what percentage can a post be described as AI generated?

[Btcdeybodi]

We have some AI detector apps and links just like the frequently used ones like, scribbr, copyleaks, and quillbot. Sometimes, after making some personal posts that you generated on your own and you insert those write up in this AI detector links you will find out that it will indicate some percentages that they are AI generated like between 35% to 15% so does it mean that the percentage is convincible enough to render your entire posts AI generated?

[1714260345]

1714260345

[1714260345]

1714260345

[Nwada001]

15–30 percent is not enough to consider a post an AI-generated post; at least it should be 60% and above, and more than two tools should be used to check and get that result before you can be convinced it's an AI-generated text. 
 
Those tools use common errors that could be made by a human writer to judge, so if your English is good enough, there is a high possibility that those tools can detect up to 15-20% of your text to be AI-generated, depending on the tools you use. 
 
I believe it's only when the percentage is above 60% that we can be that convinced it's AI-generated. Aside from the grammar errors, AI's answers to questions most of the time are different from an average person's responses to a question.

[Nheer]

To prove a post is AI I don’t think 15-30% is enough to prove the post is AI generated but anything above 50% 70% is likely AI generated but also you would need to verify this with at least 2 or more AI detector tools annd also there are certain phrases that helps identify AI generated posts. 

Read on the link below to understand the percentage and how AI posts are detected and different tools that can be utilized to detect AI posts.
AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Catenaccio]

you will find out that it will indicate some percentages that they are AI generated like between 35% to 15% so does it mean that the percentage is convincible enough to render your entire posts AI generated?

If you write your posts by yourself and don't use AI tools, you don't have to worry that how many percentage of a post is detected as AI generated by AI detective tools.

Because your posts are written by yourself 100% and no AI detective tools will analyze it with high percentage of AI generated.

If you use AI tools to write your posts, and modify it, you will have to worry about AI detective tools.

Get back to the start, don't use AI tools to generate posts, your account will not be reported.

[Churchillvv]

Using AI to detect AI generated posts, it's eventually going to give you a certain amount of wrong information which is automated in it, by considering your own generated content 15% - 30% AI generated text. Although it's as result of it not being human to be rational in thinking.

Perhaps in percentage 70% and above is usually excellent for conclusion to be AI generated hence 60% and above can also be considered AI generated texts. Hence before one could conclude that a post is AI generated they must have compared it to several AI texts detectors hence if all giving same level of answer or percentage it's considered AI generated texts.

[Doan9269]

We have some AI detector apps and links just like the frequently used ones like, scribbr, copyleaks, and quillbot. Sometimes, after making some personal posts that you generated on your own and you insert those write up in this AI detector links you will find out that it will indicate some percentages that they are AI generated like between 35% to 15% so does it mean that the percentage is convincible enough to render your entire posts AI generated?

If you make a constructive post on your own self, it will not reflect the use of AI in making composition to your post content, you can just do that for the post you made and compare the rate or percentage for AI, i see it that anything below 20% should be regarded as not AI content, moreover, most of the AI posts are nothing than copied posts from the internet, they are using the AI bot in other to make it appears as not complete plagiarism and for them not to get banned, but its totally plagiarism because they copy such and put no reference link.

[KiaKia]

This is not a job.

But let's pretend it is for a minute, are you going to use A.I to do your job? No wonder why humans want to replace humans with robots, because so many are lazy asses.

If you don't like typing or discussing you can start reading and say nothing, must you write up anything? People who use A.I tools for engaging in discussions are not suppose yo be on here.

Using AI is spamming, whatever you are about to say isn't genuine anymore, you are just trying to complete some number of posts.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

@OP, Nwada001 has already answered your question, but I would also like to let you know that if, out of your own reasoning, you created a comment or a post, there is no way it can be 50%–70% plagiarism or AI generated. When you make a unique comment and use an AI checker to confirm how authentic your content is, it should be at least 80% or 90% unique. In my opinion, unique content should not be less than 70% unique. Also, there are some AI word checkers that can detect the original article or content where your phrases and sentences were obtained. 

If you don't want to bother yourself about whether your content is AI-generated or not, then you should never use any tool to make posts or comments on this forum. Be original and contribute based on your natural sense, and it can never be the same as that of an AI. 

[lovesmayfamilis]

If you write the posts yourself and use some tools to debug your grammar, you are unlikely to get a response from AI detection sites saying that you are using chatbot text. On the forum, you can very well notice the difference in human speech, which is filled with emotions, feelings, and texts containing dry statements that AI usually produces. If we talk about percentages, somewhere between ninety and one hundred, you can usually start being accused of using AI.

[Stepstowealth]

We have some AI detector apps and links just like the frequently used ones like, scribbr, copyleaks, and quillbot. Sometimes, after making some personal posts that you generated on your own and you insert those write up in this AI detector links you will find out that it will indicate some percentages that they are AI generated like between 35% to 15% so does it mean that the percentage is convincible enough to render your entire posts AI generated?

Unless you are a very good writer, it would be difficult to write with the perfection of an AI. Unless detected within your post is a high percentage of more than average close to 70%-80% of AI generated content, it will not be taken that that post was AI generated. I have never checked to see if my post was generated by an AI because I write from my knowledge, and I am sure that if you write from your head all the time you will not even consign yourself about trying to check if your post is related to what an AI can write.

[Ojima-ojo]

I have not noticed such percentage of AI detention of usage in my check on posts in the past and all the posts I checked either shows AI detected or human written without any percentage allocation as mentioned in the ops.


But also I think is easier to spot any form of AI contribution when you read through texts and most time AI generated text always come in a wall of text and shallow contents that deviate from humans feelings.

[Lida93]

We have some AI detector apps and links just like the frequently used ones like, scribbr, copyleaks, and quillbot. Sometimes, after making some personal posts that you generated on your own and you insert those write up in this AI detector links you will find out that it will indicate some percentages that they are AI generated like between 35% to 15% so does it mean that the percentage is convincible enough to render your entire posts AI generated?

It shouldn't be a thing of serious concern that an AI detector tool indicates about 15%, 25%, to 40% of your writing to be of AI generated, we are humans with a very high intellect and you don't expect that such human intelligence shouldn't be displaced in the content of our works. In as much as you did the writing by yourself without AI contribution you have got no need to be afraid of your work been put to AI test due to the high quality of the writing.

Humans created those detectors so it's most assured they will always detect a certain percentage of AI generation in human writing, it is when the percentage is above 60% upwards that it then become suspectable buy even as that it doesn't mean there are no humans who have good writing skills that can't be detected to a 70% mark as AI generated even when it was. But in such case it's the writing history of such member that we can use to compare if there's a difference in the quality for such highly intelligent people.