Arizona moves to repel abortion ban but Trump could make it US wide

[Uhwuchukwu53]

Isn't it necessary to also consider the risks involved on the course of evacuating childs from their mothers womb? I don't know about others opinion but I think if anyone doesn't want to have a child either unwanted or wedlock, then you should be prepared and Concious on at your sexual intercourse.
The intentions of Trump could be to safe and existing life of a mother considering the risks and the other way round, I think there's no different in murderer cases and abortion a baby alive form the mothers womb.
This might literally not be about religious beliefs and sentiments are we could think.

Yes all what your saying is right, going into sexual intercourse party involved since the thought is generated from the heart before manifestation even the abortion such people who have at first conclude to take a preventive measure with the aid of contraceptive, as prevent, temporary tablet that won't allow it to take place before or after the sex , or could even make use if the so called condom, the abort a full grown fetus in not just ideal but murderer.

Just that in the period where politics and campaign is thrown over board to the public many rumors and fake news to run down opponents is always their by people who are not supportive to ones agenda but if truly trump said it I don't see anything wrong but seeking means if avoiding much loss if women during the process of abortions.

[AVE5]

Abortion is prohibited in many countries of the world. But these are usually depending on the will of the citizens they don't want to obey any law. Existing Arizona state law also prohibits abortion in the event of rape or involuntary manslaughter. Abortion will be permitted only if the mother's life is in danger. The law provides for two to five years in prison for assisting in an abortion.

I think justifying this abortion issues as an event of breaking the laws would make the law more effective and Influential if the government focuses more on the executor. I mean the individuals who're engaged on the abortion exercises as professions of carrying on the operation of aborting the child in the mothers womb. Then before the law also holds the pregnancy bearer.
Definitely if there's no professionals who carries on the events, individuals would have no choice than keeping the baby or rather men and women will be more careful to avoid unwanted pregnancies.

[paxmao]

Abortion is prohibited in many countries of the world. But these are usually depending on the will of the citizens they don't want to obey any law. Existing Arizona state law also prohibits abortion in the event of rape or involuntary manslaughter. Abortion will be permitted only if the mother's life is in danger. The law provides for two to five years in prison for assisting in an abortion.

I think justifying this abortion issues as an event of breaking the laws would make the law more effective and Influential if the government focuses more on the executor. I mean the individuals who're engaged on the abortion exercises as professions of carrying on the operation of aborting the child in the mothers womb. Then before the law also holds the pregnancy bearer.
Definitely if there's no professionals who carries on the events, individuals would have no choice than keeping the baby or rather men and women will be more careful to avoid unwanted pregnancies.

The only thing you have to consider is the mother's decision. It is her risk, her choice and you do not have a say on her life. Get that into your head or go live in Saudi Arabia. Women have their right to decide on their bodies not you, not your "consideration", not your "god" nor whatever wrong stuff got into your head. Women choose, you have nothing to say.

[Zoomic]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/may/01/speaker-mike-johnson-marjorie-taylor-greene-updates

Donald Trump may say that he does not plan to push for a national abortion ban, but Kamala Harris told voters in Florida that they should not believe him.

Who should we believe, Donald Trump or kamala Harris? This is politics and every other presidential aspirant has made promises too. Why should we not believe him and believe others? No one should have 100% confidence in any politician because they are all thesame. Its high time we the voters become wise and not allow anyone tell us who to vote for or not. The past records of these aspirants are there, going through it we would know who has kept to his past promises and who deviated from the original plan. Choose the one who has tried in the past and drum your support for them. Kamala Harris is not a Saint either, she is a politician and would do anything to ensure her favorite candidate wins.

[paxmao]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/may/01/speaker-mike-johnson-marjorie-taylor-greene-updates

Donald Trump may say that he does not plan to push for a national abortion ban, but Kamala Harris told voters in Florida that they should not believe him.

Who should we believe, Donald Trump or kamala Harris? This is politics and every other presidential aspirant has made promises too. Why should we not believe him and believe others? No one should have 100% confidence in any politician because they are all thesame. Its high time we the voters become wise and not allow anyone tell us who to vote for or not. The past records of these aspirants are there, going through it we would know who has kept to his past promises and who deviated from the original plan. Choose the one who has tried in the past and drum your support for them. Kamala Harris is not a Saint either, she is a politician and would do anything to ensure her favorite candidate wins.

Neither of them. You should believe in facts: Republican states have moved into effectively abortion bans. Trump has a record of breaking his promises, so the fact that he says something means little in terms of guarantees, but the fact that the Supreme Court has repelled a decades long ruling and many Evangelists and Methodist support Trump should give you a hint.

[legiteum]

Neither of them. You should believe in facts: Republican states have moved into effectively abortion bans. Trump has a record of breaking his promises, so the fact that he says something means little in terms of guarantees, but the fact that the Supreme Court has repelled a decades long ruling and many Evangelists and Methodist support Trump should give you a hint.

That, and their written platform which declares that:

1. Abortion is, unequivocally, murder.

2. Therefore the president should do everything in his power to stop this "murder".

3. The next US president should have powers far exceeding that of any US president before him.

4. The next US president can and should use the power of the Federal government to criminalize abortions in all 50 states.


It's very simple:

* If you want abortion to be illegal across the US, and illegal to leave the US in order to get an abortion, then vote for Trump.

* If you want the laws to stay the same as they are and have been for the last 50 years, vote for Biden.