Football/Soccer Winning Strategy

[Adbitco]

Can i ask you question:
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.

[cabron]

Can i ask you question:
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.

Happens all the time that a team doesn't score in the 2nd half.
DRAW is depressing really. I have a lot of losses with draws when the other team in the last few minutes, scores 1 point and they are 1:1.

Selecting matches before the game starts means you are familiar with the teams. The better chances you have when you know the sports. And you can tell whether the odds or the casino aren't fooling you. Of course, this system more likely going to work better for people who know more about soccer and a fan, especially in the national league.

[DaNNy001]

Can i ask you question:
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.

This is why we mustn't gamble with excessively large amount, even if the possibility of wining the ticket is high. A game of 2:0 where the home team is on the lead in the first half, can experience a turn around and later end 2:3 it has happened before and more are yet to still happen. If the home team receives a red card in the other half of the game, it would be very easy for them to conceive a goal or even series of goals from their opposition team. That's one of the reason why the game is a bit tricky and interesting. Your ability to make good predictions is what determines your chance of winning mean while it is still obviously a game of luck.

[alani123]

The difference with soccer is that the match can end in a draw and in such this strategy is much less effective overall. If you have 1/2 chances in hockey or you have 1/3 in soccer. Also I'd say that whenever someone scores the odds are immediately lowered for live bets so I don't think this is that great of a strategy.

Perhaps it's more based on luck so if you so far have been winning that's a good sign but don't let it ride forever. Eventually it would also go down at some point.

[topbitcoin]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it.  So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

ubilant success, turning $5 into $40 over two days of bets surely seems like an accomplishment worthy of pride. Yet this is not mere luck but the fruition of a strategy shrewdly devised. Curiously, your muse is not a mentor in the art of sports betting but one who provides subtle pointers, not a complete guide but enough to set you on your way.

Your adopted strategy involves seeking out sports such as Hockey where scoring is typically low and the first goal winner usually prevails. You then scout for a casino offering live play and place a Parlay on 2-3 games, best not to exceed that number as more matches translate to heightened risk. More sire, with three games placed there are only two possible outcomes in which all bets lose so you have less chance.

You even use this approach in soccer betting: sitting back until live matches appear on your screen and waiting to pounce when a team is already ahead 1-0 with promising odds. Remember not to stake a single bet but include other games in your multibet; also ensure that the matches are in the second half so you can place bets without forgetting these simple rules.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Well, you could say that it is a technique that I don't know how it can turn out, it is innovative, but innovative for me, I don't know much about Hockey, that sport is too good because it is rough and all rough sports fascinate me. Unfortunately I was never able to practice this sport because in my country there is no infrastructure for that, but at a time when they put in ice rinks I went skating many times and the truth was that it was Excellent for me, I don't know but if they had put in a team or worked on it I would have been an amateur player, but I don't understand that game very well, however if that's the case with the strategy they gave you, it's worth trying , Everything in life is a risk, and we have to take them according to our financial capabilities.

[Solosanz]

I think it's nothing different with betting on favorite teams because you're trying to bet on match with higher chance to win with low odds. I'm not really like to bet on low odds, so I either gamble on underdog or parlay bets.

It's more sadden to see low odds bets are lose than high odds bets since low odds betting mostly gamble using most of the bankroll.

If you have 1/2 chances in hockey or you have 1/3 in soccer.

Just bet on "draw no bet", so you only need to pick from two options.

[EarnOnVictor]

What I know is that what could be applied to hockey and other sports games could also be applicable to soccer betting as well, which is why I commend you on testing this out. However, this strategy looks odd and it shows some kind of "gambling within gambling" kind of pattern which I am not particularly comfortable with. The best way to bet on sports is to know the full information about the two teams playing and use your discretion and instinct to make your bet. This is still subject to some luck factors as well, and not about a certain pattern that your friend taught you.

Besides, if a team can score a goal and could keep it till the end of the match often, it only means that the team is not weak but strong which is a factor that will reduce the odds of that team against the other. This is never to my advantage and I do not do small odds in my sports betting which has been one of the ways to help me manage my gambling activities well and not be wasting my time like so many people do it randomly.

In other words, this style's risk is too high for me.

[cabron]

What I know is that what could be applied to hockey and other sports games could also be applicable to soccer betting as well, which is why I commend you on testing this out. However, this strategy looks odd and it shows some kind of "gambling within gambling" kind of pattern which I am not particularly comfortable with. The best way to bet on sports is to know the full information about the two teams playing and use your discretion and instinct to make your bet. This is still subject to some luck factors as well, and not about a certain pattern that your friend taught you.

Besides, if a team can score a goal and could keep it till the end of the match often, it only means that the team is not weak but strong which is a factor that will reduce the odds of that team against the other. This is never to my advantage and I do not do small odds in my sports betting which has been one of the ways to help me manage my gambling activities well and not be wasting my time like so many people do it randomly.

In other words, this style's risk is too high for me.

Gambling within gambling pattern is always the kind of system done in most strategies even the martingale system which one can apply also in this strategy. and just like @Solosanz said, this is like betting on your favorite team but just multi-betting but this time doing it live and in the 2nd half, and at the same time you are almost sure the team will win because they already scored.

Based on my experience, it doesn't work much in the very popular premier leagues or on FIFA because of the chances of DRAWs.

[Mia Chloe]

When it comes to Gambling bets can we say that there definitely is a strategy to making stakes and placing bets? My reason for saying this is quite simple. Now if you observe closely you will notice that sports betting including soccer is more like making a prediction and in such a case predictions are based more on luck than calculations. Although analysis and experience also helps, the percentage of luck required to ace a bet is still very huge compared to the level of experience and analysis required.
Now I am not saying it's impossible to have a strategy in sports betting, rather all I'm saying is that although it is possible the role luck has to play is still a very huge one.

[Saint-loup]

Have you tried to backtest your betting strategy on past matches by chance? How many times are you able to guess the winner of the game by applying this strategy on 100 matches for example?
I don't understand why you wait the 2nd half to place your bet BTW, since you are taking live odds, it's more profitable to bet earlier because the less time remains in the match, the lower are live odds for the team leading because it will win even if no other goal are scored, and the more the time passes, the less likely it is to have another goal. So if your strategy is just to bet on the first team to score, it is certainly more interesting to bet on it right after its first goal.  

[len01]

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

TBH, I already knew about this strategy before but never tried it because I was doubtful about the risk I was taking but it wasn't worth the odds which seemed a little small to me.
but whether this is luck or this strategy can really provide an 89% guarantee of victory, but I tried it myself in yesterday's match.
Initially I had read this thread and wanted to prove it for myself with a small amount of around $1 to see if I really got a win and it turned out I was surprised by the winning results I got.

I only tried single bets and maybe if there is another match later, maybe try parlay bets


from this picture, the match is in progress but Almeria is ahead by 1 score and I placed a bet right in the second half choosing Almeria to win with odds @1.35 and I got the win.
but unfortunately my main bet actually lost with a bigger bet
I never wanted to try this strategy because I prefer challenges at bigger odds to get profits commensurate with the risks we take.

[davis196]

So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

So basically this "strategy" is to find a bunch of games, that are playing right now and betting on the team that scored the first goal?
This doesn't seem like a sports betting strategy to me. The belief that the team, that scores the first goal usually wins the game isn't very common in football. Hockey games can't end in a draw, while football games could end in draw very often. This changes the odds.
Football games aren't as predictable as other sports. Maybe you should stick to hockey.
The best football betting strategy I know is matched betting. This isn't even a strategy, it's a method to make some easy money out of sports betting bonuses.

[justdimin]

here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.

So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.

Strategies in sports betting only work with knowledge, you can't expect to apply a strategy like this without having any knowledge and understanding about the teams involved in a match because that wouldn't make any sense and you will see your strategy falling apart. What if the team that scored a goal isn't the favorite but somehow managed to score and the opponent is stronger than them and they might score two or more goals later on?

So, however uses or applies such strategies on their bets need to understand that sports betting is all about knowledge and understanding of the teams and the players involved and you can't make your bets based on how many goals are scored and what is the timer at that time because we have often seen teams scoring more than 2 goals in the last few minutes of a game.

[Gozie51]

I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.

I quite understand your point about betting fewer games but I kind of feel that the confirmation of winning that you are talking about if you bet few games and smaller odd isn't always like that. If we say that every small odd or few games amounts to winning then every of such will be winning then every gambler will look in that direction. Are we taking away the luck factor in gambling? The point therefore is even lowest odds do become the set back on slip. There are times when only 1.30 odd will lose and 3.15 odd will win. However, I agree that it is better to bet fewer games than multiple, because the chances are high to win than multiple bets.

[TheUltraElite]

Methods like these don't always work because ultimately you are playing with luck and that first goalscorer might get their goal back from the opposing team and the game might end in a draw.

The mental satisfaction here is from the fact that you are doing something that is different from regular games. It cuts the existing redundancy but does not add anything new. It is not a skill based game and hence however you might want to twist the things, it all comes down to your luck.

[irhact]

Methods like these don't always work because ultimately you are playing with luck and that first goalscorer might get their goal back from the opposing team and the game might end in a draw.

You're right I've tried such method with sports betting and it doesn’t work very often you might be lucky on the first two trials before you realise that you won't win very often. Infact there's no strategy that guarantees one to always win you could only minimise your losing streaks but won't win everytime. And i agree with you cause most times when i used that strategy it's always a draw game that ruins it mostly.

 Every individual should understand that luck plays a very good role in gambling and whether you've got a very good strategy, their are times when luck comes in. I'm very used to sports betting lately there are sometimes when you’ll be pretty sure you've won a bet then you’ll see a lesser team equalising at 89mins just few mins to the end of the match.

[rahmad2nd]

Acceptable, in fact quite a few of us have applied it in betting on the sports we love. for example, what you say in this thread is not something foreign to me personally. anyway, I also do it even without having to do it in a live match. The concept is the same, the difference is that I don't aim to always win in every bet. Let's be realistic, in reality no one wants to lose their bet. that's why, I do my betting sessions with pleasure. I mean, without having to focus on the results. why, because for me usually these things can change our assumptions in every choice and even a high sense of desire to win. on the other hand, betting 1 or two single matches for me is enough. Of the many available schedules, we are presented with various matches.

This is where the unique thing is, sorting and choosing has become a necessity for me. It's a bit time-consuming, but in football we can review several days before the match takes place. in the final stage, evaluate and examine the results of the analysis to confirm our choice. There is no need to focus on the lowest odds or direct matches, because in fact there is no definite guarantee for that. We can sort and choose everything, according to the knowledge and insight we have. I like the lowest odds at least @1.70. that too, with all the options available. So, you don't have to bet to always choose a team. Likewise with the parlay option, 3 matches is more than enough, because the more we choose, the greater our ratio of losing. I have carried this idea through the years regardless of winning or losing. Moreover, I am a sports lover. So, the main point is not the winning money. but the sensation that is presented is also the art of football itself.

[yahoo62278]

It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting.
...
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.

I turned $5-$10 to $50-$100.. but after a good winning streak, I faced a losing streak. The strategy works for a while and brings profit, but at one point everything seems to turn around, and the same strategy starts to fail and every bet falls into the water.

So as far as sports betting is concerned, there is no guarantee, but as you say, all we can do is try, so if it works, it works. My only recommendation is to combine different bets, don't chase the same teams and the same bets, the more diverse we are the higher the chance for us to succeed in being profitable in the long run.

It's just like any strategy that anyone has, they're all doomed to daily in the long run. If there was a guaranteed winning strategy then casinos and sportsbooks would be out of business.

Basically from what I read, you're just hoping that the 1st team to score holds. Unfortunately, sports are super unpredictable and even a game with 1.01 odds can lose.

[joeperry]

Not gonna work all the time though I haven't managed to try it personally. I saw some hockey and football games where the score will become 1-1 or 1-2 (the first who scored losses or draw) and I don't think it will not work all the time. I still prefer to make a simple research regarding the team and match even if I am not familiar with them, a simple look at their previous matchup or games would give you an idea on which team who will win or how many scores in total they could make, and place that bet.

This kind of method works on me (but not all the time) there's an instances that I lose 8 consecutively so yeah, it's there's really no winning strategy that let you win all the time but there's a lot of strategy you could try on.