Blackjack.fun |SLOTS|SPORTS|ESPORTS| JACK Token

[pooya87]

They can solve this issue easily if they have a frontend dev under their payroll (which they should btw). All he has to do is some sorting and adding an if/else block. (If you are showing the balance as sats; delete “.” and the rest)

It's a UI thing so it doesn't require a conditional block, it just needs a converter to convert the selected unit to a string format. I don't know how it works in HTML but for example in C# we do it by using an IValueConverter and it would take the enum (eg. sat, milisat, etc.) and convert it to the input for StringFormat (in this case N0 for satoshi to have zero decimal places and N8 for when you want 8 decimal places).
This way the value is untouched and the code doesn't need to change, just the StringFormat is added and the converter.

The original dev didn’t do the necessary tests before submitting his work it seems. (Or maybe something broke later on, it happens all the time) Depending on their agreement, they might even ask the dev to do it for free.

UI issues are always overlooked and usually it is not possible to test them automatically.

[Alone055]

They can solve this issue easily if they have a frontend dev under their payroll (which they should btw). All he has to do is some sorting and adding an if/else block. (If you are showing the balance as sats; delete “.” and the rest)

The original dev didn’t do the necessary tests before submitting his work it seems. (Or maybe something broke later on, it happens all the time) Depending on their agreement, they might even ask the dev to do it for free.

Do they even need a dev to get such a simple thing done? A person with a little knowledge about front-end development/design can make the necessary changes but only if they know what they are doing so that they don't mess things up.

Alternatively, if they don't mind, they can easily use an AI model such as GPT-4 to get it done pretty efficiently, all they need to do is write the perfect prompt for the model to understand what exactly it needs to do and it will be done in a matter of seconds, excluding the time for applying the changes and stuff.

[Z-tight]

However, I have not seen these same commissions decrease on centralized exchanges (which in some cases process many more transactions...)

The withdrawal fee you pay on BlackJack is based on BTC on-chain tx fees, and what the casino does is to estimate it based on the time of your withdrawal. It is different from how withdrawal on exchanges work, most of them charge you a fixed withdrawal fee, and then they process your withdrawal and a lot of others in one tx and then cover the on-chain fees.

[mindrust]

It's a UI thing so it doesn't require a conditional block, it just needs a converter to convert the selected unit to a string format. I don't know how it works in HTML but for example in C# we do it by using an IValueConverter and it would take the enum (eg. sat, milisat, etc.) and convert it to the input for StringFormat (in this case N0 for satoshi to have zero decimal places and N8 for when you want 8 decimal places).
This way the value is untouched and the code doesn't need to change, just the StringFormat is added and the converter.

UI issues are always overlooked and usually it is not possible to test them automatically.

I know how to convert a string to a number, a number to a string and then modify it to whatever I want. (Split, splice, add, extract whatever)

One way or another there needs to be a condition though as you will show the sats when you list it as “btc” and not show when it is sats. You might use something else than if/else whatever suits your boat but a decision has to be made there. That’s how I would fix it with my lame coding skillz. I’ll do it for $10.

They can solve this issue easily if they have a frontend dev under their payroll (which they should btw). All he has to do is some sorting and adding an if/else block. (If you are showing the balance as sats; delete “.” and the rest)

The original dev didn’t do the necessary tests before submitting his work it seems. (Or maybe something broke later on, it happens all the time) Depending on their agreement, they might even ask the dev to do it for free.

Do they even need a dev to get such a simple thing done? A person with a little knowledge about front-end development/design can make the necessary changes but only if they know what they are doing so that they don't mess things up.

Alternatively, if they don't mind, they can easily use an AI model such as GPT-4 to get it done pretty efficiently, all they need to do is write the perfect prompt for the model to understand what exactly it needs to do and it will be done in a matter of seconds, excluding the time for applying the changes and stuff.

You say that because you know coding. If the owners knew some coding too, don’t you think they would have fixed it already?

There are millions of people who cant console.log(“shit”)

[Numeral]

Alternatively, if they don't mind, they can easily use an AI model such as GPT-4 to get it done pretty efficiently, all they need to do is write the perfect prompt for the model to understand what exactly it needs to do and it will be done in a matter of seconds, excluding the time for applying the changes and stuff.

It's better still to have a specialist handle these things. It is affordable for an organization of the Blackjack.Fun level. With all due respect to the Chat-GPT4 AI model, in order to get a correct and reliable software solution from it, it is necessary for a specialist to work with it as well. Therefore, it is better that the issue should be handled by a developer who will decide for himself whether the AI is needed as an aid or not.

[xLays]

I just want to give feedback since I got the prize from the Euro 1st Goal Time Prediction contest sponsored by blackjac.fun. I made some bets in the casino and on sports betting. It was a good experience, but I feel like the design is not for me because some aspects trigger me and make me uncomfortable. Overall, it was a good experience especially with the instant withdrawal, low fees, and no KYC. Thanks @Icopress, @inspace and blackjackfun for this contest.

[joker_josue]

Have you noticed that in the investors tab, in some areas the information appears blurry?
From what I understand, it's something related to the size of the browser window.
Note the images:

Smaller Window


Bigger Window



Here's a suggestion for the Blackjack.fun team to improve this graphic aspect.


_{Yes, I know I'm being very picky, but on these things I'm a bit like that.}

[Peanutswar]

Have you noticed that in the investors tab, in some areas the information appears blurry?
From what I understand, it's something related to the size of the browser window.
Note the images:

~


Here's a suggestion for the Blackjack.fun team to improve this graphic aspect.


_{Yes, I know I'm being very picky, but on these things I'm a bit like that.}

As per checking, I tried to make an adjustment with the screen resolution I experienced the same blur of the text in the part of the investor's feature, as per trying to make a testing resolution below 1280. I am getting a blur of the image with the range of 1280 up to 1359 once it reaches with the 1360 screen reso it will now be brought back to normal text. Seems just something overlap with the CSS tags.

[swogerino]

Alternatively, if they don't mind, they can easily use an AI model such as GPT-4 to get it done pretty efficiently, all they need to do is write the perfect prompt for the model to understand what exactly it needs to do and it will be done in a matter of seconds, excluding the time for applying the changes and stuff.

It's better still to have a specialist handle these things. It is affordable for an organization of the Blackjack.Fun level. With all due respect to the Chat-GPT4 AI model, in order to get a correct and reliable software solution from it, it is necessary for a specialist to work with it as well. Therefore, it is better that the issue should be handled by a developer who will decide for himself whether the AI is needed as an aid or not.

Nowadays almost all developers have a need for Chat-GPT4 which lately is free as far as I have seen.I use it in my daily work to check for things,also the developers at my work use it all the time,the programmers and database administrators use it all the time to try and find solution to their problems.I know that there is a premium version of it yet without human interaction it is worthless so the specialist or developer is definitely needed to check things and improve.We use a software there,an app and the developer fixes bugs all the time to the software which contains also a website,so I think the best to do is to hire a human programmer to have there and to fix things.

[bitmover]

Another bug here is the Amount column. These numbers are in satoshi and yet there is 8 decimal places in front of them which will always be zero.

Maybe they are preparing for lightning support and Sub satoshi units

Just kidding
But that would be a nice new feature, lightning support

[AHOYBRAUSE]

snip

I actually pointed this out several weeks ago in this thread, along with some other stuff, but until there haven't been any adjustments made unfortunately.
Display and overview wise the site still lacks some thing and I think they really should take care of that asap since it would very much improve the experience of the players on their site.
I hope they keep an eye on this thread and maybe get to it some time very soon!!

[GbitG]

Yesterday I had the most pleasant experience with Blackjack withdrawals. First of all, I got lucky to catch quite low commission, approximately 6 sat/b. But apart from that I also received my coins very quickly, like I never had before. All those things make working with BlackJack even more comfortable and satisfactory.

Hmm, that's true mate!
Every move of blackjack. Fun attracts you to work with it because every feature of BlackJack.fun gives you a satisfying result. I myself am a witness to the great work of Blacjack.fun. That is, the best way they have built their quality is a worthy adjective. 

Beside that, I myself withdraw from Blackjack.gun at a low commission like you. I have withdrawn only two times from week 1 till now, and every time I got the result in a very smooth way, i.e. along with a quick transaction, I also got a satisfactory response of low commission this time. So the point of saying this is that I am very thankful to Blackjack.fun for these great services.

[pooya87]

One way or another there needs to be a condition though as you will show the sats when you list it as “btc” and not show when it is sats. You might use something else than if/else whatever suits your boat but a decision has to be made there. That’s how I would fix it with my lame coding skillz. I’ll do it for $10.

Yeah there is always more than one way to skin a cat in programming.

Maybe they are preparing for lightning support and Sub satoshi units

Just kidding
But that would be a nice new feature, lightning support

Smaller units still wouldn't need 8 decimal places though. And in this particular case since they also round up the values those decimal places will always be zero.

[uswa56]

Yesterday I had the most pleasant experience with Blackjack withdrawals. First of all, I got lucky to catch quite low commission, approximately 6 sat/b. But apart from that I also received my coins very quickly, like I never had before. All those things make working with BlackJack even more comfortable and satisfactory.

Hmm, that's true mate!
Every move of blackjack. Fun attracts you to work with it because every feature of BlackJack.fun gives you a satisfying result. I myself am a witness to the great work of Blacjack.fun. That is, the best way they have built their quality is a worthy adjective. 

Beside that, I myself withdraw from Blackjack.gun at a low commission like you. I have withdrawn only two times from week 1 till now, and every time I got the result in a very smooth way, i.e. along with a quick transaction, I also got a satisfactory response of low commission this time. So the point of saying this is that I am very thankful to Blackjack.fun for these great services.

There is progress that is getting better, which means the team from Blackjack.fun is increasingly making this site easier and more satisfying.
I also experienced the same thing this week, I made withdrawals 2 days in a row and with lower fees than usual, it was a matter of happiness for me.

And I should also appreciate that the CS service has now improved quite a lot, the response given is very fast and also the answers are accurate, it really makes things easier now.

[Eternad]

I don’t remember if they have x1 wagering requirements for deposit but I consider it as a must to avoid conflict for AML policy of casino.

From my understanding from their terms and conditions, they allow users to withdraw their fund even if they have not wagered their deposit at least 1 time, but they will charge 8% of the fund as fee.

9.2. There are no withdrawal commissions if you roll over (wager) the deposit at least 1 time. Otherwise we are entitled to deduct a 8% fee with minimum sum of 4 euro (or equivalent in your account currency) in order to combat money laundering.

Thank you for sharing this. I was about to deposit now for investment purposes but I’m glad to do back-read first to check if I’m missing something. 8% is insanely high just to avoid the x1 wagering requirements that can be easily completed with less loss on low house edge games like dice, plinko and blackjack.

I decided to reduced my investment for a less risk through wager requirements. I just hope that Blackjack.fun will waived this wagering requirements and 8% fee for funds that will be used for investment purposes. Just introduced a lock feature before someone can withdraw the funds.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Thank you for sharing this. I was about to deposit now for investment purposes but I’m glad to do back-read first to check if I’m missing something. 8% is insanely high just to avoid the x1 wagering requirements that can be easily completed with less loss on low house edge games like dice, plinko and blackjack.

I decided to reduced my investment for a less risk through wager requirements. I just hope that Blackjack.fun will waived this wagering requirements and 8% fee for funds that will be used for investment purposes. Just introduced a lock feature before someone can withdraw the funds.

Well bj.fun is still a casino first and it's in their interest to have a wager requirement of course. Sure the investment is enticing but it's an offer for players, without any gameplay you are not a player. 

But yeah, I think getting through the wager requirement is not really hard. Just play some high winning % game and it should be done in no time. 1x really is not that big of a hurdle.

[Eternad]

Thank you for sharing this. I was about to deposit now for investment purposes but I’m glad to do back-read first to check if I’m missing something. 8% is insanely high just to avoid the x1 wagering requirements that can be easily completed with less loss on low house edge games like dice, plinko and blackjack.

I decided to reduced my investment for a less risk through wager requirements. I just hope that Blackjack.fun will waived this wagering requirements and 8% fee for funds that will be used for investment purposes. Just introduced a lock feature before someone can withdraw the funds.

Well bj.fun is still a casino first and it's in their interest to have a wager requirement of course. Sure the investment is enticing but it's an offer for players, without any gameplay you are not a player. 

But yeah, I think getting through the wager requirement is not really hard. Just play some high winning % game and it should be done in no time. 1x really is not that big of a hurdle.

Yeah right, I was planning to deposit huge amount that is dedicated for investment which I will have problem to withdraw later on without suffering a significant loss despite playing with high percentage.

Good thing I hold my horses before I decided to deposit or else I will be forced to play safely just to complete the wager which I don’t want to do on funds that I can’t afford to lose. 15% APY is a very good offer for a balance that can be withdrawn anytime.

[Etranger]

Well bj.fun is still a casino first and it's in their interest to have a wager requirement of course. Sure the investment is enticing but it's an offer for players, without any gameplay you are not a player. 

But yeah, I think getting through the wager requirement is not really hard. Just play some high winning % game and it should be done in no time. 1x really is not that big of a hurdle.

Sure, it is for gamblers. But, you know, for a player those investment offers could be less interesting due to the fact, that a player is used to higher percentage of winning. As you said yourself, 1x (and from my experience even 2x) is not that big of a hurdle. With BlackJack the player has every chance to develop passion to higher numbers and will prefer the game to investments. Which is also a winning option for the casino itself.

[babo]

I found one thing that could be improved
I can't find the page that explains what the minimum requirements are to be able to withdraw
now I discovered by asking support that the minimum for usdt is 25 USDT

It would be nice to have a summary page! thank you

[Peanutswar]

When I dont have anything to do I have small chats with other players in the chat board and of course, they always have an event with the chatcheer and if you are active here you can claim rewards!