Voting is harmful. Don't do it

[jvanname]

the brainwashing is worse than I thought  

People are used to choose the "lesser evil" and feel proud for exercising their right to vote. The right of choosing which criminal faction is going to rule their nations for the next few years. In other words: to prejudice common citizens in order to boost personal interests of those in charge of power.

Democracy is a sacred word. If you criticize its flaws you are excluded from social environments. The truth is that every systems have their flaws, because they are ran by wicked human beings. But I really feel annoyed for democracy having a special treatment, as it was something superior to everything else.

I would prefer being ruled by a fair and kind king, than by a cynical and manipulative democrat regime, and vice-versa. After all the problem isn't even the regime, but the society, the people who compose it. The political scenario just reflects the quality of the countrymen.

People choose the lesser of the two evils because they are themselves evil and because they are themselves too inept to strategize and coordinate the situation in such a way that delivers positive results. They can only strategize in a way that delivers poor results and in such a way that undermines their own democracy.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

the brainwashing is worse than I thought  

People are used to choose the "lesser evil" and feel proud for exercising their right to vote. The right of choosing which criminal faction is going to rule their nations for the next few years. In other words: to prejudice common citizens in order to boost personal interests of those in charge of power.

Democracy is a sacred word. If you criticize its flaws you are excluded from social environments. The truth is that every systems have their flaws, because they are ran by wicked human beings. But I really feel annoyed for democracy having a special treatment, as it was something superior to everything else.

I would prefer being ruled by a fair and kind king, than by a cynical and manipulative democrat regime, and vice-versa. After all the problem isn't even the regime, but the society, the people who compose it. The political scenario just reflects the quality of the countrymen.

People choose the lesser of the two evils because they are themselves evil and because they are themselves too inept to strategize and coordinate the situation in such a way that delivers positive results. They can only strategize in a way that delivers poor results and in such a way that undermines their own democracy.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

You are right. The good Christians are stuck in this world that is ruled by the Prince of Darkness, Satan.

If you look throughout the Gospels in the Bible (first 4 books of the NT), you will see that Jesus tells the people that they can do miracles if they believe in Him. But the people have a difficult time doing these miracles, because this world is ruled by Satan.

[AYOBA]

We live in a globalised technocracy where people have been reduced to nothing more than economic units. Voting legitimises an illegitimate system. Don't go out to vote in their little charade. Have some dignity. Don't contribute to the tryanny of modern governance systems.

The voting is matter of choice they cannot force anyone to go and vote who he didn't have interest for, and the harmful voting is normal is occur in villages there the one that like do or die, because they don't care to injury each other's. As we all know that the technology has make everything to be easy faster, and that's why the global make eve vote patterns change before when their doing physical voting the cheat is much involved then now that they the technology has changed everything.

[MissNonFall9]

If voting is harmful in your country, don't think is harmful to other countries in the world op, because voting is counting in other countries to make them to elected a potential leaders that will help the countries to achieve their goal.

I know, there are some leaders that will promised the societies with so many things during the campaign that will make the people in the societies to come out to vote massively, but once they resume office they will no longer fulfill their promise which I believe that is the harmful you are talking about in this trend, but don't allow such things to discourage you not to vote during the election period. If you live in a family that feel voting is harmful, try to prove to them that voting is helpful to a society because once you voted for the candidate of your choice, it make you to be a good citizen that want the progress of the society.

It is very clear that voting means the successful exercise of one's rightful civil rights. And by voting we can elect the leaders of our choice who will prioritize and fulfill our social needs. But there are many countries that undermine citizens right to vote to achieve their immoral ends. But it is nothing more than utter nonsense to say that voting is harmful for other countries compared to that country which is completely in line with your opinion. So as a successful citizen of a country his most important thing is not to waste votes and to exercise his civil rights by voting.

[nagaechka]

We will not vote, they will vote for us. So it's best not to avoid it.

[jvanname]

People choose the lesser of the two evils because they are themselves evil and because they are themselves too inept to strategize and coordinate the situation in such a way that delivers positive results. They can only strategize in a way that delivers poor results and in such a way that undermines their own democracy.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

You are right. The good Christians are stuck in this world that is ruled by the Prince of Darkness, Satan.

If you look throughout the Gospels in the Bible (first 4 books of the NT), you will see that Jesus tells the people that they can do miracles if they believe in Him. But the people have a difficult time doing these miracles, because this world is ruled by Satan.

People need to learn about strategic voting so that we can develop a system that prevents strategic voting. For example, if we have a closed primary, purely strategic people will not register for the party that they actually believe in. These purely strategic people may register for the party that they believe that they can improve the most. Or maybe they won't because they will be using another strategy. They may instead be voting for the candidate who has the greatest chance of winning the general election in their preferred party. Or maybe they will be voting for the person in the party they don't like who has the least chance of winning the general election. Political primaries are so rife with strategic voting that there are many strategies that people can use but these strategies cancel each other out.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[HajiBagi]

You're telling us not to be patriotic, not to vote and as well not to go for our right, choose the required leader we want, which we could also interpret that our voices should not be heard, we should just be without being under a government rule, maybe i will advise you on this, that you should just keep this to yourself, you don't have to persuade others and create a negative impression in them towards the leaders or voting process.

First of all, you should ask him the country he is from because I’m very sure that if he is in a country where things are not going well and the citizens what the country should change he will be among those who will first come out and vote, every individual has right to vote for his candidate and either you vote or not person must be voted and rule the country so you don’t have any choice, voting by yourself is what will make you have the right to prove yourself as a good citizen, you vote for a good person is your choice or you vote for a bad person is still your choice and if anyone wins the country is going to be rule by the winner so you don’t have a choice than to come out and vote to help the others.

We are the government because without the vote of the people they can’t become the leaders, although we all know that sometimes you stress yourself to vote and the person you vote for does not win, you as a citizen that votes know that you want the best for the country and vote for the right person and who you trust to be your leader, if you ask me this advice is not good at all, to vote is very important to every citizen in the country so let not discourage each for fighting for our right.

[montaga]

‘DEMOCRACY IS TWO WOLVES AND A LAMB VOTING ON WHAT TO HAVE FOR LUNCH’
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-6371
US and a lot of other countries are a Republic - of....

Dont worry this scam like others will end
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ePYZQutMoQQ

[jvanname]

‘DEMOCRACY IS TWO WOLVES AND A LAMB VOTING ON WHAT TO HAVE FOR LUNCH’
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-6371
US and a lot of other countries are a Republic - of....

Dont worry this scam like others will end
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ePYZQutMoQQ

Psssssssssssshhhh,

That only happens if people are capable of coordinating.

Theorem: The American people are incapable of strategically coordinating their votes to ensure that they will get what they want.

Proof: In a primary election, there would be two parties, namely Party A and Party B. Party A and Party B f@$%ing hate each other. Without loss of generality, assume that there is a sizable number of coordinating strategic people from Party A. Then these people would register as members of Party B and vote in the primary for dumby mcdumbface as their nominee in Party B. In the general election, Party A will head up against dumby mcdumbface in the general election and WIN. But this does not happen, so Americans can't coordinate a strategy. Q.E.D.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

‘DEMOCRACY IS TWO WOLVES AND A LAMB VOTING ON WHAT TO HAVE FOR LUNCH’
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-6371
US and a lot of other countries are a Republic - of....

Dont worry this scam like others will end
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ePYZQutMoQQ

Psssssssssssshhhh,

That only happens if people are capable of coordinating.

Theorem: The American people are incapable of strategically coordinating their votes to ensure that they will get what they want.

Proof: In a primary election, there would be two parties, namely Party A and Party B. Party A and Party B f@$%ing hate each other. Without loss of generality, assume that there is a sizable number of coordinating strategic people from Party A. Then these people would register as members of Party B and vote in the primary for dumby mcdumbface as their nominee in Party B. In the general election, Party A will head up against dumby mcdumbface in the general election and WIN. But this does not happen, so Americans can't coordinate a strategy. Q.E.D.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Think like a sheep. Then run with the wolves. Lol.     

[jvanname]

Think like a sheep. Then run with the wolves. Lol.     

Sorry. I cannot stoop to that level.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

Think like a sheep. Then run with the wolves. Lol.     

Sorry. I cannot stoop to that level.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

All we wanted to know was that you tried. Lol.

Did you vote?

[jvanname]

All we wanted to know was that you tried. Lol.

Did you vote?

I won't tell you if I voted or not. Maybe I should not vote at all or vote for a third or fourth or fifth party again. Voting does very little to change things. Of course, I could change a lot of things for the better by making sure that biological laboratories implement sensible security procedures so that we don't suffer the next 5 pandemics and unstoppable bacteria, but I don't care about anyone who suffers in the next 5 pandemics since they instead of paying me to make things better have hated me relentlessly. So to everyone who suffers in the next 5 pandemics and from unstoppable bacteria, my only message is "f@#$ you, you didn't pay me." And nobody else is going to make any effort to make sure that biological laboratories are doing anything good either. Things are going to get really sucky, and it will all be your fault. Don't blame me for your stupidity. Humans are f@#$ed up.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

All we wanted to know was that you tried. Lol.

Did you vote?

I won't tell you if I voted or not. Maybe I should not vote at all or vote for a third or fourth or fifth party again. Voting does very little to change things. Of course, I could change a lot of things for the better by making sure that biological laboratories implement sensible security procedures so that we don't suffer the next 5 pandemics and unstoppable bacteria, but I don't care about anyone who suffers in the next 5 pandemics since they instead of paying me to make things better have hated me relentlessly. So to everyone who suffers in the next 5 pandemics and from unstoppable bacteria, my only message is "f@#$ you, you didn't pay me." And nobody else is going to make any effort to make sure that biological laboratories are doing anything good either. Things are going to get really sucky, and it will all be your fault. Don't blame me for your stupidity. Humans are f@#$ed up.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

But your vote was the tie-breaker. Lol.     

[jvanname]

But your vote was the tie-breaker. Lol.    

-If I knew that my particular vote was the tiebreaking vote, I would definitely not vote at all just to p!@# everyone off. And I was more concerned with bio-safety before I became discouraged.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.