Which casino would you trust more: one that requires KYC or one that doesn't?

[Solosanz]

I don't care with KYC i.e. I don't value the trustworthiness of the casino by looking on whether they require KYC or not.

KYC or no KYC casino, both are nothing different, I will value the trustworthiness by the casino itself, means the way they handle complain or accusation, the way they promote the casino, and the customer service.

If people value KYC casino is better than no KYC casino, I don't think so, most people are complaining when the casino have mandatory KYC and  till now there are no KYC casino popular in this forum

[Frankolala]

A casino with good reputation and service is all that matters to me and not the KYC thing or not. Most of those no KYC casinos might later end up asking you for KYC if you win big or in the later.

My gaming experience is what I care about and that is why I stick to a reputable that can satisfy me when gambling. Casinos without KYC are good but might not be as good as some with KYC. How fast they handle issues and resolve customers complain is what one should look at when selecting a casino for your gambling activities.

[Wapfika]

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

It depends on the age and the reputation of the casino since the KYC part is not the basis determining the reliability of the casino. There’s some old casino that still doesn’t ask for KYC like primedice(CMIW) but they are considered as reliable since they already established their reputation through long years of good services.

On the other hand when regards to new casino. The marketing strength, customer support and other factor is the basis of trusting the casino for me so it doesn’t whether if it’s ask KYC or not. But in general, casino with license is the best which is usually the one that ask for KYC because you can assure that you are playing on legal casino.

[angrybirdy]

Nowadays, a lot of casinos do require KYC, it's either they require upon registration or later once you have done your first withdrawal.

But when it comes to trust or having more confidence in a casino, I agree with most people here that the reputation is what we follow. Just like in the old days where KYC is not a thing. All we have is looking for the reputation of the casino, being comfortable playing with the anonymity while enjoying gambling.

[TheUltraElite]

A casino changing its TOS eventually from non-KYC to KYC is nothing bad, they probably got hit by subpoena and are now being extra careful to keep the authorities away from their tails. Blame the a-holes who attempt to use tainted sources to the casino attempting to wipe out the trail putting the casino at risk.

It might be frustrating for the honest players but they have no choice here.
I would trust both the casinos provided there are no other genuine complaints regarding their services.

Additionally if your KYC cleared, you feel safe betting big amounts there.

[Zlantann]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

Based on their judgement is a vague word that could mean anything. I expect a casino to spell out the conditions or circumstances that will necessitate a casino asking for KYC. And these conditions should be spelled out in the casino's terms of service. Any casino that asked for KYC after it earlier stated that it is not required shouldn't be trusted.

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

Building trust is not very important in business and this can be done when their words are their bonds. So I will gladly accept a casino that openly requires KYC rather than the one that stylishly asks for it after registration or big wins. Some of the risks might include the freezing of funds or banning of casino accounts when you doubt their reputation. In some cases, it could lead to loss of funds.

[Taskford]

A casino changing its TOS eventually from non-KYC to KYC is nothing bad, they probably got hit by subpoena and are now being extra careful to keep the authorities away from their tails. Blame the a-holes who attempt to use tainted sources to the casino attempting to wipe out the trail putting the casino at risk.

It might be frustrating for the honest players but they have no choice here.
I would trust both the casinos provided there are no other genuine complaints regarding their services.

Additionally if your KYC cleared, you feel safe betting big amounts there.

There's nothing wrong regarding on that changes since its understandable that this scenario would really happen. But the casino need to became more transparent on the changes happening so people will not get surprised about the sudden implementation of KYC then think about that they are been fooled for telling that they are non-KYC compliant casino. For sure people would understand that cases since its not first time that a casino do that since we see those changes happening on the reputable casino in this forum.

I understand that there are people got frustrate about it but the casino cannot do anything but to implement it so that they can operate without getting into trouble for the regulation implemented by government. That's why instead of avoid it I comply with casinos asking this and just think about beneficial things rather than thinking about negativity about this implementation.

[kotajikikox]

I don't  have to put names here because I also  have gambling site in my signature but what i do care is that i am not a fan of Non KYC claim because eventually for some reason they are mandating players to provide KYC either for security or for safety reason.
so i still choose the KYCed casino that I do believe  follows everything from the government and I already knew what I am facing from day 1.

[iv4n]

...
So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

I remember that most of us gambled in Betfury casinos before they had a license. I still play there and in all this time they didn't ask me to pass KYC verification. But they had a nice ANN thread here and they were very active in the beginning, so I trusted them and I never had any serious issues.

Well, I don't like casinos with mandatory KYC. Even thou I tried a few, currently only playing in Weiss (KYC mandatory) because I have their tokens and I stake them. I don't think that we should trust casinos just because they are KYC-free or not, some other things are far more important to look at. I mostly trust casinos that have a review on BTCGosu and an ANN thread here, if it has passed BTCGo's strict control and the forum members' test, it means that the casino is really good... with or without mandatory KYC.

[Natalim]

I don't  have to put names here because I also  have gambling site in my signature but what i do care is that i am not a fan of Non KYC claim because eventually for some reason they are mandating players to provide KYC either for security or for safety reason.
so i still choose the KYCed casino that I do believe  follows everything from the government and I already knew what I am facing from day 1.

We don't gamble in a casino that we don't trust because this KYC requirement will get our personal information and documents as a proof. So if this casino aside from being regulated is reputable as well, they can ensure that they'll take care of our information and keep it confidential as mandated by the rules of their regulators.

If we like to gamble in a non-kyc casino, then we should go directly to a decentralized casino, although they are not so popular compared to the centralized, but there are numberes of dex casinos here that exist and continues to serve gamblers, at least we know from day 1 that they'll never demand KYC.

[Nwada001]

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

I will definitely go for the one I feel safe with the most, and my judgement shouldn't be based on whether they offer KYC or not, but rather on what I notice about the casino myself.
 
Trusting a casino aside from the ones that might have already built a reputation for themselves doesn't just start one day, so the more I play and have experience with how the casino works in terms of handling withdrawal deposits, the rest of them will determine which one to trust. 

[lovesmayfamilis]

It’s amazing how people are ready to show their identity to the casino without thinking at all that further actions with their documents on the Internet are unknown. This just goes to show that everyone has a price, and people are willing to do a lot to get money. We use Bitcoin, and we welcome its decentralization, but when the issue concerns money, then, of course, documents are provided without question. I will not show my documents because I know how sometimes hundreds of fraudulent documents are posted on various sources for sale. What will be registered on them and what responsibility the owners will bear is also sometimes scary to think about. The legality and integrity of a casino should not rely solely on KYC.

[Bravut]

I trust Casino that requires KYC, because it gives me the believe that they would have a good customer service as well lesser fraudulent activities as compared to Casinos without KYC which anyone can impersonate, use a wrong identity and do anything without being traced or held responsible. It ensures accountability when it comes to business and commitment to the users, casinos that requires KYC hardly make harsh rule, refuse payment for winning to there customers that not the likelihood in non KYC.
Everyone is entitled to there opinion, just my take on this subject.

[mindrust]

You can’t even find a non-KYC anymore so it is not a realistic question. If alI had a choice, I would definitely prefer a non-KYC casino. It is because many casinos use KYC as a weapon and when they start investigating your account they never tell you what it is about.

As long as the reputation of the casino is fine, you probably won’t have a problem with either of them but non-KYC is definitely a good feature to have.

[Woodie]

The fact that most casino's & sportsbook started off without KYC when cryptocurrencies were still a grey area should tell you the source of this whole KYC Shabang!!
But when you talk about trust, KYC alone can't determine if a casino is to be trusted...things such as paying out winners need to be considered, general reputation around the forums will need to be considered and how long they have been in business otherwise KYC alone isn't a major factor!

You can’t even find a non-KYC anymore so it is not a realistic question.

Very true especially that fiat has been integrated into their platforms to allow players to fund their accounts with either crypto or fiat.

[moneystery]

whether the casino imposes kyc or not on users, i think it's not that important, the most important thing is the reputation of the casino, whether they are credible and trusted by many users, that's the most important thing. many casinos impose kyc, but in the end users have difficulty withdrawing their money or the games they provide have many problems. and conversely there are casinos that do not impose kyc, but they have a reputation and users can easily withdraw from their accounts. so it all comes back to the reputation of the casino platform.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

Trust is far beyond either a casino requesting for KYC or not, because no doubt, there have been issues about people losing money both on casinos which requested for KYC and those which didn't. Hence, my ideology about trust must be a casino which have been able to stand the test of time, and yet still remains transparent in all it's activities, without a trace of scam or series of accusations. However, those who wish to maintain privacy while gambling are those to love using "No KYC" casinos, of which a typical gambling whose main aim is about making money, won't mind, inasmuch as he is able to double his stake.

[Beparanf]

You can’t even find a non-KYC anymore so it is not a realistic question. If alI had a choice, I would definitely prefer a non-KYC casino. It is because many casinos use KYC as a weapon and when they start investigating your account they never tell you what it is about.

You can only find non KYC casino on real decentralized casino that doesn’t have 3rd party games but centralized casino it’s really very hard to spot one because even crashino that doesn’t have a license that promise no KYC before now improved to have a license and probably asked for KYC.

As long as the reputation of the casino is fine, you probably won’t have a problem with either of them but non-KYC is definitely a good feature to have.

Correct, Having KYC or non is not the right basis for trust. Reputation is still the most solid  criteria on trusting a casino.

[Rruchi man]

Providing your details now for registration in a casino is something most gamblers are used to already. The warning is just to be careful not to submit your documents to too many casinos that you cannot keep track off.
 

whether the casino imposes kyc or not on users, i think it's not that important, the most important thing is the reputation of the casino, whether they are credible and trusted by many users, that's the most important thing.

In this period where it is almost regular for every casino to demand KYC as mandated, I am not sure I will be very comfortable gambling in a casino that acts as though they are not interested in KYC. It is a serious requirement these days, as it is compliance with AML regulations. Any casino not complying may face sanctions, or possible closure of their business.

[khiholangkang]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

Talking about doubts cannot be separated from me personally how to choose a casino whether it is regulated or not, however, do not fully trust them, we must give ourselves room for distrust so that we remain careful in any casino whether it has implemented KYC or not, because both also have the potential to abandon their users.

But if choosing the better of the two for me personally choose a verified casino that is responsible and pays also has a high reputation I think like that is much better than those who change their rules a lot, like in their advertisements they say Non KYC but in fact they do the same thing too.