What nature of the the rewarding games would you prefer playing with friends

[Zlantann]

Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

I would prefer to stake non-monetary materials when I am playing with friends and family who are not gamblers. My position is that using money could cause friction or disagreement if these people are not true gamblers. They might be offended if they lose and some might even want a refund of their losses. I wouldn't want to have problems with family members because of gambling and money is usually one of the major cause of problems. I used to gamble with a group of relatives who were cousins. These guys were professional gamblers who understood the activity and there have never been any issues. Losers go back home without any ill feelings while winners are free to enjoy their wins and on some occasions, they might decide to buy some bottles of beer or give out small tips to losers. In summary, if these relatives are non-gamblers, I wouldn't stake money, but if they are professionals, money will be my best choice.   

[1715151279]

1715151279

[1715151279]

1715151279

[qwertyup23]

So on the thread I was concerned to know your opinions towards which of the nature of games that you would prefer playing along with your friends such as...

I actually enjoy betting against my friends which involves card games. It may be simple or complicated card games such as poker, blackjack, etc. so that there will be that level of competition during the games.

Most of my friends are competitive in nature and they really want to prove that they are the best at what they are doing. From this, I prefer to be competitive as well in order to prove that I am the best among them!

Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

I prefer a mix of both as this also depends on the friends that I am betting against.

Like what I mentioned above, if the game involves my friends who are competitive, then I would go for the big rewards and stake cash in the process. On the other hand, I would prefer simple bets against my not-so-competitive friends where the punishment would be like a dare or something.

At the end of the day, you have to be flexible enough as each friend has their respective likes. You also have to read the room if your friends are willing to bet cash; or if your friends just want to have a chill gathering, thus, punishments and dares.

I actual

[angrybirdy]

Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

I would prefer to stake non-monetary materials when I am playing with friends and family who are not gamblers. My position is that using money could cause friction or disagreement if these people are not true gamblers. They might be offended if they lose and some might even want a refund of their losses. I wouldn't want to have problems with family members because of gambling and money is usually one of the major cause of problems. I used to gamble with a group of relatives who were cousins. These guys were professional gamblers who understood the activity and there have never been any issues. Losers go back home without any ill feelings while winners are free to enjoy their wins and on some occasions, they might decide to buy some bottles of beer or give out small tips to losers. In summary, if these relatives are non-gamblers, I wouldn't stake money, but if they are professionals, money will be my best choice.   

Same here! especially my other sets of friends are not open to gambling, it's hard to play with them if there's money involved because it's really possible to have misunderstandings and disagreements especially when they lose, of course there are different questions which is difficult to explain because they are not familiar with gambling, so it is better to bond with them without money involved, not unless as you mentioned that if some of them are professional gamblers, there will be no problem as long as they can accompany me in what I do, it's easy to talk if the person you're talking to has the same interest and background in the activity you're doing.

[Agbamoni]

Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

If it's a friendly game among my friends then I prefer something like the loser will shoulder the cost of the snacks or drinks but it should not be hard on his pocket because this is a friendly game.

Shouldering half of the cost should be enough and he will not go empty-handed as if he just treated us for a treat and everybody will go home happy because of the experience.

Thats some smart move right there. Let it the game be kept in a more friendly manner so that the one who loose will still fee reason to be happy at the end of the game.

All hands are not equal so no matter the price that will be paid by the loser if it's a fixed price most friends who are not financially buoyant won't afford it which may cause argument that may lead to conflict between friends. Such a game should be done for fun and merriment not for raising money.

[piebeyb]

Usually I play domino cards with my friends and even then I don't have to use any funds just to have fun when we feel bored or just looking for entertainment in the game, sometimes we play it while waiting for the football show which is broadcast at midnight so while waiting to watch live with Friends playing dominoes makes friendships stick together even more, there are no other games that we can play because there are some friends who don't understand the card game which is very trendy at the moment.

For example, like the game of poker or rummy, not many of my friends understand the game and on average almost many understand the game of dominoes, so it's better to give in and not be selfish, it's better to play a game that is easy for some of my friends to understand because it's impossible to play a game where friends I can't play because it doesn't look fun, talking about your previous thread, maybe your previous thread was moved somewhere else or deleted by the moderator, exactly as friends have said in this thread, at least you should put gambling discussions on the gambling board. .

[michellee]

If it were gambling with friends, maybe I would choose to play cards with them. Even though I don't have as good card playing skills as they do, it's a fun game. It has made us feel the closeness of our friendship.

As for the punishment for the loser, I think it doesn't matter because it's just a game that the loser must accept. We also cannot always win and can accept punishment because we lose. And that makes the game even more fun.

The punishment will be graffiti on the face, which is common for those who lose. Or drink soda for those who lose. The game can or cannot use funds depending on the agreement between us.

[Porfirii]

As long as the punishment is not too harsh, I think that playing with friends can be very entertaining because it creates a shared feeling which is not very common when you play, usually alone.

Just make sure that the terms are clear, everyone accepts them on beforehand, and not engage with those of your friends who like to make excuses the most, because it can be very frustrating to face the risk of the game and see, after winning it, that the other party is not willing to keep his/her end of the deal.

[rodskee]

It is possible to have a group of friends over who enjoy something like playing cards. Spades, hearts, gin, or rummy for example. Doesn't always have to be a wager involved, just a group of people getting together for some social fun.

Playing with friends is what I always enjoy because that serves also as our reunion
as we have no much time meeting up so when we decide having time together we choose
to play either in casino or in one of our houses and yeah we keep enjoying .

If it were gambling with friends, maybe I would choose to play cards with them. Even though I don't have as good card playing skills as they do, it's a fun game. It has made us feel the closeness of our friendship.

there is no best way to gamble but with cards , this is what we mostly enjoy ,
and I believe that card i what we can call a friendly game most of the time.

[Assface16678]

As long as the punishment is not too harsh, I think that playing with friends can be very entertaining because it creates a shared feeling which is not very common when you play, usually alone.

Just make sure that the terms are clear, everyone accepts them on beforehand, and not engage with those of your friends who like to make excuses the most, because it can be very frustrating to face the risk of the game and see, after winning it, that the other party is not willing to keep his/her end of the deal.

Exactly. I think the way of the game—how  the winner will be rewarded or howthe loser will be punished—doesn't matter as long as you have the bond and the fun. Any group of friends will enjoy the gambling in the sense that they are playing together. Like what I experienced, I always love to play gambling with my friends. Sometimes we will not use a betting app; instead, we will only give a pot of money where we will stake a certain amount. Those winners will get the pot money and it will be shared with the loser, who of course doesn't get anything. So I think it's better if those betting apps have only a session or if a certain group could do betting separate from the general so that their price money will only be in a closed group. But maybe there is a better reward system that could be liked by a certain group.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Well, as for what you can bet on, it can be a very specific game like poker, it is the most common, but also where something called "Rumi", "Ahiley" among others is played, sometimes they prefer to play for money for make the game more serious, but if it is for enjoyment or something like that, I think the best bet would be the box of beers, some things to eat like pizzas, hamburgers, something like that, the loser would have to opt out of such foods, but I think that things can be different ways.

What is most common to enjoy among friends may be that, there could also be sports betting maybe a good game, betting and enjoying as I said before, with a few beers and something to snack on, that would be the main reason why things could happen.

[coin-investor]

When I'm in with the company of friends and we decide to have a game I want something that will build our relationship so I don't I will recommend the loser shouldering the cost of the events.

I prefer that we pool all our money and the winners get special food or drinks or anything, games should be friendly there should be no place for cheating, and no one is pressured to win.

It's different when you are in the company of your friends, the atmosphere should be light and there's no pressure or quarrel and everyone will go home thinking that they have fun and we all feel looking forward to the next event.

[slapper]

Playing games without money is more than just choosing a board game, right? Our connection style is revealed by it. Our point is that procedure matters more than payoff. Fair competition, regardless of who wins

Even with tasty prizes or silly punishments, aren't shared times the greatest trophy? Our later stories, intimate jokes, and memories? Not the stuff you can hold, but the smack-talk, wild schemes, pushing the boundaries too far, and coming back together

Games without cash incentives test us. Understanding others, discovering their true selves. That raw human experience, right? Real feeling, developing something together, challenging ourselves and friends. Wasn't that the point?

[Jawhead999]

It's better to involve stakes or rewards in gambling because the loser might don't want to get punishment or they will try to cheat or reduce the punishment. Let's say the punishment is 20x push ups, the loser will do 20x push ups in bad forms because they're not strong enough to push up in correct forms. But if you stakes something, it's really clear the winner will get that without any drama.

[EluguHcman]

I created such a nature of post like this in couple of hours ago, I was hoping it was going to trend on the board but it did not which got me to check on my profile if was it not successfully posted, it was deleted or was it that the network error occurances obstructed it from succesdful uploading.
It is just unfortunate that it does not have a trace so probably it could be error uploads.

But anyhow, I will still bring it up again because it is such a discussion to be enjoyed as we all endivoirs to air our views.

So on the thread I was concerned to know your opinions towards which of the nature of games that you would prefer playing along with your friends such as...
Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

I don't have any,simply because nowadays in our time it is very difficult to have real friends.Those who nowadays claim to be your friends at the first occasion will stab your back that's why I prefer to play alone against slot machines or trying my knowledge in sport betting.If I would be doing any games of the types above I would choose to do it with female friends and using disciplinary measures like to take their clothes off and starting what it would end up being a good night,a good night by most guys standard including mine  ,so that is the only game I am willing to do with my female "friends" and end up like Dan Blizerian for at least one night.

How funny it sounds of you not having trustful and worthy male friends you can ably say they are your friends whom you can not even afford to play a common game of fun with but you can dwell on the pools of your female friends in a circle to be worth called friends and worth playing games that you can not play with your fellow guys.

I know your mind is dirty with the kind of stakes involved if you would have to play with the ladies. Lol.
Maybe you should just call on your GF to come play the game of the Truth and Dare games with you then because that would always let you go down beneath without stress if you are lucky to win or if you still don't win she would be the one to get down on you. 😂

[rahmad2nd]

~~
So on the thread I was concerned to know your opinions towards which of the nature of games that you would prefer playing along with your friends such as...
Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

So I interpret it if what you mean is the type of joint game, which means offline games with friends, family or best friends, I got the picture like that from what you wrote in this post. In fact, there are types of games that we can play without risking money in them. for example, the loser must treat them to food, drinks, or whatever is mutually agreed upon. The problem is, for me personally it is difficult to restore the atmosphere as you describe in this thread. For us, who are married, we are more busy with things that prioritize family rather than having fun like when we were single. what you share in this thread, reminds me of the past. yeah, there are various games that don't always involve money. but rather the loser gets punished, treated to food or drink, and other things like that. but there are times when we can play like this, unfortunately only at certain moments when there are family gatherings.

As in this thread, the concept is just for fun without involving any betting. and usually, none other than the most common game that can be played together is the type of card. As for my youth, I preferred sports, namely football. the team that loses, has to pay the service where we play or treat those of us who win. obviously, this is really fun if we flashback to remember it. however, because this era is an era of more sophisticated digital technology. Most of us separate ourselves from our respective activities, even in the type of game that can be said to be betting, gambling, without having to be together. this is the current reality, and we only follow every development of the times and technology.

[boty]

It's better to involve stakes or rewards in gambling because the loser might don't want to get punishment or they will try to cheat or reduce the punishment. Let's say the punishment is 20x push ups, the loser will do 20x push ups in bad forms because they're not strong enough to push up in correct forms. But if you stakes something, it's really clear the winner will get that without any drama.

Determining the rewards for the bets we play will of course make the bets have their own challenges for those of us who play the game and we will also be motivated to be able to win and see the rewards from the game that one of the two of them has won, if we determine the betting rewards. Doing 20 push ups of course, there could be cheating from friends in calculating the number of push ups and it would be better if we bet money and whoever wins can have the money without any drama.

[zuzie]

Would you prefer the game that the winner would earn some edible stakes? The one which the looser would earn being punished or any friendly disciplinary measures? Or such games that specifically involves stake of funds amongst your friends for the winners rewards?

Me: I would prefer the above exempts the one with the stakes of funds involved.

What's yours?

If later there is an event with friends and there are also activities to fill the event, such as playing gambling, as entertainment to strengthen friendships between friends, then I will suggest playing cards and whoever often loses a lot should treat him. all my friends there, the budget is not budgeted, the important thing is that the punishment can be carried out. ha ha ha
Yes, indirectly this will add to the excitement when hanging out with friends and most importantly everyone will feel happy and there won't be too much pressure for those who often lose their playing cards.

[bakasabo]

I think that poker is the best party game if we talk about gambling. First, you are not strictly bounded to game budget or persons balance. Buy-in can be symbolic. Second, it helps to understand your friends more. To see who are they, get more familiar with them, what to expect from time. Third, it is always fun to play. Best moments are when two friends go all-in and start joking to cheer each other.

[Webetcoins]

I don't have any,simply because nowadays in our time it is very difficult to have real friends.Those who nowadays claim to be your friends at the first occasion will stab your back that's why I prefer to play alone against slot machines or trying my knowledge in sport betting.If I would be doing any games of the types above I would choose to do it with female friends and using disciplinary measures like to take their clothes off and starting what it would end up being a good night,a good night by most guys standard including mine  ,so that is the only game I am willing to do with my female "friends" and end up like Dan Blizerian for at least one night.

How funny it sounds of you not having trustful and worthy male friends you can ably say they are your friends whom you can not even afford to play a common game of fun with but you can dwell on the pools of your female friends in a circle to be worth called friends and worth playing games that you can not play with your fellow guys.

I know your mind is dirty with the kind of stakes involved if you would have to play with the ladies. Lol.
Maybe you should just call on your GF to come play the game of the Truth and Dare games with you then because that would always let you go down beneath without stress if you are lucky to win or if you still don't win she would be the one to get down on you. 😂

If there's a mind that is dirty there, that would be his friends (not him) because they won't agree with such a game. They advanced think that him will try to do something dirty with their friends GF. You are right, they are not worthy to be called as friends (a true one) because they have trust issues. I know they are only trying to protect their girls but they are becoming over protective on this specific scenario here.

For now, he can follow your suggestion there of playing with his partner instead. I'm sure he will be successful this time. The good thing there is like you said, he will get a double treat. That would surely relieve his stress .

[Zigabel]

Personally i would find more fun if funds are been staked and the winner would have to go home with the funds because that is much easier to be settled than with other items which in some cases would want to put in some measures for consideration and the other players may not be totally comfortable with it but then in the real sense it's usually the right thing that without preference it's should be that what applies to be the reward for the winner should be given to the winner regardless of whatever be the case even with the friendly punishment some persons may come up with excuses why they shouldn't be punished after they have lost and that will cause others to feel cheated so it's always best to just use funds.

With funds everyone has got to stake before the commencement of the game and they all know the rules in that who soever wins gets away with all of the cash that was staked and that way there will be no room for rifts except the winner decide to be benevolent enough to give others off his profits then that could be still considered too.