Football/Soccer Winning Strategy

[cabron]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

[alastantiger]

I was eager to give this a try. I too want to turn my $5 to $40 as well and return to share the news too but I am not getting it. Isn't this the strategy we all do. I recently read of one user that had multibet of up to 30 plus games. And in that thread we argued that while some people were lucky to win, the risk was too high. And most people said that 2 to 3 parlay bet was a better and safer option that guarantees winning that multibet of the magnitude.

[Cantsay]

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

I know that it’s not guaranteed, but it seems like working with those little teams will improve the chance of success.

I have thought of this before but I haven’t put it to the test because sometimes we see some live matches that had 2-0 at the second half but at the end of the game we see that both time tied the match (this might be the few cases that might make this strategy a bit harder to win).

If I have some cash in my account after playing some slots I might consider trying this out and also check if I can figure out a way to make it easier.

[Fiatless]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

This strategy is not new, some gamblers in my area apply it. This is a good one that could lead to a win and it can be applied in many sports bets. I appreciate your footnote that this system would not guarantee wins but it is worth giving a trial. My best sports bet is football and the games are highly unpredictable because less than a minute can produce a goal which can cut your bet. Anyway, I will apply this strategy in this week's bet, to check if it will favor me.

[iv4n]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting.
...
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

I turned $5-$10 to $50-$100.. but after a good winning streak, I faced a losing streak. The strategy works for a while and brings profit, but at one point everything seems to turn around, and the same strategy starts to fail and every bet falls into the water.

So as far as sports betting is concerned, there is no guarantee, but as you say, all we can do is try, so if it works, it works. My only recommendation is to combine different bets, don't chase the same teams and the same bets, the more diverse we are the higher the chance for us to succeed in being profitable in the long run.

[BABY SHOES]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

I rarely bet during a match because the score will always change at the end, especially when the underdogs take the lead and the odds can be reversed.
If for example the favorite team is already 1 goal ahead then the odds are not the usual 1.30 but more like 1.03 which is lower because the probability of winning is clear unless playing with an equal team.

[DaNNy001]

Op, in gambling strange things happen that are far from our predictions. Games like this can end up Turing the other way round. Yesterday I tried using this strategy but it didn't end up well. A game of 2:0 later ended up 2:2 scenarios even worse than this have happened. So the fact that it's a goal, two or even 3 difference doesn't mean the match will always end up favouring the wining team at that moment. And this is why gambling is considered a game of absolute luck, we cannot always know what's coming and that why gambling is risky and we need to gamble with caution, not to gamble with more than what we can't afford to loss.

[electronicash]

Op, in gambling strange things happen that are far from our predictions. Games like this can end up Turing the other way round. Yesterday I tried using this strategy but it didn't end up well. A game of 2:0 later ended up 2:2 scenarios even worse than this have happened. So the fact that it's a goal, two or even 3 difference doesn't mean the match will always end up favouring the wining team at that moment. And this is why gambling is considered a game of absolute luck, we cannot always know what's coming and that why gambling is risky and we need to gamble with caution, not to gamble with more than what we can't afford to loss.

especially when we only bet without knowing the sports by heart. betting based on the odds is what this strategy is.  it does work at times and sometimes not.
but i think if this strategy is used by someone who took soccer or hockey sport by heart, i think he will have a good solid cash source.

we can see there are thousands of us here who like soccer especially because they are from a country where soccer is the most popular sport, this strategy though not new will be useful.

[Sandra_hakeem]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Booking on live games are one of the most profitable ways to gamble on sports yet, it's no new strategy like you said..or is it?
The casinos still have a bigger advantage on this as the leading team may miraculously be overruled, just about the time you're supposed to claim your winnings; a clear example of that happened when a team was already winning with 2 goals aside - To any gambler, that was enough to paralyse the other team's confidence but, the reverse was the case. The result was a 2-4 victory!
Mind you, you're not wagering on a single game though - you gotta make tons of selections or a few selection with a higher stake.

I've also got a strategy in mind - The handicap option!

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

Even if it's already the second half, that doesn't guarantee winning. While placing bets on such games, never put all hope on winning because those low-performing clubs can still improve and end up winning the game at last. There's one thing someone told me one day: "you can't decide the score of a game until the last whistle is blown." That statement made a little sense to me because even in the last 2 or 3 minutes, a club can still score against the opposite team. It is wise to only stake the amount that one is willing to lose without emotional troubles. I know that there is a wide chance to get lucky with this kind of bet, but let's not forget that gambling can't be predictable all the time.After winning four streaks at a time and you want to go the last time, that might be the time that game may go against you. 

[nelson4lov]

~Snipped

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

A wise man once said that discovery requires experimentation. Before slamming the strategy, I'm going to take some moments to try out the strategy then take note of how it goes. My most recent strategy is backing teams with a Double chance bet especially teams that are high conviction plays. It worked for majority of the time until one time that it didn't (see Liverpool recent games at anfield  ). I'm not too familiar with hockey on BcGame but I'd give it a shot and report back to the thread about how it went.

[Cryptomultiplier]

I don't really know about the 2nd half live betting, because even when I have tried to navigate a particular Sportybet site sometime back, it wasn't even up to 5mins before the match started, that the bets were closed. That's why I can't help but wonder how and which Sportsbet site you know or can recommend with such features.

Also, the idea of trying out a game like hockey seems new to me and is worth trying out, since for some of us, just a few bets or gamble on sports and casino games helps relax frayed nerves, instead of going at it like a career.

[cabron]

I don't really know about the 2nd half live betting, because even when I have tried to navigate a particular Sportybet site sometime back, it wasn't even up to 5mins before the match started, that the bets were closed. That's why I can't help but wonder how and which Sportsbet site you know or can recommend with such features.

Also, the idea of trying out a game like hockey seems new to me and is worth trying out, since for some of us, just a few bets or gamble on sports and casino games helps relax frayed nerves, instead of going at it like a career.

Haven't been on Sportybet, seen only for Nigerians.  Are you not able to sign up on other crypto casinos?
Even in the Stake though, it needs timing when you want to bet on 2nd half, the odds constantly change and sometimes betting on some match will be suspended already before your bet pushes through.

Some of those who tried may also have a good rate with this kind of system. I've talked to someone from American Football, he said this also works on that sport. I guess it all just depends on each of us.

[Odohu]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

This is 800% profit, a very enticing one if you ask me. I guess it is very aggressive to be able to achieve this result in 2 days. Well, if it works for you keep at it but be careful to manage your risk properly and don't get too over confident before you put more money than you are supposed to. There was a system I was playing before which was over 0.5 goals HT, this worked so well to an extent but the moment I increased the amount I was betting with, things turned for bad thereby forcing me to abandon that system.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

Live bet is very risky and I have a hard time coping with it. Betting on 1-0 match is still a risky bet and adding it more games even increases the risk because there is possibility of equalizer. Unless maybe the favorite team is leading in that second half and under such condition, the odd may not be up to 1.30.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

We can decide on using any strategy, but we should never forget that such may not have to work for us, and if it had already worked out perfectly as expected before, it may not be repeatedly, which means, when it comes to our own turn in using same strategy, things may change, however, we are to maintain using others opinion as part of our own experience which may also help us towards having our own strategy to develop, if we don't mind, there are no specific working strategies of sport betting except we are just lucky of being a user of one.

[SmartGold01]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Live matches has little or no much odds if I may say, why not pick up two to three games on before the matches goes live won't it work that way? Let say 1 hrs before the matches goes live at this point there is a very high chance that odd are still in good stands but before one must pick these games let it be that the both team always scores goals where it won't go below over 0.5 (under 0.5) or over 1.5 with multiple bet of 3 games.

[irhact]

I was eager to give this a try. I too want to turn my $5 to $40 as well and return to share the news too but I am not getting it. Isn't this the strategy we all do. I recently read of one user that had multibet of up to 30 plus games. And in that thread we argued that while some people were lucky to win, the risk was too high. And most people said that 2 to 3 parlay bet was a better and safer option that guarantees winning that multibet of the magnitude.

I don't really like betting on long shots, I wonder how people win from it because I find it very risky and would always go for 3-5 games, 5 maximum. That's the highest I could go, but then you'll see people playing about 24-30 games and sometimes they make good profit from it. I guess I've not made my mind to take such risk yet therefore I'll just stick to what I know which is staking high on about 3 -5 games.

 I've tried the OP's strategy and it worked for me once but the second time I tried it a funny thing happened, maybe I wasn't lucky. Away was winning 2-0, then I staked on it and added 3 more games, guess what? The one playing 2-0 ended with a draw, home team scored at 70mins and equalized the game at 90 plus I felt disappointed but it was so funny and I even laughed over it and since then I've not tried such strategy again.

[cabron]

I was eager to give this a try. I too want to turn my $5 to $40 as well and return to share the news too but I am not getting it. Isn't this the strategy we all do. I recently read of one user that had multibet of up to 30 plus games. And in that thread we argued that while some people were lucky to win, the risk was too high. And most people said that 2 to 3 parlay bet was a better and safer option that guarantees winning that multibet of the magnitude.

I don't really like betting on long shots, I wonder how people win from it because I find it very risky and would always go for 3-5 games, 5 maximum. That's the highest I could go, but then you'll see people playing about 24-30 games and sometimes they make good profit from it. I guess I've not made my mind to take such risk yet therefore I'll just stick to what I know which is staking high on about 3 -5 games.

 I've tried the OP's strategy and it worked for me once but the second time I tried it a funny thing happened, maybe I wasn't lucky. Away was winning 2-0, then I staked on it and added 3 more games, guess what? The one playing 2-0 ended with a draw, home team scored at 70mins and equalized the game at 90 plus I felt disappointed but it was so funny and I even laughed over it and since then I've not tried such strategy again.

2 or 3 games should be fine. Doing more than 3 I think you'd be comfortable when their odds are 1.15 and below. But I'd still recommend 2 or 3 games only. I'm still experimenting with this method though. Sometimes I lose but I'm sure I win more.

The DRAW is always a bummer. There are games that I am already assuming I will win but in the end, the other team scores one and the score is tie 1-1. And the house obviously wins when this happens. The beauty of just betting a small amount for like $5 in multibet is that the odds could equate to 1.70.

[temple]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

I don't want to crash the party here, but I doubt that this is a winning strategy. The odds are pretty well chosen by the bookmakers a lot of the time and finding sweet spots isn't easy. I don't know whether your claim is true that the team scoring first is the one most likely winning the game. Whether that is hockey or football, I doubt that there is obvious potential to be found in the odds.

Imagine an underdog takes the lead, which does indeed happen, but I would still feel uncomfortable picking the first scoring team as the winner only because they scored first. And picking odds of around 1.30 doesn't necessarily mean that you should do your research in live markets. The question is if you play a parlay of 1.3 + 1.3 whether you are really better off than just going for a single game with a 1.7?

[pawel7777]

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

As they say, if something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
If a simple strategy like that worked long-term, all sports-betting sites would've gone bankrupt long time ago. The reality is, the only good strategy is when you can get the pay-out rate exceeding the actual chances, which rarely happen and requires bookies to misjudge the odds.
When you bet on live events when one side already took a lead, you'd usually get super low odds to the point it's not worth the effort. I'd argue that the opposite strategy has a better chance of success: bet on live events on the losing team. You'd probably lose most of the time, but the proceeds from the fewer wins could be high enough to make it work.

(...)
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
(...)

Has anyone seen any statistics on how often the teams that take the lead first end up winning? Would be interesting to see.