I would like to remind you that reports to moderators are created not for something but despite everything. If a moderator listens to your reports and most of them are "good," that is, in agreement with your opinion, isn't that a sign of trust?
Looks to me like he's on a quest for another route to gaining positive trust...(lol) If he's gonna deny otherwise, what's the essence of the question?
And yes, a reporter is not a position or a duty, but an ordinary volunteer.
Just like every other spam busters and some few more, vying for the merit sourcehip positions.
These people don't understand the differences between voluntarily services and paid/earned services.
I am wondering what happens with this in the long run.
In the long run, we get a better forum
That's what happens
How i wish this was the case!