What category would you classify such bettor?

[wiss19]

Why do people take risks in the first place? It's so that they can get more money, so in my opinion, taking risks and greed fall under the same category with just slightly different criteria. This bettor is taking a lot of risks and he is doing it out of greed, there is no doubt about that.

What I think is that sports betting is not for gamblers like him, you can't join a sports betting platform and start making random bets with high odds and expect to win because that is not how it works. You need to have some knowledge and experience about sports and choose the sides and odds wisely.

This bettor is probably not into considering the odds and his chances of winning a bet and this is clear by looking at how randomly he is making those bets.

[bering]

I personally thinking in sport betting the winning percentages for odds above @3 is below to 50% because it is very rare to see the people can always be win their bets with high odds so if there is any people who placing their bets into high odds i think they realized those bets is very difficult to win even probably experience bettors wouldn't dare to take such a risk but in my point of view we still cannot judge him early to classify what categorized this bettor before seeing his habit and his bets histories that if when doing sports betting he is always like that then he can be categorized as lack of strategy or risky taker but if he does this just for once or twice because he know it is very difficult to win the bets from those odds then i think he just unlucky

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Even if I am drunk, I can not be taking this type of odds. The lowest odd there is 5.2 which is very risky in sport betting. I can easily find 3 odd to choose in casinos but in sport betting, any odd getting higher than 2 is very risky. The chance to win just a single bet is small, not to talk of winning the whole bet. It is greediness.

Gambling is for what again? remind me, Fun right?. Dude was just catching cruise with his stakes and you're squeezing your face in serious disapproval. I tried very hard to see the staking power, but it appears hidden. In my own analogy, this game was not staked. It was just configured to gain media attention, maybe a content creator or someone growing his social media handle.

NB: I do this sometimes with little stakes, such that I wouldn't even notice I invested in such. Its gambling, right? there's a possibility. I exploit those possibilities most times when I'm in the mood, won from it twice, but it's never something to depend on.

[dunfida]

Even if I am drunk, I can not be taking this type of odds. The lowest odd there is 5.2 which is very risky in sport betting. I can easily find 3 odd to choose in casinos but in sport betting, any odd getting higher than 2 is very risky. The chance to win just a single bet is small, not to talk of winning the whole bet. It is greediness.

Gambling is for what again? remind me, Fun right?. Dude was just catching cruise with his stakes and you're squeezing your face in serious disapproval. I tried very hard to see the staking power, but it appears hidden. In my own analogy, this game was not staked. It was just configured to gain media attention, maybe a content creator or someone growing his social media handle.

NB: I do this sometimes with little stakes, such that I wouldn't even notice I invested in such. Its gambling, right? there's a possibility. I exploit those possibilities most times when I'm in the mood, won from it twice, but it's never something to depend on.

People should really be having this approach and something that they should really be having in mind on which this is really indeed a viable reason on why there are ones who do have on intent on the moment that they would be placing up their bets. Some would really be having that experimental approach and just that using up with small amounts or simply not really that tending to go all in. We dont know on whats behind
with those kind of betting on which we know those odds are indeed that tempting but when it comes on those probabilities on winning then it would really be that so hard on making yourself as a winner.
I do agree on what you have said that gambling/betting should really be something for the sake of fun and not really that taking up that seriously.

Come to think that we do have the full rights on how we should really be gonna spending our money and even if it looks like a foolish step into to other people but since you are
preferring on that way then better dont mind other people.  There would really be always that has something to say on every actions that you are taking.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

For me, I will say that I see this as an act of poor knowledge about football analysis, because judging from all the games this gambler played in his/her ticket, it's obvious he/she never made reference to any of the country he predicted previous performance. Because if he had done it, he ought to have known that in all 5 recent matches Hungary has always had corner kicks between the range of 2 and 4, of which 7+ was an impossible act, and likewise the second game he played about Croatia to have 7+ corner kicks, but ended up zero corner kick. Hence, I see this as an act of lack of football knowledge and greed.

[Saint-loup]

A bit unlucky I would say but not more than most people since the bettor lost all his 5 bets but the odds of those ones were all above 6.00 so it's not unreasonably unlucky. If we could see a bit more of his history, we could judge more accurately, draw a trend and conclude relevantly about his habits but with such partial track record we can only observe a losing streak of 5 losses in a raw. Not very surprising for bets with such likelihood to lose though.

[Jawhead999]

I think there are no such strategy if you bet on sportsbook.

So I will judge a gambler with such record is greedy, it's clear that the gambler want to try his luck since all bets are almost identical, it's all 7+ corner range, the only difference is home or away. Probably he think that he only need to win one bet so he will able to recover his bankroll.

Risk taker is when the gambler really make an analysis and not only placing the bet blindly.

Unlucky bettor is like you bet Netherlands to win yesterday, but it ends in draw, although they were scored, but the referee disallowed the goal.

[Zoomic]

I don't know if the young man is a novice in sports betting or he is just acting under the influence of greed or some hard substance he took before placing such bets because no experienced sports bettor will use this strategy and still expect to win. From my observation, the young man was obviously interested in what he would cashout if he eventually wins and not the risks involved. Greed pushed him to take risks which weren't necessary. I won't call him a risk taker because the risks weren't necessary but were taken out of a foolish decision. This same foolish decision of his led him in following a wrong strategy that ruined everything for him.

[Wapfika]

In my own point of view,  judging from the image above it's either the bettor is greedy or lack good strategy, why I think he's greedy is because, if you check the odds properly you'll notice that the bettor is very greedy in selecting very risky odds and seems he wants to cash out very big by all means, well one can still say he's very unlucky, he took risk no doubt but that's a miscalculated risk out of greed to get bigger odds and make more profits. With that being said, what do you think is the perfect categories to classify such bettor?
Greedy
Risk taker
Lacks good strategy
Or he's just an unlucky bettor, give your reasons and why you think so.

Depending on the amount involved on each bet to classify properly the bet ticket owner gambling style. This is not greediness if he just bet small amount such as few cents with this odds since he is just aiming for high pay bets using small bets.

Same with risk taker and greediness assumption. You can only classify him like that if he bets huge amount with that kind of odds since the risk involved is judging.

Judging the betslip based on the history alone without the bet size is premature judgement. I do experience that kind of lose streak with my bets even though I’m just choosing odds less than 2.0.

[crwth]

The best description for him is probably a “hope to God it would be a win.” Not necessarily be a great Betting position But if that’s what he wants. Having high Odds or returns are not always going to be the best picks but an extremely lucky one when it does. It’s Really a lucky thing. Maybe like winning a lottery 

[Findingnemo]

if you check the odds properly you'll notice that the bettor is very greedy in selecting very risky odds and seems he wants to cash out very big by all means, well one can still say he's very unlucky, he took risk no doubt but that's a miscalculated risk out of greed to get bigger odds and make more profits. With that being said, what do you think is the perfect categories to classify such bettor?
Greedy
Risk taker
Lacks good strategy
Or he's just an unlucky bettor, give your reasons and why you think so.

We can't classify without knowing few other things, how much bankroll he got, he can afford to lose that money and how much money he made using the same strategy previously.

If this is his first time and he is taking the high risk side then he has to be rich but also lacking a strategy to increase his betting ability.

If he made good money then he is a risk taker that paid off when he was lucky but on that day it didn't go in the way he expected.

Particularly looking at these bets only he is greedy so he took high risks to make more money so all of the above is the classification can be justified.