[CFNP] Cryptomus | Signature Campaign | Accept crypto payments

[rat03gopoh]

This same message was sent to me too but I didn't do anything wrong.  I did so except the ones they asked to post.  But I don't understand why this message was given to me.

I don't want to interfere with the CM's prerogative and point of view regarding eligible posts.
What you need to know, the constructive posts here is CM's subjective assessment and this is one of the risks of dealing with new people.

I haven't received any such message but haven't received the payment yet. Has anyone already received the first week payment from this campaign?

I counted more than half of the 30 participants who were accepted did not get paid, including 2 participants who submitted invalid BTC addresses.Reputation board is available if you think this is an issue worth raising.

[fortunecrypto]

This same message was sent to me too but I didn't do anything wrong.  I did so except the ones they asked to post.  But I don't understand why this message was given to me.

I don't want to interfere with the CM's prerogative and point of view regarding eligible posts.
What you need to know, the constructive posts here is CM's subjective assessment and this is one of the risks of dealing with new people.

I haven't received any such message but haven't received the payment yet. Has anyone already received the first week payment from this campaign?

I counted more than half of the 30 participants who were accepted did not get paid, including 2 participants who submitted invalid BTC addresses.Reputation board is available if you think this is an issue worth raising.

I did not receive the payout I posted over the required 20 posts because posts related to gambling are prohibited, but on their rules, there is no specific rule that says so

I was tempted to open an accusation, but I would like first to address this issue here, there is no spreadsheet I think it better that the campaign be managed by a reputable manager here

- Excluded boards (WO & Serious, Sig Threads, Press, Politics, Games, Off-topic, Bounty)

[Nrcewker]

Hi, I don’t want to interrupt you and your campaign. But as you are a newbie, hence it will be better to hire an escrow to hold the campaign funds. In this manner, the participants will be protected from any scams.

Here is the list of a few reputable escrows in the forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5047302.

I already warned everyone to be careful while participating in this campaign. I also advised the OP to hire an Escrow for the campaign funds. But I think both parties ignored my suggestions. Op did a great job by promoting his business for almost free (or spending less money and hiring 50 participants). Now regarding the payment, OP isn’t announcing it in public and private messaging with the users. It is nothing but a shady way of managing the campaigns without any clarification of the people/participant’s doubts.

[rat03gopoh]

I did not receive the payout I posted over the required 20 posts because posts related to gambling are prohibited, but on their rules, there is no specific rule that says so

Lol, I think the CM should also state in the OP that disqualification without payment can also be based on new rules in the future that have not been announced even 1 minute before the week's round ends. Or specific rules apply to certain participants and unfortunately you will find out after the week ends.

Seriously, I think this rule doesn't have to apply for the first week and is worth paying for (with constructivity requirements). Likewise the following week as long as the rules are not written publicly in the OP.

[Grace333]

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3592483
Current Rank: Member
BTC address for payouts: bc1qd7dwrfkdcmrxedwxmze3r9w2lu3q2rsvnkvg08

Hope to work with you Sir.

[yazher]

I received the payment for this week.

If you guys have any doubt just check the BTC address of the users who are accepted in this campaign ☺️

Look at their transaction's history.

[avp2306]

Hi, I don’t want to interrupt you and your campaign. But as you are a newbie, hence it will be better to hire an escrow to hold the campaign funds. In this manner, the participants will be protected from any scams.

Here is the list of a few reputable escrows in the forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5047302.

I already warned everyone to be careful while participating in this campaign. I also advised the OP to hire an Escrow for the campaign funds. But I think both parties ignored my suggestions. Op did a great job by promoting his business for almost free (or spending less money and hiring 50 participants). Now regarding the payment, OP isn’t announcing it in public and private messaging with the users. It is nothing but a shady way of managing the campaigns without any clarification of the people/participant’s doubts.

This is the red flag what I notice on this campaign.

They don't have spreadsheet.
Their signature codes does not look appealing and its like no total effort inserted.
No escrow handling the funds.
Lacks of transparency.
And now there are users who got automatically excluded for questionable reasons.

They lack of everything and it feels weird that a company didn't listen to suggestion and try to make everything appealing since impression is important way to market their site.

[Notalony]

Hello. We are forced to exclude you from the subscription campaign without payment, as you have violated the terms of the contest regarding prohibited topics.

Thank you for your understanding.

How? Check my post history.

This same message was sent to me too but I didn't do anything wrong.  I did so except the ones they asked to post.  But I don't understand why this message was given to me.

I haven't received any such message but haven't received the payment yet. Has anyone already received the first week payment from this campaign?

-JS

I feel the same pain, I didn't receive any of such negative feedback neither did I receive any payment I don't really know what is going and I don't even if am to continue working this week or not, I really need some clarification for the op.

[Just Say]

I received the payment for this week.

If you guys have any doubt just check the BTC address of the users who are accepted in this campaign ☺️

Look at their transaction's history.

What I am most wondering is why others get paid and I don't. I have not received any message from them yet.

Moreover, I have worked according to the rules shown by them.

[LogitechMouse]

I received the payment for this week.

If you guys have any doubt just check the BTC address of the users who are accepted in this campaign ☺️

Look at their transaction's history.

Well, this just shows that the campaign is actually paying, but the requirements for participants to get paid is somewhat not clear.
- No spreadsheet to start with
- Users are being removed without proper explanation whatsoever.
- Their signature code isn't that attractive as well. I will suggest paying a signature designer for their signatures if they want to get noticed.

I hope that the OP/Manager will share some things on what's happening right now. There are some red flags indeed, but it can easily get solved IMO. They paid their participants in the first week of the campaign like @yazher said (although the transaction ID isn't posted here like what campaign managers usually does), so I guess they are willing to pay (at least for now). Let's give them some time to explain.

[rat03gopoh]

No escrow handling the funds.
Lacks of transparency.
And now there are users who got automatically excluded for questionable reasons.

Is this due to weekly budget factors that can't be ascertained?
As this week's budget won't cover enough payments, I'll fire several participants instead.

[Richbased]

I received the payment for this week.

If you guys have any doubt just check the BTC address of the users who are accepted in this campaign ☺️

Look at their transaction's history.

Well, this just shows that the campaign is actually paying, but the requirements for participants to get paid is somewhat not clear.
- No spreadsheet to start with
- Users are being removed without proper explanation whatsoever.
- Their signature code isn't that attractive as well. I will suggest paying a signature designer for their signatures if they want to get noticed.

I hope that the OP/Manager will share some things on what's happening right now. There are some red flags indeed, but it can easily get solved IMO. They paid their participants in the first week of the campaign like @yazher said (although the transaction ID isn't posted here like what campaign managers usually does), so I guess they are willing to pay (at least for now). Let's give them some time to explain.

In that case the manager should come open and explain to their participants the reasons why some of them didn't get their payments so that others can also take precautions. It is good for a manager maintain a good understanding with their campaign participants instead of keeping some of them in the dark and from my observation I can see some angry participants expressing their grievance already so all these doesn't go down well with a campaign that was just launched a week ago.

I advice the campaign manager to come and clarify their participants of the campaign rules they violated so that it can be corrected in the upcoming week(s) except they don't have long term targets for this company they represent in their signature campaign.

However, this campaign lacks quality as there are no campaign thread, spreadsheet, ANN thread and so on. No quality advertising codes and Avatar, No quality designs and these are some of the many things that will demoralize some big shoes from considering applying for this campaign.

[batang_bitcoin]

I have received the first week payment, thanks cryptomus. I agree with the suggestions above to improve and for the betterment of the campaign. Like these:

- No spreadsheet to start with
- Users are being removed without proper explanation whatsoever.
- Their signature code isn't that attractive as well. I will suggest paying a signature designer for their signatures if they want to get noticed.

[coin-investor]

I advice the campaign manager to come and clarify their participants of the campaign rules they violated so that it can be corrected in the upcoming week(s) except they don't have long term targets for this company they represent in their signature campaign.

However, this campaign lacks quality as there are no campaign thread, spreadsheet, ANN thread and so on. No quality advertising codes and Avatar, No quality designs and these are some of the many things that will demoralize some big shoes from considering applying for this campaign.

This is their first week of the campaign and they ruin their name as opposed to trying to promote their platform, this is what happens if they are not listening to the community's suggestion.

I call this arrogance I don't see anything wrong by members suggesting to create a good signature banner, to hire a reputable bounty manager but they are so arrogant and think they know better and think they can run their campaign better.

Its chaos right now if the admins of the platform knows what's happening here they better fire the guy who manage the campaign.

I supported the flag until they cleaned up their mess.

[lovesmayfamilis]

The OP's last post was written June 29,; he was online Today at 04:01:06 PM and ignored two topics that needed explanation. Should we expect something better?
My sincere condolences to the people who ended up in this "company."

OP, you need to watch how real managers behave when they have received full trust from users.

[Hamza2424]

HAha.. What's ongoing here I've checked just a couple of posts and those guys are in the campaign who don't even know about the difference between Bitcoin addresses and other chains' addresses for wrapped BTC. Anyway, it's up to the CM.

A couple of suggestions to CM.

✔️ Selection should be more strict by rank.
✔️ Need to re-lunch by self-moderated thread.
✔️ Need for transparency by establishing strict and clear rules to follow with proper Spreadsheets and participant's data.
✔️ Better to seek guidance from managers or just hire them by reducing the number of participants.


Note: A professional can handle things on a better node, like accepting users for the campaign, and imposing better rules & restrictions. I think as he's new needs some time. if he's not willing to answer current concerns it might lead this to a dead end. TBH I do encourage non-gambling projects in comparison to others but in safe hands like AB de Royse777, icopress, and others.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

They start the first weeks, there is a thing called a calculator. It's not about the budget, it's just because of management.


Speaking about the campaign, I think these are also the concussion for the participants who are joining the campaign. They joined a signature campaign and are being handled directly by the team, without any escrow for the payment, all the things are from them. Basically, people who have joined the campaign should be prepared somethings like these:
- Getting scam
- Get some unsatisfied moderation
- Other situations are really not good for the participant.

Nothings surprise................


One thing for people who are getting paid, as the good gesture for the morals better it's leaving the campaign before getting messed up. Unless, you want some problem so be it.

[Pandu Geddon]

The OP's last post was written June 29,; he was online Today at 04:01:06 PM and ignored two topics that needed explanation. Should we expect something better?
My sincere condolences to the people who ended up in this "company."

OP, you need to watch how real managers behave when they have received full trust from users.

even now (when I reply) the Op account status is online. he ignores everything and we can see how his campaign management is unprofessional. a dilemma for campaign participants that is handled by the team itself without any funds in escrow.

campaign participants who received payments and are still actively posting. Hopefully, this will be a warning for you if you want to continue as a campaign participant for this company. Last week you were paid, but maybe this week you won't get anything from what you do.

[lovesmayfamilis]

even now (when I reply) the Op account status is online. he ignores everything and we can see how his campaign management is unprofessional. a dilemma for campaign participants that is handled by the team itself without any funds in escrow.

campaign participants who received payments and are still actively posting. Hopefully, this will be a warning for you if you want to continue as a campaign participant for this company. Last week you were paid, but maybe this week you won't get anything from what you do.

I'm surprised that this company was not previously flagged for multiple deceptions. Probably no one took it seriously, although there were many comments about their development.

@cryptomus_com

• Would you mind providing a piece of evidence in regards to the "bank that gave you a license"?
• On the main page, you mentioned there are "no withdrawal limits", but that's "clearly not the case"!
• Care to explain why comments in your "What our clients say" section are fake?

Your service isn't trustless, right? It always strikes me as odd when any custodial claims to be "safe" without providing any guarantees. Let me put it this way: if you decide to run away, can you take your customers' money?

Just for such issues, we have made an automatic instant withdrawal to your other wallets. Over time, we hope to earn your trust.
The internal security system is well done and simple. Try it yourself - registration takes a few clicks.

Again, au automatic instant withdrawals that are controlled by you, so the problem of trust was not solved at all.
LoyceV asked a simple question if you decide to run away, and since we have zero information about your "company" it men's that we must be prepared at any time to lose all out money, right?

3. Who would believe that these reviews are real?
The developers are joking a bit - we are adding and testing the testimonials block to the site. Soon it will work as it's supposed to, or we'll give it up altogether.

Are you sure that Binance would have had the same joking attitude seeing you're using their name and their CEO name without their consent on your website? This shows a lot about how you think business works, there are some lines nobody but scammer dare to cross when you want to present yourself as a real business.
And these 5-star reviews from people with 1 review in their history are also legit, right, or this is another playful joke?
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cryptomus.com

Bottom line, you an unknown entity, with no headquarters, no license, no real life presence anywhere but you claim to have done 100 000 transactions already, common, at least try something else!!!!

We have a great sales department. They connect new users to our payment system every day - here 100k transactions.

So, doing just the average math with no increase at all, since the start of your business till now, shouldn't there be already 200 00 transactions by now? 

Seriously, why don't you try to do an honest business here, it will be so simple and it will stop people from criticizing you:
- stop with the fake reviews and stop boasting about paid articles, nobody is going to get mad at you for promoting yourself through PR releases but even claiming somebody is interested in your business and that's why they've spent time to write about it is bull
- stop claiming numbers you obviously don't have
- stop pretending you have licenses just because you're right now thinking of applying for one

Start focusing on other things and stick to them:
- promote the advantages of your platform over others, both technically and financially
- come clean about who is behind this and where is located

The most important thing is being honest about it, without this, you won't get anywhere, if your intention is to actually go there and not a quick $

For fiat transactions the KYC procedure will be mandatory. For crypto payments everything will remain anonymous.

Is not going to work and you're going to get any EU license revoked immediately.
You either operate without one outside of the EU and deal only with crypto or you do it with a license and you have mandatory KYC over financial transactions, it's not 2009 anymore, and although I dislike both the direction and the way things are going, this is the situation right now.

By the way, although this is a fashionable trend, their entire blog is created using AI, with not entirely accurate (after some news) information.
 

Has anyone read how it all started for them? I doubt that the people who applied for participation read this thread. Sadly, there are very few signature companies on the forum, and people are ready to advertise everything without even finding out the truth.

[Baofeng]

And since the campaign manager has a red tag already, should the campaign participants removed their signature to have some clarity?

Or those that has been paid, continue to wear the signature but then again, since the manager is not responding, chances are they are not going to get paid for the current week?