Bitcoin Forum
May 20, 2024, 10:24:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Full Node Behind StarLink ISP, CGNAT?  (Read 166 times)
MadMacks (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 5


View Profile
March 27, 2024, 10:07:50 PM
 #1

I'm setting up a RPi 5 NMVe based full node (or am trying to) and I'm concerned that I will have problems with inbound connections because I use StarLink and they use CGNAT on their residential services and do not provide a status IPv4 address. They do supply static IPv6 addresses.

So, if I configure my RPi 5 (Bookworm 12) to use both IPv4 and IPv6 will core bitcoin use the IPv6 addressing? I can configure my router to use IPv6 and pass the needed ports, and that should be stable. But the public IPv4 address is not stable.

If TOR is set up, will that solve the possible problem with inbound connections?
apogio
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 979



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2024, 06:13:44 AM
 #2

If TOR is set up, will that solve the possible problem with inbound connections?

TOR will allow you to have inbound connections without doing any network adjustments.

It is important to clarify the difference between an incoming and an outgoing connection though. An incoming connection doesn't mean that you don't receive anything from other nodes. It just means that the node that will initiate the connection process will always be yours. Once the connection between two nodes is established, it doesn't matter who initiated it or not. The transferring process will be the same.

Finally, TOR is often slow. This is just a side-note.

NotATether
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 6751


bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org


View Profile WWW
April 04, 2024, 10:07:19 AM
 #3

It makes sense that hardly any residential provider is using static IP addresses anymore because the address space is getting exhausted. I would've suggested port forwarding to you but 1) that only works if the wider network supports static addresses and you're behind a dedicated router and 2) I don't know if starlink has such a configuration directive in the first place.

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
ranochigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 4193



View Profile
April 09, 2024, 02:00:40 AM
 #4

You don't have to use IPV4 at all, and you can just portforward and point Bitcoin Core at the IPV6 address. Tor will also solve the problem with inbound connections without any issues, you just need an additional network layer ontop of the IPV4 that you have.

█████████████████████████
████▐██▄█████████████████
████▐██████▄▄▄███████████
████▐████▄█████▄▄████████
████▐█████▀▀▀▀▀███▄██████
████▐███▀████████████████
████▐█████████▄█████▌████
████▐██▌█████▀██████▌████
████▐██████████▀████▌████
█████▀███▄█████▄███▀█████
███████▀█████████▀███████
██████████▀███▀██████████
█████████████████████████
.
BC.GAME
▄▄░░░▄▀▀▄████████
▄▄▄
██████████████
█████░░▄▄▄▄████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄██████▄▄▄▄████
▄███▄█▄▄██████████▄████▄████
███████████████████████████▀███
▀████▄██▄██▄░░░░▄████████████
▀▀▀█████▄▄▄███████████▀██
███████████████████▀██
███████████████████▄██
▄███████████████████▄██
█████████████████████▀██
██████████████████████▄
.
..CASINO....SPORTS....RACING..
█░░░░░░█░░░░░░█
▀███▀░░▀███▀░░▀███▀
▀░▀░░░░▀░▀░░░░▀░▀
░░░░░░░░░░░░
▀██████████
░░░░░███░░░░
░░█░░░███▄█░░░
░░██▌░░███░▀░░██▌
░█░██░░███░░░█░██
░█▀▀▀█▌░███░░█▀▀▀█▌
▄█▄░░░██▄███▄█▄░░▄██▄
▄███▄
░░░░▀██▄▀


▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀███▄
██████████
▀███▄░▄██▀
▄▄████▄▄░▀█▀▄██▀▄▄████▄▄
▄███▀▀▀████▄▄██▀▄███▀▀███▄
███████▄▄▀▀████▄▄▀▀███████
▀███▄▄███▀░░░▀▀████▄▄▄███▀
▀▀████▀▀████████▀▀████▀▀
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 16671


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
May 02, 2024, 01:03:36 PM
 #5

TOR can be the best way to solve the issue of inbound connections in order not to freak out the central server.
Since you're shitposting on the tech boards, I feel the need to point out you're spewing BS.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!