Poker Player, loser who only knows 5 words. (SCAM, OMG SCAM, CRUDE, SCAM)

[holydarkness]

To misinterpret something is to build a wrong understanding from what is said or done

When the source of what's said or done itself is re-written to completely convey a different meaning, that's not misinterpret, that's called being the victim of someone who misled through edited statement.

Here's the two text:

Promoting scams is even worse, which is why I keep promoting, because I have no guilty conscience lol.

Promoting scams is even worse, which is why I keep promoting, because I have no guilty conscience I am not scamming anyone lol.

Tell me that you can confidently say they conveyed the same meaning?

Learn to own your mistake instead of assigning blame.

It was an accident Holydarkness, please forgive me!

But I messed up. And you misinterpreted.
 
We both gotta own up, because you keep calling me wrong, for inventing a gambling luck based system, when nobody ever did this before, bro.

So we both gotta start, owning up to when we wrong. Because nobody is right all the time.

And what the fuck is this guy ^ up here talking about, shut the fuck up and go 1v1 somebody already, stop bothering me with that shit.

Again, to misinterpret is to build a wrong understanding from what's said or done.

When you ask for a permission for night out and your mom said, "sure" with a stern face, so you hang out with your friend when she didn't mean to say she allows it, that's misinterpretation.

When you ask for that permission, and you got an answer, "sure", which much later on followed by, "but it you go, you might as well leave the home for good and never return", that means being misled.

Your insistence that I misinterpret the word that you later on edited and added extra words to it, only stressed out more about a possibility that you'll never admit when you make a mistake, which will rather explains your insistence on "luck" based system where it's been made abundantly clear that luck has no business with your platform and that you've implied that what you try to say is "entry".

And what do I have to own up on this situation?

I believe and somewhat can be rest assured and confidently say that people on the forum, who are familiar with my post record, know I own up my mistake. When I made wrong statements, I apologized. So what mistake did I do this time that worth me owning it up?

The misinterpretation which been explained twice above? Or the luck based system that's been explained even more often?


And you two, you and ditec, stop making quote pyramid. Try to snip previous quote when it's no longer relevant. It made things harder for reader to navigate through the page.

[GluttonyY]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.


(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)

[ditec_wrogn]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.


(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)

Oh, wow, GluttonyY, you literally think you're clever, don't you? Newsflash: you're not. Your response is literally a masterclass in desperation and lack of self-awareness.

Let's break it down, shall we? You claim that your "luck system" is real and that you created it. Literally, who cares? That doesn't make it legitimate or trustworthy. You can create a system that claims to make unicorns appear out of thin air, but that doesn't mean it's true.

You go on to explain that your system affects luck and chance of winning. Literally, how? You don't provide any concrete evidence or explanation of how your system works. It's just a bunch of empty words strung together to sound impressive.

And then, you literally post images of yourself and Holydarkness, as if that's supposed to prove something. Are you trying to distract us from the fact that your system is a scam? Because, literally, it's not working.

Here's the thing, GluttonyY: you're literally trying to defend a system that has been flagged as a scam. You're literally supporting a system that promises "unlimited money generation" and has a "Provably Fair" system that's about as trustworthy as a snake oil salesman.

By the way, I'd like to remind you that you're literally trying to defend a system that you yourself have already implicitly acknowledged as a scam by supporting the flag against it, which is just rich.

[GluttonyY]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.


(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)

Oh, wow, GluttonyY, you literally think you're clever, don't you? Newsflash: you're not. Your response is literally a masterclass in desperation and lack of self-awareness.

Let's break it down, shall we? You claim that your "luck system" is real and that you created it. Literally, who cares? That doesn't make it legitimate or trustworthy. You can create a system that claims to make unicorns appear out of thin air, but that doesn't mean it's true.

You go on to explain that your system affects luck and chance of winning. Literally, how? You don't provide any concrete evidence or explanation of how your system works. It's just a bunch of empty words strung together to sound impressive.

And then, you literally post images of yourself and Holydarkness, as if that's supposed to prove something. Are you trying to distract us from the fact that your system is a scam? Because, literally, it's not working.

Here's the thing, GluttonyY: you're literally trying to defend a system that has been flagged as a scam. You're literally supporting a system that promises "unlimited money generation" and has a "Provably Fair" system that's about as trustworthy as a snake oil salesman.

By the way, I'd like to remind you that you're literally trying to defend a system that you yourself have already implicitly acknowledged as a scam by supporting the flag against it, which is just rich.

On a scale of 1-10, how stupid would you say you are.

Literally, who cares?

Uh a gambler interested in profiting moron.

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

He claims everything I am saying is logical, and then goes back into this deluded state that I am scam

'I gotta admit your ability to defend you program is impressive, but your a scammer'

'I am impressed by how everything you are saying is logical'

'Thats just a fancy way of saying your avoid regulations!' DUH IM AVOIDING REGULATIONS, SO MY USERS CAN WITHDRAW THE MOST AMOUNT OF MONEY.

tf.

[holydarkness]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.

[Image snip]
(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)
[Image snip]

For the nth time, luck can not be manipulated. It can't be replicated, let alone be controlled.

But here's the middle ground, as I understand that it is what you tried to convey: "luck" is just a term in your platform to describe "entry". It's a marketing ploy, a way you use to market your platform, that the platform allows people to "manipulate luck", much like having "glitch" for an "unlimited money". It's not the act of manipulation of luck per se, rather a term of which you refer "entry" within your platform. Outside of it, it's an "entry".

[GluttonyY]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.

[Image snip]
(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)
[Image snip]

For the nth time, luck can not be manipulated. It can't be replicated, let alone be controlled.

But here's the middle ground, as I understand that it is what you tried to convey: "luck" is just a term in your platform to describe "entry". It's a marketing ploy, a way you use to market your platform, that the platform allows people to "manipulate luck", much like having "glitch" for an "unlimited money". It's not the act of manipulation of luck per se, rather a term of which you refer "entry" within your platform. Outside of it, it's an "entry".

Incorrect.

[holydarkness]

For the nth time, luck can not be manipulated. It can't be replicated, let alone be controlled.
[...]

Incorrect.

Incorrect as in luck can be manipulated, replicated and controlled outside your platform?

Then kindly prove it, give me a clear instance where you can manipulate luck, that it can be bent at your will.

Let me make it easier: as you propose that you can manipulate luck, I'll be more than happy to be the lab rat, to let you demonstrate it. Though risk-free it must be, given I am inclined toward a belief that you can't manipulate or control or replicate any luck, thus I expect that I'll lose some, and I don't want that.

I'll play on one casino, with 50-50 chance of win and lose, coin flip might be the easiest one, I'll suggest one from BC. I'll record my entire session to maintain transparency.

Three rounds to be sure, or do you want them to be five? USD 5,000 as the first entry, with every next round will be double or nothing. If your claim is true, that can manipulate my luck, then all three should be winning rounds, correct? Otherwise, if your statement is misleading and you can't actually manipulate luck, that it can only happen on your platform [namely, a marketing ploy] then at least one round will be a losing round and your statement got debunked.

If you agree with that test, I'll need you to escrow the fund of 40,000 USD if we're going to have three rounds, or 160,000 USD if it'll be five, just in case your bending ability leave you for a sec. I'll choose the escrow.

Otherwise, just say that all this time, the term you describe as luck is just a marketing ploy and shouldn't be taken literally. It'll help us tackle one issue and move to the next.

[JackpotRacer]

Look who is so active in this thread?

And just because OP said the truth, actually half of the truth, as PokerPlayer has many more disgusting words in his arsenal.

Always the same team supporting each other

@holydarkness
@PokerPlayer
@JollyGood = JollynotGood

[ditec_wrogn]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.


(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)

Oh, wow, GluttonyY, you literally think you're clever, don't you? Newsflash: you're not. Your response is literally a masterclass in desperation and lack of self-awareness.

Let's break it down, shall we? You claim that your "luck system" is real and that you created it. Literally, who cares? That doesn't make it legitimate or trustworthy. You can create a system that claims to make unicorns appear out of thin air, but that doesn't mean it's true.

You go on to explain that your system affects luck and chance of winning. Literally, how? You don't provide any concrete evidence or explanation of how your system works. It's just a bunch of empty words strung together to sound impressive.

And then, you literally post images of yourself and Holydarkness, as if that's supposed to prove something. Are you trying to distract us from the fact that your system is a scam? Because, literally, it's not working.

Here's the thing, GluttonyY: you're literally trying to defend a system that has been flagged as a scam. You're literally supporting a system that promises "unlimited money generation" and has a "Provably Fair" system that's about as trustworthy as a snake oil salesman.

By the way, I'd like to remind you that you're literally trying to defend a system that you yourself have already implicitly acknowledged as a scam by supporting the flag against it, which is just rich.

On a scale of 1-10, how stupid would you say you are.

Literally, who cares?

Uh a gambler interested in profiting moron.

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

He claims everything I am saying is logical, and then goes back into this deluded state that I am scam

'I gotta admit your ability to defend you program is impressive, but your a scammer'

'I am impressed by how everything you are saying is logical'

'Thats just a fancy way of saying your avoid regulations!' DUH IM AVOIDING REGULATIONS, SO MY USERS CAN WITHDRAW THE MOST AMOUNT OF MONEY.

tf.

Wow, GluttonyY, it seems like you've reached a new level of desperation. Your response is just a bunch of childish insults and nonsense. You can't even come up with a coherent argument to defend your scam, so you resort to calling me a moron over and over again.

By the way, I think it's interesting that you admit to avoiding regulations. That's illegal, by the way. You're basically admitting to breaking the law to benefit your scam. And you think that's something to be proud of?

You can keep ranting and raving all you want, but at the end of the day, you're just making a fool of yourself. I'm not impressed by your "logical" arguments, and I'm not buying into your scam. And neither should anyone else.

So, keep going, GluttonyY. Keep making a fool of yourself. It's entertaining, at least.

[GluttonyY]

No holydarkness, the luck system, is real and I created. There is no misinterpretation.

Your luck in my system, is based on the method I have created, affecting your luck and chance of winning.

Mwah.

I have made my own luck based system, allowing you to increase your luck.

And we are increasing our luck, in this luck based system, by using the luck based system, to give us more entries.

The luck based system, also takes entries away from winners, so that losers, have more luck.

My own luck based system.


(GluttonyY)

Vs

(Holydarkness)

Oh, wow, GluttonyY, you literally think you're clever, don't you? Newsflash: you're not. Your response is literally a masterclass in desperation and lack of self-awareness.

Let's break it down, shall we? You claim that your "luck system" is real and that you created it. Literally, who cares? That doesn't make it legitimate or trustworthy. You can create a system that claims to make unicorns appear out of thin air, but that doesn't mean it's true.

You go on to explain that your system affects luck and chance of winning. Literally, how? You don't provide any concrete evidence or explanation of how your system works. It's just a bunch of empty words strung together to sound impressive.

And then, you literally post images of yourself and Holydarkness, as if that's supposed to prove something. Are you trying to distract us from the fact that your system is a scam? Because, literally, it's not working.

Here's the thing, GluttonyY: you're literally trying to defend a system that has been flagged as a scam. You're literally supporting a system that promises "unlimited money generation" and has a "Provably Fair" system that's about as trustworthy as a snake oil salesman.

By the way, I'd like to remind you that you're literally trying to defend a system that you yourself have already implicitly acknowledged as a scam by supporting the flag against it, which is just rich.

On a scale of 1-10, how stupid would you say you are.

Literally, who cares?

Uh a gambler interested in profiting moron.

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

Silly little moron

He claims everything I am saying is logical, and then goes back into this deluded state that I am scam

'I gotta admit your ability to defend you program is impressive, but your a scammer'

'I am impressed by how everything you are saying is logical'

'Thats just a fancy way of saying your avoid regulations!' DUH IM AVOIDING REGULATIONS, SO MY USERS CAN WITHDRAW THE MOST AMOUNT OF MONEY.

tf.

Wow, GluttonyY, it seems like you've reached a new level of desperation. Your response is just a bunch of childish insults and nonsense. You can't even come up with a coherent argument to defend your scam, so you resort to calling me a moron over and over again.

By the way, I think it's interesting that you admit to avoiding regulations. That's illegal, by the way. You're basically admitting to breaking the law to benefit your scam. And you think that's something to be proud of?

You can keep ranting and raving all you want, but at the end of the day, you're just making a fool of yourself. I'm not impressed by your "logical" arguments, and I'm not buying into your scam. And neither should anyone else.

So, keep going, GluttonyY. Keep making a fool of yourself. It's entertaining, at least.

Noooooo, I dont think I am breaking any laws....

Just using a very simple loophole, so my users, can enjoy lucrative features

You wouldn't understand.... UHHHHH.. YOU GAMBLE WITH THE CASINOS LOL.

Lol, a simple human, like you wouldn't understand, something so complex. Just relax and go back to slots buddy..