Backlinks anyone?

[Lapinkulta76]

Hi there!
We've just launched the beta of https://crypto.bookmark.guru/ and reaching soon the 1000 link mark.
If you run a crypto website and want to be added, please leave a comment below.
It's a painfully manual curated link directory, so it will take some time to get added.
However, quality before quantity in this case
Cheers
CGold

[1714643373]

1714643373

[1714643373]

1714643373

[1714643373]

1714643373

[1714643373]

1714643373

[Faisal2202]

It is a good initiative as till now I have not seen any crypto-dedicated bookmark website to provide backlinks. Well, it's a good thing but don't you guys think it's not needed, like a dedicated one, because the change of rule in Google policy against crypto might hurt it, as it's dedicated? I know at this age that's not so soon to happen. But just in case. Plus you won't get so many website requests, and there are other bookmark websites that have 90+DA and a good PA as well. While you have 2 DA and 3 PA which is not so good number. I know the website is only 28 days by age.

Well, best of luck to you guys, as starting a website always brings great experience.

[Lapinkulta76]

Thanks Faisal2202. What exactly do you mean with the "Google policy against crypto"?

[NotATether]

If you run a crypto website and want to be added, please leave a comment below.
It's a painfully manual curated link directory, so it will take some time to get added.

BitMixList.org please.

Thanks.

Thanks Faisal2202. What exactly do you mean with the "Google policy against crypto"?

I think he is talking about how Google search sometimes ranks you down if you are a crypto website. I don't think it's a big deal though.

[examplens]

It is a good initiative as till now I have not seen any crypto-dedicated bookmark website to provide backlinks. Well, it's a good thing but don't you guys think it's not needed, like a dedicated one, because the change of rule in Google policy against crypto might hurt it, as it's dedicated? I know at this age that's not so soon to happen.

"Google policy against crypto" mainly refers to crypto ads, but that too has been changed and there are no more obstacles. Many times I have seen some proven scam or phishing sites as highly ranked on Google, their policy is if you pay enough, they have no problem with what you do.

Plus you won't get so many website requests, and there are other bookmark websites that have 90+DA and a good PA as well. While you have 2 DA and 3 PA which is not so good number. I know the website is only 28 days by age.

Domains with a low DA are not very attractive for backlinking, but since it is just the beginning, they may increase in importance over time.

[Lapinkulta76]

BitMixList.org please.

Thanks.

There you go: https://crypto.bookmark.guru/detail/bitmixlist
Even got your own category  
Let's me know if you want to change the description or add some social media links

[dkbit98]

If you run a crypto website and want to be added, please leave a comment below.

I don't own this website but I suggest adding one of the currently best non-kyc exchanges eXch.
There is no registration and this exchange is focused on customer privacy and automated crypocurrency swaps.
You should also add separate category for non-kyc exchanges and services.
https://exch.cx/

PS
I noticed one bug when I entered links in your search bar, there was some page with code instead of no result.
I tried to reproduce it, but no ''luck''.

[Faisal2202]

I think he is talking about how Google search sometimes ranks you down if you are a crypto website. I don't think it's a big deal though.

You got it right to some extent, anyway if seen most of the bookmark websites are not found easily by searching them. As other good and quality websites publish an article covering those bookmark websites. Like 100 high DA and PA bookmark sites for backlinking. You will find many via these articles. Plus a manual search would help you find many more. And yeah, it's not a big deal because after some time, this bookmark website which will be covered in one of those articles won't need ranking strategies. I will add this site to the sheet if in the future they come in handy I will definitely use it.

"Google policy against crypto" mainly refers to crypto ads, but that too has been changed and there are no more obstacles. Many times I have seen some proven scam or phishing sites as highly ranked on Google, their policy is if you pay enough, they have no problem with what you do.

You got it right (fully) that's why I said "the change of rule in Google policy" Who knows in what way the policies of Google will be changed for crypto-related stuff? And talking about those phishing ads they are run by other ad affiliate agencies, like Adsterra, etc. Google Adsense has approved these ads just now while ads were there on Adsterra for a long time. The only issue was de-ranking and ranking.

[Lapinkulta76]

I don't own this website but I suggest adding one of the currently best non-kyc exchanges eXch.
There is no registration and this exchange is focused on customer privacy and automated crypocurrency swaps.
You should also add separate category for non-kyc exchanges and services.
https://exch.cx/

Category added with eXch being the first listing in it 
https://crypto.bookmark.guru/category/exchanges/non-kyc-exchanges
I'm not running into any trouble listing those "unwanted" services that keeps your website being attacked?

[dkbit98]

I'm not running into any trouble listing those "unwanted" services that keeps your website being attacked?

This is not my website, and it is wanted by people, but you can decide to add whatever you want
There are other non-kyc exchanges and services out there like Bisq (decentralized). Robosats, Agoradesk, PeachBitcoin, Tradeogre, etc.

[LTU_btc]

Great website, I think that such kind of directory is useful thing. There was attempts to make such websites previously, but it didn't got updated later. I'm not only sure that .guru domain is best option.
And I suggest you to consider not listing cloud mining websites. 99% of it is just scams and by listing it here you make them to look legitimate.

[SFR10]

@Lapinkulta76
I noticed "one of your listings" has a rating without a review but AFAICS, the only way for us to leave a rating is by leaving a review as well so there might be conflicting parts in the back-end that allow users to bypass this restriction.
BTW, I couldn't find any information about featured listings on your platform, but it appears there are a few of these listings already... Can you share more details about this feature?
^{- I'm asking this because one of the "platforms" that's quite known for its selective scams is on that list and when someone hovers their mouse pointer over the green checkmark, it says "trusted site"!}

[Lapinkulta76]

@Lapinkulta76
I noticed "one of your listings" has a rating without a review but AFAICS, the only way for us to leave a rating is by leaving a review as well so there might be conflicting parts in the back-end that allow users to bypass this restriction.
BTW, I couldn't find any information about featured listings on your platform, but it appears there are a few of these listings already... Can you share more details about this feature?
^{- I'm asking this because one of the "platforms" that's quite known for its selective scams is on that list and when someone hovers their mouse pointer over the green checkmark, it says "trusted site"!}

Thanks a lot for the bug report!
Also non registered users can vote. It's the stars right under the logo on the left side of a detail page where it says "Rate here"
https://crypto.bookmark.guru/detail/exch

The featured listing feature is currently only tested with random sites. Which one is the one that's know for scams? I'll investigate.

[Lapinkulta76]

Great website, I think that such kind of directory is useful thing. There was attempts to make such websites previously, but it didn't got updated later. I'm not only sure that .guru domain is best option.
And I suggest you to consider not listing cloud mining websites. 99% of it is just scams and by listing it here you make them to look legitimate.

You are absolutely right. Don't want to get involved in any of this. I've now deleted all those cloud mining sites that are an obvious scam. Left the ones that have a somewhat positive rating overall, a sort of vivid community and a proper ahrefs history and ranking. As this is also not bulletproof, added a warning to that category.

[SFR10]

Thanks a lot for the bug report!
Also non registered users can vote. It's the stars right under the logo on the left side of a detail page where it says "Rate here"
https://crypto.bookmark.guru/detail/exch

You're very welcome, but somehow I missed the first rating system and assumed the rating system that appeared upon clicking the submit your review button, was the only way to leave a rating ^{[my bad (sorry)]}.

• Speaking of ratings, I think it would've been better if non-registered users couldn't influence these ratings in any manner.

The featured listing feature is currently only tested with random sites. Which one is the one that's know for scams? I'll investigate.

I was referring to the one I included in the above screenshots ^[Changelly]... The search field on the "Scam Accusations" sub-board of this forum is a good starting point.

[Lapinkulta76]

I was referring to the one I included in the above screenshots ^[Changelly]... The search field on the "Scam Accusations" sub-board of this forum is a good starting point.

I see now. thanks for clarifying. I'll probably implement Scamadvisor and similar services in the future.
It's hard to keeo track manually of who scams whom these days ...

[examplens]

I see now. thanks for clarifying. I'll probably implement Scamadvisor and similar services in the future.
It's hard to keeo track manually of who scams whom these days ...

It is better to do your own research than to trust these automated services ^{based on AI} which takes some irrelevant facts to determine the scam score.

Maybe you are a fan of cloud mining and that is why you insist that you have such a category at all, but it is a very sensitive territory and I would only consider them if I had personal experience with them.