List Of The Longest Forum Signature Campaign Above 100wk That Left/Still Active

[hugeblack]

In the past, most signature campaigns were paid in Bitcoin, and we did not hear about paying for $ per post until after 2020, so it is difficult to guess how much they pay, but few campaigns exceeded 100 weeks and 50 BTC.
Bitmixer was the longest campaign that decided to voluntarily stop , and some of the campaigns had automated payment so that payment was made for each post and not weekly.

[uchegod-21]

In the past, most signature campaigns were paid in Bitcoin, and we did not hear about paying for $ per post until after 2020, so it is difficult to guess how much they pay, but few campaigns exceeded 100 weeks and 50 BTC.
Bitmixer was the longest campaign that decided to voluntarily stop , and some of the campaigns had automated payment so that payment was made for each post and not weekly.

I never knew that was a campaign called Bitmover. What was the pay like, close to chipmixer? Also the automated payment aspect you mentioned, how was it achieved. Paying per post and not weekly. Does this mean that it wasn't a manager that counted and processed the payments. And why do you think that nowadays campaign stopped the idea of automated payment?

[Crypto Library]

I never knew that was a campaign called Bitmover. What was the pay like, close to chipmixer? Also the automated payment aspect you mentioned, how was it achieved. Paying per post and not weekly. Does this mean that it wasn't a manager that counted and processed the payments. And why do you think that nowadays campaign stopped the idea of automated payment?

It is called bitmi*xer not the bitmo*ver. You can check and compare to chipm*xer from their signature campaign thread- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1657397.0 the manager was Lauda.

Bitmixer was the longest campaign that decided to voluntarily stop , and some of the campaigns had automated payment so that payment was made for each post and not weekly.

But I have also the same question how do they check the quality of a post? If they have the automated posts like Identifying the spam are those are also automated at that time?
edited-
Oh! I see, may be that's how they manage the automatic system.

Anti-SPAM Policy:
Everyone is free to enroll as the system is automatic, however you are going to be subject to weekly checks. This campaign has very high post quality requirements. Here are some of the actions that will get you banned from this campaign:

[examplens]

But I have also the same question how do they check the quality of a post? If they have the automated posts like Identifying the spam are those are also automated at that time?
edited-
Oh! I see, may be that's how they manage the automatic system.

Anti-SPAM Policy:
Everyone is free to enroll as the system is automatic, however you are going to be subject to weekly checks. This campaign has very high post quality requirements. Here are some of the actions that will get you banned from this campaign:

I was in that campaign. In the beginning, there was no post quality control and all posts were counted (except for boards where the signature is not visible), even the Twitter campaign report in the service section. Of course, this turned into abuse, so later Lauda was hired to clean it and exclude sig. spammers.
Again, after some time, the number of places in the campaign was limited and with the higher price of Bitcoin, the campaign became very attractive.

[Quickseller]

The bitmixer campaign was going on for at least 3 years (~150 weeks). Although it was a mixer, I understand it was seized, so there really isn't much point in censoring discussions about it (anyone going to their website will likely end up at the seizure notice).

Bitmixer it was not seized. The owner himself decided to stop working without any pressure. The reason was what is quite current today, the misuse of the mixer service
We cannot deny that he seemed somewhat prophetic

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2042470

You are correct, that is my mistake. Either way, censoring any link to bit mixer doesn't make a lot of sense because the underlying link will not lead to a working service.

[bitmover]

The bitmixer campaign was going on for at least 3 years (~150 weeks). Although it was a mixer, I understand it was seized, so there really isn't much point in censoring discussions about it (anyone going to their website will likely end up at the seizure notice).

Bitmixer it was not seized. The owner himself decided to stop working without any pressure. The reason was what is quite current today, the misuse of the mixer service
We cannot deny that he seemed somewhat prophetic

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2042470

His post is very interesting:

Hi all!
Despite the huge profit we earn, we are closing our activity. Let me explain why.

I'm bitcoin enthusiast since 2011. When we started this service I was convinced that any Bitcoin user has a natural right to privacy. I was totally wrong. Now I grasped that Bitcoin is transparent non-anonymous system by design. Blockchain is a great open book. I believe that Bitcoin will have a great future without dark market transactions. You may use Dash or Zerocoin if you want to buy some weed. Not Bitcoin.

I hope our decision will help to make Bitcoin ecosystem more clean and transparent. I hope our competitors will hear our message and will close their services too. Very soon this kind of activity will be considered as illegal in most of countries.

Cheers,
Bitmixer.IO

There are many interesting points here.

First of all, as a bitcoin enthusiast since 2011, he made a LOT of money. This is probably one of the reason why many people stopped their services... don't need money anymore.

"I believe that Bitcoin will have a great future without dark market transactions. You may use Dash or Zerocoin if you want to buy some weed. Not Bitcoin. "
Although he was running a mixer, he suggests that people use other privacy coins to buy darknet stuff. Probably a lot of people in this forum would throw rocks in him today.


"I hope our decision will help to make Bitcoin ecosystem more clean and transparent. "

Again, he thinks that enhancing privacy on bitcoin might be a problem for bitcoin, as he believes that closing his mixer will  "help" Bitcoin ecosystem.

YOLOdice.com Signature Campaign lasted for 4 years.

I was in that campaign for years. Miss Yolodice

[hugeblack]

Does this mean that it wasn't a manager that counted and processed the payments. And why do you think that nowadays campaign stopped the idea of automated payment?

In 2018 it was easy and fun. There were not many restrictions and merit system was in the early days. I was lucky because I joined CM as soon as I reached SR rank, so I imagine it was much easier in 2016 and 2014 as there were no standards for high-quality posts and the forum was the only place for these projects to advertise, so they did not care about the quality of the posts.

The only thing that everyone was afraid of was ignore lists and ban lists, where campaign managers prepare black lists^[1] that prevent you from participating. If your name is not on those lists, your chance of earning is guaranteed.

These lists may be the reason why so many alt accounts are created.

[1] [SMAS] My list of users banned from sig. campaigns

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

i just added more campaigns to the list, that is 'Bitmixer, Rollin, FortuneJack, YOLOdice and Sportsbet' but it seems i'm having a little difficulty compiling the whole details which i needed to update 'YOLOdice and Sportsbet', as i will be very glad if there is anybody who took part in these campaigns to tell me How many weeks did YOLOdice campaign lasted? How much was the payment? Was it weekly or monthly?.
Secondly, i will also love if there are people who also took part in Sportsbet campaign, How many weeks did it last? What date did the campaign close?
Thirdly, all thanks to everybody who provided links to close/active campaign threads above 100 weeks i needed to update this.


NOTE
I will be very glad if you could keep updating me on active campaigns that crosses 100 weeks, so that they could be added to this thread for documentation purpose. Thanks

[uchegod-21]

His post is very interesting:

Hi all!
Despite the huge profit we earn, we are closing our activity. Let me explain why.

I'm bitcoin enthusiast since 2011. When we started this service I was convinced that any Bitcoin user has a natural right to privacy. I was totally wrong. Now I grasped that Bitcoin is transparent non-anonymous system by design. Blockchain is a great open book. I believe that Bitcoin will have a great future without dark market transactions. You may use Dash or Zerocoin if you want to buy some weed. Not Bitcoin.

I hope our decision will help to make Bitcoin ecosystem more clean and transparent. I hope our competitors will hear our message and will close their services too. Very soon this kind of activity will be considered as illegal in most of countries.

Cheers,
Bitmixer.IO

Maybe Bitmixer was actually a prophet. He said that very soon mixing activities will be considered as illegal in most countries. I think that is what is happening now .
In the first paragraph of his statement, after stating that he made alot of money from the service. He went ahead to say that mixer is acting against the transparency and openess of bitcoin network. He was emphatically against mixers, which is why he advised people to embrace privacy coins and also advised his competitors to shutdown. Did I get it wrong?

[bitmover]

i just added more campaigns to the list, that is 'Bitmixer, Rollin, FortuneJack, YOLOdice and Sportsbet' but it seems i'm having a little difficulty compiling the whole details which i needed to update 'YOLOdice and Sportsbet', as i will be very glad if there is anybody who took part in these campaigns to tell me How many weeks did YOLOdice campaign lasted? How much was the payment? Was it weekly or monthly?.

Yolodice started 17/01/2017 until 21/02/2021
213 weeks according to https://planetcalc.com/7740/

Payment was 0.01 btc per week when I was there. I moved out in 2020

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1755689.0

[examplens]

OP, I guess you overlooked this, Bitsler (another campaign I was in) had a signature campaign for 4 years and at that time it was one with a better payment rate

Bitsler's signature and avatar campaign was one of the highest paid that lasted for 4 years, so add them to your list.

[SFR10]

However, i will be glad if you can recommend any Signature Campaign above 100 weeks which left the forum and not included in my above list. Thanks

secondstrade ^{[119 weeks]}

• First thread ^{[they couldn't restore their account (proof), so they had to create another thread (second thread)]}.

And as well as also missing Bitvest which is running for 31 weeks
...

Sorry, I think I just adjusted the rules on the article.

Bitvest has been running for way more than that... The main issue is the fact that they keep creating new threads, so the only way to get the full picture is by connecting the dots ^{[e.g. 82 weeks on this one]}.
You might want to check the following campaigns as well:

- BIT-X
- Coinroll
- Yobit ^{[another thread]}

[AB de Royse777]

It's a nice list.

Since you already visited a lot of campaign threads and obviously earned some good knowledge before creating this thread. Do you think you can compile another thread which will have list of campaigns that have good weekly budget. Sort it out by highest to lowest.

You can also have a list of the signature campaign which paid good amount per week to its members.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Do you think you can compile another thread which will have list of campaigns that have good weekly budget. Sort it out by highest to lowest.

You can also have a list of the signature campaign which paid good amount per week to its members.

Yes, I can do that, and it will be my greatest pleasure compiling such list for you Sir, ranging from the highest to the lowest pay in both Bitcoin and Dollar weekly payment.

[shield132]

i just added more campaigns to the list, that is 'Bitmixer, Rollin, FortuneJack, YOLOdice and Sportsbet' but it seems i'm having a little difficulty compiling the whole details which i needed to update 'YOLOdice and Sportsbet', as i will be very glad if there is anybody who took part in these campaigns to tell me How many weeks did YOLOdice campaign lasted? How much was the payment? Was it weekly or monthly?.
Secondly, i will also love if there are people who also took part in Sportsbet campaign, How many weeks did it last? What date did the campaign close?
Thirdly, all thanks to everybody who provided links to close/active campaign threads above 100 weeks i needed to update this.


NOTE
I will be very glad if you could keep updating me on active campaigns that crosses 100 weeks, so that they could be added to this thread for documentation purpose. Thanks

Seriously, why didn't you add Bitsler's signature and avatar campaign to your list? It was a very long-lasting campaign with a very high pay rate.
By the way, Fortunejack has many threads, I'll try to include all of them, I'll sum it up for you.
FortuneJack.com NEW Campaign – Earn 0.12 BTC!!! Weekly Payments.
FortuneJack.com Signature Campaign – Earn 0.08 BTC!!!
FortuneJack.com Campaign – Earn up to 0.2 BTC A Month!!! Weekly Payments.
FORTUNEJACK - Earn up to 0.2BTC - NEW Signature Campaign - Weekly Payments
FortuneJack Signature Campaign -Started 6th of April- Hero/Legendary

There are also some other FortuneJack's signature campaigns but they were all temporary, to promote new features and services for a limited time.

I also just reminded another long-lasting signature campaign.
BitDice Casino Signature Campaign - 136 weeks.
bustadice signature campaign - 180 weeks

I am not confident if there are still other signature campaigns that lasted this long but if there is, I'll update you with the list. At the moment, nothing comes to my mind other than these what I posted right now.

[CODE200]

Bitvest doesn't count because of the hiatus?

It's a really cool list and I'm amazed that Crypto.Games was the one that's at the top of longest running and active campaign here in the forum, I was in the belief that it was a Bitvest or Roobet but then I guess, Crypto.Games campaign is older than my own account and I don't know any better in regards to campaigns at that time and I was just posting stuff and trying to join campaigns even if I don't know that there should be a requirements.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Thank you for all the vital informations shared on this thread, aimed at helping me to update my list. I really appreciate, and I hope you accept my apologies for not responding to individual comments, but sum up all information shared here and ask for help where I'm having difficulty.

So I just added more campaigns to the list, that is 'Bitsler, BitDice, BIT-X, Secondstrade and YoBit'. But i seem to be having little difficulty in getting more details to update my list, and I will be very glad if you all could assist me on this. Thank you.

Here they are!!

1. What was the maximum weekly post for BIT-X signature campaign?

2. What was the closing date of BitDice signature campaign?

3. What was the weekly duration & Closing date of 'YoBit' Signature campaign

Additionally, it seems nobody was able to give me the answer to this, and on that note, I'm here to ask again, What was the weekly duration & Closing date of 'Sportsnet' Signature campaign?

[SFR10]

1. What was the maximum weekly post for BIT-X signature campaign?

BIT-X's last adjustment put the cap on "150 posts per week ^{[credit goes to @TryNinja (Ninjastic.space)]}".

2. What was the closing date of BitDice signature campaign?

That's a tricky one considering that they suddenly stopped providing updates on their "second campaign thread", but based on an "archive of their spreadsheet" they lasted more than 136 weeks.

3. What was the weekly duration & Closing date of 'YoBit' Signature campaign

I don't know the answer for the first part, but the closing date is "January 27, 2020".

So I just added more campaigns to the list, that is 'Bitsler, BitDice, BIT-X, Secondstrade and YoBit'.

You forgot Bitvest

• And as well as also missing Bitvest which is running for 31 weeks
  ...
  

  Sorry, I think I just adjusted the rules on the article.
  

  Bitvest has been running for way more than that... The main issue is the fact that they keep creating new threads, so the only way to get the full picture is by connecting the dots ^{[e.g. 82 weeks on this one]}.
  

[Bitinity]

The information of "max post" can be something misleading imo because most campaign use "min post" during the week of the campaign. Perhaps it will be better if it is matched to the actual rule of each campaign (Min or Max) or put both words. Anyway I remember few campaigns but I'm not really sure how long they were running but I think they were running long enough such as dadice and yobit, maybe you can check.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

The information of "max post" can be something misleading imo because most campaign use "min post" during the week of the campaign. Perhaps it will be better if it is matched to the actual rule of each campaign (Min or Max) or put both words.

Alright, Thanks for your observation Sir, and I will like to say that the reason why "Maximum" was used instead of "Minimum" is to showcase the exact amount these campaigns were willing to pay for in it's respective signature campaign, not minding if participants were able to meet up or not. Because if you are to calculate how much a campaign is ready to pay a certain rank per week, its simply by multiplying the maximum number of post it's willing to pay to how much it's paying per post. So I don't think minimum has any role to play here.

Anyway I remember few campaigns but I'm not really sure how long they were running but I think they were running long enough such as dadice and yobit, maybe you can check.

Okay. But if you can give me the exact duration they ran in weeks, with forum proof, I don't mind changing it. I will be waiting Sir...

1. What was the maximum weekly post for BIT-X signature campaign?

BIT-X's last adjustment put the cap on "150 posts per week ^{[credit goes to @TryNinja (Ninjastic.space)]}".

2. What was the closing date of BitDice signature campaign?

Thanks for providing the correct answer. I will be adding it to the list shortly.