Wasabi topic hijacked by Kruw

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I have him on ignore list since then. I know it's not nice, since somebody has to counter him too and expose his lies, but yeah, my sanity matters too.

I don't believe money is his motive. His coordinator charges no fees. He's just a scumbag whose ultimate goal is to make Wasabi appear to be the best privacy solution that everyone should use. And those who don't should be burned at the stake.

Who will do such dedicated advertising? Someone from Wasabi or someone who is paid a lot of money to promote Wasabi.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Every post of his was about how that's the right decision because you shouldn't allow criminals, scammers, and thieves privacy and the right to participate in coinjoins with honest people. Then, when zkSNACKs' coordinator sunk, he created his own and went the opposite direction. No blacklisting and everyone can participate.

I'm not sure he ever truly became anti-censorship. It's just that recently, due to liquidity constraints, he has portrayed his stance as being free of blacklists. To me, he still one major advocate for censorship, wanting to dictate how others can use their money and mocking anyone whose spending habits he disapproves of.

Who will do such dedicated advertising?

Dedicating advertising? If I were Wasabi, I'd pay him to stop talking. That's not advertising. That's defamation.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Who will do such dedicated advertising?

Dedicating advertising? If I were Wasabi, I'd pay him to stop talking. That's not advertising. That's defamation.

What do you think it is then?
Competitor of Wasabi is paying that shit for doing all these?
Knowing how Wasabi treat the community and use the money they earn against the spirit of crypto, I do think Wasabi is paying him or he is insider from Wasabi.

[examplens]

Dedicating advertising? If I were Wasabi, I'd pay him to stop talking. That's not advertising. That's defamation.

What do you think it is then?
Competitor of Wasabi is paying that shit for doing all these?
Knowing how Wasabi treat the community and use the money they earn against the spirit of crypto, I do think Wasabi is paying him or he is insider from Wasabi.

Some would say that there is no such thing as bad advertising.
Kruw made an effort to talk about him here, several topics about him, at least about his behaviour towards Leo, but Wasabi's name is always included in all the discussions.
Maybe he's not paid for it, but certainly, Wasabi doesn't have much reason to come here and convince him to stop his nonsense.

[BlackHatCoiner]

He is an insider from Wasabi, he himself has admitted he's a contributor. He may think he's advertising for the sake of the "best open-source, privacy-enhancing wallet software" in existence, and it may be morally rewarding for him.

I refuse to believe that a company is paying a troll to derail conversations on an Internet board, effectively defaming their product. That's like shooting yourself in the foot. He just really likes what he's contributing at, and is willing to spend his time attacking competitors online. Not the first person, certainly not the last.

[dkbit98]

No scam accusation against me, I guess I don't rate in his book.

He literally accused everyone who ever had any mixer signature in their profile to be scammers.
There is no need to personally name each individual members.

But, seriously to all does it matter at this point?
I think a lot of us are at fault by just leaving him neutral ratings. Perhaps a bunch of red trust and he will leave.

I am sure that he won't leave because of more red trust, and it does matter if he is constantly lying and making false accusations.

Some would say that there is no such thing as bad advertising.
Kruw made an effort to talk about him here, several topics about him, at least about his behaviour towards Leo, but Wasabi's name is always included in all the discussions.
Maybe he's not paid for it, but certainly, Wasabi doesn't have much reason to come here and convince him to stop his nonsense.

He is doing a terrible job in ''advertising'' Wasabi wallet.
If he is insider of Wasabi that he is the worse insider that ever existed on this earth.

[Pmalek]

I refuse to believe that a company is paying a troll to derail conversations on an Internet board, effectively defaming their product. That's like shooting yourself in the foot.

He might just be their social media voice, and Bitcointalk is only one of the platforms on his list. There is no Kruw coordinator without Wasabi, so he has to advertise and talk about both. But he is an awful representative regardless of what his job is. I am repulsed by anything connected to the name Wasabi now and he is a big reason for that. I am sure that I am not the only one.

[NotATether]

He is an insider from Wasabi, he himself has admitted he's a contributor. He may think he's advertising for the sake of the "best open-source, privacy-enhancing wallet software" in existence, and it may be morally rewarding for him.

As of last month it is no longer privacy-enhancing wallet software unless you plug in a coordinator to use.