Countries with economy power controls the world.

[bluebit25]

History answers many questions for us today and also the ideals we hope for in the future. A country's prosperity allows it to continue to pursue other goals, but in reality they cannot maintain their position forever, powerful empires will also fall into degenerative cycles in their politics the prosperity they built, the collapse and the emergence of new nations capable of leading. Looking at the current social context, the US and China have full potential to dominate the things they want to control, but of course there will come a time in the future when harmony is broken, so will they will not be able to maintain and will destroy each other.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Debt isn't always bad for filthy rich people or countries, watch Robert Kiyosaki how he use debt to make more money and protect his wealth.

Yea, you are right about debt for rich people, but about Kiyosaki, mahn..., everyone doesn't have the same grace; things don't usually work the same for everyone. Life is not just based on one principle or formula that can be applied and you arrive at the same solution that another person did. In life, one formula doesn't work for everyone. 


@OP, look at all the countries who are in debt to other country, some of those debtor country doesn't have a bad economy at all, they are still powerful in other areas not just on one thing. There are still other things that contributes to making a nation powerfulpowerful. What do you have to say about a country where there's insecurity?

[iBaba]

History answers many questions for us today and also the ideals we hope for in the future. A country's prosperity allows it to continue to pursue other goals, but in reality they cannot maintain their position forever, powerful empires will also fall into degenerative cycles in their politics the prosperity they built, the collapse and the emergence of new nations capable of leading. Looking at the current social context, the US and China have full potential to dominate the things they want to control, but of course there will come a time in the future when harmony is broken, so will they will not be able to maintain and will destroy each other.

Because of the fact that all nations have their national interests and try as much as possible to protect it, no two nations will be truly be united together, at least not when their national interests will be at stake. Even the USA and the United Kingdom cannot be on a common side at all the time and we always align and realign when and where their interests are well guarded.

In the same vain, it is good to note that no nation can be a king to the kingdom of other nations because every nation have what they strongly lack and what they have as an advantage. Due to this, nations go ahead to tap from others when they are looking to augment their weaknesses and in some case, it becomes a predator and a prey situation which then bring about a tilt in the interests of nations for or against their counterparts.

[Renampun]

Debt isn't always bad for filthy rich people or countries, watch Robert Kiyosaki how he use debt to make more money and protect his wealth.

Yea, you are right about debt for rich people, but about Kiyosaki, mahn..., everyone doesn't have the same grace; things don't usually work the same for everyone. Life is not just based on one principle or formula that can be applied and you arrive at the same solution that another person did. In life, one formula doesn't work for everyone. 


@OP, look at all the countries who are in debt to other country, some of those debtor country doesn't have a bad economy at all, they are still powerful in other areas not just on one thing. There are still other things that contributes to making a nation powerfulpowerful. What do you have to say about a country where there's insecurity?

This is really interesting and I totally agree with you that not everything is effective or works for other people, a small example is debt, when strong countries create debt, they can make the most of it and make it very useful. This is different from poor countries, when they create debt, they will only add to the burden on their country in the future because they don't have a clear goal about the debt.

back to the topic, it is natural that when you are strong then you have power, in social life it is also the same, when you have a lot of money then you are respected by the people around you, strong countries have high egos, they feel superior to the country anywhere then it is very difficult to lower their ego (just look at China and the US).

[peter0425]

but in reality they cannot maintain their position forever, powerful empires will also fall into degenerative cycles in their politics the prosperity they built, the collapse and the emergence of new nations capable of leading.

Are you sure?

When you look at the countries who were colonizing different nations back in the day you will find that they are still the ones on top right now. Basically they were given a head start and now they are almost unstoppable. Until now some of the colonies they have colonized before still depend on those first world countries which ultimately still give them more power.

Of course not all colonized nations weren’t able to recover. Many asian countries now are on forefront of innovation and soaring economies. I am just saying that right now it is still the same countries basically controlling the world.

[Fuso.hp]

Most of the countries in the world belong to the United Nations, and among the countries that belong to the United Nations, there are some countries that are very powerful economically and nuclear, and those countries usually take different decisions from all other countries. Most of the world's countries are directly dependent on the American economy. If there is an adverse effect on the American economy, the effect is spread around the world. Most countries use the dollar to buy and sell various goods, so when the value of the dollar falls, it has a major impact on the economy of the country in general. Developing countries or developed countries depend a lot on those countries whose economies are very strong.

[AnonBitCoiner]

It is obvious that if a country is economically stronger then he will not beg in front of others for resources and will be represented as a good country all over the world. If a country is economically unstable then the value of their currency also reduces with the passage of time and inflation elevated in such countries.

Such countries do not borrow money from other countries and also they can create new ways to fulfil the needs of the country's population. So it is clear that if any country is economically better, they do not borrow money from others it is independent and considered as a successful country all over the world.

[Cryptoprincess101]

A country that have strong economy become influencial and experiences more economic growth because citizens of other countries moves to such country for greener pasture and it increases the revenue of that particular country because those immigrants adds more to the growth and development of the country they migrated to.

A country with good economic experts can achieve a stable economy because these experts will work towards making sure that the country ventures into platforms and projects that will make the country to experience constant economic growth.

The countries you mentioned above blossoms in their respective economy because they have good economic team that checks the economic activities within the country and bring more economic ideas on how to increase their GDP and investors troop into such country to make investments, perhaps generate more revenues for those countries.

[Marvell1]

Check this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt

United states is number one, China is number ten, Russia is number twenty nine, and Germany is number eight. It means you're wrong if you think strong economy countries aren't in debt.

Debt isn't always bad for filthy rich people or countries, watch Robert Kiyosaki how he use debt to make more money and protect his wealth.

National debt and personal debt are completely different, so don't make such a lame comparison. For example, the United States is the country that holds the world's money printing machine, they can freely export their inflation to other countries with the monetary policy they set. Do you think their government debt, their national debt, is a problem? Or is that just what they want to show the world?

Regarding personal debt, I haven't read about Robert Kiyosaki but let's use you as an example. Can you become rich with debt? Don't take other people's examples but put yourself in that situation to make it more realistic.

[GigaBit]

When a countries economy is strong it makes the country powerful, countries with low economy always find themselves borrowing from countries with stronger economy and there by making such country or nation subject to the nation with stronger economy.
Those countries with strong economy controls the world's political and religion system.

Money is now the main source of power. We will not find any country that is weak economically but stronger than others in terms of power. Countries that have strengthened their economic side are now leading the world. There are many other countries including America, Russia and China that have established a strong financial base. They are now at the top position in the world in terms of power. But you have mentioned another thing here that if economically strong those countries can control religion along with political control, I disagreed on this. Because religion is a completely different thing and has nothing to do with economics. A politically powerful country can interfere in various political and economic affairs of the world, but they have no influence on religion. It has nothing to do with finance.

[BD Technical]

The one who has more money will have a little more power. This means that the country will have more money and money and will be more economically developed.  Seeing that you have money you can do these things because without your money you will never be successful.  In the current situation, in the future, it will be difficult for anyone to live without money income and without money, your family has no value, it is natural that the country that has the highest value of money will be higher.  Those who have a lot of money control many countries in the country like you see China but in the case of economically advanced people who support many countries economically and control their economy.  Want to improve their financial condition by controlling and they are going further.

[khiholangkang]

When a countries economy is strong it makes the country powerful, countries with low economy always find themselves borrowing from countries with stronger economy and there by making such country or nation subject to the nation with stronger economy.
Those countries with strong economy controls the world's political and religion system.

Money is now the main source of power. We will not find any country that is weak economically but stronger than others in terms of power. Countries that have strengthened their economic side are now leading the world. There are many other countries including America, Russia and China that have established a strong financial base. They are now at the top position in the world in terms of power. But you have mentioned another thing here that if economically strong those countries can control religion along with political control, I disagreed on this. Because religion is a completely different thing and has nothing to do with economics. A politically powerful country can interfere in various political and economic affairs of the world, but they have no influence on religion. It has nothing to do with finance.

I agree with you a little bit, that it is true that when we think if a country gets a very strong economic growth so that it can provide better goods and services and also other countries need it so that it gets a lot of money for the growth of the country it will affect other countries of course, but not only money can control the world in my opinion, if you look at countries that control energy are much more influential than countries that have money today, for example like countries in Europe that really need energy to meet the needs of their people, I think they have enough money but they don't have enough energy for their lives.

The one who has more money will have a little more power. This means that the country will have more money and money and will be more economically developed.  Seeing that you have money you can do these things because without your money you will never be successful.  In the current situation, in the future, it will be difficult for anyone to live without money income and without money, your family has no value, it is natural that the country that has the highest value of money will be higher.  Those who have a lot of money control many countries in the country like you see China but in the case of economically advanced people who support many countries economically and control their economy.  Want to improve their financial condition by controlling and they are going further.

I don't think it's that simple because it's useless if you only focus on the money that has a lot of power and can get what he wants, maybe now yes but some cases are not like that, a value cannot be valued with money, this will not look fair if you think everything is only about money, But if you can see it more that the more expensive it is in the money system itself not in the money, if you think well money is only limited to paper but that is not the value, just like you can not demean people because they do not have income so they are considered worthless in your eyes. Speaking of the economy, Singapore is also a developed country that has a very good economy but is not so influential in the eyes of the world in larger fields.

[Baki202]

History answers many questions for us today and also the ideals we hope for in the future. A country's prosperity allows it to continue to pursue other goals, but in reality they cannot maintain their position forever, powerful empires will also fall into degenerative cycles in their politics the prosperity they built, the collapse and the emergence of new nations capable of leading. Looking at the current social context, the US and China have full potential to dominate the things they want to control, but of course there will come a time in the future when harmony is broken, so will they will not be able to maintain and will destroy each other.

A counties prosperity goal is not to make the politicians rich is no longer the betterment of the nation every decision are suppose to be against how better a country will become but money have blinded the eyes of the politicians, and another thing is that the ones that power driving, are looking for ways to showcase there power and that is what is bringing all this issues of war. And even before now countries have battled against nations just to prove how powerful they are. And countries like us and china and Russia are always looking for ways to dominate in economy or in arms and that is why they are always trying to upgrade there wat machines at all cost if not for world order things would have gotten out of hand.

[knowngunman]

Check this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt

United states is number one, China is number ten, Russia is number twenty nine, and Germany is number eight. It means you're wrong if you think strong economy countries aren't in debt.

Debt isn't always bad for filthy rich people or countries, watch Robert Kiyosaki how he use debt to make more money and protect his wealth.

Not only that but also in the part he said countries with strong economy control the world political and religion system. That very statement is arguable because I don't see the relationship between the religion and economic. Although, a strong economy is seen as an indicator of a country's power and influence in the international arena.

It's already known fact that some countries have more influence and recognition than others in the global system and economic actually play a vital role but in the aspect of religion and politics, they only have the power to regulate religious practices within their own territories and not extend to external regions. I would have agreed if Op only mention politics because some of this super power countries have an indirect influence in politics of their dependent countries but that of religion is strange to me.

[topbitcoin]

Maybe what the OP said is true, that when a country's economy has become very strong with fairly high economic growth, then that country will have quite a big influence on the international stage. Which may be quite easy for a country that has a strong economy to be able to influence global policy, this is because that country has quite high bargaining power, a fairly strong bargaining power position in international negotiations, because winning the country plays a role. which is more dominant in international trade.

When a country's economy becomes very strong, that country will really benefit in every way, including in economic and political matters.

However, regarding the statement that developed countries or countries with strong economies do not have debt, I think that is a mistake, because in reality it is countries with strong economies that have the most debt. The debt they have is much bigger than what is stated. we think, it's just that they can manage the debt well.

[tygeade]

A country that have strong economy become influencial and experiences more economic growth because citizens of other countries moves to such country for greener pasture and it increases the revenue of that particular country because those immigrants adds more to the growth and development of the country they migrated to.

A country with good economic experts can achieve a stable economy because these experts will work towards making sure that the country ventures into platforms and projects that will make the country to experience constant economic growth.

The countries you mentioned above blossoms in their respective economy because they have good economic team that checks the economic activities within the country and bring more economic ideas on how to increase their GDP and investors troop into such country to make investments, perhaps generate more revenues for those countries.

I do agree that most people will always want to move to a nation that has better economy, however in the crypto world we could make our money online. Which goes to show you that if you live in a cheaper nation with a worse economy that means making money online in the crypto world would be better for you and give you advantage instead. I get that it may not be that simple, and it could result in a different situation, but we should consider that as the most important part of it.

I believe that crypto income in a third world country could make you live better than making money on crypto at some richer and better economy nation, because in that nation things are more expensive, but in a poor country everything would be cheaper instead.

[Faisal2202]

When a countries economy is strong it makes the country powerful, countries with low economy always find themselves borrowing from countries with stronger economy and there by making such country or nation subject to the nation with stronger economy.
Those countries with strong economy controls the world's political and religion system.

I won't say they control the religious system but yeah they almost control all other systems, but religion is something that the citizens of any country won't accept any type of changes in their religions just because their government took some loans. As a matter of fact, in the name of religion, some citizens are so sensitive that, they even give away all of their wealth to the country and sacrifice there each and everything for the sovereignty of there religion mostly.

But yeah, a lot of countries are targeting other countries' religions or targeting others on the basis of there religion. And yeah the nations that you have mentioned have a good control on developing countries economy the most of the loan we took in my opinion is from IMF (USA) and then China, I might be wrong, but our physical structure (properties) are mostly at collateral to China for Loan.

[justdimin]

Check this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt

United states is number one, China is number ten, Russia is number twenty nine, and Germany is number eight. It means you're wrong if you think strong economy countries aren't in debt.

Debt isn't always bad for filthy rich people or countries, watch Robert Kiyosaki how he use debt to make more money and protect his wealth.

Not only that but also in the part he said countries with strong economy control the world political and religion system. That very statement is arguable because I don't see the relationship between the religion and economic. Although, a strong economy is seen as an indicator of a country's power and influence in the international arena.

It's already known fact that some countries have more influence and recognition than others in the global system and economic actually play a vital role but in the aspect of religion and politics, they only have the power to regulate religious practices within their own territories and not extend to external regions. I would have agreed if Op only mention politics because some of this super power countries have an indirect influence in politics of their dependent countries but that of religion is strange to me.

I do agree that debt is good, I mean when you get a lot of debt, you end up with something much bigger and better with that money, that seems to be the most important part. I believe that we are going to end up seeing things change, and we should consider the situation to be greater.

I believe that we are not going to end up with a better result, we just need to end up with a result that has to be used for greater good. If a country gets a debt, and then build a bridge, and charge for that bridge, they make the money back, and they make life easier for people too, as you can see that's a good debt. If they get debt, and then steal that money between each other to make politicians richer, that is a bad reason to get debt.

[dezoel]

There is no doubt about it that the development and prosperity of any country depends on its economy. Economically prosperous and stable countries never have to extend their hands to other countries. People from such countries do not migrate to other countries. You must have seen it often when well-educated doctors, engineers, and professors from poor and developing countries migrate to other developed countries.

If a person is getting a good salary and good opportunities to live in his own country, I don't think he would like to leave all these things and go to another country, but people who want to live a good life should be forced. Therefore, they migrate to other developed countries. When competent people are expelled from a country, that country becomes like a barren land.

Therefore, when talented and intelligent people migrate from one country to another developed country, a developed country becomes more developed and economically stable, and a developing country suffers more loss.

[Agbamoni]

There is no country that was not gifted with natural resources, traditional practices and talent that they could use to grow their economy. What makes a country subject to other countries is when they fail to manage their resources wisely. Some countries are blessed with crude oil, palm fruits and nits, gold silver.

All these things can be exchange within countries to support their country. Yet some countries are too weak to grow or produces most of the resources they have which they can exchange to other countries for money. They prefer borrowing and expect to pay back, which is quite a bad idea, because it will take so long to pay back.