fact that you were talking about anonymous casinos while they were casinos that asked for kyc and I said that a casino that asks for kyc is not anonymous, but all you responded was that it was a fair point, I thought you ran this in your casino and almost a year after my post I see you in the new thread being corrected for the same thing. you definitely need to look more into these issues of kyc and anonymity, besides nowadays people are already very informed about this to the point that they prefer casinos with kyc than anonymous casinos. So if you use titles like anonymous casinos you will have a greater chance of scaring people away than attracting people



https://jackpotinsight.com/

Another point is the way you have been marketing your website and the lack of many casinos on your website and the lack of innovation that is not on your website, think with me in that market there are many review sites, so why would people go to yours? review site? What would people find on your review site that they wouldn't find on other review sites? So you have to think about it. you have to think about what you can do and put on your website that is good that other review sites don't have

[CasinoX]

well, you had another thread on that forum and in the other thread you created in July last year I commented on the fact that you were talking about anonymous casinos while they were casinos that asked for kyc and I said that a casino that asks for kyc is not anonymous, but all you responded was that it was a fair point, I thought you ran this in your casino and almost a year after my post I see you in the new thread being corrected for the same thing. you definitely need to look more into these issues of kyc and anonymity, besides nowadays people are already very informed about this to the point that they prefer casinos with kyc than anonymous casinos. So if you use titles like anonymous casinos you will have a greater chance of scaring people away than attracting people

Yes, my bad. I think is better for me to not have this category anymore. So, no more Anonymous