Which casino would you trust more: one that requires KYC or one that doesn't?

[piebeyb]

I think casino's that requires KYC sounds more legit or trustworthy especially if it has additional good reputation from it's players. But nowadays seems non-KYC casinos are booming esepcially in Telegrams and other web3 platforms I think though I am not that sure because I never have tried on yet but it actually caught my attention recently however I had to wait for more extra time to gather positive and honest feedbacks from other players before jumping into it.

Yes, it is true that casinos that implement KYC are clearly more legitimate and safe, but that must still be an evaluation of their site, for example when online casinos implement KYC and also strict regulations to prevent money laundering or other criminal acts, at least they also facilitate the security of their site is truly safe so that there is no theft of user information that has been collected, this will clearly be detrimental to users and damage user trust in casinos that implement a KYC system.

Even though there are many choices of non-KYC casinos, it still won't look safe because the site could go bankrupt or just leave with our money without knowing the status of the gambling site. I also support sites that implement KYC as long as their site really maintains strict information. all of its users will definitely be safe and fine, this is of course a problem of lack of user trust in online casinos that implement KYC, casino security must be increased further so that everyone truly feels safe and no longer worries if the casino asks for user KYC.

[ethereumhunter]

Yeah, I will also do KYC if it’s a reputable gambling site, and I have no other alternative left, but let me ask you a question. if you are given the opportunity to choose between a casino that requires KYC and one that doesn’t, which one are you going to choose if the two casinos have an equal reputation? Some people don’t really know the implications of submitting their identities anyhow. That’s why even on some sites that are not really legitimate, immediately they request for kyc, some people will complete it immediately, and they don’t know the implications of doing that.

If we can do KYC in the first time we register at the reputable gambling site, we will not have a problem while we playing gambling on that site. The casino will allow us to deposit or withdraw much money because they already checking our account with the identity we sent to them.

If both casino have an equal reputation, I will check the different and will choose what makes me comfortable because I playing gambling on the casino site to gets the comfortable matters. I realizes the risks of submitting my identities to any third party but I will make sure that sites can be trusted to take care of the private documents.

I also don't have a problem with KYC at the casino. but some casinos do not ask their users to directly carry out KYC at the beginning of account creation. Casino users can create an account and immediately make a deposit then play. As long as you don't carry out suspicious activities, the casino will not ask for KYC. and some users are asked for KYC after winning and making a withdrawal.
Some users complained about this problem, which could actually be written in the casino rules which the user might have missed. when we understand how the casino operates and know the casino rules, it is actually not that difficult to provide KYC. but some gamblers do have problems with KYC. it is a choice.

We can asks to their support system about when we must do KYC so we will knows what we must do with that site. If we agree with their rules, we can continue registering ourselves and just playing gambling with small money so we don't have obligation to do KYC. But we gets comfortable while playing gambling on that site, we will do KYC and sends the documents to the casino.

Those who complain with the rules should asks the  support system from casino so they can knows what they must do. It is our responsible so we must make sure that everything is like what we wants. Casino have rules and we must obey it and we are not agree with the rules, we can search for the other casino.

[Nrcewker]

For me, whether it’s KYC required or not doesn’t really matter. If the casino is providing all the things that it has promised, then I am ready to play on that site. Yes, I will prefer no KYC casinos if it’s given a choice, as who likes to do the document verification and go through a long process? Hence, the non-KYC casinos will be at top priority. But as we know, all the casinos that have a license ask users to do KYC; hence, I won’t mind doing KYC either. I just want my winnings to be credited when I win at a casino.

[Taskford]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

I think it depends on the reputation of the casino, but generally, when a casino operates under a license, they tend to have more trust from the community because they feel like they can't just close shop and go away whereas a casino that doesn't have a valid license can do that without any problem because they don't have a license from a licensing firm and they are in no way bound to keep operating legally.

For me, I would say that I wouldn't have a problem gambling in a casino that doesn't require KYC or have a license as long as it has a good reputation in the gambling community because if they have been operating for some time, they wouldn't scam their gamblers, besides, I never deposit a lot of money, so I won't have a problem even if things go south.

Also depends on the length of service by those casino since if they already exist for long years then people would able to think that they are upgrading their selves and make their business a compliant to government regulation and for sure with those cases lots of people will trust them because they think that its more safe to play on those casisno since they are now regulated by the law.

But for new casino? Well I guess many people would really doubt for their KYC requirements asked since I understand that people is so concern on their identities and provably they or we won't give it to any platform that doesn't have anything proven yet in the community. Right now I don't care much about KYC but what I'm looking for a casino is their reputation and how people give their feedback or reviews on their favorite casinos.

[bakasabo]

Right now I don't care much about KYC but what I'm looking for a casino is their reputation and how people give their feedback or reviews on their favorite casinos.

Good point. Gamblers should trust reputation of a casino, instead of KYC or non-KYC thing. It is better gamble safe, then to pass KYC and get scammed by casino. Moreover, many people can explain why they are against KYC. Someone said he is against it, some read scary stories in the internet, and now all without exception say they dont want to pass it, because they care about privacy (yet upload lots of personal information on social media and give documents for copy just to get a little discount or at first request). In some cases its humans greed why they dont want to pass KYC. Because people are afraid to be asked to share prize in way of paying a tax.

[retreat]

I trust casinos that enforce KYC more on their users, that's because casinos like this are regulated directly by the gaming commission and they are monitored regarding their operations. With this regulation, it makes players feel safer and more protected when playing and will prevent casinos from doing things that are detrimental to gamblers. Regarding personal data that might be hacked, I think that it is something that cannot be avoided when we give our personal data to third parties - that even companies like Google or Facebook have the possibility of being hacked, so even though I am worried about that, at least the casino has tried to protect user data with the various technologies they implement.

[coolcoinz]

I'd trust both as long as they openly state what documents and in what form are required, or in the case of non KYC if it really was a non KYC casino that doesn't act like they don't want KYC byt in some extreme cases they do.

The casino I wouldn't trust is the one that says it does KYC, but doesn't want it until you win and decide to withdraw, then suddenly you're a suspect.
I'd also not trust a casino that says it's non KYC and then ask for documents.

Just run an honest business, people!

[Antotena]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

Trust doesn't comes from kyc, it comes from aspect of reputation. If a casino doesn't cheat user and everything they does is okay, they have fast deposit and withdrawals and doesn't block accounts as some other casinos do sometimes, then I will trust that casino more than anyone that has kyc and but do the opposite or doesn't have KYC and yet still do the opposite, it's not like KYC is the basic thing a person would have to look before using the casino.

However, for privacy sake, if all casino can actually function without KYC, it will help customers protect there privacy as they don't need to upload there sensitive information to any centralized platforms, it should be strictly based on no kyc but that privilege will be abuse by the same customers who doesn't want to do kyc, there will be multiple accounts and abuse of bonus, some people will have many account as possible which many casino don't like, it create room for cheating.

[sunsilk]

For me, whether it’s KYC required or not doesn’t really matter. If the casino is providing all the things that it has promised, then I am ready to play on that site. Yes, I will prefer no KYC casinos if it’s given a choice, as who likes to do the document verification and go through a long process? Hence, the non-KYC casinos will be at top priority. But as we know, all the casinos that have a license ask users to do KYC; hence, I won’t mind doing KYC either. I just want my winnings to be credited when I win at a casino.

I reckon. It doesn't matter if they ask kyc or not. Because as long as you're given the best service and you're not having any problems with them then that's the reason why it doesn't really matter at all.

While there are gamblers that has this as a big issue and they can't stop themselves from checking it out.

Most are really non kyc until you wanna go out on them and withdraw that huge amount of money that you've won.

[TheUltraElite]

The casino I wouldn't trust is the one that says it does KYC, but doesn't want it until you win and decide to withdraw, then suddenly you're a suspect.
I'd also not trust a casino that says it's non KYC and then ask for documents.

These situations can happen anytime with a casino moving from non-KYC to KYC. But as long as they are reputed on this forum and are active in solving money related problems, they are good.

The scam casinos will not to be coming to this forum to advertise their product.

Most of them are running an honest business or at least trying to. Lets keep the paranoia out and play as we wish and if you dont like KYC, dont play.

[swogerino]

In theory and also in practice you should trust the one who requires KYC as it should be more reputable,I am not saying go and trust a KYC casino that has just popped up,no,I mean a casino that is been operating from years and have KYC you should definitely trust them.The reason is very simple,if some dispute,some huge win needs to be validated this can be solved easily if you have passed KYC while if you are unverified the casino may play all sort of tricks to call those win void,I know it is not right but that is how important KYC is nowadays in this industry.

[redsun114]

In theory and also in practice you should trust the one who requires KYC as it should be more reputable,I am not saying go and trust a KYC casino that has just popped up,no,I mean a casino that is been operating from years and have KYC you should definitely trust them.

I think that even a casino doesn't have a KYC but it's been running for a long time now, that can be a good indication to tell that it was legit and that is actually better because we can attain full anonymity there and there are no hassles of verifying a KYC anymore since they can also take a long time to be finished.

The reason is very simple,if some dispute,some huge win needs to be validated this can be solved easily if you have passed KYC while if you are unverified the casino may play all sort of tricks to call those win void,I know it is not right but that is how important KYC is nowadays in this industry.

Why will someone dispute a huge win? But there might be a valid reason for it and if you are guilty, it will only be easy for the casino to catch you because you already provided your KYC and this might be another reason on why they require a KYC. Meanwhile, that's a shady move if casino will void a win only because you are not verified.

[Weawant]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

Going by what you have you have stated on the basis that this who requires KYC are those who have been licensed to operate in a particular area, this is a good way to make claims for accountability, if a particular casino is regulated they would want the KYC to gain the trust of their regulators to see that they are genuine enough to get licensed to operates within that region and if in the situation where they have any form of misconduct, you could channel your complaint to an appropriate channel from which you will be able to get response and whatever the situation is it could be fixed and laundry via casinos can be in check thereby building the trust they would need both by the government and their customers but with those who don't require KYC, the chances of them been fraudulent becomes higher so conclusively, the ones who require KYC remains the best choice.

[piebeyb]

In theory and also in practice you should trust the one who requires KYC as it should be more reputable,I am not saying go and trust a KYC casino that has just popped up,no,I mean a casino that is been operating from years and have KYC you should definitely trust them.The reason is very simple,if some dispute,some huge win needs to be validated this can be solved easily if you have passed KYC while if you are unverified the casino may play all sort of tricks to call those win void,I know it is not right but that is how important KYC is nowadays in this industry.

Everyone has their own views and beliefs so there are always differences between all gamblers, many gamblers are happy with decentralized online casinos without KYC and there are also those who are happy with casinos that verify their users with KYC, but again it all depends on choice if they feel uncomfortable with KYC People should not force themselves to play at casinos that apply KYC to their users, because it will definitely go against their minds that it is not truly safe and can be trusted to find out the user's identity.

I think we all know that there is a reason why online casinos implement KYC too, namely to prevent unwanted things, for example users from laundering money or other things involving criminal acts, that's why online casinos that implement KYC are stricter and probably much safer too. It can be trusted, but as you also said, looking for an online casino that really has a good reputation and has been operating for a long time, not a new casino that doesn't have a reputation, is difficult to trust.

[madnessteat]

In theory and also in practice you should trust the one who requires KYC as it should be more reputable,I am not saying go and trust a KYC casino that has just popped up,no,I mean a casino that is been operating from years and have KYC you should definitely trust them.The reason is very simple,if some dispute,some huge win needs to be validated this can be solved easily if you have passed KYC while if you are unverified the casino may play all sort of tricks to call those win void,I know it is not right but that is how important KYC is nowadays in this industry.

I believe that any gambler should be ready to undergo KYC at the request of the gambling site where he plays gambling. In any jurisdiction the laws can change in a day and if a gambler wants to collect a large winnings (if he is so lucky of course), he just has to comply with all the rules of the gambling site, as well as to provide documents confirming the origin of his money and pass KYC.

If you are not concerned about privacy, then with this should not be any problems at gambling sites with a good reputation.

[dansus021]

Which casino would you trust more: one that requires KYC or one that doesn't? Personally I prefer casino that dont required kyc because it's convenient and east to register, beside that i know online gamble in crypri that basically dont required kyc at all.

Back then crypto casino dont require kyc untill online casino getting big and government smell it and they put kyc for anti money Laundry services

[EarnOnVictor]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

This KYC of a thing is not so trustworthy as some casinos may tell you they are registered but truly are not registered, while many that are registered are being regulated in weak jurisdictions, so what's so special about it? I only noticed that many of them like to show they are reliable by asking for the KYC to build trust, but this has nothing to do with their integrity and the customer experience in their casinos. Some no-KYC casinos may treat you more fairly than the KYC casino and if you look around you, many KYC casinos do not act as if they care about regulations as they do as they like, or how many of them have been sanctioned for cheating people? That's it. It all has to do with the reputation the casinos are building to trust them, not the KYC.

Regardless, I still go for the KYC casinos but that is not entirely because they ask for KYC or I trust their registration/regulation but for the fact that they are the big names in the industry, I don't settle for the less. However, those who may start with no-KYC adverts but suddenly change to KYC casinos could mean that the authorities of the countries they cooperate from are on their necks and in most cases, it is not about the protection of the citizens or law but for proper accountability for taxation. Nonetheless, some will only frustrate the customer for the KYC and others simply because he is good with gambling.

[justdimin]

Which casino would you trust more: one that requires KYC or one that doesn't? Personally I prefer casino that dont required kyc because it's convenient and east to register, beside that i know online gamble in crypri that basically dont required kyc at all.

Back then crypto casino dont require kyc untill online casino getting big and government smell it and they put kyc for anti money Laundry services

Those were golden days but we always knew they were not going to last forever and soon enough, the authorities will start hunting down casinos and platforms offering anonymity to their users and allowing them to use their services without having to provide any identity because they can't digest this thing even if no criminal activities was happening, they just want to make sure that people who are using those casinos are known to them.

We still have some casinos that don't require KYC at the initial stage, but they might ask for it in case you want to make a large deposit or withdraw, but these things also won't exist in the future, even decentralized casinos and exchange platforms would either get banned or they would be forced to ask for KYC verification from their users.

[freedomgo]

We still have some casinos that don't require KYC at the initial stage, but they might ask for it in case you want to make a large deposit or withdraw, but these things also won't exist in the future, even decentralized casinos and exchange platforms would either get banned or they would be forced to ask for KYC verification from their users.

It would be nice if they remain that simple. I guess there's a reason why some casinos don't require KYC at the early stage, and that is to attract more gamblers. In my opinion, it's still better for them to get more volume, as that would generate consistent income on a daily basis.

So, crypto casinos, although regulated, still have an advantage over fiat online casinos since fiat casinos require KYC before you gamble. With crypto casinos, you don't have to worry about KYC as long as you aren't gambling with a significant amount. I'm ranging from $100 to $200 a week, and I haven't been required to pass the KYC yet.

[Sandra_hakeem]

Let's talk about KYC and non-KYC casinos. There are many casinos in the space, and probably most of them require KYC ^{(Know Your Customer)} since they hold a license. However, some do not promote that requirement. In fact, I've read comments mentioning that there are casinos which initially claim they don't require KYC but later do, based on their own judgment.

Even if I decide to begin gambling, I wouldn't wanna have anything to do with a casino that doesn't require KYCs. We've got government agencies with concrete anti-fraud policies that could make an unlicensed casino operate under the radar if they dared to show up... Isn't that too much risk already? Nobody fights and succeeds over the authorities. Meanwhile, why would any casino owner decide to not get his firm registered? (Basically, getting a license is a commitment that people's funds are safe with you)... Almost all the casinos I know have been licensed by the Curacao eGaming Authority

So, if we could find a casino that genuinely adheres to what they advertise (whether as a non-KYC or KYC casino), which one would we trust to gamble with? Additionally, if you have doubts, what are the risks you might be taking that could bother you while regularly gambling at such a casino?

That's a bit contradictory; you can't say a casino is GENUINELY ADHESIVE to you, but not to the authorities... What's the outline gonna look like? Those set of casinos would also have several anonymous account created for money laundering purposes.