Stake.com has permanently closed my account with 17 000 USD in it

[Rating Place]

OP was online today, but seemingly have no intention to address his case further by replying this thread. As such, I am abiding CG's findings and will mark this as resolved as well on my list.

OP, I hope you can get better resolution through their licensor. Please update us when or if they made a ruling that's different from what CG gave.

CG rejected the case. Stake didn't tell CG what rule the OP broke.

" After thoroughly reviewing the case and all the evidence provided by the casino, we have decided to reject this case. While the casino has chosen not to disclose the specific reasons for the account closure, I can only share that the documentation submitted by the player exhibits signs of inaccuracy and lack of integrity. Unfortunately, this case is too complex for us to resolve conclusively. Given the substantial evidence, we are compelled to uphold the casino's decision."

CG's final verdict is to take favor in Stake. They uphold Stake's decision and perceive it as the one that's likely to happened. I understand you're trying to say that I shouldn't mark the case as resolved on my list? Then, do tell, what status should I wrote it and why?

Could go either way but it's your thread and I don't have a really strong case against. Your call is fine by me.

[holydarkness]

CG's final verdict is to take favor in Stake. They uphold Stake's decision and perceive it as the one that's likely to happened. I understand you're trying to say that I shouldn't mark the case as resolved on my list? Then, do tell, what status should I wrote it and why?

Could go either way but it's your thread and I don't have a really strong case against. Your call is fine by me.

No, no, don't stop here. Please, by all means. My thread [and I] is not authoritarian, it's open for public and at no time all of its content is my call just because it's my thread, as I stated in the intro of my thread,

"Though I'm quite familiar with most cases below and the scam accusations board itself, I still spent many hours to get reacquainted with each of them or to get a grasp of the cases that I did not oversee. This means [and as I am only human] I might mislabeled one or two cases, or misjudged the status of a case or two. If you happen to find those situation, or if you think a case is better labeled in other status, feel free to ask me."

So, you seems to have an opinion that the case shouldn't be marked [be it by CG or me] as what I proposed I will. The room is yours.

[Rating Place]

CG's final verdict is to take favor in Stake. They uphold Stake's decision and perceive it as the one that's likely to happened. I understand you're trying to say that I shouldn't mark the case as resolved on my list? Then, do tell, what status should I wrote it and why?

Could go either way but it's your thread and I don't have a really strong case against. Your call is fine by me.

No, no, don't stop here. Please, by all means. My thread [and I] is not authoritarian, it's open for public and at no time all of its content is my call just because it's my thread, as I stated in the intro of my thread,

"Though I'm quite familiar with most cases below and the scam accusations board itself, I still spent many hours to get reacquainted with each of them or to get a grasp of the cases that I did not oversee. This means [and as I am only human] I might mislabeled one or two cases, or misjudged the status of a case or two. If you happen to find those situation, or if you think a case is better labeled in other status, feel free to ask me."

So, you seems to have an opinion that the case shouldn't be marked [be it by CG or me] as what I proposed I will. The room is yours.

nah, I'm done disagreeing. You put a lot of time into this stuff so I shouldn't be so critical. Time to watch the rest of England/Switz and then Netherlands/Turkey.

[tamadeus]

Im sorry for the late reply. I had to get away, as this is quite a large amount for me to be taken from me..

I dont really know what to say. Im very disapointed in CG, as they deem it to complex, to even tell me why my funds have been seized.

I was sure that a serious bookie as this would try to cooperate with me and solve this. I have provided every document they have asked. If need be, il take a selfie with my boss? 

As I see it ive exhausted any possibility i know. Stake has not tried to talk with me or solve this, nor provided any proof for what they allegede ive done to deceive them in any way.

I can also provide screens or what is needed for them to see that im fully verified at several other large bookies.

So.. I dont know what more to do. I will for sure never keep any more than 1000 usd at any crypto bookie that seizes customers funds at will any more. As I see it, they answer to no-one (As their licensholder still haven`t responded to my email)

As this is a KYC problem (I think) I dont know what more I can do. Ive provided everything, and I am who I say I am. Wich they could probably comfirm trough a video interview for instance..

So ive lost 17k usd without any proof nor a fair attempt from stake to resolve this. Not the best way to start my summer vacation.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I dont really know what to say. Im very disapointed in CG, as they deem it to complex, to even tell me why my funds have been seized.

Is this  casino guru?
Casino Guru have a good reputation in solving issues between sportsbook and their customers. Obviously you will need to tell them your side of story and the other party will show their documents too.